Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.288
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Sriwijaya Law Review Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum Hasanuddin Law Review Lex Scientia Law Review WIDYA LAKSANA Lex Librum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan Jurnal Simbur Cahaya Lex Lata: Jurnal Ilmah Ilmu Hukum UNES Journal of Swara Justisia SASI LamLaj Lex Stricta : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Lex Librum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Annalisa Yahanan, Annalisa
Unknown Affiliation
Arts Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 23 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Pembatalan Sepihak Akta Kuasa Khusus Dari Pemberi Kuasa Kepada Penerima Kuasa Terkait Dengan Kredit Modal Kerja Konstruksi Aldisahr, M. Dafi Siddiq; Yahanan, Annalisa; Samawati, Putu
Lex Librum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 10 No. 2 (2024): Juni
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46839/lljih.v10i2.934

Abstract

Regarding the legal consequences of unilaterally canceling a power of attorney in the case of working capital loans for construction, special requirements must be met by the bank when lending working capital for construction projects so that it is not canceled and sued unilaterally. This can be done with a power of attorney if it can be proven that the person giving the power of attorney is not carrying out their duties properly. The legal consequences of unilaterally revoking the special authority law are administrative sanctions and judicial revocation of the special authority law. Special requirements for granting working capital credit are met with two-way verification, especially for parties who provide special authority. This is to avoid further legal problems and the principal has the right to take legal action if his representative does not meet the requirements.
Pemenuhan Syarat Minimum Dua Kreditur Dalam Proses Kepailitan Melalui Pembuktian Sederhana Tiara Elpa Yuning Sari; Yahanan, Annalisa; Samawati, Putu
Lex Stricta : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

A bankruptcy petition is a legal step taken by creditors to demand repayment of debts if the debtor fails to fulfil their obligations. Simple proof in bankruptcy, especially regarding the existence of a second creditor, is often difficult to obtain. This study analyses how the two creditor requirements in bankruptcy petitions are met, as well as the legal consequences if these requirements are not met, which can lead to the rejection of the petition. The three decisions examined are Decision Number 30/Pdt.Sus.Pailit/2023/PN Niaga Jkt.Pst, Decision Number 15/Pdt.Sus. Pailit/2025/PN Niaga Jkt.Pst, and Decision Number 33/Pdt.Sus.Pailit/2020/PN Niaga Jkt.Pst. The method used is a normative approach with a legal case study. The results of the study show that simple proof does not mean without verification, but rather sufficient formal evidence showing two creditors. In two decisions, this requirement was proven, and the bankruptcy petition was accepted, while in one decision, the failure to prove the second creditor resulted in the petition being rejected. This study recommends improving bankruptcy law and creditors' understanding of the importance of simple proof to protect their receivables rights
Kewajiban Penggunaan Google Play Billing Yang Dilakukan Oleh Google LLC Rocky Bial, Anandatama; Yahanan, Annalisa; Samawati, Putu
Lex Stricta : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Google, as the largest application platform, exploits its dominant position by requiring the use of Google Play Billing (GPB) for all digital transactions on Android. Through normative legal research based on literature, relevant regulations, and KPPU Decision No. 03/KPPU-I/2024, it was found that Google LLC had engaged in monopolistic practices. The KPPU ordered Google to open up alternative payment methods within applications through the User Choice Billing (UCB) programme, provide incentives for a minimum 5% reduction in service fees for one year, and impose a fine of IDR 202,500,000,000. This case underscores that the policies of large-scale digital companies must adhere to the principles of fair competition and highlights the importance of the KPPU's role in overseeing business practices in the digital economy era
Co-Authors Adam, Bani Afrilia, Dian Aldisahr, M. Dafi Siddiq Ardini, Shela Arfianna Novera Elmadiantini, Elmadiantini Fachry Abda El Rahman Firman Muntaqo Handayani, Sri Haniff Ahamat, Haniff Joni Emirzon Murzal Murzal Murzal, Murzal Nugraha, Muslim Nurhidayatuloh Prasetyo, M Rizky Eko Primadianti, Helena Putra, Dede Riansya Putri, Ela Andini Putu Samawati, Putu Ridwan, Ridwan Rocky Bial, Anandatama Rusyan, Fazhar Eprye Si, Tongle Soetansah, Ilham Sri Turatmiyah Sulistiyaningrum, Helena Primadiantini Tiara Elpa Yuning Sari Vitriana, Novita Zuhir, Mada Apriandi