Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.59
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Brawijaya Law Journal : Journal of Legal Studies Arena Hukum Rechtsidee Pembaharuan Hukum Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Morality :Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jambura Law Review Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences International Journal of Business, Law, and Education International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM)
Setiawan Noerdajasakti, Setiawan
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Aerospace Engineering Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Neuroscience Social Sciences Other

Published : 18 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 18 Documents
Search

 1   2 
CAPITAL PUNISHMENT IN THE PERPECTIVE OF NON DEROGABLE RIGHTS Noerdajasakti, Setiawan
Brawijaya Law Journal Vol. 3 No. 1 (2016): Law and Human Rights Issues
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.blj.2016.00301.01

Abstract

Capital punishment is still exist as one of kind punishments in Indonesia. The existence of capital punishment is based on the Penal Code and other laws. On the other hand, however, according to Constitution 1945, MPR Decree Number XVII/MPR/1988 on Human Rights and Law Number 39 / 1999 on Human Rights, the right to live cannot be limited under any circumstances (non derogable). Capital punishment and the right to live as the right that cannot be limited under any circumstances (non derogable) are contradictive. This contradiction results a conflict of norm between legislations that legalize the existence of capital punishment and legislations that legalize the existence of the right to live. Solutions should be resulted to solve the conflict of norms.
Interpretation of Analogy in the Crime of Possession of a New Psychoactive Substance Zhafirah, Carissa Tita; Noerdajasakti, Setiawan; Madjid, Abdul
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 14 No 2 (2025)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2025.v14.i02.p02

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the application of analogy interpretation by judges in the case of possession of new psychoactive substances, especially in Decision Number 1352/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Mdn on behalf of the Defendant Lindawati. The background of this research departs from the delay of the Indonesian legal system in responding to social changes, especially related to the phenomenon of the spread of new psychoactive substances that have not been explicitly regulated in laws and regulations. This study uses a normative juridical method with a legislative approach, a case approach, and a conceptual approach. Analysis was carried out on primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials using anticipatory and teleological interpretation methods. The results of the study showed that the Panel of Judges used Article 62 of the Psychotropic Law to punish the Defendant, even though the substance ketamine was not listed in the official psychotropic appendix. This action reflects the findings of the law through analogy, which is doctrinally contrary to the principle of legality in criminal law. Nevertheless, from a progressive legal perspective, the application reflects a response to rapidly changing social realities as well as the need for adaptive legal protection. This study concludes that although analogies in criminal law are prohibited, their application in the context of a legal vacuum for psychoactive substances can only be understood as an effort to realize substantive justice and public protection through a progressive approach in criminal law enforcement. Keywords: New Psychoactive Substances; Legal Discovery; Analogy
Criminal Action Without Proven in Money Laundering in Indonesia Ilato, Fadel; Majid, Abdul; Noerdajasakti, Setiawan
Jambura Law Review VOLUME 3 SPECIAL ISSUES APRIL 2021
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (365.493 KB) | DOI: 10.33756/jlr.v3i0.7162

