Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

Critical Analysis of the Implementation of the Restorative Justice System in the Indonesian Legal System Runtunuwu, Yoan Barbara; Mesra, Romi
Jurnal Mahkamah Hukum Vol 1 No 1 (2024): (May) Jurnal Mahkamah Hukum
Publisher : PT. NALURI EDUKASI PRESS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64924/tg7jfw75

Abstract

This study aims to critically analyze the implementation of restorative justice practices in Indonesia, highlighting its positive aspects, challenges, and recommendations for improvement. Research method of this article is a comprehensive review of relevant literature, including theoretical frameworks, empirical studies, and policy documents, was conducted to examine the adoption of restorative justice in the Indonesian context. The analysis focused on evaluating the cultural alignment, victim empowerment, community involvement, legal and institutional frameworks, capacity and resource constraints, and stakeholder perspectives. The findings reveal that while restorative justice aligns with traditional Indonesian values and offers a victim-centered approach and community involvement, its implementation faces significant challenges. These include the lack of a comprehensive legal framework, limited application to minor offenses, victim reluctance due to power imbalances, and capacity and resource constraints across diverse regions. To address these challenges, the study recommends developing a robust legal framework, cautiously expanding the application to certain serious offenses with robust safeguards, strengthening victim support services, investing in capacity-building initiatives, and promoting public awareness and education. Overall, the successful implementation of restorative justice in Indonesia requires overcoming legal and institutional gaps, building capacity and resources, and fostering a culture of victim empowerment, community involvement, and offender accountability. By addressing these challenges, Indonesia can pave the way for a more holistic, inclusive, and effective justice system that promotes healing, reconciliation, and social harmony.
Analisis Yuridis Penerapan Asas Presumption of Innocence dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia Runtunuwu, Yoan Barbara; Barakati, Morais
Jurnal Mahkamah Hukum Vol 1 No 2 (2024): (November) Jurnal Mahkamah Hukum
Publisher : PT. NALURI EDUKASI PRESS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64924/v4z3ec93

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis secara yuridis penerapan asas presumption of innocence dalam sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia, mengidentifikasi tantangan dan kendala yang dihadapi, serta merumuskan rekomendasi untuk memperkuat implementasinya. Metode yang digunakan adalah literatur review sistematis, dengan menganalisis berbagai sumber literatur yang relevan menggunakan kerangka teori sistem hukum Friedman dan teori hukum progresif Rahardjo. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun asas presumption of innocence telah diadopsi secara formal, implementasinya masih menghadapi berbagai tantangan terkait substansi, struktur, dan kultur hukum. Penelitian ini mengidentifikasi perlunya pendekatan komprehensif yang melibatkan reformasi hukum, penguatan kelembagaan, peningkatan kapasitas aparat penegak hukum, dan edukasi publik untuk memperkuat penerapan asas ini dalam sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia.
Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan Hidup di ASEAN: Perbandingan antara Negara Anggota dan Implikasinya thd Keberlanjutan Lingkungan Runtunuwu, Yoan Barbara
Jurnal Mahkamah Hukum Vol 2 No 2 (2025): (November) Jurnal Mahkamah Hukum
Publisher : PT. NALURI EDUKASI PRESS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64924/a92dr059

Abstract

This study aims to analyze environmental law enforcement mechanisms in ASEAN member countries and examine their implications for regional environmental sustainability. Using a normative legal approach combined with comparative case studies, this study analyzes secondary data in the form of laws and regulations, international agreements, scientific journals, and official reports from Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam. The analysis is conducted qualitatively using comparative techniques to identify differences in legislative frameworks, institutional capacity, oversight mechanisms, and enforcement effectiveness. The results show significant variations in the effectiveness of environmental law enforcement, with Singapore having the most effective system (Environmental Performance Index ranking 39) and Vietnam (ranking 141). This disparity impacts regional environmental sustainability, as evidenced by transboundary environmental problems such as haze, which causes economic losses of USD 16.1 billion per year. Countries with effective law enforcement exhibit better air quality (Singapore's PM2.5 12 μg/m³ vs. Vietnam's 35 μg/m³) and higher levels of industrial compliance (Singapore's 94% vs. Vietnam's 48%). This study recommends strengthening national capacity, regional harmonization, and increasing ASEAN cooperation to achieve optimal environmental sustainability.