Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Perlindungan Hukum Pekerja Rumah Tangga dalam Pengupahan yang Layak Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2026 Moch Rizal Aditya Premono; Made Warka
RIGGS: Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Mei-Juli
Publisher : Prodi Bisnis Digital Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/riggs.v5i2.12104

Abstract

Artikel ini bertujuan mengkaji ratio legis pembentukan regulasi terbaru mengenai perlindungan pekerja rumah tangga, sekaligus menelaah mekanisme jaminan kepastian hukum yang dihadirkannya dalam pemenuhan hak atas pengupahan yang layak. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa regulasi tersebut lahir sebagai jawaban yuridis atas kekosongan norma yang telah berlangsung sejak tahun 2004 dan tidak pernah terakomodasi oleh Undang-Undang Ketenagakerjaan tahun 2003. Secara filosofis, kehadiran regulasi ini merespons realitas hukum yang hidup di tengah masyarakat terkait pekerja rumah tangga yang selama ini luput dari perlindungan, sekaligus mengisi kekosongan pembaruan hukum ketenagakerjaan yang belum terakomodasi sebelumnya. Kajian terhadap mekanisme perlindungan memperlihatkan adanya dua lapis pengaturan, yaitu perlindungan preventif melalui penetapan upah standar sektoral dan kewajiban perjanjian kerja tertulis, serta perlindungan represif melalui mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa dan sanksi administratif. Dengan begitu, kajian ini diinginkan menyampaikan kontribusi bagi peningkatkan kajian hukum buruh, terutama menyangkut transformasi status pekerja rumah tangga menuju sektor formal di Indonesia. Pekerja rumah tangga menempati posisi pekerja paling lemah di dalam ekosistem ketenagakerjaan Indonesia, akibat minimnya pengakuan formal serta absennya perlindungan hukum yang menyeluruh selama beberapa dekade terakhir. Selama ini, pekerja rumah tangga sering diperlakukan sebagai bagian dari hubungan personal informal di ranah domestik, sehingga luput dari jaminan hak-hak dasar pekerja seperti pengupahan yang layak, jaminan sosial, dan perlindungan dari eksploitasi.
Constitutional Democracy and Regulatory Vacuum During the Transition Period: A Study of Constitutional Court Decision No. 135/PUU-XXII/2024 Abdi Edison; Made Warka
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 5 (2026): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i5.3500

Abstract

This study aims to examine the constitutional issues arising from the lack of regulations regarding the transition period for members of the Regional People’s Representative Council (DPRD) following the issuance of Constitutional Court Decision No. 135/PUU-XXII/2024, while also formulating a regulatory model consistent with the principles of constitutional democracy. The Constitutional Court’s decision has altered the structure of simultaneous elections by separating national elections from local elections. This change has created a mismatch between the end of the terms of office for DPRD members elected in the 2024 general election and the timing of the next local elections. This situation has the potential to create a legal vacuum (rechtvacuum), leading to legal uncertainty and raising issues of democratic legitimacy in the administration of local government. This study employs a normative legal research method using a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a case study approach. The research analysis is based on the theory of constitutional democracy, the theory of legal vacuum (rechtvacuum), the theory of legitimacy, the theory of political representation, and the theory of constitutional engineering. The results of the study indicate that the absence of transitional norms has the potential to undermine the principles of popular sovereignty, the rule of law, and political representation—all of which are constitutionally guaranteed under the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Among the alternatives under consideration, the hybrid transitional model is viewed as the most suitable option for implementation within the context of Indonesia’s constitutional system. This model combines a limited, one-time extension of the terms of office for members of the Regional People’s Representative Council (DPRD) with the holding of local elections at a time explicitly stipulated by law. Such an arrangement is deemed capable of striking a balance between legal certainty, democratic legitimacy, the continuity of local government administration, and the protection of citizens’ constitutional rights. Therefore, it is necessary to establish transitional norms through legislative amendments that comprehensively regulate the transitional mechanism for the terms of DPRD members following the implementation of Constitutional Court Decision No. 135/PUU-XXII/2024.