Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 17 Documents
Search

CAPITAL PUNISHMENT IN THE PERPECTIVE OF NON DEROGABLE RIGHTS Noerdajasakti, Setiawan
Brawijaya Law Journal Vol. 3 No. 1 (2016): Law and Human Rights Issues
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.blj.2016.00301.01

Abstract

Capital punishment is still exist as one of kind punishments in Indonesia. The existence of capital punishment is based on the Penal Code and other laws. On the other hand, however, according to Constitution 1945, MPR Decree Number XVII/MPR/1988 on Human Rights and Law Number 39 / 1999 on Human Rights, the right to live cannot be limited under any circumstances (non derogable). Capital punishment and the right to live as the right that cannot be limited under any circumstances (non derogable) are contradictive. This contradiction results a conflict of norm between legislations that legalize the existence of capital punishment and legislations that legalize the existence of the right to live. Solutions should be resulted to solve the conflict of norms.
Interpretation of Analogy in the Crime of Possession of a New Psychoactive Substance Zhafirah, Carissa Tita; Noerdajasakti, Setiawan; Madjid, Abdul
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 14 No 2 (2025)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2025.v14.i02.p02

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the application of analogy interpretation by judges in the case of possession of new psychoactive substances, especially in Decision Number 1352/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Mdn on behalf of the Defendant Lindawati. The background of this research departs from the delay of the Indonesian legal system in responding to social changes, especially related to the phenomenon of the spread of new psychoactive substances that have not been explicitly regulated in laws and regulations. This study uses a normative juridical method with a legislative approach, a case approach, and a conceptual approach. Analysis was carried out on primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials using anticipatory and teleological interpretation methods. The results of the study showed that the Panel of Judges used Article 62 of the Psychotropic Law to punish the Defendant, even though the substance ketamine was not listed in the official psychotropic appendix. This action reflects the findings of the law through analogy, which is doctrinally contrary to the principle of legality in criminal law. Nevertheless, from a progressive legal perspective, the application reflects a response to rapidly changing social realities as well as the need for adaptive legal protection. This study concludes that although analogies in criminal law are prohibited, their application in the context of a legal vacuum for psychoactive substances can only be understood as an effort to realize substantive justice and public protection through a progressive approach in criminal law enforcement. Keywords: New Psychoactive Substances; Legal Discovery; Analogy
Juridical Analysis of Doctor's Criminal Liability in Medical Malpractice Cases Cahjono, Heru; Djatmika, Prija; Noerdajasakti, Setiawan
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 22 No. 2 (2023): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Medical malpractice is one of the crucial issues in the world of law and health because it involves patient safety and the criminal responsibility of medical personnel. In Indonesia, the complexity of proving the elements of negligence, the limitations of evidence, as well as the inconsistency between legal norms and professional ethics are the main challenges in enforcing the criminal liability of doctors. This study aims to analyse the criminal liability of doctors in medical malpractice cases, particularly the obstacles in proving the criminal element and its implications for criminal law reform in Indonesia. The approach used is normative juridical, through literature study, legislation, and analysis of court decisions. The results showed that proving the element of guilt in medical malpractice relies heavily on expert testimony and the judgement of professional institutions such as MKDKI and MKEK, which often leads to differences in legal interpretation. The case study of Tangerang District Court Decision No. 1324/Pdt.G/2021/PN.Tng highlights the weak integration between professional ethical mechanisms and the national criminal system. This research has implications for the need for regulatory reform through the establishment of a lex specialis regarding the criminal liability of medical personnel, as well as strengthening the application of restorative justice in medical dispute resolution. The originality of this research lies in the focus of juridical analysis on the obstacles to proving criminal elements and comparative application of law in the context of the Indonesian legal system, which so far has not been the main focus in the health law literature.
Criminal Action Without Proven in Money Laundering in Indonesia Ilato, Fadel; Majid, Abdul; Noerdajasakti, Setiawan
Jambura Law Review VOLUME 3 SPECIAL ISSUES APRIL 2021
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (365.493 KB) | DOI: 10.33756/jlr.v3i0.7162

