Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.515
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Diponegoro Law Review Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune Nagari Law Review JURNAL MERCATORIA Unes Law Review Media Iuris UNES Journal of Swara Justisia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Ekasakti Journal of law and Justice Lareh Law Review Jurnal Sakato Ekasakti Law Review
Ulfanora, Ulfanora
Faculty Of Law, Universitas Andalas
Humanities Education Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 33 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 33 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
Civil Liability Digital Platform Regarding Personal Data Leaks Following the Enactment of Law Number 27 of 2022 Concerning Personal Data Protection Ulfanora; Nanda Utama
Jurnal Sakato Ekasakti Law Review Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Sakato Ekasakti Law Review
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/1m23nk09

Abstract

The rapid development of technology has impacted various aspects of life, including economic, social, cultural, legal, and political aspects. This technological advancement has transformed the way people communicate and the provision of government services to the public. Information technology has become a new way for people to obtain information autonomously. Technology has become a Human Right to Digital Access. In general, the public is not yet aware of the impact of information misuse, resulting in low awareness of personal data protection. As a form of government concern for the public, who are both users and actors in this digital development, various regulations or rules have been established to provide legal protection for all people in utilizing the currently rapidly developing digital advancements. The existence of Law Number 27 of 2022 concerning Personal Data Protection is due to the numerous cases of data leaks in Indonesia. Research results explain thatFirst, Indonesia has ratified personal data protection regulations since 2022. The ratification of personal data protection regulations is effective starting from 2024. When Law Number 27 of 2022 concerning personal data protection was ratified into regulations and implemented in society, there were still shortcomings that became obstacles in its implementation in society.Second,. Following the enactment of Law Number 27 of 2022 concerning Personal Data Protection, the civil liability of digital platforms has provided legal certainty. Law Number 27 of 2022 concerning Personal Data Protection explicitly places the burden of responsibility on them as data controllers. If a leak occurs due to a security system failure, they can no longer avoid legal responsibility to compensate for the losses you have suffered as a data subject.
Bank's Position as a Holder of Lien Objects Confiscated By The State From a Public Interest Perspective Ulfanora; Tasman
Jurnal Sakato Ekasakti Law Review Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Sakato Ekasakti Law Review
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/7zmnr097

Abstract

Banking plays a strategic role in supporting national development through its financial intermediation function. One of the main instruments in banking activities is collateral, which provides legal certainty for creditors. However, problems arise when the collateral is seized by the state in corruption cases. The conflict between the bank's right of execution as the creditor holding the collateral and the state's interest in recovering assets resulting from corruption creates legal uncertainty that has a systemic impact on public trust in the banking sector. One form of uncertainty regarding bank collateral is the ease with which the state can seize the collateral for reasons of public interest. In this case, banks lack legal protection and strong legal certainty as the separatist party holding the collateral. The research results show, first, that Supreme Court Regulation Number 2 of 2022 concerning Procedures for Resolving Objections from Good-Faith Third Parties to Decisions on Confiscation of Property Not Owned by the Defendant in Corruption Cases does not provide adequate protection for banks because it only accommodates third parties with physical ownership of the assets. Furthermore, Supreme Court Decision No. 540 K/Pdt/2022 reinforces the tendency to prioritize state interests, weakening the legal position of banks as collateral holders. As agents of development, banks have a public interest that should be protected by law to maintain national economic stability. Therefore, regulatory reform is needed that explicitly recognizes banks as third parties acting in good faith in the Banking Law. Furthermore, the position of banks as collateral holders in Law Number 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage Rights needs to be explicitly regulated by adding a norm or paragraph to Article 9 in Part III concerning Grantors and Holders of Mortgage Rights. Furthermore, there needs to be an exception in the Corruption Crime Law regarding the seizure of tangible and intangible movable assets that have become collateral objects by banks. This way, there is legal certainty for banks as creditors with separatist rights over material objects, allowing them to directly execute their collateral objects without the need for asset seizure by the state.
Pengaturan Hukum Tentang Penggunaan Jasa Influencer Untuk Mempromosikan Saham Dalam Upaya Memberikan Perlindungan Investor Pasar Modal Lutfi Akalil akalil; Ulfanora Ulfanora; Muhammad Ikhsan Alia
Lareh Law Review Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Lareh Law Review
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Andalas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/llr.4.1.35-48.2026

Abstract

The rise of stock influencers providing investment recommendations through social media without official OJK permission poses the risk of market manipulation and losses for investors, as reflected in the case of Belvin Tannadi, who was fined IDR 5.35 billion by the OJK in February 2026. This study aims to analyze the legal regulations governing influencer involvement in stock promotions and the forms of legal protection for investors from the dissemination of misleading information. The method used is normative legal research with a descriptive-analytical approach. The results show that regulations regarding stock influencers are still scattered across various regulations and have not yet formed a comprehensive system. POJK Number 13 of 2025 is the first regulation specifically governing influencer involvement, but its scope is limited to influencers partnered with securities companies, leaving independent influencers in a legal vacuum. Legal protection for investors includes a preventive dimension through regulation, licensing, and financial literacy, as well as a repressive dimension through administrative sanctions, criminal sanctions, and civil lawsuits. However, its effectiveness is still hampered by weak oversight and the difficulty of proving losses. More inclusive regulatory reforms accompanied by strengthened technology-based oversight are needed to achieve optimal investor protection. Keywords : Capital Market,  Investor Protection, Market Manipulation, POJK Number 13 of 2025, Stock Influencers
Co-Authors Almaududi Almaududi Almaududi, Almaududi Amelia, Dian Arya Putra Rizal Pratama Arya Putra Rizal Pratama Aziz, Harry Azhar Devianty Fitri Dian Amelia Dian Amelia Febrizal, M. Iflah Fitri, Devianty Heni Pujiastuti Inayatul Husna Kumala, Wisnu Lutfi Akalil akalil M. Iflah Febrizal Muhammad Ikhsan Alia Nanda Oetama Nanda Utama Nanda Utama Oetama, Nanda Syam, Misnar Tasman Tasman Tasman Tasman Tasman Utama, Nanda Wisnu Kumala Yaswirman, Yaswirman Zulkifli Zulkifli