Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
5.745
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal LEX ADMINISTRATUM JURNAL HUKUM UNSRAT LEX PRIVATUM LEX CRIMEN KESMAS LEX ET SOCIETATIS JURNAL LPPM BIDANG EKOSOSBUDKUM Journal on Education Jurnal Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora AL-Ishlah : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Jurnal Nuansa Akademik: Jurnal Pembangunan Masyarakat Journal of the Community Development in Asia International Journal of Accounting & Finance in Asia Pasific Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum
Jemmy Sondakh, Jemmy
Universitas Sam Ratulangi
Religion Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 41 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 10 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal of the Community Development in Asia

 1 
LEGAL DISCRETION AND STATE RESPONSIBILITY TO REALIZE POLITICAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW FOR FOREIGNERS WITHOUT DOCUMENTS Valent Pontororing; Ronald Mawuntu; Jemmy Sondakh; Caecilia Waha
Journal of the Community Development in Asia (JCDA) Vol 5, No 3 (2022): Journal of the Community Development in Asia (JCDA)
Publisher : AIBPM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (179.244 KB) | DOI: 10.32535/jcda.v5i3.1798

Abstract

The population living without documents in Indonesia continues to grow from year to year. Law No. 12 of 2006 concerning Citizenship and Immigration Law. Number has not provided a solution regarding their residence permit status and citizenship.Problems that arise the number of people who are settlers without documents increases, especially if they have mixed marriages with Indonesians. The handling so far that has been carried out by the government is only unclear and tends to ignore the problem of how the state's discretion and responsibility towards foreign citizens are without documents. By using normative research methods, research is carried out. The results of the study a. the immigration office's discretion regarding the status of foreigners without documents is unclear. b. The state is not responsible for the status and existence of foreign citizens without documents by neglecting their civil rights status c. Politics of protecting human rights against foreign nationals without documents are unclear until now. Keywords: Foreign Citizens Without Documents, Discretion, and Immigration
The Right to Life Based on Human Rights Principles: A Normative Study of the Death Penalty in Indonesia Doortje Durin Turangan; Emma V.T. Senewe; Wempie Jh. Kumendong; Jemmy Sondakh
Journal of the Community Development in Asia (JCDA) Vol 4, No 2 (2021): Journal of The Community Development in Asia (JCDA)
Publisher : AIBPM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (227.45 KB) | DOI: 10.32535/jcda.v4i2.1095

Abstract

The right to life is the absolute right of every person and is included in the category of rights that cannot be reduced. Indonesia is one of the countries that still maintains and recognizes the legality of the death penalty as a way to punish the perpetrators of certain criminal acts such as narcotics, terrorism, and murder crimes despite the pros and cons. This study aims to investigate the regulation of the right to life against the death penalty in Indonesia, the construction of the death penalty law from human rights viewpoint, and the judge's consideration in imposing the death penalty associated with the principles of human rights. This study used a qualitative normative juridical approach by referring to the legal norms in statutory regulations and norms of the society. The findings highlight that the early existence of the death penalty in Indonesia is legally regulated in the Criminal Code, most of which are from the Netherlands, namely WvS (Wetboek van Strafrecht).
The Court Ruling Regarding Gender Change in Human Rights Law Fernando J. M. M. Karisoh; Caecilia J. J. Waha; Jemmy Sondakh; Emma V. T. Senewe
Journal of the Community Development in Asia (JCDA) Vol 4, No 3 (2021): Journal of The Community Development in Asia (JCDA)
Publisher : AIBPM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (188.673 KB) | DOI: 10.32535/jcda.v4i3.1183

Abstract

The phenomenon of gender change in Indonesia shows that many people want to change their gender. This study aims to examine and analyze legal arrangements in the field of human rights regarding gender change, the implementation of court decisions in Indonesia regarding gender change and the effect of the formation of laws and regulations that specifically regulate gender change on court decisions in Indonesia. Normative research carried out by means of law, conceptual and case approaches. The results showed international agreements and national legislation have not specifically regulated gender change. The court ruling is based on consideration of the results of the medical examination and legal considerations. The establishment of legislation in particular can strengthen court ruling.
The Existence of Nedosa Customary Offence in the Sangihe Community Related to the Development and Renewal of the National Criminal Law Michael Barama; J. Ronald Mawuntu; Caecilia J. J. Waha; Jemmy Sondakh
Journal of The Community Development in Asia Vol 5, No 1 (2022): Journal of The Community Development in Asia (JCDA)
Publisher : AIBPM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (205.516 KB) | DOI: 10.32535/jcda.v5i1.1393

