Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.721
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal LAW REVIEW Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Jurnal Yudisial PALAR (Pakuan Law review) SIGn Jurnal Hukum SABDAMAS Jurnal Rechts Vinding : Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Enrichment: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Lex Scientia Law Review
Velliana Tanaya
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pelita Harapan
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 25 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : LAW REVIEW

 1 
PENERAPAN PEMBATASAN SOSIAL BERSKALA BESAR (PSBB) AKIBAT PANDEMI CORONAVIRUS DISEASE 2019 (COVID-19) SEBAGAI FORCE MAJEURE DALAM KONTRAK [Implementation of Large-scale Social Restrictions due to Coronavirus Disease-19 (Covid-19) Pandemic as Force Majeure in Contract] Velliana Tanaya; Jessica Angeline Zai
Law Review Volume XXI, No. 1 - July 2021
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pelita Harapan | Lippo Karawaci, Tangerang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lr.v0i0.3805

Abstract

A contract is an agreement made by the parties in written form. An agreement is a binding agreement between two or more people. This incident resulted in a legal relationship between the parties, which in the agreement included the rights and obligations of each party. In a contract, there is always a force majeure clause, the arrangements are made to protect the debtor when carrying out his obligations there has been an unexpected event beyond his fault. Since the end of 2019 until now the spread of Covid-19 has been very widespread and has had an impact on slowing economic growth, resulting in the fulfillment of contract achievements executed by the parties. This article was made to examine the classification of force majeure in contracts in connection with the widespread spread of Covid-19 which resulted in the contract relationship not going well, but it was not automatically used as an excuse to cancel a contract. The research method used is normative legal research with a legal and conceptual approach. The result of the research is that the force majeure clause can be an attempt to restructure or change the contents of the agreement while taking into account the agreement of the parties through the negotiation process. The concept of force majeure in the context of non-natural disasters as regulated in Presidential Decree No. 12 of 2020, which is the discharge of responsibility and the release of fulfillment of one party's achievements for a while or is called relative force majeure. The parties' discretion is needed to carry out business contract negotiations such as rearranging the fulfillment of achievements as stated in the contract.Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: Sebuah perjanjian adalah persetujuan yang dibuat oleh para pihak dalam bentuk tertulis. Perjanjian tersebut kemudian mengikat dua pihak atau lebih. Hal ini menimbulkan hubungan hukum di antara para pihak, di mana di dalamnya terdapat hak dan kewajiban masing-masing pihak. Dalam sebuah perjanjian akan selalu ada klausul force majeure, yang ditujukan utnuk melindungi debitur jika pada saat melaksanakan kewajibannya terdapat kejadian di luar kesalahannya. Sejak akhir tahun 2019 hingga sekarang, penyebaran Covid-19 semakin meluas dan berdampak pada kelesuan pertumbuhan ekonomi, dan pemenuhan kewajiban dalam perjanjian oleh para pihak. Artikel ini bertujuan meneliti klasifikasi force majeure dalam kontrak dalam hubungannya dengan penyebaran Covid-19 yang berdampak pada hubungan kontraktual menjadi tidak lancar, namun tidak otomatis membatalkan perjanjian tersebut. Metode penelitian yang digunakan ialah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan undang-undang dan konseptual. Hasil dari penelitian ialah klausul force majeure dapat menjadi upaya untuk merestuktur atau mengubah isi perjanjian dengan tetap memperhitungkan kesepakatan para pihak melalui proses negosiasi. Konsep force majeure dalam konteks bencana non-alam yang diatur dalam Keputusan Presiden No. 12 Tahun 2020, melepaskan tanggung jawab pemenuhan perjanjian untuk sementara waktu, atau yang disebut dengan force majeure relatif. Keputusan para pihak dibutuhkan dalam bernegosiasi untuk melangsungkan pemenuhan prestasi yang diatur dalam perjanjian.
BENTUK KETERLIBATAN PEMEGANG SAHAM DALAM PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM PERSEROAN TERBATAS YANG DAPAT MEMPERLUAS PERTANGGUNGJAWABANNYA Velliana Tanaya
Law Review Volume XVII, No. 3 - March 2018
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pelita Harapan | Lippo Karawaci, Tangerang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lr.v17i3.834

