Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

Profil Kemandirian Belajar Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Hajerina, Hajerina; Suciati, Indah; Wahyuni, Dewi Sri
SJME (Supremum Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol 6 No 2 (2022): Supremum Journal of Mahematics Education
Publisher : Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Singaperbangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35706/sjme.v6i2.5796

Abstract

To describe the profile of the learning independence of Mathematics Education students at Alkhairaat University Palu during the Covid-19 Pandemic is the purpose of this study. Descriptive research with a qualitative approach is the method used in the research. The learning independence scale is given to students of the Mathematics Education Study Program at Alkhairaat University Palu in the third semester of the 2020-2021 academic year as a research instrument. Furthermore, 3 students who have high, medium, and low abilities were selected as subjects in the study. Data were collected through questionnaires and interviews. The stages of data analysis carried out refer to the Miles & Huberman model, namely data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions and verification. The findings describe nine indicators of student learning independence at each level of academic ability (high, medium, and low). From these findings, it was found that 1) the learning independence of mathematics education students during the Covid-19 pandemic was different for each level of academic ability, 2) students with high academic abilities met all indicators of learning independence very well, (3) students with moderate academic ability meets most indicators of learning independence very well, and (4) students with low academic ability meet several indicators of learning independence very well.
Ergonomic Analysis to Assess Comfort and Risk of Musculoskeletal Injuries in Office Workers at PT X Using Rosa's Method Siregar, Baharuddin; Wahyuni, Dewi Sri; Indriani, Fatma; Dalimunthe, Nadiyah Rahma; Zakwan, M. Hadin; Asti, Rahmah Dwi; Darmansyah, Rendi
JUKEJ : Jurnal Kesehatan Jompa Vol 4 No 4 (2025): JUKEJ: Jurnal Kesehatan Jompa
Publisher : Yayasan Jompa Research and Development

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57218/jkj.Vol4.Iss4.2130

Abstract

Abstract This study aims to analyze the level of workplace comfort and the risk of musculoskeletal injuries among office workers at PT X using the Rapid Office Strain Assessment (ROSA) and Nordic Body Map (NBM) methods, as well as to examine the relationship between working posture and MSD complaints. This study uses a quantitative descriptive design with a cross-sectional approach involving 50 respondents. The results indicate that most employees are categorized as having a moderate ergonomic risk (ROSA score 4-5), while a small portion has a high ergonomic risk (score 5). Based on the NBM results, most workers experience mild to moderate musculoskeletal complaints, particularly in the neck, shoulders, lower back, and wrists. The main factors contributing to ergonomic risk are non-adjustable office chairs and desks, as well as prolonged static working postures. Overall, the ergonomic conditions at PT X are relatively good. However, improvements in workstation facilities and increasing workers' awareness of ergonomic principles are necessary to reduce the risk of musculoskeletal injuries and enhance workplace comfort. As a large-scale plantation company, PT X faces a high potential risk of Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSDs) among its employees. This risk primarily stems from the nature of the work, which often requires repetitive or static activities.
Students’ Cognitive Processes in Solving Group Theory Problems: An Analysis Based on Bloom’s Taxonomy Wahyuni, Dewi Sri; Rochaminah, Sutji; Sartika, Nurhalida; Windra
Desimal: Jurnal Matematika Vol. 9 No. 2 (2026): Desimal
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24042/desimal.v9i2.30240

Abstract

Abstract algebra requires students to coordinate formal definitions, algebraic properties, and proof structures rather than rely on procedural recall alone. This study describes the cognitive processes demonstrated by fifth-semester mathematics education students when solving introductory group theory problems, using the first four categories of the revised Bloom’s taxonomy as an analytical lens. The study employed a qualitative descriptive approach at the Mathematics Education Study Programme, Alkhairaat University, from 15 September to 6 November 2025. Four students (LF, WS, AR, and N), selected purposively from students enrolled in the algebraic structures course, completed two written tasks and participated in interviews used to clarify their responses. The first task examined students’ definitions of a group, while the second required them to state and prove a theorem about group properties. All four students recalled central elements of the group definition, although the precision of their explanations varied. In the proof task, LF produced a coherent argument for the uniqueness of the identity element, whereas WS, AR, and N attempted to use familiar group properties but showed difficulties in theorem selection, property identification, or the logical ordering of operations. Across the four cases, remembering was consistently supported, whereas evidence of understanding was partial for several participants, and applying and analyzing were most clearly demonstrated in LF’s proof. These findings suggest that assessment of group theory learning should distinguish the recall of definitions and properties from the ability to coordinate them within a valid proof.