Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.655
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Rechtsidee Jurnal Daulat Hukum Dinamisia: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Veteran Law Review Veritas: Jurnal Program Pascasarjana Ilmu Hukum Universitas Islam As-Syafiiyah JUSTISI JURNAL HUKUM MEDIA JUSTITIA NUSANTARA Jurnal Ilmiah Dunia Hukum JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Jurnal Esensi Hukum Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis UNISKA LAW REVIEW Law Development Journal Jurnal Locus Penelitian dan Pengabdian Syiah Kuala Law Journal Jurnal Hukum Pelita Qaumiyyah: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia Law Reform Journal (ILREJ) Equality Before The Law Forschungsforum Law Journal Jurnal Hukum Statuta Equality Before The Law
M. Rizki Yudha Prawira
Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
Religion Aerospace Engineering Arts Humanities Automotive Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Electrical & Electronics Engineering Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 27 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 27 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Anti-Bullying Education, Discipline Education, and Responsibilities at SDN Rawa Barat 05 AM: Edukasi Anti-Bullying, Pendidikan Disiplin, dan Tanggung Jawab Pada SDN Rawa Barat 05 Pagi Ibrahim*, Aji Lukman; Bachtiar, Handar Subhandi; M. Rizki Yudha Prawira; Hilda Novyana; Anni Alvionita Simanjuntak; Al Fath; Nada Syifa Nurulhuda; Virna Amalia Nur Permata; Aisyah Nurhalizah; Rafif Sani; Riyanto, Riyanto
Dinamisia : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Vol. 8 No. 4 (2024): Dinamisia: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat
Publisher : Universitas Lancang Kuning

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31849/dinamisia.v8i4.20062

Abstract

Untuk memberikan pemahaman yang lebih mendalam mengenai pencegahan perundungan, sikap disiplin, dan tanggung jawab diperlukan adanya pemberian edukasi yang tepat dan terarah kepada peserta didik. Edukasi dengan cara edukasi menjadi salah satu langkah untuk mencegah adanya kasus perundungan khususnya di SDN Rawa Barat 05 Pagi, edukasi ini melibatkan 30 peserta didik. Pengabdian ini menggunakan metode ceramah, edukasi, dan diskusi yang berjudul Edukasi Sadar Hukum Terhadap Bullying Serta Pendidikan Disiplin dan Tanggung Jawab. Target dari pengabdian ini adalah siswa Sekolah Dasar yang duduk di kelas 4 dan kelas 5. Adapun tujuan dari pengabdian ini adalah untuk membentuk sikap disiplin serta tanggung jawab agar tindakan perundungan di sekolah diminimalisasi. Peningkatan pemahaman peserta didik dapat dilihat dari hasil posttest yang memperlihatkan peserta didik dapat memahami materi yang dibawakan.
Criminal Act of Attack on Honor Following the Constitutional Court Decision No. 105/PUU-XXII/2024: Human Rights Perspective Putri, Fadiza Amalia; Prawira, M. Rizki Yudha
Jurnal Daulat Hukum Vol 8, No 4 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/jdh.v8i4.49048

Abstract

The criminal act of attack on honor under Article 27A of Law No.  1 of 2024, following Constitutional Court Decision Number 105/PUU-XXII/2024, reflects Indonesia’s ongoing effort to balance the protection of individual dignity with the constitutional guarantee of freedom of expression. This study aims to analyze the human rights implications of the Constitutional Court’s ruling, which clarifies the interpretation of the phrases “other person” and “a matter” in Article 27A. Employing a normative legal research method and a qualitative descriptive approach, the study examines statutory provisions and the Court’s reasoning through the principles of legality, necessity, and proportionality as articulated in international human rights standards. The findings indicate that the Court’s conditional interpretation—restricting “other person” to natural persons and defining “a matter” as “an act that demeans the honor or reputation of an individual”—constitutes a significant normative improvement toward legal certainty. However, law enforcement practice continues to reveal the potential for this article to be misused to silence criticism of public officials, generating a persistent tension between normative ideals and implementation realities. This research’s novelty lies in providing the first human rights–based analysis of Article 27A following the Constitutional Court’s ruling, offering a new framework for evaluating the proportionality of criminal restrictions on freedom of expression in Indonesia’s digital democratic era.
Accountability of Shell Company's Practices in Tax Law Perspective by Limited Liability Companies: A Review of Good Corporate Governance Hutagaol, Jessica Ariana; Prawira, M. Rizki Yudha
Jurnal Daulat Hukum Vol 8, No 4 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/jdh.v8i4.49041

