Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.928
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha Yustisia Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Arena Hukum Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan JUSTITIA JURNAL HUKUM TANJUNGPURA LAW JOURNAL Kosmik Hukum Padjadjaran Journal of International Law Kumawula: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan International Journal of Business, Economics, and Social Development Indonesian Journal of International Law Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Media Ganesha FHIS (P2MMGFHIS) Yinyang: Jurnal Studi Islam Gender dan Anak Gloria Justitia
Natalia Yeti Puspita
Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya
Religion Arts Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 24 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 24 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
The Covid-19 Pandemic in Indonesia: Children as Children First, Child Refugees Second? Puspita, Natalia Yeti
JUSTITIA JURNAL HUKUM Vol 7 No 1 (2023): Justitia Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30651/justitia.v7i1.17839

Abstract

Indonesia is often a transit country for refugees, even though Indonesia is not ratified the 1951 Refugee Convention and the 1967 Refugee Protocol. The Covid-19 pandemic has made it even more challenging to fulfil human rights guarantees for child refugees in Indonesia. Child refugees and refugees who were not accompanied by adults are the group most vulnerable to human rights violations.Based on this, this paper will analyze the legal protection for child refugees in Indonesia during the Covid-19 pandemic. This article is the result of normative legal researchwhichemphasizes secondary data. The data was obtained through library research.The legal protection for handling refugees, especially child refugees in Indonesia and during the Covid-19 pandemic, is based on the principle of non-refoulment, the principle of non-discrimination and the principle of the best interests of child.Keywords: Legal Protection, Child Refugees, Indonesia, Covid-19 Pandemic.
The Covid-19 Pandemic in Indonesia: Children as Children First, Child Refugees Second? Puspita, Natalia Yeti
JUSTITIA JURNAL HUKUM Vol 7 No 1 (2023): Justitia Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30651/justitia.v7i1.17839

Abstract

Indonesia is often a transit country for refugees, even though Indonesia is not ratified the 1951 Refugee Convention and the 1967 Refugee Protocol. The Covid-19 pandemic has made it even more challenging to fulfil human rights guarantees for child refugees in Indonesia. Child refugees and refugees who were not accompanied by adults are the group most vulnerable to human rights violations.Based on this, this paper will analyze the legal protection for child refugees in Indonesia during the Covid-19 pandemic. This article is the result of normative legal researchwhichemphasizes secondary data. The data was obtained through library research.The legal protection for handling refugees, especially child refugees in Indonesia and during the Covid-19 pandemic, is based on the principle of non-refoulment, the principle of non-discrimination and the principle of the best interests of child.Keywords: Legal Protection, Child Refugees, Indonesia, Covid-19 Pandemic.
KEWENANGAN HUKUM ASEAN DALAM MEMBUAT PERJANJIAN INTERNASIONAL DENGAN PIHAK EKSTERNAL BERDASARKAN PIAGAM ASEAN Puspita, Natalia Yeti
Yustisia Vol 4, No 3: December 2015
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v4i3.8704

Abstract

Abstract Since the entry into force of the ASEAN Charter in 2008, it is widely said that ASEAN has moved from a loose organization to a rule-based one based on. As an international organization which is distinguished by its member states, ASEAN has legal authority to conclude an international agreement with external party. This is governed in the Article 3 Juncto Article 41 (7) ASEAN Charter. In order to examine this provision, has been produced the 2011 Rules of Procedure for the Conclusion of International Agreements by ASEAN. Unfortunately in practice, the implementation of this provision is affected by the strong presence of the principle of state sovereignty held by each ASEAN member states. In this paper, the writer will analysis on ASEAN Legal Authority in Conclusion of International Agreement with External Party Based on ASEAN Charter. AbstrakSejak Piagam ASEAN dinyatakan berlaku pada tahun 2008, dapat dikatakan bahwa ASEAN telah berubah dari sebuah organisasi kawasan yang longgar menjadi sebuah organisasi yang berdasarkan aturan. Sebagai sebuah organisasi internasional yang mandiri dan dibedakan dengan negara anggotanya, ASEAN mempunyai kewenangan hukum untuk membuat perjanjian internasional dengan pihak eksternal. Hal ini diatur dalam Pasal 3 Juncto Pasal 41 ayat (7) Piagam ASEAN. Untuk melaksanakan ketentuan tersebut dikeluarkanlah the 2011 Rules of Procedure for the Conclusion of International Agreements by ASEAN. Akan tetapi dalam praktik, pelaksanaan ketentuan ini dipengaruhi oleh kuatnya keberadaan prinsip kedaulatan negara yang dianut oleh masing-masing negara anggota ASEAN. Dalam tulisan ini, penulis akan menganalisis mengenai kewenangan hukum ASEAN dalam membuat perjanjian internasional dengan pihak eksternal berdasarkan Piagam ASEAN. 
PREFENTIAL TRADE AGREEMENT SEBAGAI JALUR DIPLOMASI ALTERNATIF ATAS KEBIJAKAN HILIRISASI NIKEL INDONESIA PASCA PUTUSAN WTO bill manuel marolop hutagalung; Natalia Yeti Puspita
Gloria Justitia Vol 5 No 2 (2025): JURNAL GLORIA JUSTITIA
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25170/gloriajustitia.v5i2.7031

Abstract

Putusan World Trade Organization (WTO) atas sengketa DS-592 antara Uni Eropa dan Indonesia menyatakan bahwa kebijakan pelarangan ekspor bijih nikel Indonesia bertentangan dengan ketentuan Pasal XI:1 GATT 1994, sehingga menciptakan ketidakpastian hukum terhadap keberlanjutan kebijakan hilirisasi nikel nasional. Ketidakpastian ini memunculkan dilema antara kepatuhan terhadap komitmen internasional dan perlindungan kedaulatan atas pengelolaan sumber daya alam. Sebagai respons atas dilema tersebut, strategi diplomasi ekonomi melalui skema Preferential Trade Agreement (PTA) dapat dijadikan sebagai jalur alternatif yang strategis. PTA memungkinkan Indonesia menjalin kerja sama dagang bilateral atau regional dengan memberikan preferensi tarif, tanpa secara langsung melanggar prinsip-prinsip dasar WTO. Artikel ini menganalisis bagaimana PTA dapat menjadi solusi diplomatik atas sengketa kebijakan hilirisasi nikel, dengan memanfaatkan potensi perjanjian seperti Indonesia–Pakistan PTA dan Indonesia–Mozambik PTA. Artikel ini menunjukkan bahwa PTA tidak hanya mampu memperkuat kerja sama perdagangan, tetapi juga dapat menjadi instrumen strategis untuk memperkuat kedaulatan ekonomi nasional sekaligus menjaga komitmen dalam sistem perdagangan global yang adil dan berkelanjutan.
Co-Authors A. Aris Swantoro Aloysius Deno Hervino Angga Reynady Hermawan Putra Annisa Irina Nur Halima Bernadetta Tjandra Wulandari, Bernadetta Tjandra bill manuel marolop hutagalung Boydston, Natasha Gusti Wahyu Puspitasari Dewi Liesnoor Setyowati Elizabeth Nadeak Elvina Elvina Fachrudin Sembiring Jane Madeline Joseph Maximillian Eduard Pauner Karina Stefanie Kurnia Utami Marhaeni Ria Siombo Natasya Fahira Nur ‘Azah Putra, Angga Reynady Hermawan Revin Andhika Rr. Adeline Melani Samuel MP Hutabarat Tisa Windayani Valerie Selvie Sinaga