Abstract

Money laundering is a follow-up crime, an underlying crime from a predicate crime, so that the existence of money laundering cannot be separated from the original crime. How can money laundering occur without proving the original crime? Therefore, the aim of this study is to analyze the legal implications of predicate offenses without substantiation in money laundering in Indonesia. This research is juridical-normative research, which uses a statutory approach and a case approach. The results of this study indicate that there are legal implications for predicate offenses without proof in money laundering in Indonesia. Starting from breaking through the presumption of innocence and inconsistencies in legal norms in the TPPU Law. So, it is necessary to change the construction of norms contained in article 69 related to proving predicate crimes in TPPU.
Tindakan Main Hakim Sendiri Yang Dilakukan Bersama-Sama dan Mengakibatkan Hilangnya Nyawa Seseorang (Studi Kasus Polres Kabupaten Malang): Unauthorized Persecution Done Jointly and Causing Death (A Case Study in Sub-Regional Police Department of the Regency of Malang) Halim, Darrell Putra; Noerdajasakti, Setiawan; Solehuddin
Brawijaya Law Student Journal Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Oktober 2023
Publisher : Brawijaya Law Student Journal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract This research studies the case of unauthorized persecution done jointly and causing the death of a person in the Regency of Malang, Tumpukrenteng village, Turen. This research topic departed from the highest cases of unauthorized persecution in the area. The proscription of unauthorized persecution, however, is specified in Article 170 of the Criminal Code, while the case causing the death of a person is in Article 170 paragraph 2 of the Criminal Code. Furthermore, police have introduced the stages of the report and the report-making in case of criminal conduct or violations. This indicates that some articles governing violations of social orders and the incidence of criminal cases are irrelevant in the case of unauthorized persecution collectively done by people and causing death. This research employed empirical-juridical methods and criminological-juridical approaches. Data involved primary and secondary materials, garnered from interviews and library research, and analyzed based on descriptive-qualitative methods explaining that the data were analyzed based on the contextual theory. Keywords: Death, Jointly, Unauthorized Persecution   Abstrak Pada penelitian ini penulis akan mengangkat permasalahan terkait tindakan main hakim sendiri yang dilakukan bersama-sama dan mengakibatkan hilangnya nyawa seseorang di daerah Kabupaten Malang. Penelitian ini berfokus pada kasus main hakim sendiri yang dilakukan bersama-sama dan mengakibatkan hilangnya nyawa seseorang di desa Tumpukrenteng, Turen, Kabupaten Malang. Pilihan tema tersebut dilandasi oleh Kabupaten Malang dinobatkan sebagai provinsi dengan jumlah tertinggi atas tindakan main hakim sendiri yang mengakibatkan hilangnya nyawa seseorang diantara Provinsi Malang Raya lainnya. Aturan tentang larangan Tindakan main hakim sendiri secara tidak langsung telah diejawantahkan dalam pasal 170 KUHP, dan yang mengakibatkan hilangnya nyawa seseorang diatur dalam pasal 170 ayat 2 KUHP. Terlepas dari itu kepolisian sendiri telah melakukan sosialisasi mengenai tahap-tahap pelaporan serta pembuatan laporan apabila terjadi kejatan atau penggaran. Maka dari itu terdapat ketimpangan pasal yang sudah mengatur mengenai kejahatan terhadap ketertiban umum dengan tingginya angka kejahatan terhadap ketertiban umum yakni tindakan main hakim sendiri yang dilakukan secara bersama- sama dan sampai menghilangkan nyawa seseorang. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian yuridis empiris dengan pendekatan yuridis kriminologis. Sumber data yang digunakan yaitu data primer yang didukung oleh data sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan wawancara dan studi kepustakaan. Teknik analisis data melalui deskriptif kualitatif dengan menjelaskaskan data primer yang didapat serta dianalis menggunakan teori yang berkaitan dengan permasalahan tersebut. Kata Kunci: Bersama-sama, Hilangnya Nyawa Seseorang, Main Hakim Sendiri
Reforming Criminal Procedure to Regulate Deferred Prosecution Agreements for Corporate Personal Data Breaches in Indonesia Hidayat, Jeffarel; Noerdajasakti, Setiawan
International Journal of Business, Law, and Education Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): International Journal of Business, Law, and Education
Publisher : IJBLE Scientific Publications Community Inc.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56442/ijble.v6i2.1180

Abstract

This research explores the urgency and legal formulation of implementing Deferred Prosecution Agreements (DPA) for corporations involved in personal data breaches, and its relevance to the reform of Indonesia’s Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP). The study is motivated by the increasing number of high-profile data breach cases in Indonesia such as those involving Tokopedia, BPJS Kesehatan, and PLN which highlight the weaknesses in law enforcement mechanisms and inadequate victim protection. The findings reveal that Indonesia’s criminal justice system, which strictly adheres to the principle of legality, lacks procedural flexibility to handle corporate crime through restorative and preventive approaches. In contrast, DPAs have been effectively implemented in various jurisdictions (e.g., the United States and the United Kingdom) to promote corporate accountability, facilitate victim compensation, and support economic sustainability. This study applies a normative juridical method combined with statutory, comparative, and conceptual approaches, and critically examines the Personal Data Protection Act (Law No. 27 of 2022). The research identifies a regulatory gap in KUHAP, which does not currently accommodate restorative mechanisms such as DPA within its prosecutorial framework. As a result, the study proposes an ideal DPA model for Indonesia, which includes: limited prosecutorial discretion, mandatory corporate compliance conditions, victim participation, and judicial oversight. The study concludes that incorporating DPA into Indonesia’s criminal procedure would enhance the country’s legal response to digital corporate crimes while reinforcing victims' rights and promoting procedural efficiency.
Pidana Mati dan Hak Hidup Sebagai Non derogable rights Di Indonesia Yang Berkepastian Hukum Kristanto, Kiki; Noerdajasakti, Setiawan; Nugraha, Satriya; Fransisco, Fransisco; Mugopal, Undang
MORALITY: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 10 No 1 (2024): Morality : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas PGRI Palangkaraya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52947/morality.v10i1.624