Abstract

The use of shell companies by limited liability companies as a means of tax avoidance demonstrates a legal abuse that impacts the dilemma of legal compliance and business ethics. This action raises questions regarding the implementation of good corporate governance, which should be the basic ethics of every company. This study used a normative juridical method through a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. This study utilizes primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials and then examines them descriptively. The results of the study indicate that the use of shell companies for tax avoidance purposes is contrary to the principles of good corporate governance. This scheme in practice can be subject to tax and criminal sanctions in its accountability.
Problematika Pemenuhan Kebutuhan Hukum Terhadap Kelompok Rentan Dalam Mengakses Keadilan M. Rizki Yudha Prawira
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 5 No 12 (2024): Tema Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research discusses the problems of vulnerable groups who often face various problems accessing justice. The stigma attached to them and various discriminatory treatments from the public and law enforcement officers are two forms of the problems they face. These factors contribute to negative perceptions and a growing reluctance among these groups to seek justice for their legal troubles. Based on the 2022 Legal Needs Survey report for Vulnerable Groups regarding the behavior patterns of vulnerable groups in resolving legal problems, it was found that vulnerable groups in resolving legal problems indicate that there is a problem. The form of problem portrayed is victim blaming, a perception that tends to be pessimistic when accessing justice, misunderstanding regarding informal mechanisms, and a perception that their efforts to resolve legal problems will not maket he situation getting better.
MECHANISM OF IMMEDIATE JUDICIAL REVIEW AFTER DETENTION AT THE INVESTIGATION STAGE: A HUMAN RIGHTS PERSPECTIVE M. Rizki Yudha Prawira
Qaumiyyah: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Tata Negara Islam, Fakultas Syariah, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Datokarama Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24239/qaumiyyah.v6i2.284

Abstract

This study examined the provisions on detention during the investigative process as a coercive measure under the Draft of Criminal Procedure Code (RKUHAP). These provisions are deemed not fully aligned with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and its official interpretation in General Comment No. 35. The research employs a normative juridical methodology with a comparative approach, analyzing national legal norms against international standards. The findings reveal that the RKUHAP's detention provisions do not fully adhere to international human rights principles, particularly the state's obligation to prevent prolonged detention without independent judicial oversight. The principle of "promptly," as established in the ICCPR, underscores the importance of due process and acts as a safeguard against arbitrary detention. International standards require that suspects be presented before a judge within 48 hours of arrest, allowing for an assessment of the urgency and legality of the detention. General Comment No. 35 further explicates these technical provisions, highlighting the significance of judicial oversight in safeguarding individual liberty. Abstrak Penelitian ini menganalisis substansi ketentuan penahanan pada proses penyidikan sebagai salah satu bentuk upaya paksa yang diatur dalam Rancangan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (RKUHAP). Ketentuan tersebut dinilai belum sepenuhnya selaras dengan International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) serta penafsiran resminya dalam General Comment No. 35. Metode penelitian yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan komparatif, melalui analisis perbandingan antara norma hukum nasional dan standar HAM internasional. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengaturan penahanan dalam RKUHAP belum sepenuhnya memenuhi prinsip hak asasi manusia internasional, khususnya terkait kewajiban negara untuk memastikan tidak adanya penahanan berkepanjangan tanpa pengawasan yudisial yang independen. Prinsip “segera” (promptly) dalam ICCPR merupakan jaminan atas tegaknya asas due process of law serta bentuk pencegahan terhadap penahanan sewenang-wenang. Standar internasional mewajibkan agar tersangka dihadapkan kepada hakim dalam jangka waktu maksimal 48 jam setelah penangkapan, dengan kehadiran fisik untuk menilai urgensi dan keabsahan penahanan apakah perlu dilakukan atau tidak. Ketentuan teknisnya dijelaskan dalam General Comment No. 35, yang menegaskan pentingnya kontrol yudisial sebagai perlindungan terhadap hak kebebasan individu.
The Urgency of Criminalizing Femicide as a Specific Crime within the Indonesian Legal System Novia Rahmadani; M. Rizki Yudha Prawira
Jurnal Ilmiah Dunia Hukum VOLUME 10 ISSUE 1 OCTOBER 2025
Publisher : PDIH Untag Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/jidh.v10i1.6718

