Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 14 Documents
Search

Mediation of Criminal Cases as an Effort to Settle Criminal Actions Based on Local Wisdom in Indonesia Budisetyowati, Dwi Andayani; Joko Sriwidodo; Rr. Dijan Widijowati; Juanda
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 3 No. 4 (2023): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (August 2023)
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v3i4.245

Abstract

Penal mediation is carried out to bring together criminal offenders and victims, so this penal mediation is often also known as "Victim Offender Mediation" (VOM). In Indonesia itself, the use of mediation can be seen in Law No. 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Dispute Resolution. Settlement of cases through mediation is in line with the concept of local wisdom that lives in Indonesian society. The noble values contained in the Pancasila state foundation fade with the times and technology; the values contained therein, such as divinity, justice, decency, harmony, unity, humanity, and mutual cooperation, are no longer reflected in the lives of the nation, state, and society. Society is also included in the formulation of legal products. Penal mediation is less well known among Indonesians. In mediation, the urgency is the value of Pancasila in the settlement of criminal cases in Indonesia, which is the community's need for a progressive, humane criminal dispute settlement that provides a sense of justice for victims, society, and perpetrators, which cannot be carried out by national criminal law. The local wisdom of people in various regions of Indonesia in the settlement of criminal disputes based on deliberation and consensus (mediation) as local institutions has not been utilized optimally in answering this problem. The formation of law in Indonesia is based on historical aspects and is in accordance with the conditions and circumstances of the people. In mediation, it requires the involvement of all stakeholders in solving criminal acts through mediation based on local wisdom using impartial or neutral media and mediators.
Penegakan Hukum Terhadap WNA Pemegang Visa Izin Tinggal Terbatas (ITAS) Atas Tindakan Pelanggaran Izin Tinggal M. Rangga Rantis Veri K; Joko Sriwidodo
Bhayangkara Law Review ##issue.vol## 2 ##issue.no## 1 (2025): June 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31599/mp5dph91

Abstract

Artikel ini membahas penegakan hukum terhadap warga negara asing (WNA) pemegang Izin Tinggal Terbatas (ITAS) yang melakukan pelanggaran terhadap ketentuan izin tinggal di Indonesia. Dalam kerangka sistem keimigrasian nasional yang didasarkan pada prinsip selective policy, keberadaan orang asing di Indonesia harus memberikan manfaat serta tidak menimbulkan ancaman terhadap keamanan dan ketertiban umum. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus, untuk menganalisis kelemahan normatif dan struktural dalam praktik pemberian dan pengawasan ITAS, khususnya dalam konteks pelanggaran oleh WNA yang menyalahgunakan status tinggalnya untuk aktivitas ilegal seperti prostitusi dan kejahatan siber. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa kendati regulasi telah menetapkan batasan tegas dalam Undang-Undang No. 6 Tahun 2011 dan Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan HAM No. 22 Tahun 2023, implementasi di lapangan masih menghadapi tantangan berupa lemahnya koordinasi lintas lembaga dan minimnya integrasi sistem pengawasan. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan reformasi regulasi ITAS yang bersifat substantif, berbasis risiko, serta penguatan penegakan hukum terhadap pelanggaran izin tinggal untuk memastikan bahwa prinsip selective policy tidak hanya bersifat normatif, tetapi terwujud secara efektif dalam praktik keimigrasian Indonesia
Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Surat Berupa Laporan Penilaian Aset Pasal 263 KUHP Rama Ramadhan; Lukman Hakim; Joko Sriwidodo
Bhayangkara Law Review ##issue.vol## 2 ##issue.no## 1 (2025): June 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31599/x1ncs730

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji tindak pidana pemalsuan dokumen berupa laporan penilaian aset yang dilakukan oleh Kantor Jasa Penilai Publik (KJPP), yang diatur secara hukum dalam Pasal 263 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP). Laporan penilaian aset adalah dokumen resmi yang memainkan peran penting dalam transaksi ekonomi, seperti pembiayaan bank, perpajakan, dan akuisisi aset. Namun, dalam praktiknya, dokumen ini sering dimanipulasi atau dipalsukan untuk kepentingan tertentu, yang dapat menyebabkan kerugian hukum dan finansial bagi pihak lain. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dan pendekatan kasus untuk menganalisis regulasi hukum serta pertanggungjawaban pidana terkait pemalsuan laporan penilaian aset. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa laporan penilaian aset yang dipalsukan dapat memenuhi unsur-unsur tindak pidana berdasarkan Pasal 263 KUHP, terutama jika dibuat dengan niat jahat untuk menipu atau menguntungkan pihak tertentu. Selain itu, pelanggaran terhadap Standar Penilaian Indonesia (SPI) dan Kode Etik Penilai Indonesia (KEPI) menjadi landasan untuk pertanggungjawaban pidana dan administratif, baik bagi individu maupun korporasi. Penegakan hukum yang konsisten diperlukan untuk menjaga integritas profesi penilai dan kepercayaan masyarakat terhadap sistem pembuktian hukum di Indonesia.
Legal Review of the Attorney General's Authority in Carrying Out Asset Recovery of the Proceeds of Money Laundering Crimes Ade Onny Siagian; ST Laksanto Utomo; Joko Sriwidodo
Law and Justice research journal Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): April: Law and Justice research journal
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/ljrj.v2i2.140

Abstract

Money laundering is a derivative crime that is frequently associated with corruption and has the potential to cause significant losses to state finances. Efforts to recover assets derived from criminal activities constitute an essential aspect of law enforcement aimed at restoring state losses and creating a deterrent effect for perpetrators. This study aims to analyze the authority of public prosecutors in the investigation of money laundering crimes as well as the mechanisms for state asset recovery based on the authority of the Indonesian Attorney General’s Office. The research method employed is normative juridical research using statutory and case approaches. The results of this study indicate that the Attorney General’s Office possesses clear and legally valid authority to conduct investigations into money laundering crimes as regulated under Law Number 8 of 2010 concerning the Prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering and the Law on the Attorney General’s Office. Prosecutors are authorized to trace, seize, confiscate, and recover assets derived from criminal acts without first proving the predicate offense. This study further emphasizes that although the authority of the Attorney General’s Office has been normatively regulated, in practice, state asset recovery continues to face various obstacles, both in substantive and procedural law, such as inconsistencies in statutory regulations and the suboptimal implementation of non-conviction-based asset forfeiture. Therefore, strengthening regulations and harmonizing legal policies are necessary to ensure that state asset recovery through the handling of money laundering crimes can be carried out more effectively and provide legal certainty.