Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
2.426
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam Refleksi: Jurnal Kajian Agama dan Filsafat Walisongo: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Isamic Communication Journal Ilmu Dakwah: Academic Journal for Homiletic Studies Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah Imtiyaz : Jurnal Ilmu Keislaman TAJDID HIKMATUNA: Journal for Integrative Islamic Studies Hikmatuna
Ilyas Supena
UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 19 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Refleksi: Jurnal Kajian Agama dan Filsafat

 1 
Epistemologi Tafsir, Ta’wil, dan Hermeneutika: Kajian Komparatif Supena, Ilyas
Refleksi: Jurnal Kajian Agama dan Filsafat Vol. 10 No. 1 (2008): Refleksi
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University, Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/ref.v10i1.39673

Abstract

These writing attempts to explain the epistemological construction of the methods of exegesis (tafsir), allegorical interpretation (ta’wīl), and hermeneutics. Epistemologically, several points can be put forward. Firstly, exegesis tends to emphasize an objectivist nature, based on a linguistic approach. On the other hand, allegorical interpretation tends to emphasize a subjectivist nature, relying on an intuitive and rational approach. Meanwhile, hermeneutics tends to emphasize an intersubjectivist nature, utilizing historical, sociological, and psychological approaches. Secondly, the source of knowledge according to exegesis is the text, whereas according to allegorical interpretation it is inner experience. Meanwhile, hermeneutics considers the source of knowledge to be the textual world, as well as the worlds of the author and the reader. Thirdly, the criterion for scholarly validity used in the tradition of exegesis is the similarity or closeness between the text and its meaning. In contrast, the criterion for scholarly validity used in the tradition of allegorical interpretation can only be directly sensed and experienced through intuition, taste (dzauq), or psycho-gnosis. Meanwhile, the criterion for scholarly validity used in the tradition of hermeneutics is more dialogical and dialectical, involving the interplay between the textual world, the world of the author, and the world of the reader.
Co-Authors Abdul Karim Abu Rokhmad Agus Riyadi Aida, Bakhita Encung Fachrur Rozi Farida Rachmawati, Farida Karim, Abdul Mudhofi, M. Muhammad Sulthon Nasihun Amin nurul khotimah Putra, Pandika Adi Safrodin, Safrodin Salamah, Ika Hilmiatus Setyawan, Ari Solahuddin, Solahuddin Suparman Syukur