Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Region Enhanced Edge-Based Multi-Class Object Proposal for Self-Driving Vehicles Muhamad Amirul Haq; Le Nam Quoc Huy; Muhammad Ridlwan
Khazanah Informatika : Jurnal Ilmu Komputer dan Informatika Vol. 11 No. 1 (2025): April 2025
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/khif.v11i1.4662

Abstract

On-road object detection is a fundamental element for the safety and reliability of autonomous driving systems. A primary challenge is developing object detection algorithms that are both fast and robust. This paper introduces a novel object proposal algorithm, named Region Enhanced Edge-Based (REEB) proposal, designed to accelerate object detection by significantly reducing the number of candidate regions requiring evaluation by a subsequent classification network. REEB leverages edge-map cues to score and rank initial proposals. To further enhance both detection quality and processing speed, the algorithm integrates efficient complementary techniques: image entropy is used to guide proposal generation density in relevant image regions, and road segmentation aids in refining proposal scores by differentiating road from non-road areas. Experimental evaluations on the KITTI dataset demonstrate that REEB achieves an average recall rate of 72.1% across four classes (pedestrian, cyclist, car, and truck) with an average processing time of 15 milliseconds per image. These results indicate strong performance when compared to other traditional, non-deep learning object proposal algorithms.
IDENTITAS DAN KEBINGUNGAN PERAN TOKOH UTAMA DALAM NOVEL ARGANTARA KARYA FELISTIYANA: TINJAUAN PSIKOSOSIAL ERIK ERIKSON Nur Afifah; Mas’ulah Mas’ulah; M Ridlwan; R. Panji Hermoyo
EDUCATIONAL : Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan & Pengajaran Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Pusat Pengembangan Pendidikan dan Penelitian Indonesia (P4I)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51878/educational.v6i3.14608

Abstract

ABSTRACT Adolescence in Argantara is not portrayed as a developmental stage that unfolds without pressure, but rather as an experience in which social demands confront individual readiness. This study explores how this issue is constructed through the narrative structure and the character’s environment, while also examining the transformation of the main character’s identity from the psychosocial perspective of Erik Erikson. A qualitative-descriptive approach was employed to examine Falistiyana’s novel Argantara. The data, consisting of words, phrases, sentences, dialogues, and narratives, were obtained through intensive reading and note-taking, then classified and interpreted according to the intrinsic elements, extrinsic elements, and identity versus role confusion. The findings reveal that themes of adolescent life, progressive plot development, characterization, and setting function as narrative devices that portray the character’s psychosocial transformation. Meanwhile, family, social environment, and cultural values serve as contexts that exert pressure while simultaneously shaping the character’s responses. Role confusion becomes most evident when the main character is required to assume the status of a husband while still being a student. The narrative subsequently depicts a shift from rejection and inner conflict toward increased responsibility, emotional regulation, acceptance of consequences, and a more mature identity. Thus, the novel positions adolescent identity as a dynamic process continually negotiated through the interaction between personal conditions and social demands. ABSTRAK Masa remaja dalam Argantara tidak digambarkan sebagai tahap perkembangan yang berjalan tanpa tekanan, melainkan sebagai pengalaman ketika tuntutan sosial berhadapan dengan kesiapan individu. Penelitian ini menelusuri bagaimana persoalan tersebut dibangun melalui struktur cerita dan lingkungan tokoh, sekaligus melihat perubahan identitas tokoh utama dengan menggunakan perspektif psikososial Erik Erikson. Kajian dilakukan secara kualitatif-deskriptif terhadap novel Argantara karya Falistiyana. Data berupa kata, frasa, kalimat, dialog, dan narasi diperoleh melalui pembacaan intensif serta pencatatan, kemudian dikelompokkan dan ditafsirkan sesuai fokus unsur intrinsik, unsur ekstrinsik, serta identity versus role confusion. Hasil kajian memperlihatkan bahwa tema kehidupan remaja, alur progresif, karakterisasi, dan latar menjadi perangkat yang menampakkan perubahan psikososial tokoh. Pada sisi lain, keluarga, lingkungan sosial, dan nilai budaya hadir sebagai konteks yang memberi tekanan sekaligus membentuk respons tokoh. Kebingungan peran paling kuat muncul ketika tokoh utama harus menjalankan status sebagai suami saat masih berstatus pelajar. Perjalanan cerita kemudian memperlihatkan pergeseran dari penolakan dan konflik batin menuju peningkatan tanggung jawab, pengendalian emosi, penerimaan konsekuensi, dan identitas yang lebih matang. Dengan demikian, novel ini memosisikan identitas remaja sebagai proses dinamis yang terus dinegosiasikan melalui pertemuan antara kondisi personal dan tuntutan sosial.
REPRESENTASI KEKERASAN DALAM NOVEL NAMAKU ALAM KARYA LEILA S. CHUDORI: KAJIAN SOSIOLOGI SASTRA JOHAN GALTUNG Isma Sholihah; Mas’ulah Mas’ulah; M Ridlwan; Suher Suher
EDUCATIONAL : Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan & Pengajaran Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Pusat Pengembangan Pendidikan dan Penelitian Indonesia (P4I)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51878/educational.v6i3.14610

