Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.283
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Law Reconstruction YUSTISI BINAMULIA HUKUM SOSIOEDUKASI : JURNAL ILMIAH ILMU PENDIDIKAN DAN SOSIAL Yustisi: Jurnal Hukum dan Hukum Islam Krisna Law: Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Krisnadwipayana Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR) Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora (JURRISH) Binamulia Hukum
Parbuntian Sinaga
Universitas Krisnadwipayana
Humanities Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 19 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 19 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pekerja Atas Penetapan Upah Minimum yang Ditetapkan Oleh Gubernur yang Bertentangan dengan Peraturan Menteri Ketenagakerjaan Tentang Upah Minimum Rahmi, Sri; Sinaga, Parbuntian; Setyowati, Retno Kus
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 4 (2025): JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v4i4.6570

Abstract

Within the decentralization framework, the government sets the Regency/City Minimum Wage (UMK) as the wage standard. However, in 2021, the Governor of the Riau Islands Province established a UMK that did not comply with Ministry of Manpower regulations. This decision adversely affected workers, particularly members of labor unions, as well as the entire workforce in Batam City. The research addresses two key issues: first, the legal consequences of a regional head’s policy in determining the minimum wage; second, the form of legal protection for workers against a UMK that contradicts ministerial regulations. The study applies a normative juridical method. Findings indicate, under Article 82 of the Industrial Relations Dispute Settlement Act (UU PPHI), that a state administrative decision violating statutory provisions may be: (1) declared null (nietig/absolute nietig), (2) null and void by law (nietigheid van rechtswege), or (3) annulled (verniegbaar). The Tanjungpinang Administrative Court Decision No. 1/G/2021/PTUN.TPI declared that Governor’s Decree No. 1362 of 2020 on Batam UMK contained substantial defects and was annulled. Legal protection for workers is provided through dispute settlement procedures at the Administrative Court and/or administrative remedies as stipulated by applicable regulations.
Penerapan Prinsip Ultra Petita dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi di Indonesia Michael Dolf Lailossa; Parbuntian Sinaga; Retno Kus Setyowati
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 4 (2025): JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v4i4.6590

Abstract

This study examines the application of the ultra petita principle in decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, focusing on the case study of Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023. The ultra petita principle is classically understood as a prohibition for judges to rule beyond what is explicitly requested by the parties to the case. However, in practice, the Constitutional Court often uses this principle flexibly to ensure substantive justice and the effective protection of citizens' constitutional rights. This shows how constitutional adjudication in Indonesia tends to prioritize substantive justice over procedural limitations. This thesis aims to analyze the legal basis used by the Constitutional Court when deciding ultra petita cases, while also examining the resulting legal implications for the administrative system of lawmaking in Indonesia. Using a normative legal approach, this study finds that the Constitutional Court positions itself as the sole interpreter of the constitution with progressive authority. In this sense, the Court's decisions may expand its role beyond the traditional boundaries of judicial authority. However, the Constitutional Court's ultra petita practice has the potential to raise concerns about judicial overreach. Ultra petita decisions not only resolve constitutional disputes but also have the potential to create new legal norms that can directly influence the legislative process and even change the structure of national law. Such outcomes raise the question of how to maintain a balance between judicial activism and legislative supremacy. Therefore, it is crucial to establish clear legal boundaries to ensure the Court remains within the constitutional framework, upholds the principle of checks and balances, and prevents conflicts of authority between branches of state power. Therefore, this research contributes to the academic understanding of the dynamics of the Constitutional Court's authority and the urgency of strengthening the rules of the game in maintaining harmony in the Indonesian state system.
Pengelolaan Pesisir Pasca UU Cipta Kerja: Harmonisasi Kewenangan Pusat dan Daerah Setyawan, Agus; Sinaga, Parbuntian; Bhakti, Teguh Satya
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 4 (2025): JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v4i4.6592

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the authority structure between the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries (KKP) and Regional Governments in managing coastal areas through marine spatial utilization following the enactment of Law Number 6 of 2023 concerning the Stipulation of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 2 of 2022 concerning Job Creation into Law. The main instrument studied is the Confirmation of Conformity of Marine Spatial Utilization Activities (KKPRL), which functions as a licensing instrument and a control mechanism to ensure that marine spatial utilization activities remain directed, integrated, and aligned with the principles of ecological, social, and economic sustainability. The research approach used is a juridical-empirical approach with a qualitative descriptive analysis method. Through this approach, the research not only examines legal norms but also captures the practice of implementing authority in the field. The results show that although the Job Creation Law is oriented towards simplifying business licensing, several problems remain that have implications for the effectiveness of coastal governance. These issues include disharmony between central and regional regulations, overlapping authority between the Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries (KKPRL) and regional governments, and weak synchronization between national policies and regional instruments such as the Coastal and Small Islands Zoning Plan (RZWP3K). In addition to regulatory constraints, this study also highlights institutional and technical aspects. Limited human resource capacity in the regions, a lack of understanding of KKPRL procedures, and minimal inter-agency coordination hamper the effectiveness of coastal management. These conditions result in slow investment realization, conflicts over spatial use, and potential coastal environmental degradation. Therefore, this study recommends a strategy for harmonizing authority through improving vertical-horizontal coordination, strengthening the institutional capacity of regional governments, and developing derivative regulations consistent with the principles of good governance.
Kewenangan dan Pengawasan Pemerintah dalam Regulasi Pembentukan Koperasi Desa Merah Putih Simorangkir, Debora Juliani; Sinaga, Parbuntian; Setyowati, Retno Kus
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 4 (2025): JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v4i4.6645