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to conduct an analysis and study related to how the existence of the Nedosa offense as a Sangihe customary crime and how this offense is included in the renewal of the national criminal law. The prohibition of Nedosa is still existed nowadays and is obeyed by the community and traditional leaders, the settlement is still using customary law methods even though the judicial system has been implemented by the general court. By using a normative juridical research method that focuses on the study of documents and legal materials, both laws and customary decisions are found to be (1) Judiciary, using Law No. 1 Drt/1951 concerning Provisional Measures to Organize Unitary Powers and Procedures for Civil Courts. (2) The case of Donor or “Blood Pollution” (Delik Nedosa) is a unique crime that only exists in the Sangihe Talaud Customary Rules. Both 1917 and 1932 customary rules as well as the 1951 declaration stated that marriage is forbidden between people whose families are in a straight line up and down, cousins, and siblings. The maximum penalty is 5 years in prison. Therefore, the role of the Nedosa offense is very important in the customary law which is still respected and obeyed by the Sangihe Talaud community today. Nedosa's offense is wider than Zinah in the Criminal Code because this offense is related to religion and the perpetrator will be thrown into the sea.
Discretion of Government Officials in the Perspective of Corruption Crime Reviewed from the Theory of Criminal Removal Reason Altje Agustin Musa; Jemmy Sondakh; Wempie Jh. Kumendong; Caecilia J.J. Waha
Journal of The Community Development in Asia Vol 5, No 1 (2022): Journal of The Community Development in Asia (JCDA)
Publisher : AIBPM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (167.864 KB) | DOI: 10.32535/jcda.v5i1.1389

Abstract

Providing welfare for all citizens is the goal of the Indonesian state. In government administration, government officials are often faced with concrete social situations urgently to be addressed, while regulations are unclear. To overcome government stagnation, government officials are given the authority to act based on their own considerations, called discretion. The study aims to analyze the discretionary case and find the relationship between discretion in the perspective of corruption and the theory of criminal removal reason. The study finds that Criminal Code regulates Criminal Removal Reasons concerning defending to save on body, soul, or goods of someone/others, not government officials discretion to defend social interest. The Corruption Law does not regulate Criminal Removal Reason. In judicial corruption in Indonesia, Government officials' discretion was not sentenced because the decision/act is based on considerations of urgency, for the public interest, and does not benefit the government officials/others.
Discretion of Government Officials in the Perspective of Corruption Crime Reviewed from the Theory of Criminal Removal Reason Musa, Altje Agustin; Sondakh, Jemmy; Kumendong, Wempie Jh.; Waha, Caecilia J.J.
Journal of The Community Development in Asia Vol 5, No 1 (2022): January 2022
Publisher : AIBPM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32535/jcda.v5i1.1389

Abstract

Providing welfare for all citizens is the goal of the Indonesian state. In government administration, government officials are often faced with concrete social situations urgently to be addressed, while regulations are unclear. To overcome government stagnation, government officials are given the authority to act based on their own considerations, called discretion. The study aims to analyze the discretionary case and find the relationship between discretion in the perspective of corruption and the theory of criminal removal reason. The study finds that Criminal Code regulates Criminal Removal Reasons concerning defending to save on body, soul, or goods of someone/others, not government officials discretion to defend social interest. The Corruption Law does not regulate Criminal Removal Reason. In judicial corruption in Indonesia, Government officials' discretion was not sentenced because the decision/act is based on considerations of urgency, for the public interest, and does not benefit the government officials/others.
LEGAL DISCRETION AND STATE RESPONSIBILITY TO REALIZE POLITICAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW FOR FOREIGNERS WITHOUT DOCUMENTS Pontororing, Valent; Mawuntu, Ronald; Sondakh, Jemmy; Waha, Caecilia
Journal of The Community Development in Asia Vol 5, No 3 (2022): September 2022
Publisher : AIBPM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32535/jcda.v5i3.1798

Abstract

The population living without documents in Indonesia continues to grow from year to year. Law No. 12 of 2006 concerning Citizenship and Immigration Law. Number has not provided a solution regarding their residence permit status and citizenship.Problems that arise the number of people who are settlers without documents increases, especially if they have mixed marriages with Indonesians. The handling so far that has been carried out by the government is only unclear and tends to ignore the problem of how the state's discretion and responsibility towards foreign citizens are without documents. By using normative research methods, research is carried out. The results of the study a. the immigration office's discretion regarding the status of foreigners without documents is unclear. b. The state is not responsible for the status and existence of foreign citizens without documents by neglecting their civil rights status c. Politics of protecting human rights against foreign nationals without documents are unclear until now. Keywords: Foreign Citizens Without Documents, Discretion, and Immigration
The Right to Life Based on Human Rights Principles: A Normative Study of the Death Penalty in Indonesia Turangan, Doortje Durin; Senewe, Emma V.T.; Kumendong, Wempie Jh.; Sondakh, Jemmy
Journal of The Community Development in Asia Vol 4, No 2 (2021): May 2021
Publisher : AIBPM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32535/jcda.v4i2.1095

