Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.189
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Qanun: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pembaharuan Hukum Islam Brawijaya Law Journal : Journal of Legal Studies Arena Hukum Sriwijaya Law Review Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Undang: Jurnal Hukum Kosmik Hukum PEDULI: Jurnal Imiah Pengabdian Pada Masyarakat Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum International Journal of Business, Law, and Education Jurnal Rechts Vinding : Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ) IBLAM Law Review International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences The Indonesian Journal of Socio-Legal Studies Epistemé: Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Keislaman JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies)
Fachrizal Afandi
Universitas Brawijaya
Religion Arts Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Neuroscience Social Sciences Other

Published : 24 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 24 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Reformulasi Pengaturan Hakim Ad Hoc untuk Pemerataan Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Kabupaten/Kota Tiara Lanita; Bambang Sugiri; Fachrizal Afandi; Aquelino da Costa Tilman
IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): IBLAM LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM IBLAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v6i1.663

Abstract

Pengaturan hakim ad hoc dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 46 Tahun 2009 tentang Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi masih bersifat sentralistik dan belum sepenuhnya mampu menjawab kebutuhan keadilan di tingkat daerah. Pola rekrutmen yang terpusat menyebabkan konsentrasi hakim ad hoc di kota-kota besar, khususnya ibu kota provinsi, sehingga menimbulkan ketimpangan distribusi Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Tipikor). Kondisi ini berdampak pada terbatasnya akses keadilan bagi masyarakat di kabupaten/kota yang jauh dari pusat pemerintahan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kelemahan pengaturan hakim ad hoc dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 46 Tahun 2009 yang menghambat pemerataan pembentukan Pengadilan Tipikor di daerah. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual, menggunakan bahan hukum primer dan sekunder yang diperoleh melalui studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa mekanisme rekrutmen hakim ad hoc yang bersifat nasional belum mendukung prinsip desentralisasi peradilan Tipikor. Reformasi pengaturan diperlukan melalui penerapan rekrutmen berbasis kebutuhan daerah dengan mempertimbangkan jumlah perkara, tingkat kerawanan korupsi, dan ketersediaan sumber daya manusia lokal. Selain itu, dibutuhkan model kelembagaan yang lebih fleksibel, transparan, dan akuntabel guna memperkuat pemerataan akses keadilan.
The Urgency of Gender-Based Counterterrorism Policy Regulation in Indonesia Milda Istiqomah; Fachrizal Afandi
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 6 Issue 2, July 2022
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol6.Iss2.1628.pp205-223

Abstract

Gender-based counterterrorism in Indonesia still has not yet obtained greater attention from policy stakeholders. The role of women in handling terrorism cases is still lacking and results in the absence of gender sensitivity. This research aims to analyse regulations regarding policies on terrorism that are spread out not only at the level of laws but also at a more technical level of regulations. This research also involves the analysis on the urgency for policy regulation for gender-based counterterrorism. This research combines both legal/juridical-normative research and juridical-empirical/socio-legal research. The results of this research indicate that counterterrorism regulation in Indonesia is still general or gender-neutral. From an institutional perspective, the institutions that handle the criminal act of terrorism, which are the National Counter-Terrorism Agency (BNPT) and Special Detachment 88 for Anti-Terrorism (Densus 88 AT), have not accommodated a gender perspective. Consequently, the involvement of female law enforcement officials is still limited. Further, the issue of “silo mentalities" among these institutions has resulted in partial counterterrorism policies that are issued by each institution. Policy stakeholders should cooperate with other government institutions and increase the involvement of women in counterterrorism strategies to ensure that counterterrorism policies integrate a gender perspective.
Regulating Prosecutorial Independence and Impartiality in The Indonesian Criminal Justice System Fachrizal Afandi
Kosmik Hukum Vol. 25 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30595/kosmikhukum.v25i2.25981

