p-Index From 2021 - 2026
5.646
P-Index
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : BISNIS

Developing Innovation Capability of SME through Contextual Ambidexterity Kusumastuti, Retno; Safitri, Nurul; Khafian, Nidaan
BISNIS & BIROKRASI: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi dan Organisasi Vol. 22, No. 1
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The word "ambidexterity" can be interpreted as the capability of an organization that simultaneously implement innovation activities both in exploratory and exploitative manner. The organization that implement these two types of innovation activity is called ambidextrous organization. In general, the studies on ambidextrous organization in the past mainly focused on structural ambidexterity whereas studies on contextual ambidexterity still got less attention. The contextual ambidexterity can be achieved through the provision of context that allow employees to implement both activities on exploration and exploitation. The Depok City in West Java was one of the municipalities that see a growing number of small and medium enterprises (SMEs). According to a data from the Depok Agency for Markets, Cooperatives and SMEs, the total number of SMEs was 2,400 units, consisting of 2,352 smaller merchants and 48 medium enterprises. The aim of this research paper was to elaborate on how far the SMEs in Depok could adopt the study of contextual ambidexterity. The research itself utilized qualitative approach with mixed methods research as its methodology by the use of questionnaires and in-depth interviews. The questionnaires were distributed to the owners of SMEs with purposive sampling technique whereas in-depth interviews were conducted on SME actors. The measurement on contextual ambidexterity was conducted with the instrument that was developed by Ghosbal and Bartlett (in Birkinshaw and Gibson, 2004). The research results indicated the capability of an organization to innovate was created through the context of organization in the form of performance management and social support. The designs of both performance management and social support from the organization could provide the context that would support the employees to perform innovative acts both in exploitative and exploratory sense.
Ownership Structure and Performance of Public Companies Listed in the Indonesian Stock Exchange Wasef, Raden Mouna; Kusumastuti, Retno
BISNIS & BIROKRASI: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi dan Organisasi Vol. 17, No. 3
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The aim of this study is to find out if the concentration of the biggest shareholder, the control rights and the ratio of cash flow rights-control rights of the controlling shareholders contributed to profitability. This study uses purposive sampling technique in collecting the data and linear panel regression in analysing the panel data. The result of this study shows that the ownership concentration of the biggest shareholders has positive impact to company profitability as big shareholders have bigger incentive and thus better chance to do supervision upon the management. The study also found that the control rights concentration of controlling shareholders have negative effect to profitability since more concentrated power of the controlling shareholders made the shareholders position stronger and may incline them to gain individual profit which in turn will reduce the company’s profit. On the contrary, higher ratio of cash flow rights to-control rights contributed positively to profitability because higher cash flow rights will tend to prevent the controlling shareholders from expropriating the company’s assets.
Analysis of The Impacts of Family Ownership on a Company’s Costs of Debt PERDANA, IDA BAGUS PUTRA; KUSUMASTUTI, RETNO
BISNIS & BIROKRASI: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi dan Organisasi Vol. 18, No. 2
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

There is an increasing trend among investors to consider Good Corporate Governance (GCG) in determining company incentives are to be invested in. Obviously, investors would prefer to make investments in companies that adopt Good Corporate Governance rather than otherwise. This view has eventually led to a belief that GCG can give added values not only to the adopting company, but also to the stakeholders. This research analyzes the impacts of family ownership and founding CEO/chairperson on a company’s costs of debt. This topic is chosen in consideration that there are still a lot of family-owned companies in Indonesia. The research uses a positivist-quantitative paradigm and the samples are 64 family-owned companies listed at the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2007 to 2009. The research also uses a random effect model. The results of the research indicate that family ownership has positive but insignificant impacts, while founding CEO/chairperson has no impacts on a company’s costs of debt.
Analysis of Ownership Structure Effect on Economic Value Added Henryani, Friska Fardhina; Kusumastuti, Retno
BISNIS & BIROKRASI: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi dan Organisasi Vol. 20, No. 3
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Ownership structure has a direct relationship with company’s capital structure where the cost of capital is the main component in the calculation of economic value added to measure the value of the firm. This research aims to analyze the effect of ownership structure that consists of managerial ownership, public ownership, institutional ownership, and government ownership on economic value added, used as a measurement of the firm value. This research uses an unbalanced panel data of 182 observations data of all listed companies in the period of 2007-2011 that issued dividend regularly every year during the research’s year. The result shows: (1) managerial ownership has no significant effect on economic value added, (2) public ownership has a significant positive effect on economic value added, (3) institutional ownership has a significant positive effect on economic value added, (4) government ownership has no significant effect on economic value added, (5) ownership structure (managerial ownership, public ownership, institutional ownership, government ownership) simultaneously has a significant positive effect on economic value added.