Articles
<![CDATA[14. HAMBATAN PEMERINTAH INDONESIA DAN ECPAT DALAM MENANGANI PARIWISATA SEKS ANAK MELALUI RAN PTPPO DAN ESKA ]]>
<![CDATA[Novi, Silvia]]>;
<![CDATA[Putranti, Ika Riswanti]]>;
<![CDATA[Farabi, Nadia]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Volume 2, Nomor 4, Tahun 2016 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (310.689 KB)
<![CDATA[Indonesia has become the second largest country in Asia after Thailand in child sextourism. The situation will increase every year because the tourists migrated from Thailandto Indonesia, since Thailand implement the Child Protection Act’s amendment in theircountry. These conditions make this research made for knowing obstacle from IndonesianGovernment and ECPAT’s efford in resolve child sex tourism crimes through RAN TPPOand ESKA 2009-2014. After research conducted using collective action teory,implementation of policy teory, and an explanatory method, researcher found there areobstacle in the implementation of the RAN TPPO and ESKA 2009-2014. These obstaclescome from groups of people who abuses the system, where the group of people helptourists to get child, or they sell the women and children by reason of giving them job. Theobstacle also come from the implementation of the policy, where there is no clearregulatory standards, target in the policy not comprehensive, and bad conditions in theeconomic and social sectors of society.]]>
<![CDATA[Kebijakan Pemerintah Nepal dalam Menanggulangi Perdagangan Organ Tubuh Manusia dari Nepal ke India ]]>
<![CDATA[Shabrina, Izazi Nur]]>;
<![CDATA[Putranti, Ika Riswanti]]>;
<![CDATA[Farabi, Nadia]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Volume 4, Nomor 2, Tahun 2018 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (318.669 KB)
<![CDATA[Since 2007, The Government of Nepal has began implementing Human Trafficking and Transportation Control Act 2064 to curb organ trafficking. In reality, the policy is unable to contain organ trafficking from Nepal to India. Therefore, by using explanative method, this research aims to to analyze the causes of the crime. In order to analyze the cause of organ trafficking from Nepal to India, this research will use the public policy implementation framework from Donald Van Horn and Carl Van Meter. This study finds that organ trafficking from Nepal to India still occured because of the unfulfillment of the following factors; standards and objectives, policy resources, interorganizational communication and enforcement activities, characteristics of implementing agencies, economic, social and political condition and the disposition of implementers, therefore the policy cannot work accordingly.]]>
<![CDATA[3. KEGAGALAN DIPLOMASI PEMERINTAH AUSTRALIA DALAM PEMBEBASAN TERPIDANA HUKUMAN MATI KASUS BALI NINE DI INDONESIA ]]>
<![CDATA[Alfeini, Yulia]]>;
<![CDATA[Susiatiningsih, Hermini]]>;
<![CDATA[Farabi, Nadia]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Volume 3, Nomor 1, Tahun 2017 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (277.895 KB)
<![CDATA[Execution of the death penalty in The Bali Nine Case made The Government of Australiadid some of diplomatic efforts to rescue the two Australian prisoners, namely MyuranSukumaran and Andrew Chan. Those efforts are made through smart diplomacy, the typeof diplomacy that combines soft power diplomacy and hard power diplomacy. Moreover,there were also diplomatic efforts that undertaken by the international organization torescue both of convicted from the death penalty. However, the entire diplomacy was failedafter the decisions to reject the clemency for the two prisoners was issued by ThePresident Jokowi, which in turn made the bilateral relation between Indonesia andAustralia were in conflict. This research aim to analyze the cause of releasing thedecisions to reject the clemency in The Bali Nine case, which is also causing the failure ofAustralian Government’s diplomacy to Indonesia in that case. The framework used in thisresearch is the concept of diplomacy and foreign policy to explain the case of Bali Nine,and also the theory of foreign policy analysis by Snyder to analyze the decisions in therejection of clemency. The type of this research is explanatory, using qualitative dataanalysis techniques from the primary and secondary data accumulation. The result of thisresearch explains that there are four determinant factors that come from the internal andexternal state, which makes the rejection of clemency decision (Indonesia). These fourfactors include: The first factor comes from the perspective of President Jokowi and hisgovernment as the main actor of policymakers for the rejection of clemency. The secondcomes from the public opinion of Indonesian people through the case of Bali Nine. Thethird comes from the relation between Indonesia and Australia in Tony Abbott’s era, whilethe fourth comes from the perception of the countries in Southeast Asia against drugscrime.]]>
<![CDATA[KERJA SAMA BILATERAL INDONESIA DAN AUSTRALIA DALAM PENANGANAN TERORISME DI INDONESIA TAHUN 2002 – 2013 ]]>