Abstract

The right to life is the absolute right of every person and is included in the category of rights that cannot be reduced. Indonesia is one of the countries that still maintains and recognizes the legality of the death penalty as a way to punish the perpetrators of certain criminal acts such as narcotics, terrorism, and murder crimes despite the pros and cons. This study aims to investigate the regulation of the right to life against the death penalty in Indonesia, the construction of the death penalty law from human rights viewpoint, and the judge's consideration in imposing the death penalty associated with the principles of human rights. This study used a qualitative normative juridical approach by referring to the legal norms in statutory regulations and norms of the society. The findings highlight that the early existence of the death penalty in Indonesia is legally regulated in the Criminal Code, most of which are from the Netherlands, namely WvS (Wetboek van Strafrecht).
The Court Ruling Regarding Gender Change in Human Rights Law Karisoh, Fernando J. M. M.; Waha, Caecilia J. J.; Sondakh, Jemmy; Senewe, Emma V. T.
Journal of The Community Development in Asia Vol 4, No 3 (2021): September 2021
Publisher : AIBPM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32535/jcda.v4i3.1183

Abstract

The phenomenon of gender change in Indonesia shows that many people want to change their gender. This study aims to examine and analyze legal arrangements in the field of human rights regarding gender change, the implementation of court decisions in Indonesia regarding gender change and the effect of the formation of laws and regulations that specifically regulate gender change on court decisions in Indonesia. Normative research carried out by means of law, conceptual and case approaches. The results showed international agreements and national legislation have not specifically regulated gender change. The court ruling is based on consideration of the results of the medical examination and legal considerations. The establishment of legislation in particular can strengthen court ruling.
The Existence of Nedosa Customary Offence in the Sangihe Community Related to the Development and Renewal of the National Criminal Law Barama, Michael; Mawuntu, J. Ronald; Waha, Caecilia J. J.; Sondakh, Jemmy
Journal of The Community Development in Asia Vol 5, No 1 (2022): January 2022
Publisher : AIBPM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32535/jcda.v5i1.1393

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to conduct an analysis and study related to how the existence of the Nedosa offense as a Sangihe customary crime and how this offense is included in the renewal of the national criminal law. The prohibition of Nedosa is still existed nowadays and is obeyed by the community and traditional leaders, the settlement is still using customary law methods even though the judicial system has been implemented by the general court. By using a normative juridical research method that focuses on the study of documents and legal materials, both laws and customary decisions are found to be (1) Judiciary, using Law No. 1 Drt/1951 concerning Provisional Measures to Organize Unitary Powers and Procedures for Civil Courts. (2) The case of Donor or “Blood Pollution” (Delik Nedosa) is a unique crime that only exists in the Sangihe Talaud Customary Rules. Both 1917 and 1932 customary rules as well as the 1951 declaration stated that marriage is forbidden between people whose families are in a straight line up and down, cousins, and siblings. The maximum penalty is 5 years in prison. Therefore, the role of the Nedosa offense is very important in the customary law which is still respected and obeyed by the Sangihe Talaud community today. Nedosa's offense is wider than Zinah in the Criminal Code because this offense is related to religion and the perpetrator will be thrown into the sea.
Co-Authors Altje Agustin Musa Bawole , Herlyanti Boby Pinasang Brigita Teresa Manopo Budi H. Panjaitan Cevonie M. Ngantung Dani R.Pinasang Dani Robert Pinasang Devy K.G. Sondakh Doortje Durin Turangan Edwin N. Tinangon Emma V.T Senewe Eugenius Paransi Fernando J. M. M. Karisoh Friend H. Anis Gian Wiatma Jonimandala Gianluca Brenden Kalalo Herlyanty Y. A. Bawole Hervian Rumengan J. Ronald Mawuntu JACOBUS RONALD MAWUNTU Josua Otniel Sondakh Walangitan Karisoh, Fernando J. M. M. Kristania Montolalu Kumendong, Wempie Jh. Kurnia Gracella Lumingkewas Maulana Miraj, Muhammad Mawuntu, J. Ronald Mawuntu, Ronald Mercy M. M. Setlight Mercy M. M. Setlight Michael Barama Michael Barama, Michael Michellin Ferensia Tahiru Muaja, Harly Stanly Muaja Musa, Altje Agustin Ngantung, Cevonie Marietje Panjaitan, Budi H. Paransi, Eugenius Patria Caraka Regar Peacecilia Nonny Suhantri Poli, Kevin Jousen Aprilino Pontororing, Valent Rantung, Margereth Inof Riisyie Refly Umbas Regitha Rara Payuk Rivaldo C. A. Tungka Ronald Mawuntu Ronny Sepang Rudolf Mamengko Rudy M.K Mamangkey Rumengan, Hervian Y. Senewe, Emma V. T. Senewe, Emma V.T. Sondakh, Devy K. G. Sondakh, Sarah Malena Andrrea Dondokambey Devy Tangkudung, Givenchy L. Theodorus Hendrik Willem Lumunon Thrisya Elisabeth Engelina Ch. A. Langi Turangan, Doortje Durin Valent Pontororing Vicenzo D.M.Manalip Victor Trihart Paul Batubuaja Viktoria Blandina Anthonie Waha, Caecilia J. J. Wempie Jh. Kumendong Wempie Jh. Kumendong Wowor, Kristo Karolus