Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.302
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Qanun: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pembaharuan Hukum Islam Arena Hukum Sriwijaya Law Review Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Undang: Jurnal Hukum Kosmik Hukum PEDULI: Jurnal Imiah Pengabdian Pada Masyarakat Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum International Journal of Business, Law, and Education Jurnal Rechts Vinding : Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ) IBLAM Law Review International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences PATTIMURA Legal Journal The Indonesian Journal of Socio-Legal Studies Epistemé: Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Keislaman JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies)
Fachrizal Afandi
Universitas Brawijaya
Religion Arts Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Neuroscience Social Sciences Other

Published : 25 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : IBLAM Law Review

 1 
The Urgency of Regulating Asset Recovery at the District Attorney Level to Ensure the Exclusionary Rules Principle in Corruption Crimes Adhyaksa, Fredi Wahyu Putra; Djatmika, Prija; Afandi, Fachrizal
IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): IBLAM LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM IBLAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v6i1.641

Abstract

Corruption is categorized as an extraordinary crime that requires extraordinary measures. One important strategy is asset recovery to compensate for state losses. However, the absence of explicit regulations regarding the principle of exclusionary rules in Indonesian positive law has caused disharmony between theory and practice. Purposes of the Research: This study aims to analyze the implications of asset recovery regulations on the application of exclusionary rules in the enforcement of criminal acts of corruption. Methods of the Research: This study uses a normative juridical method with a legislative and conceptual approach, focusing on the analysis of regulations and the authority of the District Attorney's Office related to asset recovery. Results / Main Findings / Novelty/Originality of the Research:The results of the study show that the lack of regulations and SOPs at the District Attorney's Office level has the potential to weaken the legitimacy of law enforcement. This condition emphasizes the need for comprehensive regulations that explicitly include the principle of exclusionary rules. In addition, the establishment of an Asset Recovery Section in the District Attorney's Office is necessary to ensure effectiveness, legal certainty, and justice in combating corruption.
Reformulasi Pengaturan Hakim Ad Hoc untuk Pemerataan Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Kabupaten/Kota Lanita, Tiara; Sugiri, Bambang; Afandi, Fachrizal; Tilman, Aquelino da Costa
IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): IBLAM LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM IBLAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v6i1.663

Abstract

Pengaturan hakim ad hoc dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 46 Tahun 2009 tentang Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi masih bersifat sentralistik dan belum sepenuhnya mampu menjawab kebutuhan keadilan di tingkat daerah. Pola rekrutmen yang terpusat menyebabkan konsentrasi hakim ad hoc di kota-kota besar, khususnya ibu kota provinsi, sehingga menimbulkan ketimpangan distribusi Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Tipikor). Kondisi ini berdampak pada terbatasnya akses keadilan bagi masyarakat di kabupaten/kota yang jauh dari pusat pemerintahan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kelemahan pengaturan hakim ad hoc dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 46 Tahun 2009 yang menghambat pemerataan pembentukan Pengadilan Tipikor di daerah. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual, menggunakan bahan hukum primer dan sekunder yang diperoleh melalui studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa mekanisme rekrutmen hakim ad hoc yang bersifat nasional belum mendukung prinsip desentralisasi peradilan Tipikor. Reformasi pengaturan diperlukan melalui penerapan rekrutmen berbasis kebutuhan daerah dengan mempertimbangkan jumlah perkara, tingkat kerawanan korupsi, dan ketersediaan sumber daya manusia lokal. Selain itu, dibutuhkan model kelembagaan yang lebih fleksibel, transparan, dan akuntabel guna memperkuat pemerataan akses keadilan.
Co-Authors Abdul Madjid Abdul Majid Abdul Majid ABDUL RACHMAD BUDIONO Adhyaksa, Fredi Wahyu Putra Annisa Azzahra Burhan Aria Perkasa Utama Bagaskoro, Ladito Risang Budi Suhariyanto, Budi Daru Adianto Ezenduka, Uzodinma Yurriens Gaol, Michael Yudhistira Lumban Heru Kurniawan I Nyoman Nurjaya I NYOMAN NURJAYA Imam Koeswahyono Kariawan, I Ketut Dody Arta Lanita, Tiara Lilik Mulyadi Lucky Endrawati Martri Sonny Michael Yudhistira Lumban Gaol Milda Istiqomah Monnachu Wemonicha Lovina Muhammad Fathony Rizky Noorizain Muhammad Luthfi Muhammad S.R.P., Sri Gilang Nababan, Anisa Magdalena Nurini Aprilianda Prija Djatmika Prija Djatmika, Prija Prischa Listiningrum Ramadan, Muhammad Anugrah Sasongko, Andy Septiawan Ridho Permadi Setiawan Noerdajasakti Sugiri, Bambang Thesa Tamara Sanyoto Tilman, Aquelino da Costa