Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.169
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Ilmu Hukum Prima Veritas: Jurnal Program Pascasarjana Ilmu Hukum Universitas Islam As-Syafiiyah Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis RIO LAW JURNAL Co-Value : Jurnal Ekonomi, Koperasi & Kewirausahaan SETARA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Sosial dan Sains SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research International Journal of Management Research and Economics Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Ilmu
Puguh Aji Hari Setiawan
Universitas Bung Karno
Aerospace Engineering Arts Humanities Astronomy Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Neuroscience Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 30 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 30 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Settlement Of Industrial Relations Disputes Due To Termination Of Employment Due To Efficiency In Maintaining Balance Between Employers And Workers Tony Sudirgo; Dewi Iryani; Puguh Aji Hari Setiawan
Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM PRIMA
Publisher : jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34012/jihp.v8i2.7645

Abstract

Regulations related to termination of employment for reasons of efficiency are not explained explicitly, this will have an impact on the emergence of industrial relations disputes, thus affecting the balance between the interests of employers and the protection of workers/laborers. This study aims to examine the regulations regarding termination of employment for reasons of efficiency based on laws and judges' decisions and efforts to resolve them to ensure justice for the parties. In this study, a normative juridical method is used with a statutory and case approach, where this study analyzes Law Number 13 of 2003, Law Number 6 of 2023, Government Regulation Number 35 of 2021, and decisions such as the Constitutional Court Number 19/PUU-IX/2011. With the findings of ambiguity in the definition of efficiency, the phrase loss, and prevention of potential losses, which are seen in the cases of PT. S against Mrs. E and PT. Jtrust Olympindo Multi Finance against Sudadi Hari Widianto, causing misuse of efficiency reasons in termination of employment. Thus, in its implications, it is necessary to update regulations with a more explicit definition of efficiency, strengthening the role of judges in analyzing company financial audit reports, and transparent steps by companies such as analyzing the company's macro and micro conditions in advance and mapping workers/laborers to ensure the achievement of justice, benefits, and legal certainty, so as to support a harmonious balance in industrial relations.
Legal Certainty Regarding The Cancellation Of Arbitration Awards In District Courts Santy Juniarty; Puguh Aji Hari Setiawan; Dewi Iryani
Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM PRIMA
Publisher : jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34012/jihp.v8i2.7647

Abstract

Arbitration in Indonesia, based on Law Number 30 of 1999, is designed as a dispute resolution mechanism that provides legal certainty through its final and binding decisions. This principle, known as das sollen, is expected to support a conducive investment climate. However, in practice (das sein), Article 70 of the same law authorizes the District Court to annul arbitration awards. The implementation of this authority, particularly on grounds of "trickery," often leads to inconsistencies in court decisions. This study uses a normative juridical research method with a statute approach and a conceptual approach. Data collection was conducted through library research on primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The collected data were then analyzed qualitatively using systematic, theological, and grammatical interpretations. To analyze legal issues in depth, this study uses the Theory of Legal Certainty and the Theory of Agreements as analytical tools for three relevant case studies of Supreme Court decisions: Decision Number 941 B/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2024, Decision Number 244 B/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2022, and Decision Number 477 B/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2022. The research findings indicate that the legal basis and considerations of judges in annulling arbitral awards are in accordance with legal provisions only if they are based on violations of fundamental principles in the legal process, such as the existence of legally proven fraud that affects the legal standing of the parties or the integrity of the process. However, court intervention becomes unlawful when re-examining the substance of the dispute, because it violates the autonomy of the parties' will. It is concluded that legal certainty regarding the annulment of arbitral awards is in a vulnerable condition due to inconsistent interpretations of judges. This inconsistency directly weakens the predictability of law and the principle of finality of arbitration, which has implications for declining investor confidence in the domestic dispute resolution system.
Application of the Principle of Commercial Exit from Financial Distress in Corporate Bankruptcy Applications and its Implications for Creditor Protection Rindi Elina; Didik Suhariyanto; Puguh Aji Hari Setiawan
Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM PRIMA
Publisher : jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34012/jihp.v8i2.7665

