Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

PENGARUH USIA TERHADAP PREVALENSI HIPERTENSI DI DUSUN JEJERUK DESA CANDIREJO KABUPATEN MAGETAN Sindy Saputri; Sindy Dwi Lestari; Roro Dyah Sekar Djatiningrum; Desti Nur Annisa; Ananda Tri Hapsari; Dhiah Dharmastuti Pinuji; Yoni Rohman; Temi Aldiansyah; Tyo Aulia Supriyanto; Imroatul Apriliana; Haryani Saptaningtyas
Jurnal Intelek Dan Cendikiawan Nusantara Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): AGUSTUS - SEPTEMBER 2024
Publisher : PT. Intelek Cendikiawan Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Di Dusun Jejeruk, Desa Candirejo, Magetan sekitar 60% dari populasi lansia mengalami hipertensi yang dipengaruhi oleh beberapa faktor yang mencakup pola makan tinggi garam, aktivitas fisik yang rendah, serta kebiasaan merokok yang masih ditemukan pada sebagian penduduk lanjut usia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh usia terhadap prevalensi hipertensi di Dusun Jejeruk Desa Candirejo Kabupaten Magetan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode analitik observasional dengan pendekatan cross sectional. Sampel penelitan ini sebanyak 40 responden yang diambil melalui pengukuran tekanan darah. Data dianalisis secara bivariat dengan menggunakan uji chi-square. Hasil penelitian mendapatkan responden laki-laki sebanyak 10 orang (25%) dan perempuan sebanyak 30 orang (75%). hasil tertinggi dari total responden yang berusia 61-70 tahun sebanyak 21 orang, terdapat 18 orang yang mengalami hipertensi (45%) dan 3 orang memiliki tekanan darah normal (8%), dari total responden yang berusia 50-60 tahun sebanyak 10 orang mengalami hipertensi (100%), dan dari total responden yang berusia 71-80 tahun sebanyak 9 orang, terdapat 8 orang yang mengalami hipertensi (20%), dan hanya 1 orang yang memiliki tekanan darah normal (3%). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa variabel usia responden memiliki hubungan yang signifikan terhadap hasil tekanan darah.. Kata Kunci : Lansia, Hipertensi, Kesehatan Masyarakat
Identifikasi Jebakan Kelompok Miskin Transien di Sumurarum Magelang Yuni Indarti; Drajat Tri Kartono; Haryani Saptaningtyas
Jurnal Humanitas: Katalisator Perubahan dan Inovator Pendidikan Vol 11 No 4 (2025): Desember
Publisher : Universitas Hamzanwadi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29408/jhm.v11i4.32931

Abstract

The issue of extreme poverty has become a global strategic issue, but ironically, transient poor households are often neglected in poverty alleviation policy schemes. This group, despite their motivation to escape poverty, is highly vulnerable to falling back below the poverty line when shocks occur. This study aims to (1) describe the conditions of transient poor households in Sumurarum Village, Magelang Regency, and (2) identify the causes of transient poverty through a participatory approach. This study uses a qualitative approach with Participatory Action Research (PAR). Data were collected through field observations, in-depth interviews, and Focus Group Discussions involving transient poor households and village officials. Data analysis was conducted qualitatively through reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The results of the study show that: 1) Transient poor households in Sumurarum Village are in a vulnerability trap, with the following characteristics: a) Marginal welfare, where households are above the poverty line but depend on fluctuating daily wages and have minimal physical assets. b) High vulnerability, where they are exposed to shocks (health, social, program failure) without adequate protection, even more vulnerable than the extremely poor who still receive social assistance. c) Systemic powerlessness, characterized by a lack of access and voice due to the failure of data collection systems and unfair access to programs at the village level. 2) Issues causing transient poverty include: a) Limited human resources (low education and informal employment), b) Inappropriate intervention design (social assistance that only provides a sense of security, not improved welfare), and c) Village institutional inefficiency (information asymmetry and lack of specific empowerment programs).