Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.419
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat Health Science Journal of Indonesia Paediatrica Indonesiana YUSTISI Unes Law Review Jurnal Ilmu Keperawatan Jiwa Yustisi: Jurnal Hukum dan Hukum Islam Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology PROFICIO: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Concept: Journal of Social Humanities and Education JUSTICES: Journal of Law Jurnal Kabar Masyarakat TONGKONAN: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Jaksa: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia
Agus Suwandono
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Astronomy Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Veterinary Other

Published : 25 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 25 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
IMPLEMENTASI PERAN PENGAWASAN BPOM TERHADAP PENJUALAN MAKANAN DAN MINUMAN KEMASAN RUSAK (PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN) Azizah Putri Umami; Agus Suwandono; Deviana Yuanitasari
YUSTISI Vol 11 No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ibn Khaldun Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32832/yustisi.v11i1.16199

Abstract

Penjualan makanan dan minuman kemasan rusak kepada konsumen merupakan pelanggaran terhadap ketentuan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Tujuan dilakukannya penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui bagaimana pelaksanaan pengawasan BPOM terhadap penjualan makanan dan minuman kemasan rusak serta akibat hukum bagi pelaku usaha yang menjual makanan dan minuman kemasan rusak ditinjau dari Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif analitis. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah studi kepustakaan dan studi lapangan dengan melakukan wawancara. Berdasarkan penelitian yang dilakukan, dapat disimpulkan: Pertama, pengawasan pre-market dan post-market yang dilakukan BPOM belum dapat melindungi konsumen dari peredaran makanan dan minuman kemasan rusak. Kedua, akibat hukum bagi pelaku usaha yang menjual makanan dan minuman kemasan rusak dapat dikenakan sanksi administratif dan sanksi pidana berdasarkan UUPK dan UU Pangan, serta dapat dimintai pertanggungjawaban berdasarkan prinsip product liability. Kata kunci: BPOM; Makanan; Minuman; Konsumen.
Peningkatan Pemahaman Konsumen Mengenai Gugatan Perwakilan Kelompok dalam Mewujudkan Perlindungan Konsumen Suwandono, Agus; Agus Suwandono; Deviana Yuanitasari; Hazar Kusmayanti
TONGKONAN: JURNAL PENGABDIAN MASYARAKAT Vol 4 No 1 (2025): Tongkonan: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat
Publisher : FKIP UKI TORAJA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47178/fqdz0v29

Abstract

The Resolution of consumer disputes involving many consumers will be effective and efficient if carried out jointly through a class action mechanism. Class action is generally a lawsuit filed by a number of people who have the same interests and the same legal events and legal basis. The Objective of this community services is to increase consumer understanding of class action lawsuits in consumer protection law. The approach used in this community service is legal counseling using a participatory action research (PAR) approach. The results of this community service have increased consumer and public understanding of class action lawsuits in consumer protection. The understanding of consumers regarding class action lawsuits is expected to provide consumer with an effective and efficient means of resolving disputes, in addition to filling lawsuits individually. The increased understanding of consumer regarding class action lawsuits is expected to raise awareness and understanding among consumers, thereby realizing consumer protection.
Penyuluhan Hukum Mengenai Larangan Pencantuman Klausula Baku Bagi Pelaku Usaha dalam Rangka Mewujudkan Pelindungan Konsumen Agus Suwandono; Deviana Yuanitasari; Nun Harrieti; Etty Mulyati; Holyness N. Singadimedja; Rafan Darodjat
PaKMas: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Vol 4 No 1 (2024): Mei 2024
Publisher : Yayasan Pendidikan Penelitian Pengabdian Algero

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54259/pakmas.v4i1.2869

Abstract

Standard clauses in consumer protection are terms or conditions unilaterally determined by business actors. Standard clauses are regulated in Article 18 of the Consumer Protection Act. Understanding standard clauses is essential for consumers and business actors, so legal counseling is needed to increase awareness and understanding for consumers and business actors. The Consumer Protection Act does not prohibit the inclusion of standard clauses in agreement documents between consumers and business actors. The Consumer Protection Act only prohibits the inclusion of standard clauses contrary to Article 18, paragraphs (1) (2) of the Consumer Protection Act. Article 18 paragraph (3) of the Consumer Protection Act determines that the standard clause that contradicts Article 18 paragraph (1), (2) of the Consumer Protection Act is declared null and void. In addition, the legal consequences for business actors for the inclusion of standard clauses that are contrary to Article 18 paragraph (1), (2) of the Consumer Protection Act based on Article 62 paragraph (1) of the Consumer Protection Act are threatened with imprisonment for a maximum of five years or a maximum fine of two billion. In including standard clauses in documents or agreements with consumers, business actors must pay attention to the provisions of Article 18 of the Consumer Protection Act. This legal counseling activity increases the awareness and understanding of consumers and business actors regarding standard clauses based on consumer protection laws, which can ultimately realize consumer protection.
Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Mahasiswa Peserta Program Pemagangan Pada Perusahaan Start-Up Dihubungkan Dengan Peraturan Menteri Ketenagakerjaan Nomor 6 Tahun 2020 tentang Penyelenggaraan Pemagangan di Dalam Negeri dan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata Diana Marchella; Holyness N Singadimedja; Agus Suwandono
Jaksa : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Januari : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Politik
Publisher : Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51903/jaksa.v2i1.1669

