Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 26 Documents
Search

DO DIFFERENT DISCUSSION ACTIVITIES IN DEVELOPING SCIENTIFIC ARGUMENTATION AFFECT STUDENTS’ MOTIVATION IN CHEMISTRY? Sri Rahayu; Klaudia E.N Bambut; Fauziatul Fajaroh
Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan Vol 39, No 3 (2020): CAKRAWALA PENDIDIKAN, VOL. 39, NO. 3, OCTOBER 2020
Publisher : LPMPP Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21831/cp.v39i3.32228

Abstract

Argumentation has an influence on students’ cognitive skills as well as learning motivation through the increase in confidence, science, and social activities. Argumentation skills can be trained through different patterns of discussion — cooperative and collaborative. This study aimed to reveal the learning motivation of students who enacted their argumentation skills using Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) with cooperative and collaborative discussions. The research design was a case study that engaged 95 Grade 11 students who were learning the chemical equilibrium topic. The research instrument employed was the ARCS motivation questionnaire that consisted of four aspects, namely attention, confidence, relevance, and satisfaction. The quantitative data were collected from the ARCS questionnaire and the qualitative data were collected from classroom observation, interview, and students’ discussion process. The data were analyzed using designed criteria and percentages, and were described qualitatively. The study found that students who learn chemistry through cooperative-ADI gain a high average motivation. For each aspect of motivation, the majority of students in the cooperative-ADI discussion show a higher level of motivation compared to students’ level in the collaborative-ADI discussion. The study has implications on how to design a discussion group in terms of motivation.
THE EFFECT OF INQUIRY BASED LEARNING WITH SOCIOSCIENTIFIC ISSUES CONTEXT ON CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS AND SCIENTIFIC EXPLANATION Intan Mahanani; Sri Rahayu; Fauziatul Fajaroh
Jurnal Kependidikan Vol 3, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (299.942 KB) | DOI: 10.21831/jk.v3i1.20972

Abstract

This study was aimed at investigating the application of inquiry learning in the context of socioscientific issues (SSI) influences students' skills in critical thinking and scientific explanation on the topic of reaction rates. This study was quantitative research used post test only control group design. A total of 90 students who were enrolled in the 3 classes from one public senior high school in Malang regency were selected as the research sample by convenience. The data of critical thinking ability were collected through critical thinking test. The data of scientific explanation were collected through scientific explanation test. The results of critical thinking test were categorized by Ennis’s critical thinking, while the results of scientific explanation test were categorized by SOLO taxonomy. The data were analysed quantitatively by statistical parametric. The result of One-Way ANOVA showed that there were significant differences in students' critical thinking skills and scientific explanation ability who were taught by inquiry with SSI learning, inquiry, and verification model. Students who were taught by inquiry with SSI learning had a higher average of critical thinking and scientific explanation skills than the students who were taught by inquiry and verification learning. PENGARUH PEMBELAJARAN INKUIRI BERKONTEKS SOCIOSCIENTIFIC-ISSUES TERHADAP KETERAMPILAN BERPIKIR KRITIS DAN SCIENTIFIC EXPLANATIONPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menginvestigasi pengaruh penerapan pembelajaran inkuiri berkonteks socioscientific issues (SSI) terhadap keterampilan siswa dalam berpikir kritis dan scientific explanation pada topik laju reaksi. Penelitian kuantitatif dilakukan dengan posttest only control group design. Sampel penelitian berjumlah 90 siswa yang terbagi ke dalam 3 kelas dari satu SMA Negeri di Kota Malang yang dipilih menggunakan teknik convenience sampling. Data keterampilan berpikir kritis diperoleh dari tes keterampilan berpikir kritis. Data penjelasan ilmiah dikumpulkan dengan tes scientific explanation. Data kemampuan berpikir kritis dikategorikan menurut kategori berpikir kritis Ennis. Adapun data kemampuan scientific explanation siswa dikategorikan menurut taksonomi SOLO. One-Way ANOVA digunakan untuk menganalisis pengaruh perlakuan Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya perbedaan yang signifikan keterampilan berpikir kritis dan scientific explanation pada siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan pembelajaran inkuiri berkonteks SSI, inkuiri, dan verifikasi. Siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan pembelajaran inkuiri berkonteks SSI memiliki nilai rata-rata keterampilan berpikir kritis lebih tinggi dan lebih mampu membangun explanation hingga level tertinggi yaitu level extended abstract, dibandingkan dengan siswa yang dibelajarkan menggunakan pembelajaran inkuiri dan verifikasi.
Pengaruh pembelajaran POGIL berkonteks socioscientific issues terhadap kualitas keterampilan berargumentasi siswa SMA pada materi ikatan kimia Anisyah Dasa Astarina; Sri Rahayu; Yahmin Yahmin
Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA Vol 5, No 1: April 2019
Publisher : Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21831/jipi.v5i1.20890

