Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

Antara Autentisitas dan Kepastian Hukum: Analisis Terhadap Akta Pernyataan Keputusan Rapat yang Tidak Dibacakan di Hadapan Notaris Kusumawati, Raden Krishnaputri Devi; Martanti, Yurisa; Prasetyo, Dedy Ardian
Politica: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam Vol 12 No 1 (2025): POLITICA: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam
Publisher : Prodi Tata Negara (Siyasah) IAIN Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/politica.v12i1.12474

Abstract

The Deed of Statement of Meeting Resolution, as an authentic deed, must be read and signed before a notary in accordance with Article 16 paragraph (1) letter (m) of the Notary Office Law. In practice, however, this requirement is often neglected, leading to legal uncertainty. This study aims to analyze the legal consequences and legal certainty of deeds that are not read and signed before a notary. The research applies normative juridical methods with legislation, case, and conceptual approaches, supported by legal literature as primary and secondary sources. The analysis uses legal interpretation and construction techniques. The findings show that the absence of reading and signing before a notary nullifies the authenticity of the deed, resulting in new legal conditions, the alteration or termination of legal relationships, and potential sanctions. Legal certainty requires clear regulations, consistent application, approval by citizens, independent judiciary, and enforceable court decisions. The study recommends legal outreach by supervisory councils to notaries regarding due diligence principles and updated regulations, as well as public legal education on the validity of authentic deeds.
Legal Reformulation of Ultra-Micro Financing as an Instrument for Strengthening the People's Economy in Indonesia Tambunan, Melpa; Prasetyo, Dedy Ardian; Patarawadee, Patarawadee
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (Agustus)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v4i2.1448

Abstract

Ultra Microfinance (UMi) is one of the inclusive strategies to encourage people's economic growth, especially for small businesses that have not been reached by the formal financial system. However, the implementation of this program still faces obstacles due to the lack of comprehensive and responsive legal regulations. This research aims to analyze the gap between legal norms and the practice of ultra-micro financing implementation in the field and offer an adaptive and equitable legal reformulation model. Using a juridical-normative and empirical approach, data was collected through a literature study, interviews with micro business actors, and focus group discussions (FGDs) with lending institutions and stakeholders. The results show that the lack of legal protection, regulatory incoherence, and low legal literacy of the community hinder the effectiveness of the UMi program. Therefore, regulatory reformulation is needed in the form of a master legal framework that includes clear legal substance, strong institutional structure, and participatory legal culture. This research offers a conceptual model of legal reformulation of ultra-micro financing based on the principles of distributive justice, financial inclusion, and legal responsiveness. The results are expected to provide conceptual and practical contributions in the development of financing law policies that favor the community and support inclusive and sustainable national economic development.
Corporate Human Rights Due Diligence in Transnational Business: Towards a Binding Normative Framework in International Private Law Cindya, Cindya; Prasetyo, Dedy Ardian; Akkapin, Supaphorn
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (Inpress Desember)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v4i3.1712

Abstract

The global expansion of transnational corporations has intensified concerns over human rights (HR) violations, including forced labor, environmental harm, and the displacement of local communities. Existing international instruments—such as the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) and OECD Guidelines—remain non-binding and lack effective enforcement. While regional initiatives like the European Union’s Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) signal a transition toward binding obligations, their territorial scope limits broader applicability. This gap underscores the pressing need for normative frameworks that supersede voluntary standards. This study adopts a normative juridical methodology, analyzing international instruments, landmark cases (Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum and Chevron v. Ecuador), and comparative regulatory approaches. The findings demonstrate that private international law offers untapped potential to embed HR due diligence (HRDD) obligations within transnational business practices. Contractual mechanisms, choice of law clauses, and international arbitration can transform HRDD into binding legal commitments, complementing public international law while addressing jurisdictional and enforcement barriers. The novelty of this research lies in reframing private international law as a substantive tool for human rights enforcement. It advances the paradigm of “privatization of human rights accountability,” expanding the discourse on corporate accountability beyond the limits of public law. Practically, the study contributes actionable models for regulators and corporations to integrate HRDD into global supply chains, thereby strengthening both human rights protection and sustainable corporate governance