Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.255
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah DE JURE Substantia: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin LEGITIMASI: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum SAMARAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Media Syari'ah: Wahana Kajian Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial Kafa’ah: Journal of Gender Studies JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah) DIKTUM: JURNAL SYARIAH DAN HUKUM Al-Mudharabah Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Peradilan Islam
Khairuddin Hasballah
Univeristas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry, Banda Aceh
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 23 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Identifying ‘Illat through Munasabah in Islamic Law: A Perspective of Imam Al-Ghazali Hasballah, Khairuddin; Darna, Andi; Said, Wardana; Akbar, Hajarul; Karim Makinara, Ihdi; Fauzan, Faisal
Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam Vol 5, No 2 (2021): Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam
Publisher : Islamic Family Law Department, Sharia and Law Faculty, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/sjhk.v5i2.10914

Abstract

This study discusses the way in determining ‘illat through the munasabah method proposed by Imam al-Ghazali in the perspective of Islamic law. The study focuses on two main problems: the identification of ‘illat through munasabah and the legal formulation to utilize hikmat to obtain ‘illat according to al-Ghazali. This normative legal research used a legal history approach as an analytical tool to examine the Islamic scholars’ thoughts on concepts, theories and ways of doing istinbath. The study concluded that according to al-Ghazali there are three kinds of munasabah in determining ‘illat, consisting of munasib mu’atstsir, munasab mula’im, and munasib gharib. In munasib mu’atstsir, there is no issue found in seeking ‘illat because the ‘illat is understood directly from the nash or ijma’. Therefore, munasabah is no longer needed in the determining ‘illat. Here, the munasabah method focuses on munasib mula’im and munasib gharib in identifying ‘illat. Munasib mula’im seeks for the genus ‘illat, an ‘illat drawn from every event that has been predetermined by the nash, by examining the same hikmah in each of the events. Such hikmah is then used as the genus ‘illat which will later be applied as qiyas for other events that have been legally stipulated by the nash. On the other hand, munasib gharib seeks for the species ‘illat, an ‘illat obtained from an event that has been predetermined by the nash, with no comparison found in other events. ‘Illat determined from munasib gharib is also hikmah, having no concrete nature. In the perspective of legal history, this method of seeking ‘illat is inseparable from kalam and philosophy as was the development of the Islamic sciences at the time. As such, this had also affected al-Ghazali’s mastery in Islamic law as well as in other Islamic disciplines. 
Resolving Inheritance Conflicts and Their Legal Repercussions in Aceh: A Sociological and Anthropological Look at Peace Initiatives Using Customary Courts M. Amin, Sayuthi; Hakim, Lukman; Hasballah, Khairuddin; Khairani, Khairani; Mustaqiem, Riza Afrian
El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): EL-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/akx7xp17

Abstract

The division of inheritance is a legal matter that intersects significantly with local customs and cultural practices. Within the field of legal studies, dispute resolution is generally categorized into two pathways: litigation (formal legal processes) and non-litigation (customary deliberation). Non-litigation methods include Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) and customary courts, the latter being a distinctive feature of Aceh's legal landscape, recognized as a special domain of customary law by the Indonesian government. Each approach to resolving inheritance disputes, whether through formal or customary channels, presents its own advantages and drawbacks. This article examines the resolution of inheritance disputes and the legal consequences arising from the application of customary justice mechanisms in Aceh. The research adopts an empirical legal methodology, incorporating sociological and anthropological perspectives. Fieldwork was conducted in Aceh Besar, Central Aceh, and Aceh Tamiang districts, utilizing interviews and literature reviews for data collection. The findings reveal that inheritance division in local tradition follows the concept of trok uroe, with distribution being the responsibility of the heirs. Inheritance disputes in Aceh are predominantly resolved through non-litigation avenues, specifically through customary institutions operating within the gampong and mukim customary courts. The resulting legal implications are primarily non-litigation impacts, including both primary and secondary social effects, though these are not overwhelmingly dominant. Litigation-based legal consequences, while present, are minimal in influence. From a sociological and anthropological standpoint, the preference for non-litigation approaches contributes positively to social cohesion and cultural preservation within the Acehnese society.
The Marriage Model in the Gayo Community and Its Impact on the Inheritance System Hasballah, Khairuddin; Achyar, Gamal
Media Syari'ah Vol 26 No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/jms.v26i1.22180

Abstract

The issue of inheritance is closely related to kinship ties, both blood and marital. An example of marriage model in the Gayo community differs from other Acehnese communities, thus leading to different inheritance practices. The Gayo community recognizes three marriage models: jeulen, angkap, and kuso-kini. This is interesting to study in relation to the inheritance system in the Gayo community and its connection to these marriage models. Research findings indicate that inheritance practices in some parts of the Gayo community are greatly influenced by their marriage models. For instance, female children who marry jeulen may not receive inheritance rights, while male children who marry angkap may also be excluded from inheritance. According to traditional Gayo leaders, the inheritance system in the Gayo community is not directly influenced by their marriage system, as they adhere to Islamic inheritance laws. Any deviation from Islamic inheritance laws is attributed to the ignorance of village authorities or the heirs themselves, rather than customary practices. The research also found other inheritance issues practiced by the Gayo community, such as equal distribution of inheritance based on responsibilities towards parents and family. The study also revealed various cultural practices in the Gayo community that warrant further serious and in-depth research, both in terms of marital customs and inheritance systems (such as cases where parents are not given inheritance rights when the heir is still alive), and other related matters.
Co-Authors Abdul Jalil Salam Agustin Hanapi Akbar, Hajarul Badri Hasan Barnawy, Julius Darna, Andi Fauzan, Faisal Gamal Achyar Harnides, Harnides Haya Rizqa Ihdi Karim Makinara Imanuddin Imanuddin Julius Barnawy Khairani Khairani Lukman Hakim M. Amin, Sayuthi Mubarrak, Dhaiful Muhammad Haiqal Bin Mohamad Angkashah Muntasir A Kadir Mursyid Djawas Muslim Zainuddin Mustaqiem, Riza Afrian Mutiara Fahmi Nurul Auliyana Qandian Rahmadani Rahmadani Ridha Syahfutra Ridwan Nurdin Saddam Rassanjani Said, Wardana Soraya Devy Syahrizal Abbas Tarmizi M. Jakfar Yusfriadi Abda Zaiyad Zubaidi