Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 24 Documents
Search

Local Capacity, Village Governance, and Livelihood Development: A Review Prakoso, Maliki Aji; Fadli, Amril; Abd Fatah, Rahmat; Mardhotillah, Bunga; Prananingrum, Dwi Kartika; Feriana, Rina; Ariyanto, Komang
Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/innovative.v5i3.19784

Abstract

This article reviews the literature on the relationship between local capacity, village governance, and livelihood development at the village level. It aims to explore how local capacity enhances village governance and its subsequent effect on the livelihoods of community members. The review analyzes previously published scholarly articles on the subject. The findings reveal that robust local capacity is positively correlated with more effective village governance, which, in turn, promotes sustainable livelihood development. Additionally, the article identifies key factors influencing this relationship, including community participation, program sustainability, and government policy support. In conclusion, the article emphasizes the importance of strengthening local capacity and enhancing village governance as strategies for fostering sustainable livelihood development. The insights from this literature review are intended to guide policymakers and practitioners in designing more effective village development programs.
The Role of Parental Pressure in Relation to Academic Stress and Adolescent Mental Health in Urban Indonesia Anbar Salma Mardhiyah; Komang Ariyanto; Neuis Marpuah; M Zainul Hafizi; Anie Rohaeni; Feby Arief Nugroho
Media Publikasi Promosi Kesehatan Indonesia (MPPKI) Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): January 2026
Publisher : Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat, Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56338/mppki.v9i1.8663

Abstract

Introduction: This study analyses the impact of parental pressure on academic stress among adolescents in urban Indonesia, emphasizing adolescent mental health as a critical health promotion issue. With increasing evidence of mental health challenges among school-aged youth worldwide, our objective was to investigate how parental expectations and restrictions contribute to academic stress, addressing a gap in the literature on school-based health promotion in Southeast Asia. Methods: We conducted a quantitative cross-sectional survey in leading public high schools in urban Indonesia during the 2024 academic year. A total of 100 students were enrolled through purposive sampling, and data were collected via validated scales that measured parental pressure and academic stress. Ethical approval was obtained from the institutional ethics committee, and all participants provided informed consent before data collection. Results: The primary outcome of the study was the relationship between parental pressure and academic stress. Regression analysis revealed a significant positive correlation between the two variables (R² = 0.566; p < 0.001), indicating that parental pressure had a strong and significant influence on academic stress among adolescents. Additionally, parental restrictions on nonacademic activities were associated with increased stress levels, highlighting the complex nature of parental influence on adolescent well-being. Conclusion: Our study enhances the understanding of adolescent mental health by identifying parental pressure as a key determinant of academic stress. This research emphasizes the need for school-based health promotion strategies that involve parental engagement to foster supportive learning environments. Future studies should investigate culturally tailored interventions to reduce academic stress and improve adolescent well-being, ultimately advancing knowledge in the field of international health promotion.
A Review of the Resilience of Rural Communities in the Face of Climate Change Yohanes Kamakaula; Komang Ariyanto; Roys Qaribilla; Aghus Jamaludin Kharis; Farikhul Muafiq; Ratnawati Yuni Suryandari
Journal of Innovative and Creativity Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/joecy.v5i2.3332

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the multifaceted nature of rural community resilience in the face of climate change. It sought to identify how social, ecological, and institutional factors interact to support or hinder adaptive capacity in rural settings, particularly where infrastructure is limited. Materials and methods. This review drew upon global literature and case studies to explore resilience frameworks and adaptation strategies. The analysis integrated structural approaches, including the Baseline Resilience Indicators for Communities (BRIC) and the STAR model (Specific assets, Tradeable specialization, Access to markets, Resources), to provide lenses for assessing rural resilience and informing policy interventions. Results. The review revealed that social capital, traditional ecological knowledge, and livelihood diversity are critical foundations for resilience and transformative potential. Adaptation strategies such as diversified agriculture, agroforestry, participatory planning, and ecosystem-based approaches were found to be effective in enhancing socio-ecological sustainability. However, challenges such as limited infrastructure, insufficient institutional support, unequal access to finance and technology, and erosion of local knowledge persist and constrain resilience-building efforts. Conclusions. This study concludes that while promising practices exist, gaps remain in comprehensive frameworks and in the design of inclusive, participatory policies. Strengthening rural resilience requires localized, equity-driven approaches that integrate local knowledge with institutional support, while addressing systemic barriers to resources and infrastructure. Future research should prioritize community-driven models and multi-scalar strategies to better fortify rural resilience amid accelerating global environmental change.
Free nutritious meals program or Makan Bergizi Gratis (MBG) and the rural political economy: A theory-driven literature review of urban bias, spatial justice, and fiscal dynamics in rural–urban relations Ariyanto, Komang; Saharuddin, Saharuddin
Priviet Social Sciences Journal Vol. 6 No. 5 (2026): May 2026
Publisher : Privietlab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v6i5.1803

Abstract

This article presents a theory-driven literature review of the Free Nutritious Meals Program or Makan Bergizi Gratis (MBG) through the lens of urban bias theory, structuring the analysis into four distinct pillars: economic opportunity, infrastructural constraints, political risk, and fiscal trade-offs. It examines whether the policy can reduce rural–urban disparities or reinforce the structural rural dependence on the central government. By systematically searching and synthesizing 22 core scientific publications from 2024 to April 2026 via the conceptual approaches of Snyder (2019) and van der Waldt (2021), guided by explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria, this review assesses the political‒economic implications of the MBG. The synthesis indicates that, based on policy projections and early modeling, MBG has the potential to serve as a rural economic stimulus through increased demand for local food, improvement in farmers’ terms of trade, and job creation within village-based food supply chains. Economic multiplier effects also emerge through household income redistribution and strengthening local agricultural product markets. However, the findings also reveal several structural constraints that may reinforce these biases. Documented logistical infrastructure limitations in 3T regions (disadvantaged, frontier, and outermost areas), such as the absence of cold chains and adequate food transportation access, create a reasonable inference that urban vendors will likely dominate food procurement in these areas. Furthermore, the centralized policy design increases the risk of local elite political patronage, the marginalization of microeconomic actors such as school cafeteria vendors, and potential budget leakage. From a fiscal perspective, the large allocation for the MBG creates pressure on financing sustainability and raises the risk of budget substitution away from productive rural sectors. This study concludes that MBG can become an effective instrument for reducing urban bias only if accompanied by governance decentralization, investment in rural logistics infrastructure, procurement transparency, and the integration of local economic actors. As a normative warning, without such reforms, the MBG risks becoming a consumptive policy that reinforces spatial inequality and rural dependence on the central government for funding.