Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 27 Documents
Search

Pelanggaran Hak Cipta Musik Berbentuk Cover Song di Media Sosial Uyan Wiryadi
Reslaj : Religion Education Social Laa Roiba Journal Vol 3 No 3 (2021): Reslaj: Religion Education Social Laa Roiba Journal
Publisher : LPPM Institut Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (323.114 KB) | DOI: 10.47467/reslaj.v3i3.411

Abstract

The purpose of this study: 1) To find out copyright violations in the field of music in the form of a cover song by recording through social media connected with Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright. 2) To find out the factors that influence copyright violations in the music field in the form of cover songs by recording through social media. The writing of this thesis uses a statute approach, by reviewing amendments to Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright and its implications for copyright and its implementation by state institutions and the Republic of Indonesia Law No. 19 of 2016 concerning Amendment of Law Number 11 Year 2008 Regarding Information and Electronic Transactions. Results of research conducted by the author: When someone does a cover song through social media without permission from the creator, both for the purpose not for commercial or commercial purposes, it is an infringement of copyright. Factors that influence the occurrence of violations of copyright in Indonesia include: 1) Weak law enforcement against violators. 2) Works on the internet can easily be duplicated and disseminated globally in a short period of time and in large quantities. 3) There is no limit on the place of the offender because a domain name or website can be accessed by anyone globally. 4) Procedures for events between countries in dealing with violations of copyright on the internet, such as to determine who the perpetrators are and when they occur and determine the jurisdiction of violations still vary.
PENERAPAN TEORI HUKUM DALAM KONTEKS PEMBAHARUAN HUKUM PIDANA BERBASIS SYARI’AH Nurlely Darwis; Uyan Wiryadi
JURNAL ILMIAH HUKUM DIRGANTARA Vol 5, No 2 (2015): JURNAL ILMIAH HUKUM DIRGANTARA
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS DIRGANTARA MARSEKAL SURYADARMA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (399.962 KB) | DOI: 10.35968/jh.v5i2.107

Abstract

Usaha pembaharuan hukum pidana secara menyeluruh dapat dianggap sebagai pelaksana atas amanat pendiri bangsa yang terkandung dalam pasal II Aturan Peralihan dimana ditegaskan bahwa berlakunya peraturan perundang-undangan yang bersifat sementara sebab belum ada undang-undang baru maka undang-undang lama masih tetap digunakan walaupun produk kolonial, sampai terbentuknya undang-undang baru. Hal ini bermakna bahwa pembaharuan hukum tetap harus diupayakan.  Beberapa teori besar dari pakar hukum ternama ada dikemukakan yang pada prinsipnya secara evolusi dapat menggambarkaan bagaimana masyarakat berkembang pesat sebgaimana digambarkan oleh “Teori Keos”. Oleh karena itu diperlukan dukungan hukum yang sepadan untuk dapat mengimbangi situasi dan kebutuhan atas rasa keadilan di masyarakat. Pembaharuan hukum pidana berbasis Syari’ah adalah suatu alternatif yang ditawarkan guna memenuhi keinginnan masyarakat yang mempunyai tujan untuk melaksanakan perintah dan kehendak Allah serta menjauhi larangannya demi mencapai kebahagian hidup dunia akhirat.
The Violation of Copyright Music in the Form of Cover Song By Recording Through Social Media Related To Law Number 28 Of 2014 Concerning Copyright And Law Number 19 Of 2016 Regarding Electronic Transaction Information uyan wiryadi
LEGAL BRIEF Vol. 11 No. 2 (2022): Law Science and Field
Publisher : IHSA Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (934.488 KB) | DOI: 10.35335/legal.v11i2.347

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to: 1) Determine whether cover songs that were recorded via social media violated Law Number 28 of 2014 Concerning Copyright in the sphere of music. 2) To identify the factors that contribute to copyright infringement when cover songs are recorded and shared on social media. This thesis was written using a statutory approach, specifically by analyzing the changes to Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright and its implications for copyright and its implementation by high state institutions and the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 19 of 2016 Regarding Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 Concerning Information and Electronic Transactions. The following are the findings of the author's research: It is a copyright infringement when someone performs a cover song on social media without permission from the artist, whether for non-commercial or commercial purposes. Among the factors influencing the occurrence of copyright infringement in Indonesia are: 1) Weak law enforcement against infringement violators. 2) Internet creations can be quickly replicated and spread internationally in a very short period of time and in big numbers. 3) There is no geographical restriction on the location of the perpetrator because a domain name or website can be viewed by anybody worldwide. 4) The procedure for inter-state events in dealing with copyright infringement on the internet, such as ascertaining who the perpetrator is and when the infringement happens (tempus delicti) and determining the legal region of the infringement (locus delicti), remains inconsistent.
LAW ENFORCEMENT ON THE CRIMINAL ACTS OF SERIOUS ABUSE BY CHILDREN TO CHILDREN Lidansyah, Wendy; Wiryadi, Uyan; Sinaga, Parbuntian
JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024): Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR), October 2024
Publisher : International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial dan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56371/jirpl.v6i1.322