Abstract

In the Indonesian economic system, cooperatives play a crucial role as one of the pillars of the national economy, as mandated in Article 33 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. This article emphasizes that "the economy is structured as a joint venture based on the principle of kinship," which serves as the constitutional basis for the existence and development of cooperatives in Indonesia. The research method used in this study is normative juridical, focusing on legal frameworks and regulations related to cooperatives. The results of the study indicate that the government holds an important and strategic role in regulating and supervising cooperatives to ensure the protection of the rights and obligations of cooperative members. Through regulatory instruments such as Law Number 25 of 1992 concerning Cooperatives, the government establishes cooperative principles, good governance standards, and oversight and development mechanisms. The government’s efforts are aimed at ensuring the operation of cooperatives is transparent, accountable, and beneficial to all members. Furthermore, the study found that despite these regulatory efforts, significant challenges remain in the cooperative sector. These include issues such as weak financial reporting, low literacy rates among cooperative members, and the dominance of local elites, which can hinder the equitable distribution of benefits. These challenges need to be addressed to ensure that cooperatives can fulfill their role as economic agents that contribute to national development in line with the principles of kinship and mutual benefit.
Analisis Yuridis Penerapan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 16 Tahun 2021 tentang Bangunan Gedung di Provinsi DKI Jakarta Sudrajat; Sinaga, Parbuntian; Setyowati, Retno Kus
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 4 (2025): JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v4i4.6648

Abstract

This research discusses the Juridical Analysis of the Application of Government Regulation Number 16 of 2021 concerning Building in DKI Jakarta Province. The focus of the research is directed at the effectiveness of local policies in adjusting national regulations to the diverse urban dynamics of Jakarta, especially related to the Building Approval mechanism (PBG), supervision system, and enforcement of administrative sanctions. Using a normative juridical approach and analyzing local regulations such as Government Regulation No. 16 of 2021 on the Implementation Regulation of Law No. 28 of 2002 on Building, this research identifies implementative obstacles, such as weak supervision, limited human resources, and low public legal awareness. The findings show that adaptation efforts have not been fully optimized, so policy adjustments, institutional strengthening, and cross-sector collaboration are needed. This research confirms the importance of digitalization, public participation, and consistency of law enforcement in creating orderly and sustainable building development in Jakarta.
MASA JABATAN HAKIM AD HOC DALAM SISTEM KEKUASAAN KEHAKIMAN INDONESIA Arifin, Firmansyah; Sinaga, Parbuntian; Setyowati, Retno Kus
YUSTISI Vol 12 No 3 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Ibn Khaldun Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32832/yustisi.v12i3.19832

Abstract

Masa jabatan hakim merupakan salah satu elemen penting dalam independensi kekuasaan kehakiman yang harus dijamin dalam undang-undang. Hakim ad hoc adalah hakim yang menjalankan fungsi kekuasaan kehakiman dan perlu dijamin masa jabatannya dalam undang-undang. Pada kenyataannya, pengaturan masa jabatan hakim ad hoc dalam sistem kekuasaan kehakiman di Indonesia diatur dalam berbagai peraturan perundang-undangan. Tidak hanya bentuk peraturannya yang beragam, model pengaturannya pun beragam, termasuk yang telah diputus melalui putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 49/PUU-XIV/2016 dan Putusan Nomor 85/PUU-XVIII/2020. Penelitian tesis ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana pengaturan masa jabatan hakim ad hoc dalam sistem kekuasaan kehakiman di Indonesia menurut peraturan perundang-undangan dan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif yang didasarkan pada sumber-sumber kepustakaan. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah pengaturan masa jabatan hakim ad hoc, baik dari segi bentuk maupun materi muatan ketentuannya, belum cukup menjamin kepastian hukum dan kesamaan kedudukan di hadapan hukum serta independensi bagi hakim ad hoc, sebagaimana yang telah dikuatkan oleh putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Oleh karena itu, perlu adanya penataan kembali masa jabatan hakim ad hoc melalui perubahan atau pembentukan undang-undang yang komprehensif dalam sistem kekuasaan kehakiman yang berlandaskan pada prinsip-prinsip negara hukum, UUD 1945, dan Pancasila.
MASA JABATAN HAKIM AD HOC DALAM SISTEM KEKUASAAN KEHAKIMAN INDONESIA Arifin, Firmansyah; Sinaga, Parbuntian; Setyowati, Retno Kus
YUSTISI Vol 12 No 3 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Ibn Khaldun Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32832/yustisi.v12i3.19832