<![CDATA[Ansari, Rahmat]]>;
<![CDATA[Utomo, Tri Cahyo]]>;
<![CDATA[Farabi, Nadia]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Volume 2, Nomor 1, Tahun 2016 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (258.998 KB)
<![CDATA[The development of terrorism on global scale triggers Indonesia and Australiato increase their capacity by working together to tackle terrorism in Indonesia.In order to determine the actions undertaken by the Government of Indonesiaand Australia to respond and prevent terrorism crime growing in Indonesia,the research use the approach of liberalism, that the relationship betweenIndonesia and Australia based on the same view to protect themselves from thethreat of terrorism through cooperation to increase the capacity of the countryagainst non-state actor, terrorist organizaton. Details about the importance ofcooperation between Indonesia and Australia done within the scope ofcooperation to deal with terrorism in Indonesia focused on government acttoward police institution, Indonesian National Police (Polri) for Governmentof Republic of Indonesia, and Australian Federal Police (AFP) for Governmentof Australia in the area of counter terrorism. Polri and AFP relationship inorder to overcome terrorism crime using curative and preventive action basedon the following bilateral cooperation between states. Counter terrorism actbased on Momerandum of Understanding Between Government of Republic ofIndonesia and Government of Australia signed on 7th February 2002.]]>
<![CDATA[10. PERAN INTERNATIONAL TELLECOMMUNICATION UNION DALAM MENGATASI CYBER CRIME DI INDONESIA TAHUN 2011 - 2013 ]]>
<![CDATA[Kusumah Anshary, Ahmad Daniel]]>;
<![CDATA[Susiatiningsih, Hermini]]>;
<![CDATA[Farabi, Nadia]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Volume 2, Nomor 2, Tahun 2016 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (860.133 KB)
<![CDATA[International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is an organization founded in 1865 with thegoal of developing the technology and Informatics. Indonesia is one country that has anoffice member of ITU since 1984 as a coordination center in the Southeast Asia regionworking together to develop and secure ICT in the countries of Southeast Asia. Thisresearch seeks to analyze the role of ITU in combatting cyber crime rate in Indonesia in2011 - 2013, at which time the level of criminal activity in Indonesia cyber crime hasincreased. By using the method descriptive study, researchers found that the ITU has beeninstrumental in making every effort to develop and secure ICT in Indonesia, but there arefactors that make cyber crime in Indonesia has increased in 2011 - 2013. However afterfurther testing through a variety of data and a pooled analysis, the researchers concludedthat there are barriers that keep cyber crime in Indonesia increased despite the ITU hasbeen instrumental in Indonesia.]]>
<![CDATA[Perlindungan Keamanan Manusia Australia Melalui Kebijakan Turn Back The Boat Pada Masa Pemerintahan Tony Abbott ]]>
<![CDATA[Ulfa, Nadrah]]>;
<![CDATA[Farabi, Nadia]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Volume 5, Nomor 4, Tahun 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (195.061 KB)
<![CDATA[Australia experienced a significant increase in refugee arrivals from 2008 to 2012 with the highest number of refugee arrivals occurring in 2012. Therefore, during the reign of Tony Abbott, Australia implemented the ‘turn back the boat’ policy to prevent refugees and asylum seekers from entering Australian waters. The aim of this research is to explain the causes of Australia implementing the ‘turn back the boat’ policy. In the concept of human security there are seven aspects of security namely economic security, food security, health security, environment security, personal security, community security, and political security. Therefore, the causes of Australia implemented the ‘turn back the boat’ policy because Australian human security is threatened due to the arrival of refugees and asylum seekers, especially in the aspects of environment security and personal security]]>
<![CDATA[Kebijakan Indonesia dalam Perlindungan Pencari Suaka dan Pengungsi Pasca Kebijakan Turn Back the Boat Pemerintahan Tony Abbott ]]>
<![CDATA[Sihombing, Herlina]]>;
<![CDATA[Farabi, Nadia]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Volume 5, Nomor 4, Tahun 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (343.87 KB)