Abstract

This research is motivated by the increasing misuse of bankruptcy mechanisms in Indonesia, where solvent debtors exploit bankruptcy as a strategy to evade obligations rather than as a genuine solution for financial distress. The study aims to analyze the regulation of corporate bankruptcy applications that reflect the principle of Commercial Exit from Financial Distress and to examine creditor protection in cases that deviate from this principle. Using a normative juridical approach through statute, case, and conceptual methods, this research relies on primary legal materials including Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations and two court decisions: Number 04/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2023/PN Niaga Medan (PT Ricky Kurniawan Kertapersada) and Number 41/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2025/PN Niaga Central Jakarta (PT Teknik Lancar Mandiri). The analysis was conducted qualitatively using sociological interpretation to link legal norms with judicial practice. The findings reveal that Indonesia’s bankruptcy system remains formalistic because it does not apply an insolvency test as a substantive basis for determining financial failure. The PT RKK case demonstrates bankruptcy abuse to avoid debt, while the PT TLM case exemplifies fair application of the Commercial Exit from Financial Distress principle. Hence, reform of bankruptcy law is essential to achieve substantive justice and equitable legal protection for creditors. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif, melalui statute approach, case approach, dan conceptual approach. Bahan hukum primer yang digunakan meliputi peraturan perundang-undangan dan dua putusan pengadilan, yaitu Putusan Nomor 04/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2023/PN Niaga Medan (PT Ricky Kurniawan Kertapersada) dan Putusan Nomor 41/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2025/PN Niaga Jakarta Pusat (PT Teknik Lancar Mandiri). Analisis dilakukan secara kualitatif menggunakan metode interpretasi sosiologis untuk menemukan relevansi norma hukum dengan penerapannya di pengadilan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa sistem kepailitan Indonesia masih bersifat formalistik karena belum menerapkan insolvency test sebagai dasar substantif. Kasus PT RKK menunjukkan penyalahgunaan mekanisme pailit untuk menghindari kewajiban, sedangkan PT TLM mencerminkan penerapan prinsip Commercial Exit from Financial Distress secara adil dan proporsional. Oleh karena itu, reformasi hukum kepailitan diperlukan untuk memastikan keadilan substantif dan perlindungan hukum kreditur secara seimbang.
Legal Protection For Bank Customers Regarding The Disclosure Of Financial Information By Tax Authorities Based On Law Number 9 Of 2017 And Law Number 27 Of 2022 Ewi Banjarnahor; Didik Suhariyanto; Puguh Aji Hari Setiawan
Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM PRIMA
Publisher : jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34012/jihp.v9i1.7766

Abstract

This research examines the legal tension between the state’s interest in tax collection and the protection of bank customers’ privacy rights under two regimes: Law No. 9 of 2017 on Access to Financial Information for Tax Purposes and Law No. 27 of 2022 on Personal Data Protection, alongside bank secrecy provisions in Law No. 10 of 1998. The expanded authority of tax authorities to access financial data aims to enhance transparency and compliance but risks infringing privacy rights. Using a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, the study analyzes key legal sources, including the 1945 Constitution and Constitutional Court Decision No. 102/PUU-XV/2017. The analysis applies the principle of proportionality, as well as theories of legal protection (Philipus M. Hadjon) and legal certainty (Gustav Radbruch). Findings indicate that legal protection for bank customers remains largely formal and lacks substantive safeguards. Broad access by tax authorities is not matched by clear mechanisms of oversight, accountability, and legal responsibility. Normative overlap between tax disclosure rules and personal data protection obligations creates legal uncertainty for both financial institutions and customers. The study concludes that regulatory harmonization is necessary to resolve these conflicts. It recommends establishing an independent supervisory body and strengthening accountability frameworks to ensure a proportional balance between effective tax enforcement and the protection of citizens’ privacy rights. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan kasus. Bahan hukum primer meliputi UUD NRI Tahun 1945, UU No. 9 Tahun 2017, UU No. 27 Tahun 2022, serta Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 102/PUU-XV/2017. Analisis dilakukan secara deskriptif-analitis dengan menelaah disharmoni norma dan penerapan asas proporsionalitas dalam pembatasan hak privasi. Pendekatan konseptual digunakan untuk mengkaji teori perlindungan hukum Philipus M. Hadjon dan teori kepastian hukum Gustav Radbruch sebagai pisau analisis terhadap pelaksanaan kebijakan keterbukaan informasi keuangan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perlindungan hukum terhadap nasabah bank dalam pelaksanaan keterbukaan informasi keuangan masih bersifat formal dan belum substansial. Akses data keuangan oleh otoritas pajak belum diimbangi dengan mekanisme pengawasan, akuntabilitas, dan tanggung jawab hukum yang jelas. Terdapat tumpang tindih antara kewenangan fiskus dalam UU No. 9 Tahun 2017 dan kewajiban perlindungan data pribadi dalam UU No. 27 Tahun 2022, yang menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum bagi lembaga keuangan dan nasabah. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan harmonisasi regulasi dan pembentukan lembaga pengawas independen untuk menjamin keseimbangan antara efektivitas fiskal dan perlindungan hak privasi warga negara.
Effectiveness Of Trademark Protection In Electronic Commerce In A Case Study Of Trademark Infringement In Indonesia Andi -; Puguh Aji Hari Setiawan; Hartana Hartana
Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM PRIMA
Publisher : jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34012/jihp.v9i1.7767

