Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.47
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal jurnal niara Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik International Journal of Law Reconstruction Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi Nagari Law Review Unes Law Review Jambura Law Review Jurnal Yudisial Puitika Warta Pengabdian Andalas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pengembangan Dan Penerapan Ipteks Jurnal Rechts Vinding : Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Ekasakti Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian (EJPP) Ius Positum: Journal of Journal Of Law Theory And Law Enforcement Jurnal Konstitusi dan Demokrasi Lareh Law Review South East Asian Journal of Advanced Law and Governance
Simabura, Charles
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Andalas, Padang, Indonesia
Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Medicine & Pharmacology Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 18 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 18 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Kerangka Hukum Aktifasi Warisan Tambang Batu Bara Ombilin Sawahlunto dan Jalur Kereta Api Simabura, Charles
Puitika Vol. 20 No. 3 (2024): Edisi Khusus Pemetaan dan Pendokumentasian Warisan Tambang Batu Bara Ombilin S
Publisher : Universitas Andalas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/puitika.v20i3.629

Abstract

The Ombilin Sawahlunto Coal Mine World Heritage management requires a strong legal basis to guide the parties involved. This is because multiple parties, such as local governments, central governments, BUMN, and community ownership, own various world heritage sites, objects, and properties. The legal study in this paper presents the results of mapping the legislation, authority, ownership, and challenges in its management by the Management Agency that needs to be formed. With a strong legal basis, it will be able to support various steps in managing this world heritage in the future.
Reconstruction of Restrictions on the President's Power in Determining the Posture of Ministries in the Indonesian Government System Saifulloh, Putra Perdana Ahmad; Yuliandri, Yuliandri; Simabura, Charles; Fahmi, Khairul; Nur, Asrul Ibrahim
Jambura Law Review VOLUME 7 NO. 2 JULY 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33756/jlr.v7i2.29684

Abstract

This research is a critique of the 2024 State Ministry Law which gives the President the freedom to form Ministries according to his needs.. Based on this law, the President, Prabowo Subianto, formed a Cabinet consisting of 48 Ministries. For this reason, it is urgent to immediately enact a Presidential Agency Law to limit the President's power in determining the posture of ministries so that their functions do not overlap, do not reflect cabinet affairs, and prevent corruption. Through the Presidential Agency Law, it is hoped that the President will not use Ministerial positions as political barter and "share power" with political parties, coalitions and volunteers in General Elections. This research is normative research with statutory, historical, comparative and conceptual approaches. In this study it was concluded: 1).Cabinet dynamics in Indonesia after the enactment of the 2008 Law on State Ministries, namely, the Indonesia Bersatu; The Kerja Cabinet; and The Indonesia Maju Cabinet has Cabinet members, 34 Ministry; and Merah Putih Cabinet,  The number of Cabinet members is 48 Ministries in accordance with the 2024 State Ministry Law which gives the President the freedom to form Ministries according to his needs. 2).Design a Reconstruction of Restrictions on the President's Power in Determining the Posture of Ministries in the Indonesian Government System, namely: First, Establishing the Presidential Agency Law. Second, the Law on Presidential Agency must regulate the maximum number of 24 Ministries. Third, the amalgamation of Institutions within the President's circle to become an integral part of the Ministry of State Secretary. Fourth, the abolition of the Coordinating Ministry Institution. Fifth, Elimination of the Position of Vice Minister
The Decision-Making Based on Public Aspirations and Complaints through SP4N-Lapor! in Three Provinces of Indonesia Ibty, Idham; Widnyani, Ida Ayu Putu Sri; Simabura, Charles
Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik Vol 9, No 3 (2025): Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik
Publisher : Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24198/jmpp.v9i3.60928

Abstract

This study examined the role of digital public service transformation in Indonesia, focusing on decision-making based on public aspirations and complaints through SP4N- Lapor! The research method was a qualitative with a case study approach at Yogyakarta, Bali, and West Sumatra. The findings showed that the government has enhanced transparency and public service effectiveness through decision making based on digital data at SP4N-Lapor! even though mechanisms remain unstructured. In Yogyakatra, SP4N-Lapor! have a positive impact of complaint resolution and service improvement, especially for disabled communities. Further policy development is recommended, with more structured coordination and stakeholder feedback. Academics are urged to explore risk mitigation strategies involving stakeholders to address system limitations.
Presidential Power in the Formation of Cabinet Posture after the State Ministries Law 2024 Kurnia Illahi, Beni; Simabura, Charles; Kabullah, Muhammad Ichsan
Southeast Asian Journal of Advanced Law and Governance (SEAJ ALGOV) Vol 1 No 2 (2024): Public Law and The Risk of Democration Regression
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/seajalgov.v1i2.15929