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the qualifications of criminal acts of physical violence against children based on legislation and to analyze the application of criminal law in criminal acts of physical violence against children in Decision Number 19/Pid.Sus-Anak/2018/PN Jkt.Pst., and Decision Number 00/Pid.Sus-Anak/2023/PN Jkt.Brt. The type of research used by the author is a type of normative legal research with a legislative approach method, a case approach, and a conceptual approach. The legal materials used consist of primary legal materials, namely laws and regulations, and judges' decisions. Secondary legal materials, namely journals and book literature related to this study. As well as tertiary legal materials, namely articles and literature on the internet as supporting data in this study. All of these legal materials are analyzed qualitatively and presented descriptively. The results of this study are, 1) The qualification of the crime of physical violence against children based on statutory regulations is an act that is included in Article 80 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection concerning physical violence committed against children as victims and in the general scope. 2) The application of criminal law in Decision Number 19/Pid.Sus-Anak/2018/PN Jkt.Pst., and Decision Number 00/Pid.Sus-Anak/2023/PN Jkt.Brt., is correct. The defendant has been proven legally and convincingly to fulfill the elements in Article 80 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection. The judge considered that the defendant could be held responsible for the actions he had committed because he was in good health when he committed the crime, and there was no reason to remove the criminal sentence, so the Panel of Judges sentenced the Defendants to imprisonment.
CORRUPTION OFFENSES MANAGING DIRECTOR IN MAKING BUSINESS DECISIONS Habonaran, Benedictus Satrio; Wirogioto, Ali Johardi; Wiryadi, Uyan
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v7i1.1360

Abstract

Business decisions taken by the Board of Directors are solely an obligation for the Board of Directors so that SOE can grow sustainably, stably, and have high competitiveness, but an unavoidable reality is that a business entity does not only experience profits, but is also faced with phases of loss. Business decisions that have been made with full calculation and prudence are still not free from business risks that can result in the SOEs they manage experiencing losses, so that they are categorized as detrimental to state finances and lead to criminal justice processes. This study aims to (1) analyse losses in SOEs that can be qualified as state financial losses and (2) analyse what business decisions made by the President Director of SOEs are categorized as fulfilling the elements of corruption in criminal cases in the Central Jakarta District Court Decision Number 15/Pid.Sus-TKP/2019/PN.Jkt.Pst. This research uses normative juridical research methods using statute approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. The results showed that separated state assets are state assets originating from the state budget to be used as state equity participation in SOEs. State assets that become capital in the form of shares are no longer state assets. State assets in SOEs are limited to the ownership of the company's shares, so that if there is a loss in the SOE Persero, this is not a state loss, but a loss of the SOE. The business decisions made by the President Director of the SOE are categorized as fulfilling the elements of corruption due to a series of actions by Karen that do not entirely reflect the principle of prudence in making decisions, nor do they fully fulfil the elements of Article 97 paragraph (5) of the Limited Liability Company Law.
TRANSFER OF RIGHTS TO INDIVIDUAL OWNED LAND TO THE COMPANY Sukirman, Dani Ramdani; Wiryadi, Uyan; Budiman, Anwar
JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR), February 2025
Publisher : International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial dan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56371/jirpl.v6i2.353

Abstract

The transfer of land rights refers to the process of moving or shifting land ownership from an individual or a group of people to another individual or group. Based on Article 37 of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997, the transfer of land rights and ownership rights of a strata title unit, such as through sale, exchange, donation, incorporation into a company, and other legal acts of transfer (except for auctions), can only be officially recorded if proven by a deed created by an authorized Notary Public. Although the regulation doesn't explicitly define 'transfer' and 'transferred,' it clearly outlines the process of transferring land rights or ownership rights of a strata title unit. In practice, many people still buy and sell land without involving a notary or a Notary Public. These transactions often involve only a simple receipt as proof of the sale, without any witnesses. Due to a lack of public awareness about land transfer regulations, many land rights are transferred without any legal validity. This research employs a normative juridical approach, examining laws as they are written (law in books) and as they serve as guidelines for appropriate human behavior. It specifically focuses on the resolution of disputes involving the transfer of individual land ownership to a company, as seen in Supreme Court Decisions Number 852 K/Pdt/2021 and Number 213 K/PDT/2020. These cases highlight the importance of legal certainty when contributing buildings (without the land) as capital to a limited liability company. According to Article 34 of the Company Law, there are specific procedures for contributing capital in forms other than cash. To ensure a clear and legally valid process for contributing immovable property (other than land), a deed of contribution must be created before a Notary Public. This deed serves as official proof of the capital contribution to the limited liability company. Landowners whose land has a building that is contributed as capital to a limited liability company generally only retain ownership rights over the land itself. If there is an agreement between the landowner and the building owner (such as a cooperation agreement, profit-sharing agreement, or lease agreement), all terms, rights, and obligations must be clearly defined to prevent future disputes.
DISPARITAS PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA TANPA HAK MEMILIKI NARKOTIKA GOLONGAN 1 Rizky Wicaksono; Mardani; Uyan Wiryadi
YUSTISI Vol 11 No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ibn Khaldun Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32832/yustisi.v11i2.16693