Abstract

This study analyzes the effectiveness of trademark protection in Indonesia’s e-commerce sector amid rising digital trade and increasing infringement, including unauthorized use, counterfeiting, and consumer deception. It aims to identify causal factors and evaluate enforcement mechanisms. Using a juridical-normative method with case studies, the research examines legal documents, infringement cases, and platform-level protection policies. The findings show that although regulations such as Law No. 20 of 2016 on Trademarks and Geographical Indications and Government Regulation No. 80 of 2019 on Electronic Commerce exist, enforcement gaps persist, enabling ongoing violations. Key issues include weak supervision, inconsistent enforcement, and limited platform accountability. The study concludes that legal protection remains suboptimal due to lack of coordination among regulators, business actors, and e-commerce providers. Recommended measures include strengthening regulatory synergy, enhancing monitoring by authorities, optimizing platform-based filtering and enforcement mechanisms, and increasing legal awareness among businesses and consumers. These steps are necessary to ensure legal certainty, improve compliance, and support fair and sustainable growth of Indonesia’s e-commerce ecosystem.
Legal Reconstruction of Input Tax Credits That Have No Direct Relationship With Business Activities For Legal Certainty of Corporate Taxpayers Wisnu Paruly Setiawan; Ismail Ismail; Puguh Aji Hari Setiawan
Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM PRIMA
Publisher : jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34012/jihp.v9i1.7809

Abstract

Taxes play a crucial role in national development, both as a source of state revenue and as an instrument for regulating the economy. Value Added Tax (VAT), with its Input Tax credit mechanism against Output Tax, is designed to maintain the principle of neutrality, but in practice it often raises legal issues. Article 9, paragraph 8, letter (b) of the VAT Law, concerning the phrase "directly related to business activities," lacks a clear definition, thus opening room for multiple interpretations. This has given rise to numerous disputes between Corporate Taxpayers and the Directorate General of Taxes (DGT). This research employs a normative legal method with a statutory, conceptual, and case-based approach. The results show that the norm in Article 9 paragraph 8 letter (b) has fundamental weaknesses due to multiple interpretations and implications for legal uncertainty. Legal reconstruction is needed through the development of an explicit negative list, consistent jurisprudence, and modern, digital-based administrative guidelines, so that the national tax system can provide legal certainty, protect taxpayer rights, and strengthen the principle of VAT neutrality. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan kasus. Bahan hukum primer yang digunakan meliputi Undang-Undang PPN, UU HPP, dan putusan pengadilan terkait, sedangkan bahan hukum sekunder berupa literatur perpajakan, jurnal, dan karya ilmiah yang relevan. Analisis dilakukan secara deduktif dengan interpretasi sistematis dan teleologis untuk menilai kesesuaian norma dengan asas legalitas, keadilan, serta tujuan sistem perpajakan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa norma dalam Pasal 9 ayat 8 huruf (b) UU PPN memiliki kelemahan mendasar karena multitafsir dan berimplikasi pada ketidakpastian hukum. Putusan pengadilan memperlihatkan adanya penafsiran sempit dan formalis terhadap “hubungan langsung dengan kegiatan usaha,” yang merugikan Wajib Pajak Badan. Rekonstruksi hukum diperlukan melalui penyusunan daftar negatif (negative list) yang eksplisit, konsistensi yurisprudensi, serta pedoman administratif modern berbasis digitalisasi. Dengan demikian, sistem perpajakan nasional dapat memberikan kepastian hukum, melindungi hak Wajib Pajak, serta memperkuat prinsip netralitas PPN dalam mendukung iklim investasi dan pertumbuhan ekonomi.
Analisis Implementasi Kebijakan Penangkapan Ikan Terukur dalam Permen KP Nomor 28 Tahun 2023: Studi Keadilan Penetapan Pelabuhan Pangkalan bagi Nelayan Wendy Hendriawan; Didik Suhariyanto; Puguh Aji Hari Setiawan
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 10 (2025): Tema Filsafat, Politik dan Etika Profesi Hukum
Publisher : Himpunan Ilmu Hukum dan Ilmu Hukum Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i10.3219