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji pengaruh pembelajaran POGIL berkonteks SSI terhadap kualitas argumentasi siswa kelas X. Rancangan penelitian adalah mixed-methods. Data kuantitatif berupa tingkat kualitas argumentasi siswa yang diperoleh melalui instrumen tes keterampilan berargumentasi. Data kualitatif berupa hasil wawancara siswa tentang sikap siswa terhadap SSI dan argumentasi siswa pada proses pembelajaran. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan keterampilan berargumentasi antara siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan POGIL berkonteks SSI dengan siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan POGIL dan konvensional. Pembelajaran POGIL berkonteks SSI lebih efektif dalam membelajarkan keterampilan berargumentasi siswa dibandingkan dua kelas lainnya berdasarkan nilai rata-rata kualitas argumentasi. The effect of POGIL with socioscientific issues context for high school argumentation skills quality in chemical bonding AbstractThe aim of the study was to examine the influence of POGIL with SSI context on the quality of high school students argumentation. The research design was mixed-methods. Quantitative data in the form of level of students’ argumentation quality collected by instrument of argument skills. Qualitative was the students’ transcript of interview about their attitude toward SSI and their argumentation in process of learning.The results showed that there was a difference in the skills of argumentation between the students who taught with the POGIL with SSI context and the students taught by POGIL and conventional instruction. POGILS with SSI context was more effective in teaching students’ argumentation skills compared to the other classes based on the average score of student argumentation.
Pengaruh Process Oriented-Guided Inquiry Learning berkonteks isu sosiosaintifik terhadap keterampilan berargumentasi siswa sekolah menengah atas Arum Setyaningsih; Sri Rahayu; Fauziatul Fajaroh; Parmin Parmin
Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA Vol 5, No 2: October 2019
Publisher : Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1121.624 KB) | DOI: 10.21831/jipi.v5i2.20693

Abstract

Kemampuan berargumentasi merupakan salah satu aspek dalam kemampuan berliterasi sains. Rendahnya skor pada survei PISA siswa Indonesia menunjukkan rendahnya kemampuan mereka dalam berargumen. Untuk mengatasi masalah tersebut, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan keterampilan berargumentasi dan kualitas argumentasi siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan model pembelajaran Process Oriented-Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) berkonteks isu-isu sosiosaintifik, POGIL, dan konvensional pada materi asam basa. Rancangan penelitian adalah eksperimen semu posstest only design. Sampel terdiri dari tiga kelas di salah satu SMAN di Kota Malang. Data diperoleh dari hasil tes keterampilan berargumentasi tertulis siswa. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya perbedaan yang signifikan secara statistik terhadap keterampilan berargumentasi siswa di ketiga kelas penelitian (p=0.000). Kualitas argumentasi dianalisis menggunakan kerangka analitik Osborne. Pencapaian level argumentasi siswa kelas POGIL berkonteks isu-isu sosiosaintifik lebih tinggi daripada kelas POGIL dan konvensional. The effect of process oriented-guided inquiry learning with socioscientific issue contexts on high school students’ argument skills  AbstractThe argumentation ability is one of aspect of scientific literacy. The low scores on PISA survey of Indonesian students showed their low ability in argumentation. To address this problem,  this study aims to investigate the difference of students’argumentation skills who were taught using POGIL with socioscientific issues context, POGIL, and conventional learning. Research design was quasi-experimental postest only design. The sample consisted of three classes of a public senior high school in Malang. The data were obtained from students’ written argumentation. The result of this study showed significantly different statistic on students’argumetation skills in three classes (p=0,000). The quality of students’argumetation were classified using analytical framework by Osborne. Achievement of the argument level of POGIL class students contexted sociosaintific issues higher than POGIL class and conventional class.
Pengaruh Model Daur Belajar Enam Fase-STAD Terhadap Hasil dan Motivasi Belajar Siswa pada Materi Asam Basa Anike Sem; Srini Iskandar; Sri Rahayu
EduChemia (Jurnal Kimia dan Pendidikan) Vol 4, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : Department of Chemical Education Faculty of Teacher Training and Education Universitas Su