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengidentifikasi dua permasalahan utama. Pertama, bagaimana hakim mempertimbangkan pelaku tindak pidana narkotika golongan 1 dalam dua putusan berbeda, yakni Nomor 89/PID.SUS/2020/PT MTR dan Nomor 126/PID.SUS/2019/PT MKS. Kedua, bagaimana penerapan hukum terhadap tindak pidana tersebut mengakibatkan disparitas, terutama terkait kesamaan berat di bawah 1 gram barang bukti pada putusan Nomor 147/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Pya Jo. Penelitian ini merupakan gabungan antara pendekatan hukum normatif dan empiris. Metode yang digunakan melibatkan data primer yang diperoleh melalui wawancara dengan narasumber terkait dan data sekunder yang berasal dari berbagai literatur. Perbedaan dalam pertimbangan hakim dan penerapan hukum terlihat pada kasus dengan berat barang bukti di bawah 1 gram. Penelitian menyoroti pentingnya pertimbangan terhadap SEMA No 04/Bua.6/Hs/Sp/IV/2010, khususnya terkait penempatan penyalahguna, korban penyalahgunaan, dan pecandu narkotika ke dalam lembaga rehabilitasi. Hal ini dipertimbangkan dalam putusan Nomor 147/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Pya Jo dan Nomor 89/Pid.Sus/2020/PT. MTR, namun tidak dalam putusan Nomor 6/Pid.Sus/2019/PN Ban (Narkotika) Jo Nomor 126/PID.SUS/2019/PT MKS. Kata kunci: Disparitas, Pertanggungjawaban Pidana, Narkotika
DISPARITAS PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA TANPA HAK MEMILIKI NARKOTIKA GOLONGAN 1 Rizky Wicaksono; Mardani; Uyan Wiryadi
YUSTISI Vol 11 No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ibn Khaldun Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32832/yustisi.v11i2.16693

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengidentifikasi dua permasalahan utama. Pertama, bagaimana hakim mempertimbangkan pelaku tindak pidana narkotika golongan 1 dalam dua putusan berbeda, yakni Nomor 89/PID.SUS/2020/PT MTR dan Nomor 126/PID.SUS/2019/PT MKS. Kedua, bagaimana penerapan hukum terhadap tindak pidana tersebut mengakibatkan disparitas, terutama terkait kesamaan berat di bawah 1 gram barang bukti pada putusan Nomor 147/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Pya Jo. Penelitian ini merupakan gabungan antara pendekatan hukum normatif dan empiris. Metode yang digunakan melibatkan data primer yang diperoleh melalui wawancara dengan narasumber terkait dan data sekunder yang berasal dari berbagai literatur. Perbedaan dalam pertimbangan hakim dan penerapan hukum terlihat pada kasus dengan berat barang bukti di bawah 1 gram. Penelitian menyoroti pentingnya pertimbangan terhadap SEMA No 04/Bua.6/Hs/Sp/IV/2010, khususnya terkait penempatan penyalahguna, korban penyalahgunaan, dan pecandu narkotika ke dalam lembaga rehabilitasi. Hal ini dipertimbangkan dalam putusan Nomor 147/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Pya Jo dan Nomor 89/Pid.Sus/2020/PT. MTR, namun tidak dalam putusan Nomor 6/Pid.Sus/2019/PN Ban (Narkotika) Jo Nomor 126/PID.SUS/2019/PT MKS. Kata kunci: Disparitas, Pertanggungjawaban Pidana, Narkotika
Kedudukan dan Kewenangan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK) Dalam Ketatanegaraan Indonesia Pasca Undang-Undang Baru Wiryadi, Uyan; Gifari, Fadhila; Chariansyah, Hery
Begawan Abioso Vol. 14 No. 2 (2023): Begawan Abioso
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Krisnadwipayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37893/abioso.v14i2.797