Abstract

As an archipelagic state, Indonesia possesses vast fishery resource potential but faces the threat of overfishing. In response, the government implemented the Measured Fishing (Penangkapan Ikan Terukur or PIT) policy, regulated under Government Regulation Number 11 of 2023 and Ministerial Regulation of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Number 28 of 2023, which includes the mandatory landing of fish at designated base ports. This policy has raised concerns regarding distributive justice due to infrastructure disparities, limited facilities and a disproportionate administrative burden on small-scale fishermen. This research aims to analyze the regulation of base ports in ensuring equitable access and resource distribution, as well as to formulate more just policy frameworks. The method employed is normative legal research using a statutory approach and an analysis based on John Rawls' Theory of Distributive Justice. The findings reveal procedural and economic injustices resulting from the misalignment between legal obligations and infrastructural availability. This condition creates structural discrimination against fishermen in regions with limited facilities. Therefore, a policy reconstruction based on distributive justice is required through the implementation of tiered tariffs, prioritization for small-scale fishermen and the equitable distribution of cold chain facilities to ensure that legal compliance does not disadvantage traditional fishermen.
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Debt Collector dalam Penarikan Paksa Kendaraan Bermotor: Integrasi POJK 22/2023, Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi, dan KUHP Nasional Maruli Simalango; Puguh Aji Hari Setiawan; G. Nyoman Tio Rae
Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Ilmu Vol. 3 No. 4 (2026): Agustus : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Ilmu (JIMI)
Publisher : CV. Denasya Smart Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69714/1a65ha07

Abstract

Motor-vehicle repossession by debt collectors in distressed financing lies at the intersection of creditors' rights, consumer protection, security law, and criminal law. This study examines the legal limits of debt collection and fiduciary execution and formulates a criminal-liability framework following the enactment of Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 22 of 2023 and Indonesia's national Criminal Code. It employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Legal materials are analyzed qualitatively and prescriptively through normative synchronization and offence-element testing. The study finds that a financing company's mandate does not authorize a debt collector to use threats, violence, pressure, or unilateral seizure. Execution is lawful only where the fiduciary security is registered, default is demonstrable, prior warning has been issued, and the debtor voluntarily surrenders the asset; where default or surrender is disputed, judicial procedure is mandatory. Conduct exceeding these limits may constitute coercion, theft, robbery, extortion, blackmail, or property damage under the Criminal Code, depending on the facts. Financial Services Providers remain responsible for the consequences of outsourcing collection and may incur corporate criminal liability when the attribution requirements under the Criminal Code are satisfied. The study contributes a dual-track accountability model combining the collector's individual criminal liability with the provider's administrative, civil, and corporate responsibility.
Legal, Accounting and Tax Implications of the Lending Cartel Case 05/KPPU-I/2025 in Indonesia Grace Grace; Chindy Flawdia Putri; Mutiara Rizqi Nur Rachmi; Josmar Munthe; Puguh Aji Hari Setiawan
International Journal of Management Research and Economics Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): August : International Journal of Management Research and Economics
Publisher : Institut Teknologi dan Bisnis (ITB) Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54066/ijmre-itb.v4i3.4694

