Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 25 Documents
Search

Regulation Act of Torture in Criminal Code: Opportunity and Challenge to Improve Human Rights Situation in Indonesia M. Rizki Yudha Prawira
JUSTISI Vol. 11 No. 1 (2025): JUSTISI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33506/js.v11i1.3653

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the opportunities and challenges with regulating the criminal act of torture in Law No. 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code (KUHP). The provisions regarding the criminal act of torture in the Criminal Code certainly open up opportunities in efforts to eliminate the practice of torture in Indonesia. The provisions of Article 530 of the current Criminal Code and the explanatory section stipulate that this article directly derives from the provisions in the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. On the other hand, all efforts and mechanisms to eliminate the practice of torture in Indonesia still require many steps to be taken. This research was conducted using a normative juridical method with a statutory approach. This research also provides an explanation of several gaps from previous similar studies by explaining several novel analyses, such as: (1) the application of sanctions to perpetrators must be adjusted to the provisions of international instruments, (2) revision of various articles in the Criminal Procedure Code which has the potential to perpetuate the practice of torture, and (3) the urgency to ratify the Optional Protocol to the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (OPCAT). The conclusion of this research is an explanation that the regulation of criminal acts of torture in the provisions of the new Criminal Code needs to be appreciated, but of course it is not enough. The state must have high commitment and political will to revise the Criminal Procedure Code openly and involve the community, ratify OPCAT, implement national legal provisions, and ensure law enforcement against perpetrators.
Anti-Bullying Education, Discipline Education, and Responsibilities at SDN Rawa Barat 05 AM: Edukasi Anti-Bullying, Pendidikan Disiplin, dan Tanggung Jawab Pada SDN Rawa Barat 05 Pagi Ibrahim*, Aji Lukman; Bachtiar, Handar Subhandi; M. Rizki Yudha Prawira; Hilda Novyana; Anni Alvionita Simanjuntak; Al Fath; Nada Syifa Nurulhuda; Virna Amalia Nur Permata; Aisyah Nurhalizah; Rafif Sani; Riyanto, Riyanto
Dinamisia : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Vol. 8 No. 4 (2024): Dinamisia: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat
Publisher : Universitas Lancang Kuning

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31849/dinamisia.v8i4.20062

Abstract

Untuk memberikan pemahaman yang lebih mendalam mengenai pencegahan perundungan, sikap disiplin, dan tanggung jawab diperlukan adanya pemberian edukasi yang tepat dan terarah kepada peserta didik. Edukasi dengan cara edukasi menjadi salah satu langkah untuk mencegah adanya kasus perundungan khususnya di SDN Rawa Barat 05 Pagi, edukasi ini melibatkan 30 peserta didik. Pengabdian ini menggunakan metode ceramah, edukasi, dan diskusi yang berjudul Edukasi Sadar Hukum Terhadap Bullying Serta Pendidikan Disiplin dan Tanggung Jawab. Target dari pengabdian ini adalah siswa Sekolah Dasar yang duduk di kelas 4 dan kelas 5. Adapun tujuan dari pengabdian ini adalah untuk membentuk sikap disiplin serta tanggung jawab agar tindakan perundungan di sekolah diminimalisasi. Peningkatan pemahaman peserta didik dapat dilihat dari hasil posttest yang memperlihatkan peserta didik dapat memahami materi yang dibawakan.
The Urgency of Criminalizing Femicide as a Specific Crime in the Indonesian Legal System Rahmadani, Novia; Prawira, M. Rizki Yudha
Jurnal Ilmiah Dunia Hukum VOLUME 10 ISSUE 1 OCTOBER 2025
Publisher : PDIH Untag Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/jidh.v10i1.6718

Abstract

Femicide represents the most extreme form of gender-based violence, yet Indonesia’s legal framework particularly the Criminal Code (KUHP) and the Sexual Violence Crime Law (UU TPKS) does not explicitly recognize gender-motivated killings of women. As a result, femicide cases continue to be prosecuted under general homicide provisions without acknowledging discriminatory motives, leading to inadequate legal protection and disproportional sentencing. This research aims to analyze the urgency of criminalizing femicide as a special offense and to formulate an ideal legal concept for its regulation within the Indonesian criminal justice system. Using a normative juridical method supported by statutory, comparative, and conceptual approaches, this study examines national legal norms, international human rights instruments, and comparative legislation from Argentina, Chile, and Mexico. The findings show that a specific femicide offense is essential to fill normative gaps, incorporate gender-based motives as an aggravating factor, and strengthen state obligations under Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, the Belém do Pará Convention, and other global standards. The study concludes that Indonesia requires a dedicated femicide law based on lex specialis principles, gender-sensitive investigation and adjudication mechanisms, and integrated victim-protection measures to ensure a more just, responsive, and gender-equitable criminal law system.
Criminal Act of Attack on Honor Following the Constitutional Court Decision No. 105/PUU-XXII/2024: Human Rights Perspective Putri, Fadiza Amalia; Prawira, M. Rizki Yudha
Jurnal Daulat Hukum Vol 8, No 4 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/jdh.v8i4.49048

Abstract

The criminal act of attack on honor under Article 27A of Law No.  1 of 2024, following Constitutional Court Decision Number 105/PUU-XXII/2024, reflects Indonesia’s ongoing effort to balance the protection of individual dignity with the constitutional guarantee of freedom of expression. This study aims to analyze the human rights implications of the Constitutional Court’s ruling, which clarifies the interpretation of the phrases “other person” and “a matter” in Article 27A. Employing a normative legal research method and a qualitative descriptive approach, the study examines statutory provisions and the Court’s reasoning through the principles of legality, necessity, and proportionality as articulated in international human rights standards. The findings indicate that the Court’s conditional interpretation—restricting “other person” to natural persons and defining “a matter” as “an act that demeans the honor or reputation of an individual”—constitutes a significant normative improvement toward legal certainty. However, law enforcement practice continues to reveal the potential for this article to be misused to silence criticism of public officials, generating a persistent tension between normative ideals and implementation realities. This research’s novelty lies in providing the first human rights–based analysis of Article 27A following the Constitutional Court’s ruling, offering a new framework for evaluating the proportionality of criminal restrictions on freedom of expression in Indonesia’s digital democratic era.
Accountability of Shell Company's Practices in Tax Law Perspective by Limited Liability Companies: A Review of Good Corporate Governance Hutagaol, Jessica Ariana; Prawira, M. Rizki Yudha
Jurnal Daulat Hukum Vol 8, No 4 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/jdh.v8i4.49041

Abstract

The use of shell companies by limited liability companies as a means of tax avoidance demonstrates a legal abuse that impacts the dilemma of legal compliance and business ethics. This action raises questions regarding the implementation of good corporate governance, which should be the basic ethics of every company. This study used a normative juridical method through a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. This study utilizes primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials and then examines them descriptively. The results of the study indicate that the use of shell companies for tax avoidance purposes is contrary to the principles of good corporate governance. This scheme in practice can be subject to tax and criminal sanctions in its accountability.