Abstract

Nowadays, student internship programs are increasingly being held by start-up companies. However, in practice there are still many students participating in internships who have not received their rights as agreed in the internship agreement. Apart from that, there is no clear regulation regarding student internship programs in labor regulations in Indonesia, especially in Law of the Republic of Indonesia no. 6 of 2003 concerning Employment and Regulation of the Minister of Manpower of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6 of 2020 concerning the Implementation of Domestic Apprenticeships. This research aims to analyze the legal relationship between student interns and start-up companies and to find appropriate legal protection for student interns to defend their rights. This research was written using a normative juridical approach. The research results show that there is no employment law relationship between student interns and start-up companies. The legal relationship that occurs is a legal relationship that arises because of an internship agreement which is civil in nature and is subject to the Civil Code agreement law. Intern students whose rights are not fulfilled can seek repressive legal protection to defend their rights through non-litigation dispute resolution through negotiation. If non-litigation efforts are not achieved, litigation efforts can be pursued by filing a lawsuit, with the basis of the lawsuit being default and prioritizing mediation efforts in court first.
Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Mengenai Penjualan Wafer Cheese Nabati Kadaluwarsa Di Toserba Asia Garut Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen Diva Yohana Margaretha Marbun; Aam Suryamah; Agus Suwandono
Concept: Journal of Social Humanities and Education Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): Juni: Concept: Journal of Social Humanities and Education
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/concept.v2i2.312

Abstract

The position of business actors and consumers often becomes unequal. Consumers are often the object of business activity to get the maximum profit by business actors and in the end the consumer becomes the aggrieved party. Cases of business actors harming consumers are found in BPSK Garut Regency Decision Number 18/Pdt.S-Brg/BPSK-GRT/IX/2020 regarding the sale of expired vegetable cheese wafers at the Asia Garut Department Store. In this case, there were legal issues regarding BPSK's authority and the judge's considerations in deciding compensation. The research objective is to determine whether BPSK has the authority to decide this case; and analyzing the judges' considerations in the BPSK Decision of Garut Regency Number 18/Pdt.S-Brg/BPSK-GRT/IX/2020 in deciding compensation. This study uses research methods with a normative juridical approach based on applicable legal concepts and theories. Based on the research results, it can be concluded 2 (two) things. First, the settlement process in this case has not provided legal certainty because the choice of dispute resolution method is directly determined by the Garut Regency BPSK Assembly and not based on the agreement of the parties to the dispute and this case should have been tried at the District Court after mediation failed. Second, the Garut Regency BSPK Assembly has not been right in deciding on compensation because the Assembly has confused the duties and responsibilities of producers and supermarkets and does not understand the intent of Article 52 letter (k) of the Consumer Protection Act.
Co-Authors Aam Suryamah Adrasitta Khaliddya Fithrianni Agus Sjahrurachman Agus Suwandono Amir Su'udi Anggit Vikasari Anies Ari Udiyono Aris Sugiharto Azizah Putri Umami Bagoes Widjanarko Budi Anna Keliat Cika Nirbaya Br Lubis Deviana Yuanitasari Diana Marchella Diva Yohana Margaretha Marbun Etty Mulyati Fera Ibrahim Fera lbrahim Gneissa Beltsazar Harimat Hendarwan Hazar Kusmayanti, Hazar Henry Setyawan Susanto Henry Setyawan Susanto Holyness N Singadimedja Holyness N. Singadimedja Indriati Indriati Ketut Aryastami Lintang Dian Saraswati Made Dewi Susilawati Made Setiawan Martini Martini Mateus Sakundarno Mazroatul Khasanah Nelly Puspandari Nun Harrieti, Nun Rafan Darodjat Rozzaq Alhanif Islamudin Sutopo Patria Jati Syachroni Syachroni Ully Adhie Mulyani Vivi Setiawaty Yulianto Prabowo