Abstract

ABSTRACT The experience of violence in Namaku Alam does not end when past political events come to an end; instead, it continues to shape how characters are treated, perceived, and positioned within social life. Leila S. Chudori’s novel (2023) serves as the object of this study to explore how the legacy of violence operates through the interplay of actions, social structures, and cultural constructions. The study draws on Johan Galtung’s Triangle of Violence within the perspective of literary sociology, employing a qualitative-descriptive approach and content analysis. The data, consisting of words, phrases, sentences, dialogues, monologues, and narratives related to violence, were obtained through repeated reading and systematic note-taking, then classified and interpreted according to their contextual occurrence. The findings reveal three interconnected layers of violence. Direct violence appears through arrests, torture, murder, intimidation, insults, and sexual violence; structural violence operates through institutional discrimination, restrictions on rights and mobility, passport revocation, and exclusion; while cultural violence manifests through stigma, labeling, prejudice, bullying, and the normalization of exclusion. Their interconnectedness demonstrates that stigma can reinforce discrimination, discrimination can create space for direct violence, and the overall process sustains intergenerational trauma and injustice. ABSTRAK Pengalaman kekerasan dalam Namaku Alam tidak berakhir ketika peristiwa politik masa lalu selesai, tetapi terus hadir melalui cara tokoh diperlakukan, dinilai, dan ditempatkan dalam kehidupan sosial. Novel Leila S. Chudori (2023) tersebut menjadi objek kajian untuk menelusuri bagaimana warisan kekerasan bekerja melalui hubungan antara tindakan, struktur sosial, dan konstruksi budaya. Penelitian ini berpijak pada teori Segitiga Kekerasan Johan Galtung dalam perspektif sosiologi sastra, dengan pendekatan kualitatif-deskriptif dan teknik content analysis. Data berupa kata, frasa, kalimat, dialog, monolog, serta narasi yang berkaitan dengan kekerasan diperoleh melalui pembacaan berulang dan pencatatan sistematis, kemudian diklasifikasikan serta ditafsirkan berdasarkan konteks kemunculannya. Hasil kajian memperlihatkan tiga lapisan kekerasan yang saling terhubung. Kekerasan langsung muncul melalui penangkapan, penyiksaan, pembunuhan, intimidasi, penghinaan, dan kekerasan seksual; kekerasan struktural berlangsung melalui diskriminasi institusional, pembatasan hak dan mobilitas, pencabutan paspor, serta pengucilan; sedangkan kekerasan kultural beroperasi melalui stigma, pelabelan, prasangka, perundungan, dan normalisasi pengucilan. Keterhubungan ketiganya memperlihatkan bahwa stigma dapat menopang diskriminasi, diskriminasi membuka ruang bagi kekerasan langsung, dan keseluruhan proses tersebut mempertahankan trauma serta ketidakadilan antargenerasi.
TINDAK TUTUR ILOKUSI DAN PERLOKUSI DALAM INTERAKSI TOKOH PUBLIK DENGAN WARGANET DI TIKTOK: STUDI PADA AKUN @GIBRAN_RAKABUMING Nyoman Aprilia Cintya Dewi; M Ridlwan; R. Panji Hermoyo
ACADEMIA: Jurnal Inovasi Riset Akademik Vol. 6 No. 4 (2026)
Publisher : Pusat Pengembangan Pendidikan dan Penelitian Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51878/academia.v6i4.14312

Abstract

ABSTRACT Public figures’ interactions on TikTok present a pragmatic issue when the intentions conveyed through their utterances are not always interpreted uniformly by audiences. Differences in interpretation can be seen in netizens’ comments, which may reinforce, question, or redirect the meaning of the messages conveyed. This issue provides the basis for examining the forms of illocutionary speech acts on the TikTok account @gibran_rakabuming, the perlocutionary responses of netizens, and the relationship between the two within a single communicative event. The study employed a pragmatic approach and a descriptive qualitative method to examine utterances in posts and related comments published from February to April 2026. Data were collected through non-participant observation and documentation, then analyzed through identification, classification, interpretation, and presentation according to the communicative context. The findings revealed four forms of illocutionary speech acts, namely assertives, directives, expressives, and commissives, while perlocutionary responses were categorized into support and agreement, criticism and rejection, and humor and sarcasm. Their relationship indicates that netizens’ responses do not emerge automatically from the speaker’s intentions but are shaped by the context and audience interpretation. These findings position public figures’ communication on TikTok as a pragmatic process in which meaning is continually negotiated through the interaction between utterances and audience responses within the digital sphere. ABSTRAK Interaksi tokoh publik di TikTok menghadirkan persoalan pragmatik ketika maksud yang dibangun melalui tuturan tidak selalu diterima audiens dalam pemaknaan yang seragam. Perbedaan penafsiran tersebut tampak melalui komentar warganet yang dapat memperkuat, mempertanyakan, atau mengubah arah makna pesan yang disampaikan. Persoalan ini menjadi dasar penelitian untuk mengkaji bentuk tindak tutur ilokusi pada akun TikTok @gibran_rakabuming, respons perlokusi warganet, serta keterkaitan keduanya dalam satu peristiwa komunikasi. Kajian dilakukan dengan pendekatan pragmatik dan metode deskriptif kualitatif terhadap tuturan dalam unggahan dan komentar yang berkaitan selama Februari–April 2026. Data diperoleh melalui observasi nonpartisipan dan dokumentasi, kemudian ditelaah melalui identifikasi, klasifikasi, interpretasi, dan penyajian sesuai konteks komunikasi. Hasil kajian memperlihatkan empat bentuk ilokusi, yakni asertif, direktif, ekspresif, dan komisif, sedangkan respons perlokusi terbagi menjadi dukungan dan persetujuan, kritik dan penolakan, serta humor dan sindiran. Keterkaitan keduanya memperlihatkan bahwa respons warganet tidak terbentuk secara otomatis dari maksud penutur, melainkan dipengaruhi konteks dan penafsiran audiens. Temuan ini menempatkan komunikasi tokoh publik di TikTok sebagai proses pragmatik yang maknanya terus dinegosiasikan melalui interaksi antara tuturan dan respons audiens dalam ruang digital.