Abstract

The President has the authority to determine the structure of the government under him as part of the President’s prerogative rights as regulated by Article 17 of the 1945 Constitution. Ironically, the Government and the House of Representatives insisted on changing the substance of Law No. 39 of 2008 concerning State Ministries through a swift amendment resulting in the enactment of Law No. 61 of 2024. One significant change in the new regulation is the removal of the limitation on the number of state ministries. It is necessary to examine how the constitutional mandate and the Law on State Ministries limit the president’s power in designing the cabinet posture in Indonesia. Second, what are the implications of unlimited presidential power in forming the cabinet posture from the administrative law and state finances perspective? This research uses normative juridical legal research with a descriptive nature and a prescription form. Based on the research, there are 4 (four) priority issues, first, the rise in the number of ministries will have an impact on the state budget’s ability to finance it, implications for the apparatus and infrastructure that will run government administration, further complicates the coordination function and authority between ministries, and the increasement is not in line with the government’s spirit to simplify the state institutions and regulations.
Politik Hukum Batas Minimum Usia Perkawinan Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 22/PUU-XV/2017 Sania, Yori; Simabura, Charles; Andriani, Henny
Lareh Law Review Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Lareh Law Review
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Andalas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/llr.2.1.58-72.2024

Abstract

Abstract Regulations regarding the minimum age for marriage in Indonesia have basically gone through a long history and dynamics starting from the pre-Dutch Colonial government until the New Order era when Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage was born and was most recently revised into Law Number 16 of 2019 concerning Amendments. Based on Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage. This research discusses two problem formulations, First, how is the minimum age limit for marriage regulated before the Constitutional Court Decision Number 22/PUU-XV/2017?, Second, what are the legal politics of the minimum age limit for marriage after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 22/PUU-XV/2017 ? To be able to discuss this problem, a normative juridical research method with a historical and statutory approach is used, where the data source used is a secondary data source. From the research and discussions that have been carried out, the following results were obtained: First, the history of setting the minimum age limit for marriage in Indonesia has started since pre-Dutch Colonial times where at that time the applicable marriage law was the respective religious law which was then enforced during the Dutch occupation. Classification is based on ethnicity and each group has its own rules. In the old order era, Law Number 22 of 1946 concerning Marriage Registration, Divorce and Reconciliation (hereinafter referred to as NTR) was born, in the new order era Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage was born, which was followed by its first revision in the reform era to become Law. Number 16 of 2019 concerning Amendments to Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage. Second, the will (political will) of the state authorities is a determining factor in where the law will be directed, including in the issue of determining the minimum age limit for marriage. This can be seen from the development of marriage law in Indonesia starting from the Dutch colonial period, the post-independence period, and the New Order period where marriage law experienced a very strong influence from the interests of the authorities.  
Pembaharuan Kementerian Negara Di Indonesia Ayuni, Quratta; Simabura, Charles
Nagari Law Review Vol 7 No 2 (2023): Nagari Law Review
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Andalas University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/nalrev.v.7.i.2.p.279-292.2023

Abstract

Tulisan ini membahas mengenai gagasan perbaikan terkait kementerian dan jabatan Menteri yang ada di Indonesia. Situasi pelik terkait jabatan Menteri disebabkan adanya potensi penggunaan jabatan menteri untuk kepentingan politis. Disisi lain terdapat harapan public untuk mendapatkan menteri-menteri professional yang tidak politis. Dalam momentum UU 39 Tahun 2008 tentang Kementerian Negara yang masuk dalam long list program legislasi nasional, tulisan ini berupaya memberikan masukan terhadap pembaharuan UU Kementerian tersebut. Menggunakan metode doktrinal, tulisan ini memberikan rekomendasi pembatasan terhadap wakil menteri, menteri koordinator, rangkap jabatan dan kewenangan pembentukan peraturan menteri. Gagasan ini menjadi penting, utamanya untuk memperkuat checks and balances dalam sistem presidensial di Indonesia untuk tidak kehilangan jati dirinya. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode doktrinal dengan mengkaji bahan-bahan kepustakaan untuk mencari landasan teoritis, serta menganalisis data sekunder. Keberadaan menteri dan wakil menteri yang cukup banyak dan merata pada hampir semua partai koalisi membuat mekanisme pengawasan dan legislasi parlemen menjadi lemah, sehingga diperlukan suatu pembatasan. Pembatasan lainnya yang perlu dilakukan adalah terkait kewenangan menteri dalam membentuk peraturan. Dalam hal ini salah satu jalan keluarnya adalah dengan mengembalikan kedudukan delegasi pengaturan dari undang-undang kepada Presiden, bukan peraturan menteri.
PENDAMPINGAN PEMBENTUKAN PERATURAN NAGARI DI NAGARI PANAMPUANG KABUPATEN AGAM Charles Simabura; Delyarahmi, Sucy; Arfiani Arfiani; Beni Kharisma Arrasulli; Ilhamdi Putra
Ekasakti Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): (EJPP) Ekasakti Jurnal Penelitian & Pegabdian (November 2023 - April 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/ejpp.v4i1.985

