Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 22 Documents
Search

Workshop Literasi Digital dan Keamanan Informasi Bagi Guru dan Siswa SMA Negeri 1 Sedayu Riadi, Imam; Shalihah, Fithriatus; Prasetyaningrum, Putri Taqwa; Robiin, Bambang
Mohuyula : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Vol 4, No 2 (2025): Desember
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31314/mohuyula.4.2.42-50.2025

Abstract

Perkembangan teknologi digital yang pesat menuntut peningkatan literasi digital dan kesadaran akan keamanan informasi di kalangan generasi muda, khususnya di tingkat SMA. Tujuan dari kegiatan pengabdian ini adalah untuk memberikan pelatihan mengenai literasi digital dan keamanan informasi kepada guru dan siswa SMA Negeri 1 Sedayu. Metode yang digunakan dalam pelatihan ini adalah pendekatan workshop interaktif yang meliputi ceramah, diskusi, dan simulasi praktis. Materi yang disampaikan mencakup pengenalan terhadap literasi digital, ancaman siber seperti phishing dan malware, serta cara melindungi data pribadi di dunia maya. Hasil dari kegiatan ini menunjukkan peningkatan signifikan dalam pemahaman peserta mengenai cara melindungi informasi pribadi dan mengenali ancaman siber. Berdasarkan evaluasi menggunakan pre-test dan post-test, peserta mengalami peningkatan pengetahuan mengenai literasi digital dan keamanan informasi, dengan 100% peserta mampu mengidentifikasi ancaman siber setelah pelatihan. Pelatihan ini juga berhasil meningkatkan kesadaran peserta tentang bahaya kejahatan siber, seperti cyberbullying, serta langkah-langkah pencegahan yang dapat dilakukan. Kesimpulannya, pelatihan ini berhasil mencapai tujuannya dalam meningkatkan pemahaman dan keterampilan peserta dalam menghadapi tantangan dunia digital. Diharapkan pelatihan ini dapat menjadi model untuk kegiatan serupa di sekolah lain, guna menciptakan lingkungan digital yang lebih aman dan bijak di kalangan generasi muda.
The Impact of Asset Recovery Regulations on Corruption Cases in Indonesian: A Leap Forward? Shalihah, Fithriatus; Bakhshillo Kamolovich Khojaev; Fitrat Umirov; Mohammad Ishaque Husain; Deslaely Putranti
Contrarius Vol. 2 No. 3 (2026): Contrarius
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/contrarius.v2i3.297

Abstract

The central problem lies in the structural limitations of the asset recovery regime under the Anti-Corruption Law, which requires a criminal conviction for confiscation. This restriction has hindered full recovery of state losses, particularly in cases involving hidden or transferred assets and transnational challenges. The research aims to assess the paradigmatic nature of Indonesia’s asset forfeiture reform by analysing its conceptual transformation, constitutional legitimacy, and systemic coherence. This research employs a normative juridical method, relying on statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The research reveals that, first, the shift from conviction-based forfeiture to non-conviction-based (NCB) forfeiture reflects an emerging transformation from offender-oriented justice toward asset-oriented justice. However, in Indonesia, this transformation remains transitional and has not yet restructured the philosophical and institutional foundations of asset recovery. Second, the comparative analysis demonstrates that the United Kingdom has successfully institutionalised civil recovery mechanisms within a strong framework of judicial oversight and proportionality, supported by human rights safeguards, thereby illustrating that effectiveness and constitutional protection are not mutually exclusive. Finally, Indonesia’s reform, while normatively progressive, still depends on harmonisation with constitutional guarantees and requires clearer standards of proof, differentiated procedural safeguards, and stronger institutional coordination to ensure systemic coherence and prevent abuse of power. The research recommends adopting a hybrid-restorative constitutional model of asset forfeiture. Such a model should provide limited autonomy for non-conviction-based confiscation, integrate early asset tracking and freezing mechanisms, apply differentiated standards of proof, and embed strict constitutional safeguards through effective judicial review and proportionality principles.