<![CDATA[This research discusess Indonesian policy in protection of asylum seekers and refugees. Since Australia’s turn back the boat policy was issued, the number of asylum seekers and refugees in Indonesia has increased. Indonesia has not refused the arrival of asylum seekers and refugees. As known that Indonesia is not part of state that ratifies the Convention 1951 and Protocol 1967, but Indonesia is willing to accommodate and provide protection to asylum seekers and refugees. Indonesian policy about protection of asylum seekers and refugees in Peraturan Presiden No. 125 Tahun 2016 raises the question, why is Indonesia willing to do that. To explain that, this research will use liberalism theory. Liberalism believes that state is not the unitary actorin the international world, but there are other actors in it. The presence of other actors who play a significant role, has a great influence to state’s policies. This research aims to explain the background of Indonesian policy of provide protection to asylum seekers and refugees. This research also describe Indonesian policies to resolve problem of asylum seekers and refugees in Indonesia.]]>
<![CDATA[Respons Indonesia terhadap Kasus Penyadapan Australia ]]>
<![CDATA[Shaffan, Ahmad Mafud]]>;
<![CDATA[Wahyudi, Fendy Eko]]>;
<![CDATA[Farabi, Nadia]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Volume 4, Nomor 2, Tahun 2018 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (278.626 KB)
<![CDATA[In 2013, widespread preaching on wiretapping scandal conducted by the United States and its allies. This news comes after a leak of data about the list of people who tapped included their nationality. Edward Snowden, a former NSA contractor who spread the secret data. Australia was mentioned in the news by wiretapping several key people in Indonesia, including President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono. In response, the Government of Indonesia took some action as a clarification step by withdrawing the Ambassador, also cutting all bilateral aggrement in security and information sector. This study will aim to examine the causes of the Government of Indonesia in issuing such responses. Using the concept of national security based on the actor's understanding of threats coming measured by its own vulnerabilities. This research proves that the reason the Government of Indonesia in doing the response is based on the existence of national insecurity caused by wiretapping’s threats that are been there cause of vulnerabilty of Indonesian’s technology and information security]]>
<![CDATA[4. PERAN PEMERINTAH THAILAND DALAH MENGATASI PENCARI SUAKA ROHINGYA DI THAILAND ]]>
<![CDATA[Augita, Sella]]>;
<![CDATA[Windiani, Reni]]>;
<![CDATA[Farabi, Nadia]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Volume 3, Nomor 1, Tahun 2017 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (257.792 KB)
<![CDATA[This research aims to determine the cause of Thai Government's role on handling theissues of Rohingya’s asylum seekers, victims of ethnic conflict in Thailand. These problemsarise as a result of the conflict between ethnic Rakhine Buddhists and Rohingya Moslemsin Myanmar 2012, until eventually the Rohingya moslems fled from Myanmar seekingasylum to neighboring countries. English school of thought, concept of compliance andResponsibility to Protect or R2P, is used to explain the basis and forms of Thailandcompliance on the international organizations of the United Nations (UN), as well asThailand's responsibility to protect the Rohingya refugees and asylum seekers. Theresearch method is explanative which used to analyze and explain the various problems ofRohingya asylum seekers such as the existence of smuggling and trafficking of Rohingyaasylum seekers. Results from this research is the Thai government act in accordance withthe provisions of the United Nations and international law on handling Rohingya’s asylumseekers, as a form of allegiance to United Nations and also has the responsibility toprovide human right protection for Rohingya refugees. From these findings, thesuggestions that emerged was the Government of Thailand should ratify the 1951Convention and 1967 Protocol about the international refugee protection, in order forasylum seekers to gain firm and fair access to the procedure for sanctuary.]]>
<![CDATA[Kebijakan Pemerintah Nepal dalam Menanggulangi Perdagangan Organ Tubuh Manusia dari Nepal ke India ]]>
<![CDATA[Shabrina, Izazi Nur]]>;
<![CDATA[Putranti, Ika Riswanti]]>;
<![CDATA[Farabi, Nadia]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Volume 4, Nomor 2, Tahun 2018 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (250.885 KB)
<![CDATA[Since 2007, The Government of Nepal has began implementing Human Trafficking andTransportation Control Act 2064 to curb organ trafficking. In reality, the policy is unableto contain organ trafficking from Nepal to India. Therefore, by using explanative method,this research aims to to analyze the causes of the crime. In order to analyze the cause oforgan trafficking from Nepal to India, this research will use the public policyimplementation framework from Donald Van Horn and Carl Van Meter. This study findsthat organ trafficking from Nepal to India still occured because of the unfulfillment of thefollowing factors; standards and objectives, policy resources, interorganizationalcommunication and enforcement activities, characteristics of implementing agencies,economic, social and political condition and the disposition of implementers, therefore thepolicy cannot work accordingly.]]>