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (218.642 KB) | DOI: 10.30870/educhemia.v4i1.1846

Abstract

Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle menekankan pada masalah rendahnya hasil belajar siswa dan mendorong motivasi belajar siswa selama proses pembelajaran. Model pembelajaran Learning Cycle dapat dipadukan dengan model pembelajaran STAD pada fase elaborasi. Perpaduan tersebut bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar dan motivasi siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan model pembelajaran LC 6E-STAD dengan siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan model pembelajaran LC 6E. Penelitian ini menggunakan rancangan eksperimen semu. Sampel penelitian terdiri dari dua kelas XI IPA yang dipilih secara random sampling. Instrumen penelitian terdiri atas tes pilihan ganda materi asam basa dan angket motivasi yang valid dan reliabel. Data hasil belajar dan motivasi siswa dianalisis secara deskriptif dan statistik dengan menggunakan uji t pada taraf sig. α = 0,05. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ada perbedaan hasil belajar dan motivasi belajar antara siswa yang dibelajarkan menggunakan model pembelajaran LC 6E-STAD dengan siswa yang dibelajarkan menggunakan model pembelajaran LC 6E pada materi asam basa. Hasil belajar kognitif dan psikomotor siswa kelas LC 6E-STAD lebih baik dari kelas LC 6E. Motivasi belajar siswa pada kelas LC 6E-STAD lebih meningkat dibanding motivasi belajar pada kelas LC 6E.
Chemical Literacy of First Year Students on Carbon Chemistry Nursida Djaen; Sri Rahayu; Yahmin Yahmin; Muntholib Muntholib
J-PEK (Jurnal Pembelajaran Kimia) Vol 6, No 1 (2021): J-PEK (JURNAL PEMBELAJARAN KIMIA)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17977/um026v6i12021p041

