Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Pelanggaran Imunitas Diplomatik oleh Petugas Imigrasi Indonesia Kajian Yuridis terhadap Konvensi Wina 1961 Anesva Sari Della; Zahra Utami Aprilia; Firdhan Azhim Akbar; Ema Septaria; M. Ilham Adepio
Journal of Innovative and Creativity Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/joecy.v5i2.408

Abstract

Diplomatic Immunity is one of the important things in international relations, which is regulated by the 1961 Vienna Convention to protect diplomats in carrying out their duties. However, the application of this immunity often poses challenges, especially when there is tension between international law and domestic law. Such as in the incident involving Nigerian diplomats who were attacked by Indonesian immigration officers in 2021. This incident raises the question of how the Principle of Diplomatic Immunity Relates to Indonesian Immigration Law and How the Implementation of Indonesian Immigration Law Policy is in the Case of Nigerian Diplomats. This study uses a normative approach with the Statute Approach method, namely the approach to statutory regulations consisting of legal materials and is of a library research nature. The results of this study indicate that, although Indonesia has a strict immigration policy, the protection of diplomatic rights based on the 1961 Vienna Convention has not been fully implemented. Weaknesses in the understanding of officers require increased training on diplomatic immunity, integrated supervision, and alignment of immigration regulations to prevent diplomatic conflicts and maintain the stability of international relations. This study suggests that Indonesia can strengthen immigration officer training on diplomatic immunity, as well as align immigration regulations with the principle of diplomat protection to prevent escalation of diplomatic conflicts and maintain its global reputation.
Kedudukan Perjanjian Internasional Bagi Indonesia Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 Dan Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2000 Tentang Perjanjian Internasional Dian Alya; Yolanda Fitri; Windia Febrica Stevany; Ema Septaria; M. Ilham Adepio
Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 2 No. 3 (2026): April - Juni
Publisher : GLOBAL SCIENTS PUBLISHER

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The development of globalization has increased Indonesia’s involvement in international treaties, creating the need for legal certainty in their implementation at the national level. This study aims to analyze the position of international treaties within the Indonesian legal system based on the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and Law Number 24 of 2000 concerning International Treaties. The research method used is normative juridical with statutory and conceptual approaches. The results show that international treaties have a constitutional basis in Article 11 of the 1945 Constitution and require ratification to be applicable in national law, reflecting a moderate dualism approach. However, their position within the hierarchy of laws and regulations is not explicitly regulated, which may lead to normative conflicts. Furthermore, constitutional supremacy remains the fundamental principle in Indonesia’s legal system.
Perjanjian Internasional Sebagai Sumber Hukum Internasional Dalam Praktik Hubungan Antar Negara Mutiara Deja Saputri; Nabila Zahra Okta Dwiwani; Ema Septaria; M. Ilham Adepio
Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 2 No. 3 (2026): April - Juni
Publisher : GLOBAL SCIENTS PUBLISHER

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal arrangements of diplomatic immunity and examine the form of abuse of such immunity by diplomatic officials in the practice of international relations. In addition, this study also discusses the legal implications arising from the abuse of diplomatic immunity and efforts to counter it. The research method used is normative legal research with a legislative approach and a conceptual approach, supported by literature studies through various primary and secondary legal sources. The results of the study show that diplomatic immunity as stipulated in the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations of 1961 is a functional legal instrument to ensure the smooth implementation of diplomatic duties, not as an absolute right for diplomatic officials. However, in practice, there are still frequent abuses of diplomatic immunity in various forms, ranging from administrative violations, civil violations in commercial activities, to serious criminal acts. These abuses show that there is a gap between legal norms and their implementation in the field. The legal implications of the abuse of diplomatic immunity include the inhibition of law enforcement in the recipient country, the emergence of potential impunity, and the disruption of diplomatic relations between countries. Therefore, countermeasures are needed through the optimization of diplomatic legal mechanisms, such as the implementation of persona non grata and waiver of diplomatic immunity, as well as strengthening supervision by sending countries and increasing international cooperation. Thus, it is hoped that a balance will be created between the protection of diplomatic functions and law enforcement in international relations.
Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelanggaran Kedaulatan Di Laut Natuna Utara Oleh Kapal Asing Lea Laska Arepa; Muhammad Farraz Syaviq; Ema Septaria; Arimbi Fajari Furqon
ULIL ALBAB : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol. 5 No. 6: Mei 2026
Publisher : CV. Ulil Albab Corp

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56799/jim.v5i6.16618

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaturan hukum laut internasional dan hukum nasional Indonesia dalam penegakan hukum di Zona Ekonomi Eksklusif (ZEE), serta mengkaji pelaksanaan dan kendala penegakan hukum terhadap pelanggaran oleh kapal asing di Laut Natuna Utara. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, kasus, dan konseptual. Bahan hukum yang digunakan meliputi UNCLOS 1982, peraturan perundang-undangan nasional, serta putusan Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) tahun 2016. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa secara normatif Indonesia memiliki dasar hukum yang kuat dalam menegakkan hukum di ZEE, baik berdasarkan UNCLOS 1982 maupun hukum nasional. Namun, dalam praktiknya, penegakan hukum menghadapi berbagai kendala, seperti keterbatasan sarana pengawasan, tumpang tindih kewenangan antar lembaga, serta tekanan geopolitik akibat klaim sepihak China di Laut Cina Selatan. Pelaksanaan penegakan hukum telah dilakukan melalui patroli, penangkapan kapal, dan langkah diplomasi, tetapi efektivitasnya belum optimal. Maka penegakan hukum di Laut Natuna Utara memerlukan penguatan kapasitas pengawasan maritim, peningkatan koordinasi antar lembaga, serta strategi diplomasi yang konsisten guna menjaga kedaulatan dan kepentingan nasional Indonesia.