Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.346
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al Hurriyah : Jurnal Hukum Islam Politea : Jurnal Politik Islam Abdi Masyarakat Al-Manhaj: Journal of Indonesian Islamic Family Law JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Law and Civil Law Istinarah: Riset Keagamaan, Sosial dan Budaya Al-Mujtahid: Journal of Islamic Family Law Al Hurriyah : Jurnal Hukum Islam Business Management SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum MAHAKIM: Journal of Islamic Family Law GEMOVE Journal of Gender Movement and Empowerment Journal of Tabulation Economic Data Politea : Jurnal Pemikiran Politik Islam
suci ramadhani putri
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Neuroscience Social Sciences Other

Published : 23 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
The Family Crisis Behind Democracy: An Analysis of Family Resilience of 2024 General Election Organizers in North Lombok Regency Putri, Suci Ramadhani; Anam, Ahmad Gautsul; Nizamudin, Nizamudin
POLITEA Vol 8, No 1 (2025): Politea : Jurnal Pemikiran Politik Islam
Publisher : State Islamic Institute of Kudus (IAIN Kudus)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21043/politea.v8i1.31607

Abstract

This study aims to examine the forms of crisis experienced by the families of General Election organizers in North Lombok and examine their family resilience, efforts to negotiate roles amidst the demands of public and domestic spaces. This research is a qualitative study that uses an ethnographic approach. The data analysis of this research uses a stepwise forward method. The primary data source of this research is the travel experience of the General Election organizers and their families during the stages of the Regional Head Election in North Lombok. Secondary data are literature, documents, journals relevant to this research. Data collection was conducted using interview, observation and documentation techniques. The results of this study found that Election Organizers in North Lombok experienced a family crisis due to the demands of the domestic space and family space. The crisis faced by female organizers tends to be more complex than male organizers. In facing the crisis, some families are resilient, while others end up not resilient. This research argues that democracy will not run healthily if the actors of democracy, namely Election Organizers, experience a family crisis. Therefore, family resilience is an important foundation for the quality of democracy itself. 
Family Conflict Resolution Patterns: A Study of Wet Sesait in North Lombok Suci Ramadhani Putri; Raden Sumiadi; Sinardi Sinardi
JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pendidikan (LPP) Mandala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58258/jihad.v8i2.10630

Abstract

This study examines the patterns of family conflict resolution practiced by the Sesait Customary Law Community (Wet Sesait) in North Lombok. Using a legal sociology approach with qualitative methods, this research analyzes the integration between Tau Lokaq Empat (the traditional leadership structure) and the Majelis Krama Desa (MKD) in resolving family conflicts. Tau Lokaq Empat consists of four pillars: Mangku Gumi (traditional/adat leader), Jintaka (socio-economic leader), Penghulu (religious leader), and Pemusungan (governmental leader). The MKD, established under North Lombok Regent Regulation No. 20 of 2017, functions as a formal village institution integrating three legal systems: positive law, customary law, and religious law. Research findings reveal that conflict resolution follows a structured yet flexible procedure involving complaint submission, victim-centered verification, formal meetings integrating all four Tau Lokaq Empat pillars, and participatory mediation that synthesizes positive law, customary, and religious perspectives. The binding force of MKD decisions derives from dual legitimacy: formal legal legitimacy through the regent's regulation and socio-cultural legitimacy through the involvement of Tau Lokaq Empat. This integrative model demonstrates constructive legal pluralism in practice, where different legal systems function as complementary resources that create comprehensive and contextual justice, rather than competing entities. This study contributes to understanding how indigenous communities maintain traditional conflict resolution mechanisms while adapting to formal legal systems, offering important lessons for victim-centered restorative justice approaches
Consent-Based Approach Dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual: Kajian Komparatif Dan Prospek Adopsi Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia Irpan Suriadiata; Suci Ramadhani Putri
SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, Juni 2026
Publisher : LPPM Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi 45 Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/seikat.v5i3.2554

Abstract

:  Pengesahan Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2022 tentang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual (UU TPKS) merupakan tonggak legislatif penting dalam upaya perlindungan korban di Indonesia. Namun demikian, terdapat kesenjangan mendasar yang belum terjawab: undang-undang ini mempertahankan pendekatan pembuktian berbasis paksaan, bukan mengadopsi consent-based approach yang telah menjadi standar normatif global. Artikel ini mengkaji mengapa Indonesia belum mengadopsi consent-based approach dan apa implikasi yuridis serta sosiokultural dari pilihan tersebut. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dan pendekatan komparatif-perundang-undangan, penelitian ini menganalisis implementasi model persetujuan di Swedia, Inggris, Kanada, Jepang, dan Belanda, serta mengevaluasi kompatibilitasnya dengan tradisi civil law dan konteks sosiokultural Indonesia. Penelitian menemukan bahwa adopsi penuh model affirmative consent atau communicative consent berisiko menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum dan ketidaksesuaian struktural. Sebagai novelty, artikel ini mengusulkan model hibrida Contextual Consent with Structural Presumption yang mempertahankan kerangka dasar UU TPKS namun menambahkan rebuttable presumption of non-consent pada relasi kuasa asimetris sebagaimana diatur Pasal 6 dan Pasal 12. Model ini, didukung panduan yudisial dan reformasi prosedural berbasis trauma, menawarkan jalur adopsi bertahap yang kompatibel dengan sistem hukum Indonesia sekaligus memperkuat perlindungan korban secara efektif.
Co-Authors Ahmad Ahmad Anam, Ahmad Gautsul Andi Pranata, Andi Arqurnain, Weis Baiq Ratna Mulhimmah Baiq Ratna Mulhimmah Deva Yulinda Elmhemit, Hüseyin I Putu Buda Yasa Imron Hadi Irpan Suriadiata Junaedi Junaedi Mahfuz, M. Mahfuz, Muhammad Mariani, Dina Mutia Sari, Dian Aulia Nizamudin Nizamudin Nizamudin, Nizamudin Raden Sumiadi Raden Sumiadi Rosdiyanti, Evi Sinardi Sinardi Siti Aminah Suharti Weis Arqurnain Yulinda, Deva