Abstract

This research aims to develop and validate chemical literacy test instruments on competency and knowledge aspects and to measure the chemical literacy of first-year science education students. Instrument development involved expert consultation, expert judgment, and testing of 114 first-year students majoring in chemistry for the analysis of item validity and instrument reliability.  The instrument was developed using the  Research& Development model by Borg and Gall (1989). The developed instrument consisted of 30 valid item items with Cronbach's Alpha reliability coefficient of 0.718. The analysis was carried out on 28 first-year students of the Jember State University Science Education Study Program who had studied carbon chemistry. Data analysis showed that the average score of students' chemical literacy was 59.7 in the moderate category.ReferencesAdawiyah, R., & Wisudawati, A. (2017). Pengembangan instrumen tes berbasis literasi sains. Indonesian Journal of Curriculum and Educational Technology Studies, 5(2), 112–121.Akengin, H., & Sirin, A. (2013). A comparative study upon determination of scientific literacy level of teacher candidates. Educational Research and Reviews, 8(19), 1882–1886.Arikunto, S. (2012). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan edisi 2. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.Assessment, P. for I. S., & service), S. (Online. (2006). Assessing scientific, reading and mathematical literacy: A framework for PISA 2006. Publications de l’OCDE.Barnea, N., Dori, Y. J., & Hofstein, A. (2010). Development and implementation of inquiry-based and computerized-based laboratories: Reforming high school chemistry in Israel. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 11(3), 218–228.Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. ERIC.Celik, S. (2014). Chemical literacy levels of science and mathematics teacher candidates. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1), 1.Cigdemoglu, C., Arslan, H. O., & Cam, A. (2017). Argumentation to foster pre-service science teachers’ knowledge, competency, and attitude on the domains of chemical literacy of acids and bases. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(2), 288–303.Cigdemoglu, Ceyhan, & Geban, O. (2015). Improving students’ chemical literacy levels on thermochemical and thermodynamics concepts through a context-based approach. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(2), 302–317.De Ovira, E. (2018). PENGEMBANGAN DAN VALIDASI TES KIMIA DENGAN FRAMEWORK PISA PADA MATERI KELAS XI SEMESTER 1. Menara Ilmu, 12(80).DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582–601.Duschl, R. A., & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education.Gall, M. D., & Borg, W. R. (1989). Educational Research. A Guide for Preparing a Thesis or Dissertation Proposal in Education. ERIC.Gerlach, K., Trate, J., Blecking, A., Geissinger, P., & Murphy, K. (2014). Valid and reliable assessments to measure scale literacy of students in introductory college chemistry courses. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(10), 1538–1545.Gurel, D. K., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2015). A review and comparison of diagnostic instruments to identify students’ misconceptions in science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(5), 989–1008.Impey, C. (2013). Science literacy of undergraduates in the united states. Organizations, people and strategies in astronomy, 2(2), 353–364.Kemendikbud, R. I. (2014). Permendikbud No. 49 Tahun 2014 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan Tinggi. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.Laugksch, R. C., & Spargo, P. E. (1996). Development of a pool of scientific literacy test-items based on selected AAAS literacy goals. Science Education, 80(2), 121–143.Miller, J. D. (1983). Scientific literacy: A conceptual and empirical review. Daedalus, 29–48.Muntholib, M., Ibnu, S., Rahayu, S., Fajaroh, F., Kusairi, S., & Kuswandi, B. (2020). Chemical Literacy: Performance of First Year Chemistry Students on Chemical Kinetics. Indonesian Journal of Chemistry.Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science education, 87(2), 224–240.Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2009). Scientific literacy. The Cambridge handbook of literacy, 271–285.OECD, F. (2016). FDI in Figures. Organisation for European Economic Cooperation Paris.OECD, P. (2015). Assessment and analytical framework: Science. Reading, Mathematic and Financial Literacy,(Interscience: Paris, 2016), 24–25.Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections (Vol. 13). London: The Nuffield Foundation.Permendikbud, R. I. (t.t.). Nomor 59 tahun 2014 Tentang Kurikulum 2013 Sekolah Menengah Atas. Madrasah Aliyah, Jakarta: Depdikbud.Rahayu, S. (2017). Mengoptimalkan aspek literasi dalam pembelajaran kimia abad 21. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Kimia UNY, 319–324.Rifal, M., & Rauf, W. (2018). Analisis Penggunaan Bahan Bakar Etanol-Pertalite Pada Motor Honda Scoopy 110 cc. Gorontalo Journal of Infrastructure and Science Engineering, 1(1), 55–64.Shwartz, Y., Ben-Zvi, R., & Hofstein, A. (2006). The use of scientific literacy taxonomy for assessing the development of chemical literacy among high-school students. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(4), 203–225.Sumarni, W., Supardi, K. I., & Widiarti, N. (2018). Development of assessment instruments to measure critical thinking skills. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 349(1), 012066.Sunarti, T. (2015). Pemahaman literasi sains mahasiswa calon guru fisika Universitas Negeri Surabaya. Seminar Nasional Fisika dan Pembelajarannya, 2015, 34–39.Tarhan, L., & Sesen, B. A. (2010). Investigation the effectiveness of laboratory works related to “acids and bases” on learning achievements and attitudes toward laboratory. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2631–2636.Thummathong, R., & Thathong, K. (2018). Chemical literacy levels of engineering students in Northeastern Thailand. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39(3), 478–487.Traiwichitkhun, D., & Wongwanich, S. (2014). Causal Model of Research Competency via Scientific Literacy of Teacher and Student Lertporn Udompong. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1581–1586.Turiman, P., Omar, J., Daud, A. M., & Osman, K. (2012). Fostering the 21st century skills through scientific literacy and science process skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 110–116.
Gagasan Model Pembelajaran Mobile–NOS Untuk Peningkatan Literasi Sains Siswa Yusran Khery; Baiq Asma Nufida; Suryati Suryati; Sri Rahayu; Endang Budiasih
Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia Vol 6, No 1 (2018): Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (661.447 KB) | DOI: 10.33394/hjkk.v6i1.1600

