Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.066
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS) Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains Scientific Development Journal
Mery Rohana Lisbeth Sibarani
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
Law Enforcement of Criminal Actions for Capital Market Insider Trading Carried Out by Corporations Based on Law Number 8 of 1995 Mery Rohana Lisbeth Sibarani
International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS) Vol. 6 No. 2: April 2024
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56338/ijhess.v6i1.3581

Abstract

Corporations in Indonesia are legal subjects because they have rights and obligations. The capital market has high volatility so that insider trading is very detrimental to the implementation of the capital market which is one of the country's economic instruments. The issue of insider trading as an individual has been regulated in Law Number 8 of 1995, however the implementation of the imposition on corporate criminal sanctions has not yet been rigidly regulated or applied. This research aims to determine how criminal sanctions and insider trading regulations are carried out by corporations based on the Capital Markets Law. The method used is normative juridical. The results of this research found that insider trading regulations are located in articles 95 to 99 of the Capital Markets Law and investigation procedures are under BAPEPAM-LK. The crime of corporate insider trading can be punished because of Article 1 point 23 of the Capital Markets Law and the maximum fine is contained in Article 14, namely a fine of IDR 15,000,000,000.00.
Karakteristik Noodweer dalam Penghapusan Sanksi Pidana: Characteristics of Noodweer in the Elimination of Criminal Sanctions Mery Rohana Lisbeth Sibarani; Riadi Asra Rahmad; Zulkarnain S; Hamzah Mardiansyah; Daffa Fadhil Maulana
Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains Vol. 7 No. 9: September 2024
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (164.785 KB) | DOI: 10.56338/jks.v2i1.732

Abstract

Noodweer merupakan prinsip hukum yang memungkinkan seseorang untuk menghindari hukuman pidana jika tindakannya dilakukan untuk mempertahankan diri dari ancaman langsung dan tidak sah. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi elemen-elemen kunci dari noodweer, termasuk syarat-syarat legal yang harus dipenuhi, serta bagaimana penerapan prinsip ini dalam praktik hukum. Artikel ini juga membahas tantangan dalam penegakan noodweer, seperti penilaian proporsionalitas dan kebutuhan dalam situasi pembelaan diri. Melalui pendekatan penelitian hukum yuridis normative yang secara spesifik menggunakan deskriptif analitis, artikel ini memberikan pemahaman yang lebih mendalam mengenai bagaimana noodweer dapat diterapkan untuk menghapuskan sanksi pidana dan bagaimana prinsip ini berfungsi dalam sistem peradilan pidana. dasar hukum noodweer (self-defense) di Indonesia terutama diatur dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP). Noodweer merupakan prinsip penting dalam hukum pidana yang memungkinkan penghapusan sanksi pidana jika elemen-elemen noodweer terpenuhi.
Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Narkotika: Law Enforcement Against Narcotics Crime Maria Alberta Liza Quintarti; Ilham; Mery Rohana Lisbeth Sibarani; Hajairin; Muchamad Taufiq
Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains Vol. 7 No. 6: Juni 2024
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56338/jks.v7i6.5540

Abstract

Narkotika menurut Pasal 1 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika, adalah zat atau obat yang berasal dari tanaman atau bukan tanaman, baik sintetis maupun semisintetis, yang dapat menyebabkan penurunan atau perubahan kesadaran, hilangnya rasa, mengurangi sampai menghilangkan rasa nyeri, dan dapat menimbulkan ketergantungan. Pecandu narkotika wajib direhabilitasi. Dalam hal ini yang dimaksud dengan pecandu berdasarkan Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung (SEMA) Nomor 4 Tahun 2010 tentang Penempatan Penyalahgunaan, Korban Penyalahgunaan dan Pecandu Narkotika ke dalam Lembaga Rehabilitasi Medis dan Rehabilitasi Sosial adalah orang yang menggunakan atau menyalahgunakan narkotika dalam keadaan ketergantungan baik secara fisik maupun psikis, tentang penempatan penyalah guna, korban penyalahguna dan pecandu narkotika ditempatkan ke dalam lembaga rehabilitasi medis dan sosial. Dalam proses penegakan hukum terhadap tindak pidana narkotika baik dalam proses penyelidikan, penyidikan, penuntutan, pemeriksaan didepan sidang pengadilan dan proses eksekusi mengacu pada Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP) sedangkan dalam pengenaan sanksinya diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika.
Penerapan Konsep Pembuktian Digital dalam Kasus Kejahatan Teknologi Informasi: Application of the Concept of Digital Evidence in Information Technology Crime Cases Mery Rohana Lisbeth Sibarani; Bambang Supriadi; Zabidin; Herniwati; Ozha Tiwa Hiawananta
Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains Vol. 8 No. 1: Januari 2025
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56338/jks.v8i1.6742

