Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

Evaluating Computer-Based Testing System Success Using the DeLone and McLean Model among Cadets at an Indonesian Aviation Higher Education Institution Faoyan Agus Furyanto; Lady Silk Moonlight; Maulana Anifa Silvia; Anton Budiarto; Ahmad Musadek; Faoyan Agus Furyanto; Lady Silk Moonlight; Maulana Anifa Silvia; Anton Budiarto; Ahmad Musadek; Abdul Mu’ti Sazali
Jurnal Pembelajaran, Bimbingan, dan Pengelolaan Pendidikan Vol. 7 No. 2 (2027)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17977/um065.v7.i2.2027.4

Abstract

The rapid adoption of Computer-Based Testing (CBT) in higher education requires an evaluation framework to determine whether the implemented system successfully provides benefits for users. This study aims to evaluate the success of CBT implementation among cadets of a higher education institution in Indonesia using the DeLone and McLean Information Systems Success Model. A quantitative explanatory approach was employed involving 108 cadets who had experience using the CBT system. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire and analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) with SmartPLS 3.2.9. The evaluation consisted of measurement model assessment and structural model testing using bootstrapping with 5,000 resamples. The results indicate that information quality significantly influences user satisfaction (β = 0.399, p = 0.001), and service quality significantly influences user satisfaction (β = 0.298, p = 0.011). However, system quality does not significantly influence user satisfaction (β = 0.225, p = 0.055). Furthermore, user satisfaction has a strong positive influence on implementation impact (β = 0.846, p < 0.001). These findings indicate that successful CBT implementation is determined not only by technical system performance but also by the quality of information and service support provided to users. This study contributes practical implications for higher education institutions in improving digital assessment systems by prioritizing information clarity, technical assistance, and user satisfaction.
Wildlife Hazard Management in Aviation Safety Policy at Indonesian Airports: A Qualitative Gap Analysis Catur Erik Widodo; Didi Hariyanto; Dewi Ratna Sari; Lady Silk Moonlight; Fortunata Dos Reis Pinto
Jurnal Penelitian Vol. 11 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal Penelitian Agustus 2026
Publisher : Politeknik Penerbangan Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46491/jp.v20i2.2555

Abstract

Wildlife strikes remain a persistent safety risk for airport operators because birds and terrestrial animals can damage aircraft, disrupt schedules, and threaten passengers and crews. In Indonesia, the issue is particularly important because airports operate in diverse ecological settings, including coastal zones, forest edges, wetlands, agricultural areas, settlements, and rapidly urbanizing airport vicinities. This study evaluates the implementation of Wildlife Hazard Management (WHM) at Indonesian airports by synthesizing published airport evidence and comparing reported practices with ICAO standards and Indonesian aerodrome regulations. A qualitative documentary review and structured gap analysis were conducted using ICAO Annex 14, ICAO Doc 9137 Part 3, ICAO Safety Management System principles, Indonesian CASR Part 139-related regulations, and empirical studies from several Indonesian airports. The analysis was organized around eight WHM components: wildlife assessment, habitat and attractant control, patrol and surveillance, reporting and risk assessment, equipment and technology, personnel competence, emergency preparedness, and off-airport stakeholder coordination. The findings show that Indonesian airports have generally adopted core WHM practices, including patrols, reporting, grass cutting, perimeter control, and deterrent equipment. However, implementation remains uneven. Key gaps include limited species-specific and seasonal risk assessment, incomplete evidence on reporting quality, insufficient recurrent training and simulation, suboptimal placement and maintenance of deterrent equipment, and weak documentation of off-airport coordination within the 13 km wildlife-risk area. The study contributes a comparative policy-implementation framework for strengthening WHM as part of airport Safety Management Systems in Indonesia.