Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.449
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL EKOLOGI BIROKRASI Papua Law Journal Awang Long Law Review Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Jurnal hukum IUS PUBLICUM International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS) Sibatik Journal : Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi, Dan Pendidikan Jurnal Pengabdian Papua Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities The Easta Journal Law and Human Rights West Science Law and Human Rights GEMBIRA (Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat) Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Tumian Lian Daya Purba
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Cenderawasih, Indonesia
Religion Arts Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 21 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 21 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Whistleblower Protection Models in Corruption Cases: A Legal Analysis of Reporting Mechanisms and Whistleblower Safety Purba, Tumian Lian Daya; Loogman Palit, Silvester Magnus
West Science Law and Human Rights Vol. 4 No. 02 (2026): West Science Law and Human Rights
Publisher : Westscience Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58812/wslhr.v4i02.2774

Abstract

Whistleblowers play a crucial role in exposing corruption, yet their effectiveness is often constrained by inadequate legal protection and ineffective reporting mechanisms. This study aims to analyze whistleblower protection models in corruption cases through a normative legal approach, focusing on the relationship between reporting systems and whistleblower safety. The research utilizes statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches by examining legal instruments, doctrines, and best practices across jurisdictions. The findings reveal that although many legal systems have established formal whistleblower protection frameworks, significant gaps remain in their implementation, particularly in ensuring confidentiality, protection against retaliation, and access to reliable reporting channels. The effectiveness of whistleblowing systems is largely determined by the availability of secure, independent, and accessible reporting mechanisms, as well as the strength of institutional support and enforcement. Furthermore, whistleblower safety requires not only legal guarantees but also practical measures such as witness protection, psychological support, and financial safeguards. The study concludes that an integrated protection model—combining comprehensive legal frameworks, effective reporting mechanisms, and robust institutional coordination—is essential to enhance whistleblower participation and strengthen anti-corruption efforts.
Co-Authors Anna Veronica Pont Bambang Sasmita Adi Putra Dahliana Kataren Desy Kartika Ningsih Dian Rahadian Edbert Reba, Jeremy Hamzah Mardiansyah Irsyad Sudirman Loogman Palit, Silvester Magnus Muhammad Aiman Nining Suningrat Priyana, Yana Ramli, Kaharuddin Silvester Magnus Loogman Palit Sitti Munawwarah Tri yanuaria William Hendrik Reba Yanto Irianto Yudhi Hertanto