Abstract

Ketentuan Pasal 4 UU No. 39 Tahun 1999 tentang HAM yang di dalamnya menyebutkan bahwa hak hidup merupakan non derogable rights secara horizontal bertentangan dengan KUHP dan sejumlah UU di luar KUHP yang mencantumkan ancaman pidana mati. Konflik norma ini mencerminkan tidak adanya relevansi di antara aturan yang memberlakukan pidana mati dengan aturan yang menyebutkan bahwa hak hidup adalah non derogable rights. Menanggapi adanya konflik norma tersebut, perlu dikaji pengaturan pidana mati dan hak hidup sebagai non derogable rights dalam perspektif ius constituendum. Jenis penelitian ini yakni penelitian Hukum normatif dengan metode pendekatan statute approach, historical approach, dan conceptual approach. Hasil dan pembahasan bahwa kedepan tentang pidana mati masih dipertahankan, sehingga perlu melakukan perubahan UUDN RI Tahun 1945 dengan menambahkan ketentuan pasal yang menyatakan bahwa pidana mati tidak bertentangan dengan hak hidup sebagai non derogable rights. Selain itu, dalam KUHP baru eksistensi pidana mati tetap dipertahankan, tetapi pengaturannya dilakukan secara khusus (eksepsional).
Criminal Law Policy On Corruption Criminal Acts: Considering The Death Penalty In The Framework Of Restorative Cension Noerdajasakti, Setiawan; Kristanto, Kiki
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 2 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i2.7510

Abstract

Corruption offenses in Indonesia are positioned as extraordinary crimes that generate systemic impacts on state finances, the national economy, and public trust, thereby necessitating firm and effective criminal law policies. One of the punitive instruments normatively regulated is the death penalty, as specified in Article 2 paragraph (2) of Law Number 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law Number 20 of 2001, particularly when corruption is committed under certain circumstances. Nevertheless, in law enforcement practice, this provision has almost never been applied, giving rise to issues concerning its relevance, rationality, and consistency with the objectives of punishment, especially from the perspective of restorative sentencing and human rights protection. This study employs a normative legal research method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The findings indicate that the death penalty in corruption offenses functions more as a symbolic normative threat than as an applicable sentencing instrument and is less aligned with the orientation toward restoring state financial losses. Therefore, this research emphasizes the need to reform corruption-related criminal law policies by balancing strict law enforcement with the strengthening of restorative sentencing, in order to achieve substantive justice, effective corruption eradication, and the sustainability of the national legal system
Hierarchical Authority of Indonesia’s Professional Disciplinary Board in Medical Malpractice: Ambiguity, Evidence, and Constitutional Legitimacy Cahjono, Heru; Djatmika, Prija; Noerdajasakti, Setiawan
Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum Vol 12, No 3 (2025): Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum
Publisher : UNISSULA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26532/jph.v12i3.49061

Abstract

Medical malpractice lies at the intersection of healthcare and criminal law. In Indonesia, Law Number 17 of 2023 on Health introduced the Professional Disciplinary Board (Majelis Disiplin Profesi/MDP), replacing the MKDKI and granting it expanded authority, including recommending criminal investigations. Article 308(1) requires a prior MDP recommendation before prosecution, positioning the MDP as a procedural gatekeeper while creating ambiguity over whether its examination is mandatory or discretionary.This study analyzes the hierarchical authority of the MDP in managing medical malpractice cases, focusing on the evidentiary challenges in proving criminal elements and their implications for criminal law reform. Using a normative juridical approach combining statutory, conceptual, and case analyses, the study finds that Article 308(1) creates a de jure mandatory MDP review requirement that operates as de facto discretionary, producing fundamental legal uncertainty, cases bypassing the MDP suffer from procedural invalidity concerns, evidentiary quality deficiencies due to loss of specialized technical review, and inconsistent judicial outcomes across different court levels, and the MDP's constitutional legitimacy as a pre-judicial gatekeeper is questionable due to insufficient procedural safeguards (14-working-day timeframe), unclear separation of powers between administrative and judicial functions, and violation of the lex certa (legal certainty) principle essential to criminal law
Co-Authors Abdul Madjid Abdul Majid Ahmad Siboy Al Fikri, Badrus Zaman ansori ansori Dewi Setyowati Fadel Ilato Fadhila, Kharisma Wulan Faizin Sulistio Fransisco, Fransisco Halim, Darrell Putra Heru Cahjono Hidayat, Jeffarel Iwan Permadi Kristanto, Kiki Kurniaty, Rika Laksono Trisnantoro Mugopal, Undang Muslim, Shohib Nur Chanifah Nurini Aprilianda Pakpahan, Alman P. Parama Artha, Krisna Adi Prija Djatmika, Prija Ramadhani, Defi Sri Sunardi Satriya Nugraha Sholeh, Achmad Rilyadi Solehuddin Sugiri, Bambang Zhafirah, Carissa Tita