Abstract

Money laundering is a follow-up crime, an underlying crime from a predicate crime, so that the existence of money laundering cannot be separated from the original crime. How can money laundering occur without proving the original crime? Therefore, the aim of this study is to analyze the legal implications of predicate offenses without substantiation in money laundering in Indonesia. This research is juridical-normative research, which uses a statutory approach and a case approach. The results of this study indicate that there are legal implications for predicate offenses without proof in money laundering in Indonesia. Starting from breaking through the presumption of innocence and inconsistencies in legal norms in the TPPU Law. So, it is necessary to change the construction of norms contained in article 69 related to proving predicate crimes in TPPU.
Tindakan Main Hakim Sendiri Yang Dilakukan Bersama-Sama dan Mengakibatkan Hilangnya Nyawa Seseorang (Studi Kasus Polres Kabupaten Malang): Unauthorized Persecution Done Jointly and Causing Death (A Case Study in Sub-Regional Police Department of the Regency of Malang) Halim, Darrell Putra; Noerdajasakti, Setiawan; Solehuddin
Brawijaya Law Student Journal Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Oktober 2023
Publisher : Brawijaya Law Student Journal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract This research studies the case of unauthorized persecution done jointly and causing the death of a person in the Regency of Malang, Tumpukrenteng village, Turen. This research topic departed from the highest cases of unauthorized persecution in the area. The proscription of unauthorized persecution, however, is specified in Article 170 of the Criminal Code, while the case causing the death of a person is in Article 170 paragraph 2 of the Criminal Code. Furthermore, police have introduced the stages of the report and the report-making in case of criminal conduct or violations. This indicates that some articles governing violations of social orders and the incidence of criminal cases are irrelevant in the case of unauthorized persecution collectively done by people and causing death. This research employed empirical-juridical methods and criminological-juridical approaches. Data involved primary and secondary materials, garnered from interviews and library research, and analyzed based on descriptive-qualitative methods explaining that the data were analyzed based on the contextual theory. Keywords: Death, Jointly, Unauthorized Persecution   Abstrak Pada penelitian ini penulis akan mengangkat permasalahan terkait tindakan main hakim sendiri yang dilakukan bersama-sama dan mengakibatkan hilangnya nyawa seseorang di daerah Kabupaten Malang. Penelitian ini berfokus pada kasus main hakim sendiri yang dilakukan bersama-sama dan mengakibatkan hilangnya nyawa seseorang di desa Tumpukrenteng, Turen, Kabupaten Malang. Pilihan tema tersebut dilandasi oleh Kabupaten Malang dinobatkan sebagai provinsi dengan jumlah tertinggi atas tindakan main hakim sendiri yang mengakibatkan hilangnya nyawa seseorang diantara Provinsi Malang Raya lainnya. Aturan tentang larangan Tindakan main hakim sendiri secara tidak langsung telah diejawantahkan dalam pasal 170 KUHP, dan yang mengakibatkan hilangnya nyawa seseorang diatur dalam pasal 170 ayat 2 KUHP. Terlepas dari itu kepolisian sendiri telah melakukan sosialisasi mengenai tahap-tahap pelaporan serta pembuatan laporan apabila terjadi kejatan atau penggaran. Maka dari itu terdapat ketimpangan pasal yang sudah mengatur mengenai kejahatan terhadap ketertiban umum dengan tingginya angka kejahatan terhadap ketertiban umum yakni tindakan main hakim sendiri yang dilakukan secara bersama- sama dan sampai menghilangkan nyawa seseorang. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian yuridis empiris dengan pendekatan yuridis kriminologis. Sumber data yang digunakan yaitu data primer yang didukung oleh data sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan wawancara dan studi kepustakaan. Teknik analisis data melalui deskriptif kualitatif dengan menjelaskaskan data primer yang didapat serta dianalis menggunakan teori yang berkaitan dengan permasalahan tersebut. Kata Kunci: Bersama-sama, Hilangnya Nyawa Seseorang, Main Hakim Sendiri
Reforming Criminal Procedure to Regulate Deferred Prosecution Agreements for Corporate Personal Data Breaches in Indonesia Hidayat, Jeffarel; Noerdajasakti, Setiawan
International Journal of Business, Law, and Education Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): International Journal of Business, Law, and Education (On Progress July-Desembe
Publisher : IJBLE Scientific Publications Community Inc.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56442/ijble.v6i2.1180

Abstract

This research explores the urgency and legal formulation of implementing Deferred Prosecution Agreements (DPA) for corporations involved in personal data breaches, and its relevance to the reform of Indonesia’s Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP). The study is motivated by the increasing number of high-profile data breach cases in Indonesia such as those involving Tokopedia, BPJS Kesehatan, and PLN which highlight the weaknesses in law enforcement mechanisms and inadequate victim protection. The findings reveal that Indonesia’s criminal justice system, which strictly adheres to the principle of legality, lacks procedural flexibility to handle corporate crime through restorative and preventive approaches. In contrast, DPAs have been effectively implemented in various jurisdictions (e.g., the United States and the United Kingdom) to promote corporate accountability, facilitate victim compensation, and support economic sustainability. This study applies a normative juridical method combined with statutory, comparative, and conceptual approaches, and critically examines the Personal Data Protection Act (Law No. 27 of 2022). The research identifies a regulatory gap in KUHAP, which does not currently accommodate restorative mechanisms such as DPA within its prosecutorial framework. As a result, the study proposes an ideal DPA model for Indonesia, which includes: limited prosecutorial discretion, mandatory corporate compliance conditions, victim participation, and judicial oversight. The study concludes that incorporating DPA into Indonesia’s criminal procedure would enhance the country’s legal response to digital corporate crimes while reinforcing victims' rights and promoting procedural efficiency.
Pidana Mati dan Hak Hidup Sebagai Non derogable rights Di Indonesia Yang Berkepastian Hukum Kristanto, Kiki; Noerdajasakti, Setiawan; Nugraha, Satriya; Fransisco, Fransisco; Mugopal, Undang
MORALITY: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 10 No 1 (2024): Morality : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas PGRI Palangkaraya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52947/morality.v10i1.624

Abstract

Ketentuan Pasal 4 UU No. 39 Tahun 1999 tentang HAM yang di dalamnya menyebutkan bahwa hak hidup merupakan non derogable rights secara horizontal bertentangan dengan KUHP dan sejumlah UU di luar KUHP yang mencantumkan ancaman pidana mati. Konflik norma ini mencerminkan tidak adanya relevansi di antara aturan yang memberlakukan pidana mati dengan aturan yang menyebutkan bahwa hak hidup adalah non derogable rights. Menanggapi adanya konflik norma tersebut, perlu dikaji pengaturan pidana mati dan hak hidup sebagai non derogable rights dalam perspektif ius constituendum. Jenis penelitian ini yakni penelitian Hukum normatif dengan metode pendekatan statute approach, historical approach, dan conceptual approach. Hasil dan pembahasan bahwa kedepan tentang pidana mati masih dipertahankan, sehingga perlu melakukan perubahan UUDN RI Tahun 1945 dengan menambahkan ketentuan pasal yang menyatakan bahwa pidana mati tidak bertentangan dengan hak hidup sebagai non derogable rights. Selain itu, dalam KUHP baru eksistensi pidana mati tetap dipertahankan, tetapi pengaturannya dilakukan secara khusus (eksepsional).