Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.949
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Hotel Journal of Tourism and Interdiciplinary Studies Journal Research of Management Sevanam: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Stilistika BJHTCR Jurnal Pengabdian Dosen Republik Indonesia (JPDRI) Jurnal Daya Tarik Wisata Harmony Hospitality
Ni Putu Yunik Anggreni
Universitas Triatma Mulya
Religion Arts Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences Other

Published : 21 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Stilistika

 1 
ALIH KODE DAN CAMPUR KODE DALAM INTERAKSI PEMBELAJARAN GENERAL ENGLISH DI SMK TRIATMA JAYA TABANAN Anggreni, Ni Putu Yunik; Antara, Agung Rai
Stilistika : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Seni Vol. 12 No. 1 (2023): Stilistika: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Seni
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia dan Daerah Universitas PGRI Mahadewa Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59672/stilistika.v12i1.3312

Abstract

Penggunaan ragam bahasa dilakukan dalam pembelajaran bahasa dalam proses interaksi antara pembelajar dan pengajar dan antar pembelajar. Penggunaan ragam bahasa dapat bervariasi tergantung dari penutur dan mitra tutur, topik yang dibicarakan dan kondisi pada saat berinteraksi. Kajian ini membahas tentang penggunaan alih kode (code switching), campur kode (code mixing) dan faktor penyebab penggunaan alih kode (code switching) dan campur kode (code mixing) dalam interaksi pembelajaran General English di Sekolah Menengah Kejurusan Triatma Jaya ( SMK TJ ) Tabanan. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian deskripsi kualitatif. Percakapan Siswa SMK TJ Tabanan adalah sumber data penelitian ini. Metode observasi, wawancara dan dokumentasi diterapkan dalam kajian ini. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa :1) bentuk alih kode yang digunakan dalam pembelajaran General English adalah alih kode ekternal yaitu interaksi yang terjadi antara penutur dengan mitra tutur dengan menggunakan bahasa itu sendiri, misalnya dari Bahasa Indonesia ke Bahasa Inggris dan sebaliknya, 2) campur kode yang digunakan adalah outher code mixing dan hybrid code mixing. Faktor penyebab penggunaan variasi bahasa ini dapat dijelaskan sebagai berikut campur kode dsebabkan karena faktor (1)mitra bicara,(2) topik,(3) fungsi dan tujuan pembicara,(3) ragam dan tindak tutur bahasa, sedangkan alih kode disebabkan oleh faktor (1)pembicara,(2) topik (3) fungsi dan tujuan pembicara,(4) ragam dan tindak tutur bahasa. Kata kunci : alih code, campur kode, pembelajaran, general English, interaksi, SMK The use of various languages is carried out in language learning in the process of interaction between students to teachers and between students to students. The use of the various languages can vary depending on the speaker and speech partner, the topic being discussed and the conditions during the interaction. This study discusses the use of code switching, code mixing and the factors causing the use of cade switching and code mixing in general English learning interactions at Triatma Jaya Vocational High School (SMK TJ) Tabanan. This research is qualitative descriptive research. Conversation that used by the students to teachers and the students to students are the data source for this research. Observation, interviews and study documentation methods were applied in this study. The result of the research show that: 1) the code switching form used in General English learning is external code switching, namely the interaction that occurs between speakers and interlocutors using the language itself for example from Indonesian to English or from English to Indonesian, 2) code mixing that used in the General English learning are outer code mixing and hybrid code mixing,3) the factors causing the use of language variations can be explained as follows : code mixing is caused by factors (1) interlocutor,(2) topic, (3) function and purpose of the speakers,(4) langiage function and speech act, while code switching is caused by factors ;(1) speakers, (2) topic, (3) function and purposes of the speaker, (4) varieties and language speech act.    Keywords : code switching, code mixing, learning, general English, interaction, vocational school
UTILIZING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TO EVALUATE STUDENTS’ COMPETENCY IN WRITING SIMPLE PAST TENSE Antara, I Made Agung Rai; Anggreni, Ni Putu Yunik
Stilistika : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Seni Vol. 12 No. 2 (2024): Stilistika: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Seni
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia dan Daerah Universitas PGRI Mahadewa Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59672/stilistika.v12i2.3691