Abstract

Limited Liability Company is the most popular form of business entity in Indonesia because law acknowledges the principle of limited liability of its shareholders, which gives advantages for entrepreneurs running a business. Article 3 Subsection 1 Law No. 40 Year 2007 concerning Limited Liability Company stated that company’s shareholders are not personally liable for agreements made on behalf of the Company and are not liable for the Company’s losses in excess of their prospective shareholding. However, in Article 3 Subsection 2 there are some waivers of the principle, one of the exceptions is if the relevant shareholders are involved in illegal actions committed by the Company. It is interesting because in fact, usually, shareholder do not get involved in company’s management. Through normative research with Statute and Conceptual Approach on Piercing the Corporate Veil, shareholders can be accountable for personal responsibility if shareholders in giving his/her voting rights in General Meeting of Shareholders neglect his/her duty of care, or if besides of being shareholders he/she also become Board of Directors and/or Board of Commissioners who runs the Company’s management, or if the shareholders give order or command to Board of Directors or Board of Commissioners or company’s employee to perform actions that causing the Company committed an unlawful act and harm others (tort). Personal liability can be requested if injured party filing a tort lawsuit and set the relevant shareholders as a defendant besides the Company.
LAND GRABBING AS UNLAWFUL ACT Catherine Susantio; Velliana Tanaya; Cassey Regina Salamintargo
Law Review Volume XXII, No. 1 - July 2022
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pelita Harapan | Lippo Village, Tangerang 15811 - Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lr.v0i1.5100

Abstract

Land cases in Indonesia are one of the most common types of cases in Indonesia. The forms of land cases that often arise are related to land grabbing, namely illegal taking of land belonging to other party. An example of a land grabbing case can be seen in the Supreme Court Decision Number 1071 K/PDT/2020 where the Plaintiff is the rightful owner of a piece of land with property rights in Tanjung Jabung Barat Regency, Jambi Province as proven by the Certificate of Ownership, but then Defendant I came to take the land belonging to the Plaintiff by constructing a building on the land without a permit and refusing to move even though it has been given a warning, so that the Plaintiff feels aggrieved. Therefore, the author intends to find out how an act can be classified as against the law and what kind of compensation arrangements are in accordance with applicable regulations. The research method used is normative legal research method and the approach used is law approach and case approach. The results showed that land grabbing done by Defendant I could be classified as an act against the law because all the elements had been fulfilled; while related to losses due to unlawful acts in the form of land grabbing, the most appropriate compensation is the return of the Plaintiff’s condition to its original state.
Co-Authors Abraham Jiavello Rumampuk Akila Kieyenatama Kristanto Aldryan Perez Elisa Paka Angeline, Felicia Audrea Dindya Djohan Baretta, Nicole Cassey Regina Salamintargo Catherine Susantio Catrina Yuka Chen, Natasya Edgina Desuardi, Shabrina Aurellia Nafisah Dian Parluhutan Dicky Winata Dicky Winata, Dicky Djohan, Audrea Dindya Dwi Nugraha Dwi Putra Nugraha Elisa Paka, Aldryan Perez Elizabeth Prima Ratrisari elsa, elsa Emmanuel Stutanto, Theodore Francisco Fajar Sugianto Felicia Angeline Gisella Helga Xaviera Gunadi, Chaterine Grace Gunawan, Anneke Catlynne Gunawan, Lauren Angel Gymnastiar, Rigan Haganta Orvin Ginting Harimurti Adi Nugroho Indrakusuma, Jason Jason Matthew Anthony Jemimah Puteri Rajagukguk Jessica Angeline Zai Jessica Vincentia Marpaung Jessy Yohanes Jordan Baros Indraputra Silalahi Jordan Baros Indraputra Silalahi Joseph Radya Pandu Nararya Kristanto, Akila Kieyenatama Kwu, Paulina Shelly Lee, Elena Philomena Lo, Adeline Marpaung, Jessica Vincentia Matthew Benedictus Manuputty Mirelle Elicia Perera Nadya Aurelia, Caitlynn Nathanael, Sheren Christabella Nugraha, Dewi Nugraha, Dwi Nugroho, Harimurti Adi P. Karo, Rizky Pratama Paulina Shelly Kwu Perera, Mirelle Elicia Putri, Intan Indriani Putri, Veronica Salim, Hartono Agus Shabrina Aurellia Nafisah Desuardi Sheren Christabella Nathanael Silalahi, Jordan Baros Indraputra Silalahi, Thomas Rifera Indraputra Singgih, Marvino Nathanael Steven Ignatius Chandra Subiran, Danishel Thomas Rifera Indraputra Silalahi Thomas Rifera Indraputra Silalahi Veronica Enjelina Manalu Veronica Putri Xaviera, Gisella Helga Yamamoto, Atsuko Yap, Celine Alexia Yohanes, Jessy Yuka, Catrina