Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.112
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Wahana Didaktika Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Gammath : Jurnal Ilmiah Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika ALGORITMA : Journal of Mathematics Education LINEAR: Journal of Mathematics Education Hipotenusa: Journal of Research Mathematics Education (HJRME) Smart Society: Community Service and Empowerment Journal Inovasi Matematika (Inomatika) CONSEN: Indonesian Journal of Community Services and Engagement Cartesian: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Lampung
Desrina Hardianti
Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Muhammadiyah Lampung, Indonesia
Religion Humanities Computer Science & IT Education Engineering Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mathematics Physics Social Sciences Other

Published : 20 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : cartesian jurnal pendidikan matematika

 1 
Profil Kemampuan Literasi Matematis Siswa pada Materi Program Linear Ditinjau dari Gaya Berpikir Gregorc Utami, Lintang Fitra; Hardianti, Desrina; Rahayu, Chika; Asyhara, Suryatul Aini
Cartesian: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Cartesian Vol. 5 No. 2 April 2026
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika FIP UNHASY

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33752/cartesian.v5i2.11538

Abstract

This study aims to describe mathematical literacy abilities as viewed through Gregorc’s thinking styles, which are classified into four types: concrete sequential (CS), abstract sequential (AS), concrete random (CR), and abstract random (AR). This study is a qualitative descriptive study. Subjects were selected using purposive sampling from a population of 23 11th-grade MIPA students. The sample consisted of two students representing each thinking style category. Data collection techniques included a mathematical literacy test and the Gregorc thinking style questionnaire. The results of this study indicate that CS and AA students generally able to construct models, apply them, and interpret results, but they still lack precision. AS students tend to be less systematic and less accurate in their problem-solving, while CR students still struggle to understand information and determine solutions. Overall, differences in thinking styles influence students’ precision, thoroughness, and accuracy in solving mathematical problems.
Co-Authors Alfusori, Wahyu Andika Eko Prasetiyo Antonio, Joemar P Arnelis Djalil Astuti Anggra Niwi Ningsih, Sri Asyhara, Suryana Aini B A Priatna Deni Efendi Deni Efendi Desmayanasari, Dwi Dopy Rizko Dwi Desmayanasari Dwi Desmayanasari Elsa Kurnia Falamy, Ryna Aulia Fitra Utami, Lintang Fitria Lestari Lintang Fitra Utami M. Coesamin M. Yogi Riyantama Isjoni Mar’atus Sholehah, Anis Muhammad Riansyah N Priatna Nadia Putri, Desta Noprisa, Noprisa Nurain Suryadinata Purwaningtias, Shindi Putra Wijaya, Agung Rahayu, Chika Rani Yosilia Retno Dumila Riansyah, Muhammad Rini Asnawati Sugeng Sutiarso Suryatul Aini Asyhara Tia Agnesa Triyana Dara Ubaidillah, Muhammad Wahyu Alfurosi Yanuar Dwi Prastyo Zakiya, Hanifah Zuniawati, Afdella