Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.266
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JUSTITIA JURNAL HUKUM Journal Analytica Islamica Unes Law Review Sewagati: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia AHKAM : Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Humaniora Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Fatih: Journal of Contemporary Research Sujud: Jurnal Agama, Sosial dan Budaya
Ibnu Radwan Siddik Turnip
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Studi Perbandingan Reformasi Hukum Perceraian Di Negara Muslim: Mesir, Pakistan, Malaysia, Dan Indonesia Jumita Riska; Dea Nurul Ela Puteri Br Bangun; Ibnu Radwan Siddik Turnip; Rahmat Efendi Rangkuti
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 4 No 2 (2026): 2026
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v4i2.4492

Abstract

Artikel ini bertujuan untuk melakukan studi perbandingan ketentuan hukum perceraian di beberapa Negara muslim meliputi Mesir, Pakistan, Malaysia dan Indonesia, yang dianalisa dengan menggunakan metode kualitatif, dan menganalisanya dengan kajian kepustakaan, lalu artikel ini dilihat dengan metode pendekatan penelitian komparatif, yaitu dilihat dengan berdasarkan perbandingan reformasi hukum dari masing-masing Negara. Dalam penelitian ini menampilkan hukum atau undang-undang hukum keluarga yang mengalami reformasi dari ke empat Negara ini; Mesir memperkenalkan pembaharuan dalam hukum keluarga pertamakali dengan mengesahkan Undang-Undang No.25 tahun 1920 dan 1929. Pakistan, lewat Muslim Familiy Law Ordinance tahun 1961 mengatur persoalan perceraian dan menjamin hak perempuan di dalamnya. Malaysia, ada beberapa aturan yang dipegang pada masing-masing wilayah sekutu dalam Negara tersebut. Indonesia, Sedangkan di Indonesia aturan mengenai perceraian tertuang dalam Undang-Undang Perkawinan tahun 1974 dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam.
Isu Gender dalam Reformasi Hukum Perkawinan di Negara-Negara Islam Tengku Rizki Rahman; Heriandi Heriandi; Ibnu Radwan Siddik Turnip; Rahmad Efendi
AHKAM Vol 5 No 1 (2026): MARET
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/ahkam.v5i1.8877

Abstract

Although marriage law reform in Muslim-majority countries has received sustained academic attention, studies that systematically classify reform trajectories based on the interaction between the legitimacy of sharīʿa, state authority, and gender justice remain relatively limited. This study aimed to analyze how Muslim states negotiate women’s rights in Islamic family law through different models of legal reform. Employing a qualitative, historical–comparative approach in legal studies, it examines statutory texts, judicial practice, and law reform policies in selected Muslim-majority jurisdictions. Data were obtained from primary legislation, court decisions, and authoritative secondary literature and were analyzed using comparative legal reasoning and thematic analysis. The findings identify three main reform models. The conservative–traditional model, evident in Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and several Gulf states, maintains classical fiqh with minimal state intervention, thereby perpetuating hierarchical gender relations. The moderate–codificatory model, implemented in Egypt, Morocco, Jordan, and Indonesia, selectively modifies fiqh through state codification and judicial oversight, enabling incremental gender reform. The secular–progressive model, as exemplified by Turkey and Tunisia, reconstructs family law by discarding sharīʿa as the basis of state law, abolishing male guardianship, prohibiting polygamy, and institutionalizing more gender-equal forms of divorce. This study concludes that Islamic marriage law reform does not move linearly toward secularization but rather produces a spectrum of normative arrangements shaped by configurations of political authority, interpretive choices in law, and evolving gender discourses. These findings contribute to the development of comparative Islamic law theory and offer policy-relevant implications for the design and implementation of future family law reforms.
THE VIEWS OF RELIGIOUS COURT JUDGES IN NORTH SUMATRA REGARDING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ROYALTIES REMAINING JOINT PROPERTY AFTER DIVORCE Syahran Camil; Ibnu Radwan Siddik Turnip
Journal Analytica Islamica Vol 14, No 2 (2025): ANALYTICA ISLAMICA
Publisher : Program Pascasarjana UIN Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30829/jai.v14i2.26581

Abstract

The status of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) royalties as joint property after divorce remains a matter of debate among academics and legal practitioners due to the lack of clear regulations in positive law or the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI). This article aims to examine the views of judges at the Religious Court of North Sumatra regarding IPR royalties remaining as joint property after divorce. This study uses empirical juridical research with a statutory approach, case studies, and a conceptual approach. Primary data sources were obtained from interviews with several Religious Court judges domiciled in North Sumatra. Secondary data sources were obtained from primary legal materials such as Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright and Law Number 13 of 2016 concerning Patents. Data analysis used qualitative analysis methods. The results show that the views of Religious Court judges in North Sumatra regarding the distribution of IPR royalties after divorce are very diverse, reflecting a spectrum of thought from moderate to restrictive. Some judges argue that the approach to distributing royalties from intellectual works, such as songs, is based on the principle of moderate justice. The 50:50 distribution scheme is considered a basic rule or default rule that reflects the balance of rights between both parties during the marriage. However, this rule is not absolute; the distribution can be adjusted if there is evidence that one party has made a greater contribution, whether financially, through creative ideas, or through administrative support. Some judges reject the distribution of intellectual property royalties after a divorce, in order to maintain the principle of creator autonomy, unless there is a clear prenuptial agreement. In other words, intellectual property rights cannot simply be categorized as joint property without a clear contractual legal basis. Others prefer a contextual approach, assessing each case uniquely based on the economic structure, relationship history, and contributions of each party.
Co-Authors Ainul Mardhiyah Khaidir Anggi Egi Anggraini Dea Nurul Ela Puteri Br Bangun Faisar Ananda Faisar Ananda Arfa Farida Berliana Heriandi Heriandi Hotma Pasaribu Jumita Riska Juni Arnisa Napitupulu Khairatun Nisa M. Rafli Lingga Muhammad Hafiz Antassalam Muhammad Zikri Rahmad Efendi Rahmad Efendi Rangkuti Rahmat Efendi Rahmat Efendi Rangkuti Siti Khairani Maisyaroh Sulastri Daulay Syahran Camil Tengku Rizki Rahman Wiranto Zainul Aziz