Abstract

Dosen merupakan tenaga pendidik professional dimana selain tugasnya sebagai pendidik dosen juga harus melakukan pengabdian kepada Masyarakat untuk mengimplementasikan ilmu yang sudah dipelajarinya. Berkaitan dengan hal tersebut tim penulis kemudian melakukan kegiatan pengabdian masyarakat di nagari Panampuang Kabupaten Agam. Nagari ini terdiri dari 7 (tujuh) jorong yaitu: pertama Jorong Bonjo, kedua Jorong Sungai Baraingin, ketiga Jorong Lurah, keempat Jorong Lundang, kelima Jorong Kubu, keenam Jorong Surau Laut dan ketujuh Jorong Surau Labuah. Nagari Panampuang memiliki Luas 6,8 (enam koma delapan) kilometer persegi atau kira-kira mencapai 22,18% (dua puluh dua koma delapan belas persen) bagian Kecamatan Ampek Angkek. Sesuai dengan keilmuan penulis yang berkaitan dengan ilmu perundang-undangan penulis membantu pemerintahan nagari panampuang dalam pembentukan peraturan nagari. Kegiatan ini dilakukan dengan 2 (dua) metode yaitu metode seminar dan Focus Group Discussion (FGD). Melalui kegiatan ini penulis menemukan permasalahan terkait kepenulisan rancangan perna yang kemudian penulis memberikan masukan terhadap pemerintahan nagari panampuang tentang kerangka yang benar dalam membuat Peraturan Nagari. Penulis juga turut membantu membuat pilihan kata dalam perumusan pasal-pasal yang diatur di dalam rancangan Peraturan Nagari tentang Penyelesaian Sengketa melalui Peradilan Adat di Nagari Panampuang.
Implementasi Prinsip Ultra Vires di Indonesia, Inggris, Jerman, Singapura, dan Australia Wirazilmustaan, Wirazilmustaan; Simabura, Charles
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1242

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membandingkan konsep ultra vires dalam hukum perusahaan di Indonesia, Inggris, Jerman, Singapura, dan Australia. Ultra vires mengacu pada tindakan perusahaan yang melewati batas wewenang yang telah ditetapkan dalam anggaran dasar atau memorandum of association. Setiap negara memiliki kerangka hukum yang berbeda dalam mengatasi masalah ultra vires, dan tulisan ini akan menganalisis perbedaan dan persamaan dalam pendekatan hukum kelima negara tersebut.
Co-Authors afred suci, afred Alexsander Yandra, Alexsander Alsyam Alsyam Andriani, Henny Aprilio, Dhuha Arfiani Arfiani Ayuni, Quratta Beni Kharisma Arrasulli Delfina Gusman Emy Sadjati, Emy Fajri, M. Nurul Faridhi, Adrian Henny Andriani Hilaire Tegnan Ida Ayu Putu Sri Widnyani Idham Ibty, Idham Ilhamdi Putra Khairul Fahmi Khairul Fahmi Kurnia Illahi, Beni Lucky Lhaura Van FC, Lucky Lhaura Muhammad Ichsan Kabullah Nur, Asrul Ibrahim prama widayat, prama Putra Perdana Ahmad Saifulloh Putra Perdana Ahmad Saifulloh, Putra Perdana Ahmad Quratta Ayuni Saldi Isra Sania, Yori Sayuti, Ageng Triganda Sucy Delyarahmi Wirazilmustaan Wirazilmustaan Wirazilmustaan, Wirazilmustaan Yuliandri, Yuliandri