Abstract

Masa jabatan hakim merupakan salah satu elemen penting dalam independensi kekuasaan kehakiman yang harus dijamin dalam undang-undang. Hakim ad hoc adalah hakim yang menjalankan fungsi kekuasaan kehakiman dan perlu dijamin masa jabatannya dalam undang-undang. Pada kenyataannya, pengaturan masa jabatan hakim ad hoc dalam sistem kekuasaan kehakiman di Indonesia diatur dalam berbagai peraturan perundang-undangan. Tidak hanya bentuk peraturannya yang beragam, model pengaturannya pun beragam, termasuk yang telah diputus melalui putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 49/PUU-XIV/2016 dan Putusan Nomor 85/PUU-XVIII/2020. Penelitian tesis ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana pengaturan masa jabatan hakim ad hoc dalam sistem kekuasaan kehakiman di Indonesia menurut peraturan perundang-undangan dan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif yang didasarkan pada sumber-sumber kepustakaan. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah pengaturan masa jabatan hakim ad hoc, baik dari segi bentuk maupun materi muatan ketentuannya, belum cukup menjamin kepastian hukum dan kesamaan kedudukan di hadapan hukum serta independensi bagi hakim ad hoc, sebagaimana yang telah dikuatkan oleh putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Oleh karena itu, perlu adanya penataan kembali masa jabatan hakim ad hoc melalui perubahan atau pembentukan undang-undang yang komprehensif dalam sistem kekuasaan kehakiman yang berlandaskan pada prinsip-prinsip negara hukum, UUD 1945, dan Pancasila.
Equitable Law Enforcement Against Law Enforcement Officers in Criminal Acts of Corruption Andi Apriyanto; Siswantari Pratiwi; Parbuntian Sinaga
JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review Vol. 4 No. 3 (2023): Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR), June 2023
Publisher : International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial dan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56371/jirpl.v4i3.179

Abstract

The pattern of eradicating corruption by punishing perpetrators with severe criminal sanctions and even up to the death penalty must be upheld to prevent acts of corruption. However, in practice, the criminal sanctions given by court judges to perpetrators are still light, even when the perpetrators are law enforcement officials such as the Prosecutor General's Office. The problem is how to consider the judges of the DKI Jakarta High Court Number 10/Pid.Sus-TPK/2021/PT.Dki and the Decision of the Central Jakarta District Court Number 11/Pid.B/TPK/2008/PN.Jkt.Pst in imposing criminal sanctions by Prosecutor Pinangki and Prosecutor Urip Tri Gunawan? The research method used is normative juridical research using secondary data. The results of the study stated that the consideration of the DKI Jakarta High Court Judge Number 10/Pid.Sus-TPK/2021/PT.Dki and the Decision of the Central Jakarta District Court Number 11/Pid.B/TPK/2008/PN.Jkt.Pst in imposing criminal sanctions that were carried out by Prosecutor Pinangki and Prosecutor Urip Tri Gunawan was based on mitigating and aggravating matters which led to disparities. This is caused by structural factors, substance factors, and cultural factors.
Is the Post-Reformation System of the Indonesian Government a Parliamentary Form? Sinaga, Parbuntian; Machmud, Aris
International Journal of Law Reconstruction Vol 8, No 1 (2024): International Journal of Law Reconstruction
Publisher : UNISSULA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26532/ijlr.v8i1.35535

Abstract

Indonesia's democratic government system has experienced ups and downs based on history, where at the beginning of independence Indonesia used a presidential system, then changed to a parliamentary and then returned to a presidential system. The reformation period was a milestone in changing the government system where previously the president was elected by the MPR as the highest state institution to switch to direct presidential elections carried by a party or a coalition of parties - due to the existence of regulation on the threshold for nomination (parliamentary threshold) - but to maintain the implementation of the presidential campaign promise to establish a coalition of parties supporting the government which has an impact on the role of the People^s Representative Council only as a stamp of government interests. The problem in this study is how the presidential system exists in the post-reform Indonesian government system. The form of the research method used is normative juridical with a statutory approach and an analytical descriptive approach that examines primary and secondary legal materials, besides examining the synchronization and harmonization of law. The conclusion is that the current Indonesian government system tends to be parliamentary. This is due to the weak bargaining position of the DPR in supervising the running of government because the majority of DPR members are supporters of the government, while the opposition forces are unequal with the majority, which prioritizes the most voting system over consensus deliberation for the benefit of the people. so that checks and balances - separation of powers - turned into a division of powers - dividing power.
Co-Authors Agus Setyawan Andi Apriyanto Firmansyah Arifin, Firmansyah Harief, Aulia Hartanto Lidansyah, Wendy Machmud, Aris Michael Dolf Lailossa Nahot Martua Purba Philips A. Kana Retno Kus Setyowati Simorangkir, Debora Juliani Siswantari Pratiwi Sri Rahmi Sudrajat Suwanti, Robet Syafri Donny Sirait Teguh Satya Bhakti Timbul, Hari Uyan Wiryadi Wijanarko, Gapung