Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Lentera Pustaka

Pusat Arsip di Era Digital: Dilema antara Urgensi dan Relevansi Sari, Indah Novita; Putranto, Widiatmoko Adi; Nurtanzila, Lastria
Lentera Pustaka: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Perpustakaan, Informasi dan Kearsipan Vol 6, No 2 (2020): December
Publisher : Library and Information Science Study Program, Faculty of Humanities, Univ. Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/lenpust.v6i2.31328

Abstract

Permasalahan pusat arsip di era digital menjadi menarik untuk diulas mengingat kondisi pusat arsip di instansi publik yang belum memadai dan kemunculan arsip elektronik sebagai tantangan baru dalam dunia kearsipan. Tema penelitian yang diangkat memang sedikit berbeda dengan penelitian sebelumnya yang lebih banyak mengkaji sarana prasarana tempat penyimpanan arsip dinamis inaktif pada instansi. Penelitian ini berfokus pada dilema urgensi dan relevansi pusat arsip di era digital. Penelitian ini dilakukan sebagai upaya penyelamatan arsip dalam berbagai format penyimpanan yang akan berguna sebagai bukti historis bagi generasi akan datang. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah kualitatif deskriptif dengan setting penelitian pada 21 instansi publik di Yogyakarta. Penulis menemukan bahwa terdapat masalah keamanan dan temu kembali arsip pada instansi publik yang di observasi. Hal ini merupakan dampak dari kurang sesuainya manajemen penyimpanan arsip secara umum, dimana arsip diletakkan pada pusat arsip, gudang dan basement yang kurang memadai. Di sisi lain, perkembangan teknologi memunculkan tantangan baru dalam pengelolaan tempat penyimpanan, sehingga arsiparis perlu merencanakan pusat data. Arsiparis berada dalam posisi sulit dikarenakan masih harus meneyelesaikan permasalahan arsip konvensional, sehingga perencanaan pusat data arsip elektronik.Pada akhirnya, penyelamatan arsip dalam berbagai format perlu dipersiapkan, baik pusat arsip maupun pusat data. Tempat penyimpanan arsip yang dapat mengakomodir berbagai format dan kebutuhan instansi, akan berdampak positif bagi kelancaran tugas sehari-hari pada instansi pemerintah dan layanan kepada publik.
Information Governance and Transparency Information: Two Sides of the Same Coin? Sari, Indah Novita; Mulya, Lillyana; Darajat, Irfan Rizky
Lentera Pustaka: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Perpustakaan, Informasi dan Kearsipan Vol 11, No 1 (2025): June
Publisher : Library and Information Science Study Program, Faculty of Humanities, Univ. Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/lenpust.v11i1.69304

Abstract

Background: Information governance plays a central role in ensuring transparency, accountability, and compliance in public institutions. In the context of public administration, particularly in Indonesia, the implementation of information governance remains inconsistent, leading to issues such as information disputes and limited access to public data. The Freedom of Information (FOI) Act was established to promote openness; however, its success depends significantly on the maturity level of information governance in public institutions.Objective: This study aims to analyze the maturity level of information governance in public institutions within the Yogyakarta Special Region and to explore the relationship between information governance and the implementation of the Freedom of Information (FOI) Act. The assessment framework is based on the maturity model developed by the Association of Records Managers and Administrators (ARMA).Methods: A mixed-method approach was employed, combining quantitative and qualitative data. Data were collected through surveys, interviews, and observations involving key informants and respondents, including heads of administrative units, information managers, and records managers. The study was conducted in eight government institutions in the Yogyakarta Special Region.Results: The maturity levels of information governance across the eight institutions vary significantly. They range from sub-standard to in development, essential, and transformational. None of the institutions achieved a fully transformational level. Only the Department of Agriculture attained levels 3 and 4 (essential and transformational) across all eight indicators: accountability, transparency, integrity, protection, compliance, availability, retention, and disposition. Most other institutions remain below the essential standard, especially in accountability and transparency, which are critical components for effective information governance. Furthermore, the study finds a strong interconnection between information governance and freedom of information: effective governance enhances FOI implementation, while the FOI Act positively influences governance practices.Conclusion: The maturity of information governance in public institutions in Yogyakarta remains uneven, with most institutions yet to meet essential standards. Strengthening accountability and transparency should be prioritized. The study concludes that information governance and freedom of information are inherently linked—improving one supports the success of the other. Enhancing information governance is thus essential for realizing the full potential of FOI implementation in public sector institutions.