Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
2.522
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam Jurnal Penelitian Agama Jurnal YIN YANG Jurnal KOMUNIKA JOURNAL OF INDONESIAN ISLAM FIKRAH PALASTREN Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum JURNAL YAQZHAN: Analisis Filsafat, Agama dan Kemanusiaan SAMARAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam Ijtima'iyya: Journal of Muslim Society Research MAGHZA: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur´an dan Tafsir Transformatif Veteran Law Review Jurnal Cahaya Mandalika Al-Manahij : Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam Jurnal Penelitian Agama Mazahib: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Islam Al Hurriyah : Jurnal Hukum Islam Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam AMALA Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat el-Aqwal: Journal of Sharia and Comparative Law Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research
Bani Syarif Maula
Institut Agama Islam Negeri Purwokerto
Religion Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 31 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 31 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
Assessing Indonesia and Malaysia’s Legal Responsiveness to Domestic Violence Victims within Islamic Law Framework Nuroniyah, Wardah; Al Azkiya, Mohammad Azka; Wahid, Abdul; Labib Shodiq, Fatimah Lubabiyah; Maula, Bani Syarif
Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam Vol. 19 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Sharia Faculty of State Islamic University of Prof. K.H. Saifuddin Zuhri, Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24090/mnh.v19i2.13736

Abstract

This study presents a comparative analysis of Indonesia and Malaysia’s legal frameworks for protecting victims of domestic violence through the lens of Islamic legal principles. It examines both substantive and procedural dimensions in light of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah, which emphasize the preservation of life (ḥifẓ al-nafs), dignity (ḥifẓ al-‘ird), and family integrity (ḥifẓ al-nasl). Indonesia’s Law No. 23 of 2004 provides broad substantive protection by recognizing various forms of violence physical, psychological, sexual, and economic and extending safeguards to domestic workers. This inclusivity aligns with the Islamic principle of ‘adl (justice) and the duty to uphold human dignity, though weak coordination and limited law enforcement training hinder procedural implementation. In contrast, Malaysia’s Domestic Violence Act 1994 demonstrates stronger procedural responsiveness, particularly in issuing protection orders and promoting inter-agency cooperation. While its narrower scope excludes domestic workers, it reflects dar’ al-mafāsid (prevention of harm) through timely intervention. Malaysia’s dual legal system also integrates Islamic values into judicial practice. The study concludes that Indonesia excels in substantive inclusivity, while Malaysia demonstrates procedural strength. A hybrid model combining Indonesia’s normative scope with Malaysia’s procedural efficiency would better fulfill the Shariah’s holistic objectives of justice and protection.
Co-Authors Abdul Wahid Adnan Adnan Akbar, Wahyu Al Azkiya, Mohammad Azka Harahap, Najhan Parluhutan Khoerul Anwar Labib Shodiq, Fatimah Lubabiyah Muhsin, Ilyya Nada, Syifaun Novia Permana, Farid Putra, Faiq Danendra Rizqi Rafi, Faris Rahima, Dwira Sayuti, M. Noor Setiaji, Tyas Agus Arga Vivi Ariyanti Wardah Nuroniyah Zain, Muhammad Fuad