Abstract

This article describes the idea of a mobile learning model - NOS for enhancingstudents' scientific literacy and student responses to these ideas. This article iscompiled based on literature studies, simple observations on several variablessupporting mobile learning at IKIP Mataram, and evaluating prospective userresponses to the development idea using a questionnaire. Respondents were 54students of IKIP Mataram Chemistry education. The response data is processedby percentage formula based on category criteria. Mobile-NOS learning islearning that applies the Nature of Science (NOS) learning steps with the supportof learning media in the form of mobile applications that can be applied in smartmobilephone. The six main steps in implementing learning are oriented to Natureof Science (NOS), namely: (1) Reading the context on electronic articles; (2) Indepthquestioning; (3) Observation of cases and targets; (4) DemonstrationProcedure; (5) Library Search; (6) Implementing Procedures; (7)Communicating Science Knowledge; and (8) Authentic Assessment.The results ofthis study showed an average response to the idea of developing NOS-orientedmobile learning at 85.23% with a very good category.
Pemahaman Konsep dan Keterampilan Proses Sains Melalui Inkuiri Terbimbing di Sekolah Dasar Nurul Fitriah Aras; Mardi Lestari; Arif Hidayat; Sri Rahayu; Agus Agus
Jurnal Basicedu Vol 5, No 2 (2021): April Pages 446-1111
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/basicedu.v5i2.850

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui apakah model inkuiri terbimbing dapat meningkatkan pemahaman konsep dan KPS (Keterampilan Proses Sains). Desain penelitian menggunakan Pretest-Postest Control Group Design pada penelitian eksperimen semu. Tes berbentuk pilihan ganda yang digunakan untuk mengukur keberhasilan pemahaman konsep dan KPS. Hasil penelitian yang dihasilkan yaitu, Pertama, ada perbedaan pemahaman konsep siswa yang belajar dengan model inkuri terbimbing dengan siswa yang belajar metode konvensional, dengan hasil skor rata-rata kelas eksperimen lebih tinggi. Kedua, tidak ada perbedaan KPS siswa pada kedua kelas walaupun skor rata-rata kelas ekperimen lebih tinggi dibandingkan pencapaian kelas kontrol.
Chemical Literacy: Performance of First Year Chemistry Students on Chemical Kinetics Muntholib Muntholib; Suhadi Ibnu; Sri Rahayu; Fauziatul Fajaroh; Sentot Kusairi; Bambang Kuswandi
Indonesian Journal of Chemistry Vol 20, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (16.247 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/ijc.43651

Abstract

This study aims to (1) develop and validate a multiple choice chemical literacy test instrument (MC-CLTI) on chemical kinetics and (2) conduct a small survey on chemical literacy of first year chemistry students. The development of the instrument involved expert consultation and judgment, validation and two times pilot studies. The first pilot study involved 119 first year chemistry students while the second pilot study involved 197 second year chemistry students. The final form of MC-CLTI consists of 30 valid and reliable items (Cronbach's Alpha coefficient = 0.744). The survey showed that the average score of respondents' chemical literacy was 63.24. This score is in the range of the average scores reported by several previous studies.
Do understanding nature of science (nos) play role to students understanding chemistry concept and science process skill? Yusran Khery; Baiq Asma Nufida; S Suryati; Sri Rahayu; Endang Budiasih
International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education of Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Vol 4 (2019): Mathematics and Science Education Research for Sustainable Development
Publisher : Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (225.73 KB)

Abstract

The aim of this research was to evaluate how Understanding Nature of Science (NOS) play role to students Understanding chemistry concept and Science Process Skills on Chemistry Classroom. This descriptive research was carried out by Ex-post Facto method at the Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education of IKIP Mataram. The research subjects were 75 students participating in the General Chemistry course for the academic year 2018- 2019 that taken by the saturated sampling method. Data were collected by understanding of NOS questionnaire, Understanding chemistry concept Test, and Science Process Skills observation sheet. The data is described and analyzed by product moment correlation test and One Way Anova test for uncorrelated samples. The results showed that there was a significant and very strong correlation between Understanding of NOS and Understanding chemistry concept and between Understanding of NOS and Science Process Skills. One Way Anova test result showed that there was difference on Students Understanding chemistry concept and Science Processes Skills on different Understanding of NOS.