Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.325
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Elektronik Pendidikan Matematika Tadulako Jurnal Kreatif Tadulako Online AKSIOMA Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika HISTOGRAM: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Journal of Honai Math Prima: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Sustainable: Jurnal Kajian Mutu Pendidikan Aksioma Media Eksakta Jurnal Elektronik Pendidikan Matematika Tadulako
Bakri Mallo
Universitas Tadulako
Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 42 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 42 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4   5 
THE IMPACT OF RADEC LEARNING MODEL ON THE PROBLEM-SOLVING ABILITY OF HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS Mallo, Bakri; Idris, Mustamin
Journal of Honai Math Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Honai Math
Publisher : Universitas Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aimed to determine whether the RADEC learning model with differentiated learning strategies significantly impacted the mathematical problem-solving abilities of high school students in Palu City. The research method is a quasi-experiment with an intact group comparison design. The instruments used are problem-solving ability tests and learning style questionnaires. Data were analyzed using t-test statistics and two-way ANOVA. The results showed that the RADEC learning model with differentiated learning strategies had a greater impact than the direct instruction model on the mathematical problem-solving abilities of high school students in Palu City. The mean score of problem-solving abilities of students who followed the RADEC learning model was 79.63. While the mean score of problem-solving of students who followed the direct instruction model was 50.72 the difference in the impact of the learning model was 28.91. The RADEC learning model does not provide a different impact on mathematical problem-solving abilities in high school students in Palu City based on learning styles.
ANALYSIS OF THE THINKING PROCESS OF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS INPRES 1 KAWATUNA IN SOLVING AKM PROBLEMS BASED ON WALLAS THEORY IN TERMS OF LEARNING STYLES Riska, Riska; Mubarik, Mubarik; Sukayasa, Sukayasa; Mallo, Bakri
Prima: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Vol 9, No 2 (2025): PRIMA : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika
Publisher : FKIP Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31000/prima.v9i2.13933

Abstract

This study aims to describe students' thinking process in solving Minimum Competency Assessment (AKM) questions based on learning styles. This research uses a descriptive qualitative approach with the method of analyzing the thinking process according to Wallas which includes four stages, namely: the preparation stage, the incubation stage, the illumination stage, and the verification stage. The research subjects consisted of three students, namely one student with a visual learning style, one student with an auditory learning style and one student with a kinesthetic learning style. The data collection technique was carried out through giving a learning style questionnaire, giving AKM test questions and unstructured interviews, after which it was analyzed using the data condensation model, data presentation, and conclusion drawing/verification. The results showed that in the preparation stage, subjects with visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles gathered information by reading the questions repeatedly. At the incubation stage, subjects with visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles understand the problem well then reflect on ideas to solve the problem. At the illumination stage, visual, auditory and kinesthetic subjects find ideas and express ideas to solve the problem, but at this stage auditory and kinesthetic subjects cannot find more than one idea while visual subjects can find more than one idea to solve the problem. At the verification stage, visual, auditory and kinesthetic subjects express their ideas verbally well, but at this stage auditory subjects do not re-examine the answers they have done while visual and kinesthetic subjects always re-examine the answers they have done.
Co-Authors Abd. Hamid Abdul Hamid Abimanyu, Wisnu Aam Ahmad Ahmad Apriyanti Wulandari Asmar Asmar Asmar, Asmar Baharuddin Paloloang Baharuddin Paloloang Dasa Ismaimuza Debi Susilawati Deswati, Elvira Dewi Oktariani Didit Firmansyah Elin Rostriana Evie Awuy Evie Awuy Firmansyah, Didit Fitrianti Fitrianti Gandung Sugita Geofana, Jeane Hardianti Hayah, Ni I Nyoman Murdiana I Nyoman Murdiana Ibni Hadjar Jeane Geofana Karniman, Tegoeh S. Khaeri, Fathul Laksono Trisnantoro Linawati Linawati Lusi Susilawati Mardatillah Mubarik Mubarik MUFIDAH Muh Hasbi Muh. Rizal Muhammad Rivai Mursyid, Baso Amri MUSTAMIN IDRIS Ni Hayah Niluh Putu Ayu Mecawati Nur Ainun Nurulia Nurulia, Nurulia Pathuddin Pujiati Sari Rachmawiasari RATNA SARI Ratna Sari Riska Riska Rita Lefrida Sari, Pujiati Sindi Geby Sintia Sudarman Bennu Sukayasa Susilawati, Lusi Sutji Rochaminah Tegoeh S. Karniman Tiska Tiska, Tiska Tri Endrawati Wisnu Aam Abimanyu Wulandari, Apriyanti