Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : JURNAL ILMIAH ADVOKASI

IMPLIKASI HUKUM HAK TANGGUNGAN BAGI KREDITOR SEPARATIS DALAM PROSES KEPAILITAN DEBITOR: STUDI PUTUSAN NO. 20/PDT.SUS-GUGATAN LAIN-LAIN/2023/PN.NIAGA.SMG Yunianti, Devi; Abdullah, Ali; Triwulandari, Endah
Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 13, No 3 (2025): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi
Publisher : Universitas Labuhanbatu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36987/jiad.v13i3.7612

Abstract

The position of secured creditors in Indonesian bankruptcy law raises critical issues regarding the limits of execution rights and the protection of stakeholders’ interests. This study specifically examines these dynamics through the case study of Decision Number 20/Pdt.Sus-Gugatan Lain-Lain/2023/PN.Niaga.Smg. Using a normative juridical approach, the research analyzes the execution rights of secured creditors, particularly holders of security rights, within the framework of prevailing bankruptcy law. The findings reveal that although secured creditors enjoy privileged rights, their enforcement is subject to strict legal procedures, including a 90-day execution moratorium following the bankruptcy ruling. These results highlight a shift in Indonesian bankruptcy law toward a more responsive and adaptive system, functioning not only as a debt resolution mechanism but also as an instrument to maintain economic balance and social justice Keywords: Bankruptcy; Separatist Creditors; Mortgage Rights
LEGAL PROTECTION FOR SHARE TRANSFERS: THE ROLE OF DERIVATIVE ACTION LAWSUITS IN DEFENDING SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS Asih, Ayu Lestarining; Abdullah, Ali
Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 13, No 3 (2025): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi
Publisher : Universitas Labuhanbatu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36987/jiad.v13i3.7605

Abstract

This research examines the legal complexity of share transfer in Indonesia, focusing on derivative action as an instrument for protecting shareholders' rights. This research is strictly limited to the Indonesian legal framework and does not involve comparative analysis with foreign jurisdictions. The methodological scope is also limited to a normative juridical approach, relying solely on statutory analysis, doctrinal studies, and jurisprudence without conducting empirical data collection or field-based validation. The study aims to analyze the legal construction of share transfer, identify juridical challenges, and evaluate the effectiveness of derivative action in protecting minority shareholders' interests. Utilizing a normative juridical method, the research investigates legislation, legal literature, and relevant jurisprudence. Findings reveal that derivative action is a complex legal mechanism transforming corporate governance, providing space for minority shareholders to protect corporate interests from potential abuse. The research uncovers significant implementation challenges, including evidence complexity and structural resistance. The conclusion emphasizes the need for regulatory framework improvement, strengthening judicial institutions' capacity, and enhancing legal literacy to create an effective and just legal protection system.Keywords: Share Transfer, Derivative Action, Legal Protection
UPAYA HUKUM DAN PEMULIHAN HAK SAHAM MINORITAS PASCA PUTUSAN PENGADILAN: STUDI ATAS PERLINDUNGAN INVESTOR DI INDONESIA Abdullah, Ali; Liesmawati, Liesmawati
Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 13, No 4 (2025): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi
Publisher : Universitas Labuhanbatu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36987/jiad.v13i4.7869

Abstract

Restoration of minority shareholder rights in private limited companies is often ineffective, despite court decisions confirming a breach of fiduciary duty. This situation indicates a gap between the legal protection norms in Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies and their implementation in practice. This study analyzes the effectiveness of the mechanism for restoring minority shareholder rights following a court decision. The results show that court decisions are generally declarative and poorly enforced, making them difficult to implement. Key obstacles include resistance from majority shareholders, weak institutional coordination, and low transparency in private companies. This study recommends the formulation of more operational rulings, strengthening implementation oversight, and integrating legal technology with a restorative justice approach. Using a juridical-empirical approach, this study contributes to strengthening legal protection for minority shareholders and increasing legal certainty in corporate practice.Keywords: Minority Shareholders, Fiduciary Duty, Legal Remedies