Abstract

Kejahatan berbasis teknologi juga meningkat seiring dengan berkembangnya teknologi informasi yang sangat pesat. Berbagai pelanggaran yang memanfaatkan perangkat digital termasuk dalam kategori ini: hacking, penipuan online, pencurian identitas, hingga penyebaran informasi yang merugikan. Penerapan konsep pembuktian digital merupakan bagian yang sangat penting dari proses penegakan hukum kejahatan ini. Pengumpulan, penyimpanan, dan analisis bukti dari perangkat atau sistem digital, seperti komputer, ponsel, server, dan jaringan internet, disebut pembuktian digital. Bukti digital ini harus dapat dipertanggungjawabkan secara hukum dan harus menjadi komponen penting dari proses pengadilan. Artikel ini akan membahas lebih lanjut tentang bagaimana konsep pembuktian digital dapat digunakan dalam kasus kejahatan teknologi informasi. Ini akan membahas masalah yang ada dalam proses pembuktian dan solusi untuk masalah tersebut.
The Application of the Ultimum Remedium Principle in the Handling of Minor Crimes in Indonesia Mery Rohana Lisbeth Sibarani; Aribandi; Aliman; Ade Ari Gumilar; Liza Utama
International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS) Vol. 7 No. 3: July 2025
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56338/ijhess.v7i3.8187

Abstract

The principle of ultimum remedium serves as a fundamental concept in criminal law, emphasizing that criminal sanctions should be the final recourse after other legal remedies are deemed insufficient. This doctrine arises from the understanding that criminal law is inherently repressive and should only be employed when non-penal approaches fail to resolve legal issues. In Indonesia, the application of this principle in handling minor criminal offenses remains problematic. Although recent legal reforms have begun to incorporate restorative justice mechanisms, punitive approaches still dominate in practice. Many individuals committing petty crimes continue to be prosecuted through formal judicial proceedings and subjected to imprisonment, despite the relatively minor harm caused. This study explores the extent to which the ultimum remedium principle has been implemented in the enforcement of minor criminal offenses in Indonesia. It also examines the challenges hindering its effective application and offers potential policy recommendations. Using a normative juridical approach, this research analyzes statutory provisions and relevant case studies. The findings indicate that the principle has not been fully realized, primarily due to inconsistent enforcement practices among law enforcement officials and the underdevelopment of alternative dispute resolution frameworks outside the court system.
Juridical Analysis of the Death Penalty for Perpetrators of Corruption as the Ultimate Remidium for Corruption Eradication in Indonesia Mery Rohana Lisbeth Sibarani
Side: Scientific Development Journal Vol. 2 No. 6 (2025): Side: Scientific Development Journal
Publisher : Arbain Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59613/krz7jx57

Abstract

The death penalty for perpetrators of corruption crimes is regulated in Article 2 of Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes jo. Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Amendments to Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes (hereinafter referred to as the PTPK Law). The death penalty is imposed on perpetrators of corruption crimes with crimes that harm state finances under certain circumstances, namely perpetrators of corruption crimes commit corruption when the state is in danger in accordance with applicable laws, when a national natural disaster occurs, as a repetition of corruption crimes, or when the country is in a state of economic and monetary crisis. However, in Indonesia, the death penalty for convicted corruptors is still minimal, even corruption of the Minister of Social Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia, Juliari Batubara, was not sentenced to death and received leniency by a judge in a different trial than in China, even though the death penalty or uitvoering provides a deterrent effect for corrupt perpetrators that correlates with the eradication of corruption. This type of research is normative research. The result of this study is that the regulation of the death penalty in Indonesia is already contained in the Criminal Code and the special criminal law of the death penalty is also found in the Drug Law, the Terrorism Law, the Human Rights Court Law and PTPK. Both in general and special criminal law, the death penalty is only given to extra ordinary or very cruel crimes that have an impact on a wide audience. Indonesia has similarities in the application of the death penalty with China, namely providing the death penalty for corruption crimes and has carried out more executions of corruption convicts than Indonesia. Both countries prioritize human rights, so that the imposition of the death penalty has a waiting period and changes to life imprisonment if the convict shows efforts to improve commendable behavior and actions as well as the right to apply for clemency. The death penalty as the ultimate remidium in Indonesia has not been effective so that it cannot produce a deterrent effect for the eradication of corruption in Indonesia.
Co-Authors Ade Ari Gumilar Aliman Aribandi Daffa Fadhil Maulana Hajairin Hamzah Mardiansyah Herniwati ILHAM Liza Utama Maria Alberta Liza Quintarti Muchamad Taufiq Ozha Tiwa Hiawananta Riadi Asra Rahmad Supriadi, Bambang Zabidin Zulkarnain S