Abstract

Abstract The purpose of this study is to determine the application of artificial intelligence (Copilot) in evaluating student writing in writing simple past tense. The method of this research is qualitative. The data collection technique was carried out by collecting 5 student writings randomly. The data analysis technique was carried out with qualitative descriptive method. The results showed that the copilot was able to create a rubric used to evaluate students' writing in writing simple past tense. This rubric consists of several parts, namely content development, organization, grammar and mechanics, usage and style. The results showed that copilots were able to evaluate well, such as being able to identify topic coverage, relevance, paragraph structure, transitions, sentence structure, spelling and punctuation, verb tense consistency and word choice. The feedback provided by Copilot is able to describe writing errors well and in detail. Teachers are advised to utilize artificial intelligence in the learning process, especially in evaluating student writing. Teachers can explore the use of artificial intelligence and its capabilities in language learning so that they can work more easily and effectively. Teachers can integrate AI tools such as Copilot into the assessment process, particularly grammar and tenses. The developer of AI should continuously refine AI capability to give more sophisticated feedback on complex transitions and sentence structures. Keywords: Writing, artificial Inteliggence, Assesment
ANALYZING GRAMMATICAL ERRORS IN EFL STUDENTS' OPINION ESSAYS USING DEEPSEEK AI: PATTERNS AND PEDAGOGICAL IMPLICATIONS Antara, I Made Agung Rai; Anggreni, Ni Putu Yunik
Stilistika : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Seni Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025): Stilistika: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Seni
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia dan Daerah Universitas PGRI Mahadewa Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59672/stilistika.v13i2.4560

Abstract

This study aims to examine grammatical errors in opinion essays written by  Post-Intermediate Level students at the Bali International Language Centre (BILCEN) at Triatma Mulya University, utilising DeepSeek AI to discover error trends and offer strategic advice for educators. A qualitative analysis of 17 articles revealed 109 grammatical problems, predominantly characterised by article omission errors (42.2%), followed by subject-verb agreement (26.6%), preposition errors (17.4%), and tense inconsistencies (13.8%). The primary reasons for these errors encompass first-language interference and sentence fragmentation, indicative of the impact of Indonesian structures on English production. Examples include “work in a cruise ship” rather than “work on a cruise ship.” This study underscores the significance of a teaching methodology incorporating contrastive exercises, targeted feedback, and task design that balances fluency and accuracy. Strategic recommendations involve implementing exercises that juxtapose Indonesian and English structures and utilizing DeepSeek AI’s functionalities to provide comprehensive feedback. This study presents a novel approach for educators to tackle systematic grammatical issues in EFL students’ opinion writing. It underscores the potential of AI to enhance the precision of academic writing.
Co-Authors Adi Ananta, I Putu Wahyu Antara, Agung Rai Arini, Ni Nyoman Cahyani, Ni Luh Putu Dhedhe, Edel Merikwin Hadi Swarna, I Made Rudi I Made Agung Rai Antara I Made Bayu Wisnawa I Nengah Aristana I Nengah Subadra I Putu Ardimahada I Putu Bagus Andhy Putra I Putu Bagus Suthanaya I Wayan Kartimin Jayanti Kumala Dewi, I Dewa Ayu Riskya Kadek Erna Parniti Krisna Atmaja, Ida Bagus Gede Bayu Mahendra, I Putu Ariska Mbadhi, Delviana Ni Kadek Meita Juliawati Ni Kadek Widya Elvirawati Ni Made Yulia Chrisanti Ni Nyoman Arini Ni Putu Putri Widyaningsih Ni Wayan Mekarini Nurul Hakiki Nurul Hakiki Permana, I Made Deni Putra, Putu Devan Maheswara reynaldi, ade S.Pd.M.Pd., Ni Nym. Nidya Trianingrum, Semesta, Putu Cahaya Sunarprasetyo, mahardjono Supradnyani, Ni Putu Intan Unggas, Ardianus Virgia Ratna Devi Yuni, Luh Ketut Herindiyah Kartika