Abstract

This research examines the case Number 05/KPPU-I/2025, and states that about 97 peer-to-peer (P2P) lending platforms were found guilty of cartel practices by fixing daily interest rates at 0.8%. Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) imposed fines amounting to IDR 755 billion. This decision was upheld by the Supreme Court’s Judicial Review in 2026. Upon basic legal overview, this research also discussed the interdisciplinary chain reaction triggered by this antitrust ruling. The second point of view is from an accounting perspective, discussing margin compression and capital depletion caused by fines that required platforms to aggressively reclassify loan portfolios into Stage 2 and 3 under PSAK 109. This reclassification will make a sharp spike in Allowance for Impairment Losses, and impacting the platform’s profitability and capital adequacy. From A Taxation point of view,  this research also dis-cussed the structural friction between PSAK 109 predictive, forward-looking Expected Credit Loss (ECL) provisioning and the Directorate General of Taxes’ retrospective, realization-based approach to bad debts under Minister of Finance Regulation No. 69/PMK.03/2022. The difference between ac-counting and taxation; creates a permanent book-tax gap, thus inflating the Effective Tax Rate (ETR) when platforms are under extreme cash flow duress. Using an empirical juridical qualitative case study design, this research will reveal the systemic bottlenecks in inter-agency data sharing between the KPPU and Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) under Law No. 4/2023.
Kewenangan Kementerian Pelindungan Pekerja Migran Indonesia terkait Jaminan Sosial Kesehatan Pekerja Migran Indonesia untuk Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum widyaningsih; Puguh Aji Hari Setiawan; Ismail
SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Vol. 5 No. 4 (2026): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, Agustus 2026
Publisher : LPPM Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi 45 Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/seikat.v5i4.3533

Abstract

Kementerian Pelindungan Pekerja Migran Indonesia (KP2MI) yang dibentuk untuk menyelenggarakan suburusan pelindungan Pekerja Migran Indonesia mempunyai kewenangan untuk memastikan Pekerja Migran Indonesia mendapatkan pelindungan salah satunya melalui program Jaminan Sosial Kesehatan yang menjadi hak seluruh warga negara Indonesia. Implementasi jaminan sosial Kesehatan mulai dari diterbitkannya UU 18 Tahun 2017 sampai dengan saat ini belum ada regulasi yang diterbitkan untuk melaksanakan jaminan sosial Kesehatan sehingga belum dapat dimanfaatkan secara optimal. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian yuridis normatif dengan 5 (lima) pendekatan, yakni pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, konseptual, kasus, historis, dan p perbandingan dengan beberapa negara pengirim Pekerja Migran. Hasil dari penelitian diperlukannya perubahan beberapa ketentuan dalam UU PPMI khususnya terkait definisi “Menteri” yang harus didefinisikan sebagai Menteri P2MI agar memiliki dasar kewenangan yang kuat dari sisi yuridis dan perubahan norma agar jaminan kesehatan dapat diberikan juga selama bekerja di luar negeri, serta perubahan norma di PP 59/2021 agar selaras dengan pengaturan dengan UU PPMI. Selain itu juga diperlukan terobosan dalam pelaksanaan jaminan kesehatan melalui mekanisme reimbursment ataupun metode lain yang dapat memberikan kepastian kepada Pekerja Migran Indonesia.
Co-Authors amran rabani zubaidi Andi - Asmanah Asmanah Bernadete Nurmawati Chindy Flawdia Putri Dendy Derajat Utama Dewi Iryani Didik Suhariyanto Ewi Banjarnahor G. Nyoman Tio Rae Gomulia Oscar Grace Grace Gradios Nyoman Tio Rae Hartana Heppy Lades Sidabutar Ismail Ismail Josmar Munthe Juri Frasiska KMS Herman Maradona Sinuraya Martunas Sianturi Maruli Simalango Mierza Darsya Putra Moh Yusuf Pradhana Mutiara Rizqi Nur Rachmi Myrna Fitria Najmi Ismail Nomensen Sinamo Rinaldi Agusta Fahlevie Rindi Elina Santy Juniarty Suwito Suwito Thomas Ericson Hadinata Sihite Tony Sudirgo Wendy Hendriawan widyaningsih Wisnu Paruly Setiawan Yusuf H Hemuto