Abstract

Pentingnya independensi yang dimiliki Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK) bertujuan untuk mempercepat kinerja lembaga KPK itu sendiri. Namun, pasca disahkannya Undang-Undang KPK, kedudukan KPK yang mulanya merupakan lembaga non pemerintah kini termasuk dalam rumpun cabang kekuasaan pemerintah dan beberapa revisi terkait kewenangannya yang saat ini diatur dalam UU KPK terbaru membuat banyak kalangan ahli mengkritik hal tersebut. Penelitian normatif, peneliti tidak melakukan pengumpulan data primer melalui observasi atau eksperimen, melainkan lebih fokus pada analisis terhadap dokumen-dokumen yang sudah ada. Dengan pendekatan ini, peneliti dapat menggali pemahaman yang mendalam mengenai isu hukum yang sedang diteliti. Ada tujuh poin utama yang menjadi penilaian mengapa dalam UU KPK terbaru justru membuat KPK menjadi lemah diantaranya: Pertama, terkait kedudukan KPK yang berada dalam rumpun eksekutif yang dalam pelaksanaan kewenangan dan tugasnya tetap independen; Kedua, mengenai pembentukan Dewan Pengawas KPK; Ketiga, terkait pelaksanaan fungsi penyadapan; Keempat, mengenai mekanisme penerbitan Surat Perintah Penghentian Penyidikan (SP3) oleh KPK; Kelima, terkait koordinasi kelembagaan KPK dengan penegak hukum sesuai dengan hukum acara pidana, kepolisian, kejaksaan, dan kementerian atau lembaga lainnya dalam pelaksanaan penyelidikan, penyidikan dan penuntutan perkara tindak pidana korupsi; Keenam, mengenai mekanisme penggeledahan dan penyitaan; Ketujuh, terkait sistem kepegawaian KPK.
PEMBUKTIAN TINDAK PIDANA TERHADAP PERANTARA JUAL BELI NARKOTIKA GOLONGAN I Rifai, Choirur; Haryono, Waty Suwarty; Wiryadi, Uyan
Jurnal Ilmiah Dinamika Hukum Vol 26 No 1 (2025): Edisi April 2025
Publisher : Universitas Stikubank

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35315/dh.v26i1.10088

Abstract

Tanpa hak menjadi perantara jual beli narkotika merupakan suatu perbuatan yang bertentangan dengan hukum dan masuk dalam rumusan deli sebagaimana dirumuskan dalam Pasal 8 Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Nakotika. Dengan demikian tanpa hak menjadi perantara dalam jual beli Narkotika yang dimaksud dalam Putusan Putusan Negeri Jakarta Selatan Nomor 152/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Jkt.Sel., dan Putusan Nomor 207/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Jkt. Sel., yaitu seorang yang tidak berhak atas Narkotika Golongan I atau yang menggunakannya tidak untuk kepentingan pengobatan, tidak mendapatkan izin, dan melakukan perantara jual beli dengan melawan hukum. Penelitian ini akan menganalisis dasar pertimbangan hakim dalam memutuskan perkara dan tindak pidana tersebut menurut hukum pidana. Jenis Penelitian ini termasuk dalam penelitian pustaka (library research), sehingga mengambil dan mengolah data dari sumber-sumber kepustakaan seperti buku-buku dan jurnal yang terkait dengan penelitian ini. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif (yuridis normatif) atau penelitian doktrinal. Metode pengumpulan data penelitian ini adalah metode dokumentasi yakni data-data yang dikumpulkan dari sumber dokumen yang ditulis atau dibuat langsung oleh subjek yang bersangkutan. Dan analisis yang digunakan adalah Teknik analisis isi (Content Analysis), yaitu suatu teknik dipergunakan dalam menganalisis terhadap isi suatu informasi secara tertulis yang bertujuan untuk menarik kesimpulan dari informasi yang dianalisis tersebut. Penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa pertimbangan hakim dalam memutuskan perkara didasarkan pada alat bukti dan fakta-fakta yang telah terungkap di persidangan, terdakwa melakukan tindak pidana tanpa hak menjadi perantara jual beli narkotika dengan dakwaan alternatif yaitu melanggar Pasal 114 ayat (2) Nomor 35 tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika dan didakwa dengan dakwaan kesatu. Jual beli narkotika memiliki arti perbuatan-perbuatan yang dilarang oleh undang-undang dan dari perbuatan tersebut pelaku kejahatan akan mendapatkan sanksi hukuman karena dalam perkara ini pelaku melakukan tindak pidana.