Abstract

This article examines prosecutorial independence in Indonesia by analyzing three key aspects: the status of prosecutors as civil servants, the constitutional position of the Prosecution Service, and the role of prosecutors in the criminal justice system. It applies an interdisciplinary legal research method by reviewing laws, regulations, and relevant theories. Understanding these aspects helps assess whether the current legal framework adequately protects prosecutors from external influence and recognizes them as independent legal actors, similar to magistrates in other jurisdictions. Prosecutorial independence and impartiality ensure fairness in the criminal justice system. In Indonesia, prosecutors work as civil servants, similar to those in many inquisitorial systems. However, the law does not clearly define their role as magistrates with judicial authority. This legal uncertainty makes them vulnerable to political and hierarchical pressure, which can influence their decisions. A strong legal framework must protect prosecutors from external interference and allow them to act independently, as magistrates do in other systems. The findings highlight a critical issue: the law classifies prosecutors as civil servants but does not formally recognize them as independent legal actors. This gap allows political leaders, superiors, and other parties to interfere in prosecutorial decisions. Without strong legal protection, prosecutors struggle to maintain impartiality. This article argues that lawmakers must formally recognize prosecutors as independent legal actors, similar to magistrates. Legal reforms should strengthen prosecutorial independence and prevent undue influence. A clear legal framework will protect prosecutors, enhance public trust, and uphold justice in Indonesia.
The Role Of The Legal System And Law Enforcement In Handling Crimes Of Corruption: A Comparative Analysis Of Indonesia, Malaysia, And Thailand Michael Yudhistira Lumban Gaol; Abdul Majid; Fachrizal Afandi
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 1 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i1.5012

Abstract

The  criminal  act  of  corruption  that  is  rampant  in  the  country  is  not  only  detrimental  to  state  finances  but  is  a  violaton  of  the  social  and  economic  rights  of  society  at  large,  corruption  is  no  longer  a  national  problem,  but  has  become  a  transnational  phenomenon  so  that  internatonal  cooperaton  is  essential  in  preventing  and  eradicating  it.  , in  fact,  for  what  has  been  caused  by  the  crimnal  act  of  corrupton,  extraordinary  efforts  are  needed  in  terms  of  prevention  and  eradication  of  crimnal  acts  of  corruption.  One  of  the  efforts  to  prevent  Indonesia  from  falling  due  to  corruption  is  to  confiscate  and  return  assets  resulting  from  corrupton  crimes  based  on  the  laws  and  regulations  in  force in  the  Indonesan  legal  system.  in  Indonesia,  there  is  no  uinfied  institution  that  has  the  right  to  deal  with  corruption.  The  eradication  of  corruption  in  Indonesia  is  carred  out  by  3  state  institutions,  namely  the  Attorney  General's  Office,  the  Police,  and  the  Corrupton  Eradication  Commission  (KPK).  The  eradication  of  corruption in  one  country  will  not  run  optimally  if  it  is  not  supported  by  the  government's  political  will  to  eradicate  corruption,  the  unity  of  state  institutions  that  eradicate  corrupton,  and  the  enforcement  of  existing  corrupton  eradication  regulations.
Co-Authors Abdul Madjid Abdul Majid ABDUL RACHMAD BUDIONO Annisa Azzahra Burhan Aquelino da Costa Tilman Bagaskoro, Ladito Risang Bambang Sugiri Budi Suhariyanto, Budi Daru Adianto Heru Kurniawan I Nyoman Nurjaya I Nyoman Nurjaya Imam Koeswahyono Lilik Mulyadi Lucky Endrawati Martri Sonny Michael Yudhistira Lumban Gaol Milda Istiqomah Monnachu Wemonicha Lovina Muhammad Fathony Rizky Noorizain Muhammad Luthfi Muhammad S.R.P., Sri Gilang Nababan, Anisa Magdalena Nurini Aprilianda Prija Djatmika Prischa Listiningrum Ramadan, Muhammad Anugrah Sasongko, Andy Septiawan Ridho Permadi Thesa Tamara Sanyoto Tiara Lanita