Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search
Journal : Al-Ahkam

EKSEKUSI HUKUMAN MATI - Tinjauan Maqāṣid al-Sharī’ah dan Keadilan Yahya, Imam
AL-AHKAM Volume 23, Nomor 1, April 2013
Publisher : AL-AHKAM

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (60.419 KB)

Abstract

Perdebatan tentang hukuman mati, hingga kini masih menarik perhatian banyak kalangan. Setidaknya ada dua mainstream dalam hal ini, yaitu orang yang setuju dan menolak diberlakukan hukuman mati. Bagi yang setuju beralasan bahwa pelanggaran berat terhadap hak hidup, harus diancam hukuman mati sehingga bisa menjadi efek jera, sementara yang menolak berpendapat bahwa hukuman mati meru­pakan pengingkaran terhadap hak asasi manusia, yaitu berupa hak hidup. Hakekat hukuman mati bukanlah pelanggaran hukum, karena penerapan hukuman mati justru ditegakkan dalam rangka melindungi Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM) itu sendiri. Dalam pandangan hukum Islam, hukuman mati, dapat dilakukan terhadap empat kasus, yaitu yang melakukan zina muhṣan, membunuh dengan sengaja, ḥirābah dan murtad (keluar dari Islam). Selanjut­nya hukuman mati harus dilaksanakan sesuai dengan maqāṣid al-sharī’ah dan keadilan. Dalam perspektif maqāṣid tujuan hukuman mati harus merujuk pada tujuan me­melihara agama (ḥifẓ al-dīn), memelihara diri atau menjaga kelangsungan hidup (ḥifẓ al-nafs), akal (ḥifẓ al-‘aql), keturunan (ḥifẓ al-nasl), dan memelihara harta (ḥifẓ al-māl). Dalam perspektif keadilan, negara atas nama hukum harus melindungi warganya dari peristiwa-peristiwa hukum yang merugikan masya­rakatnya.***The debate about death penalty, is still attracted attention of people. At least, there are, two mainstream firstly those who agrees and secondly who refuses the death penalty being imposed. For those who agrees reasoned that severe violations of the right to life, should be punished by death so that could provide a deterrent effect, while those who refuses argued that the death penalty is a denial of human rights, especially right to life. The essence of the death penalty is not a violation of the law, because the imple­mentation the death penalty actually enforced in order to protect human rights itself. In the view of Islamic law, death penalty, can be done on four cases, namely that of adultery, killing intentionally, Hirabah and apostasy. Furthermore, the death penalty should be carried out in accordance with maqāṣid al-sharīah and justice. In maqāṣid al-sharīah perspective, the purpose of death penalty should refer to maintain religion (ḥifẓ al-dīn), maintain body or maintain the survival (ḥifẓ al-nafs), mind (ḥifẓ al-aql), descent (ḥifẓ al-nasl), and maintaining property (ḥifẓ al-māl). While in the perspective of justice, State, on behalf of the law must protect its citizens from legal events that harm society.***Keywords: hukuman mati, maqāṣid al-sharī’ah, keadilan
EKSEKUSI HUKUMAN MATI Tinjauan Maqāṣid al-Sharī’ah dan Keadilan Yahya, Imam
Al-Ahkam Volume 23, Nomor 1, April, 2013
Publisher : Faculty of Shariah and Law, State Islamic University (UIN) Walisongo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (290.337 KB) | DOI: 10.21580/ahkam.2013.23.1.74