Abstract

This research discusses femicide, which is the most extreme form of gender-based violence, but the Indonesian legal framework, particularly the Criminal Code (KUHP) and the Law on Sexual Violence Crimes (UU TPKS), does not explicitly recognize gender-motivated murder of women. As a result, femicide cases continue to be prosecuted under general homicide provisions without acknowledging discriminatory motives, leading to inadequate legal protection and disproportional sentencing. This research aims to analyze the urgency of criminalizing femicide as a special offense and to formulate an ideal legal concept for its regulation within the Indonesian criminal justice system. Using a normative juridical method supported by statutory, comparative, and conceptual approaches, this study examines national legal norms, international human rights instruments, and comparative legislation from Argentina, Chile, and Mexico. The findings show that a specific femicide offense is essential to fill normative gaps, incorporate gender-based motives as an aggravating factor, and strengthen state obligations under Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, the Belém do Pará Convention, and other global standards. The study concludes that Indonesia requires a dedicated femicide law based on lex specialis principles, gender-sensitive investigation and adjudication mechanisms, and integrated victim-protection measures to ensure a more just, responsive, and gender-equitable criminal law system.
Menolak Buah dari Pohon Beracun: Pengaturan Exclusionary Rule dalam Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia Berdasarkan Perspektif Fair Trial M. Rizki Yudha Prawira; Shahinshah Satria Al Aziz
Esensi Hukum Vol 7 No 2 (2025): Desember - Jurnal Esensi Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35586/esensihukum.v7i2.658

Abstract

The enactment of Law Number 20 of 2025 on the Criminal Procedure Code introduces an improvement to Indonesian criminal evidence law by explicitly recognizing the exclusionary rule in Article 235. Unlike the 1981 Criminal Procedure Code, which merely enumerated categories of evidence without questioning the legality of their acquisition, the new provision establishes procedural legality as a precondition for the admissibility of evidence. This study aims to analyze the regulation of the exclusionary rule under Article 235 and to examine its opportunities and challenges from the perspectives of human rights and the right to a fair trial. The issues discussed include the concepts of illegally obtained evidence and the exclusionary rule, a comparison between the 1981 Code and the new Code, and a review against international human rights instruments. This research employs a normative legal method, using statutory and comparative approaches and drawing on the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) dan Convention Against Torture (CAT). The findings show that Article 235 strengthens human rights and fair trial guarantees, affirms the absolute exclusion of evidence obtained through torture, and restores equality of arms. Nevertheless, the provision has shortcomings, namely the absence of explicit regulation of the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine, the good-faith exception, standing, and the burden of proof. The study recommends reinforcement through supreme court jurisprudence, implementing regulations, and the transformation of law enforcement working culture.
Co-Authors Aisyah Nurhalizah Aji Lukman Ibrahim Al Fath Anni Alvionita Simanjuntak Aryaputri, Aqila Shafiqa Davilla Prawidya Azharia Diani Sadiawati Falevi, Yunizar Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar Hanifah, Nida Syahla Hannafiah, Mumtaz Hilda Novyana Hutagaol, Jessica Ariana Islami, Diajeng Dhea Annisa Aura Muhammad Raihan Yulistio Nada Syifa Nurulhuda Novia Rahmadani Prabangkara, Ali Arva Putri, Fadiza Amalia Rafif Sani Remal Agungta Ketaren, Saher Rianda Dirkareshza Riyanto Riyanto Shahinshah Satria Al Aziz Siti Helmyati Virna Amalia Nur Permata Wibowo, Hanifah Fairuz Yusuf Argiansyah, Hikmal