Abstract

The debate about death penalty, is still attracted attention of people. At least, there are, two mainstream firstly those who agrees and secondly who refuses the death penalty being imposed. For those who agrees reasoned that severe violations of the right to life, should be punished by death so that could provide a deterrent effect, while those who refuses argued that the death penalty is a denial of human rights, especially right to life. The essence of the death penalty is not a violation of the law, because the implementation the death penalty actually enforced in order to protect human rights itself. In the view of Islamic law, death penalty, can be done on four cases, namely that of adultery, killing intentionally, Hirabah and apostasy. Furthermore, the death penalty should be carried out in accordance with maqāṣid al-sharī'ah and justice. In maqāṣid al-sharī'ah perspective, the purpose of death penalty should refer to maintain religion (ḥifẓ al-dīn), maintain body or maintain the survival (ḥifẓ al-nafs), mind (ḥifẓ al-'aql), descent (ḥifẓ alnasl), and maintaining property (ḥifẓ al-māl). While in the perspective of justice, State, on behalf of the law must protect its citizens from legal events that harm society.
Zakat Management in Indonesia: a Legal Political Perspective Yahya, Imam
Al-Ahkam Volume 30, Nomor 2, Oktober 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Walisongo Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (342.751 KB) | DOI: 10.21580/ahkam.2020.30.2.6420

Abstract

This article aims to describe the management of zakat in Indonesia in a political and legal perspective carried out by BAZNAS (Badan Amil Zakat Infaq and Sadaqah) and LAZ (Lembaga Amil Zakat). Management of zakat management in a political-law approach is manifested in the zakat management regulations in Indonesia, namely Law no. 23 of 2011 concerning Zakat Management. Through literature research with a political-law approach, this research finds the following three points. First, the existence of BAZNAS is legitimized by law as a non-structural institution under the President, which has the authority to manage zakat, whether it is the collection, distribution or development of zakat assets. Second, as a consequence, taxes that have been paid through central BAZNAS or regional BAZNAS can reduce taxable assets. Third, BAZNAS has the power to recommend LAZ as well as supervise LAZ's performance at all levels, and the results are reported to BAZNAS.
EKSEKUSI HUKUMAN MATI Tinjauan Maqāṣid al-Sharī’ah dan Keadilan Imam Yahya
Al-Ahkam Volume 23, Nomor 1, April, 2013
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Walisongo Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (290.337 KB) | DOI: 10.21580/ahkam.2013.23.1.74

Abstract

The debate about death penalty, is still attracted attention of people. At least, there are, two mainstream firstly those who agrees and secondly who refuses the death penalty being imposed. For those who agrees reasoned that severe violations of the right to life, should be punished by death so that could provide a deterrent effect, while those who refuses argued that the death penalty is a denial of human rights, especially right to life. The essence of the death penalty is not a violation of the law, because the implementation the death penalty actually enforced in order to protect human rights itself. In the view of Islamic law, death penalty, can be done on four cases, namely that of adultery, killing intentionally, Hirabah and apostasy. Furthermore, the death penalty should be carried out in accordance with maqāṣid al-sharī'ah and justice. In maqāṣid al-sharī'ah perspective, the purpose of death penalty should refer to maintain religion (ḥifẓ al-dīn), maintain body or maintain the survival (ḥifẓ al-nafs), mind (ḥifẓ al-'aql), descent (ḥifẓ alnasl), and maintaining property (ḥifẓ al-māl). While in the perspective of justice, State, on behalf of the law must protect its citizens from legal events that harm society.
Zakat Management in Indonesia: a Legal Political Perspective Imam Yahya
Al-Ahkam Vol 30, No 2 (2020): October
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Walisongo Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (342.751 KB) | DOI: 10.21580/ahkam.2020.30.2.6420

Abstract

This article aims to describe the management of zakat in Indonesia in a political and legal perspective carried out by BAZNAS (Badan Amil Zakat Infaq and Sadaqah) and LAZ (Lembaga Amil Zakat). Management of zakat management in a political-law approach is manifested in the zakat management regulations in Indonesia, namely Law no. 23 of 2011 concerning Zakat Management. Through literature research with a political-law approach, this research finds the following three points. First, the existence of BAZNAS is legitimized by law as a non-structural institution under the President, which has the authority to manage zakat, whether it is the collection, distribution or development of zakat assets. Second, as a consequence, taxes that have been paid through central BAZNAS or regional BAZNAS can reduce taxable assets. Third, BAZNAS has the power to recommend LAZ as well as supervise LAZ's performance at all levels, and the results are reported to BAZNAS.