Articles
153 Documents
<![CDATA[FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MENJADI PENYEBAB TIMBULNYA WANPRESTASI DALAM TRANSAKSI E-COMMERCE ]]>
<![CDATA[Hauliani, Cleopatra Martina]]>;
<![CDATA[pujiyono, ']]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Privat Law Vol 10, No 2 (2022): JULI - DESEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/privat.v10i2.65061
<![CDATA[AbstractThis article aims to determine the factors cause default conducted by the seller. The research methodology used is the empirical legal research method, the nature of descriptive research and using a qualitative approach. The source of research is primary legal material in the form of legal material. Data collection technique by interview. Based on the result of research conducted by the author can be concluded, the factors cause default conducted by the seller can be reviewed from the side of regulation, platform, law enforcement and the parties. Keywords: Default; Seller; Costumer; E-CommerceAbstrakArtikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui tentang faktor-faktor yang menjadi penyebab timbulnya wanprestasi yang dilakukan oleh penjual. Penelitian hukum ini dilakukan dengan metode penelitian hukum empiris yang bersifat deskriptif. Pendeketan penelitian yang digunakan bersifat kualitatif yaitu menggunakan data verbal untuk memeahami fenomena yang ialami subjek. Sumber penelitian adalah bahan hukum primer yang berupa perundang-undangan, bahan hukum sekunder yaitu kepustakaan, bahan non hukum, dan bahan hukum tersier. Dengan teknik pengumpulan data melakukan wawancara dengan para pembeli dan pihak YLKI. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian yang telah dilakukan penulis dapat disimpulkan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi timbulnya wanprestasi yang dilakukan penjual dapat ditinjau dari sisi regulasi, platform, penegakan hukum dan para pihak.Kata Kunci: Wanprestasi; Penjual; Pembeli; E-commerce]]>
<![CDATA[ANALISIS TANGGUNG JAWAB KURATOR SECARA PRIBADI DAN JABATAN ]]>
<![CDATA[Kinanti, Alya Putri]]>;
<![CDATA[Suryono, Arief]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Privat Law Vol 10, No 2 (2022): JULI - DESEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/privat.v10i2.64958
<![CDATA[AbstractThis article aimed to elaborating and analyzing differences between curator personal liability and curator duty-based liability in the process of bankruptcy settlement. This article is normative legal reseach. Secondary data covers primary, secondary legal materials. Materials collecting method using literature research. Furthermore Analysis method is deductive which is a thinking concept from general concept then take the specific concept. This article conclusion shows that punishment with compensation is characterized as personal resposibility because that form of punishment involves curator’s personal wealth while punishment which relied under bankruptcy’s assets is categorized as dutybased responsibility.AbstrakArtkel ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan dan mengkaji perbedaan tanggung jawab kurator secara pribadi dan tanggung jawab kurator sebatas dalam melaksanakan tugasnya dalam penyelesaian kepailitan meliputi perbuatan-perbuatan apa saja yang dapat dikenai tanggung jawab pribadi maupun tanggung jawab jabatan. Artikel ini menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif. Data sekunder meliputi bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan studi kepustakaan. Selanjutnya teknik analisis menggunakan metode deduksi yaitu konsep berpikir dari rumusan umum kemudian ditarik ke rumusan khusus. Artikel ini menghasilkan kesimpulan bahwa jenis hukuman ganti rugi merupakan tanggung jawab pribadi karena meliputi harta pribadi milik kurator sedangkan jenis hukuman yang ditanggung oleh boedel pailit merupakan tanggung jawab sebatas jabatan kurator itu sendiri.]]>
<![CDATA[PERBANDINGAN HAK PESERTA BPJS KESEHATAN DENGAN JKN- KBS (KRAMA BALI SEJAHTERA) SEBAGAI BENTUK PELAYANAN JAMINAN SOSIAL DI INDONESIA ]]>
<![CDATA[Putra, Aries Aditya]]>;
<![CDATA[Sulistiyono, Adi]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Privat Law Vol 10, No 2 (2022): JULI - DESEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/privat.v10i2.65079
<![CDATA[AbstractThis research is prescriptive and applied normative legal research. Types of legal materials include primary and secondary legal materials. Data collection techniques used were literature study, research instruments in the form of Presidential Regulation Number 82 Year 2018 on Health Insurance and, and Bali Governor Regulation Number 104 Year 2018 regarding National Health Insurance of Krama Bali Sejahtera, then the technical analysis used was the deductive method. The results of this study are an analysis of the fundamental differences between the rights of participants received in the Health BPJS and also JKN-KBS. Keywords: Health BPJS; participant rights; JKN-KBS AbstrakArtikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perbandingan hak peserta yang lahir dari perjanjian antara peserta dengan BPJS Kesehatan dan juga JKN-KBS. Perjanjian antara peserta dengan BPJS Kesehatan dan juga JKN-KBS memiliki beberapa perbedaan terkait hak peserta sehingga perlu dilakukan perbandingan untuk perbaikan pelayanan jaminan sosial di Indonesia. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif bersifat preskriptif dan terapan. Jenis bahan hukum meliputi bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah studi kepustakaan, instrumen penelitian berupa Peraturan Presiden Nomor82 Tahun 2018 tentang Jaminan Kesehatan dan dan, Peraturan Gubernur Bali Nomor 104 Tahun 2018 tentang Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional Krama Bali Sejahtera, selanjutnya teknis analisis yang digunakan adalah metode deduktif. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah analisis perbedaan mendasar antara hak peserta yang diterima dalam BPJS Kesehatan dan juga JKN-KBS. Kata Kunci: BPJS Kesehatan; Hak peserta; JKN-KBS]]>
<![CDATA[EFEKTIVITAS PRINSIP FIRST TO FILE PADA SISTEM PENDAFTARAN MEREK DALAM MELINDUNGI HAK MEREK ]]>
<![CDATA[Kusumahwardhana, Raden Fajar Agung]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Privat Law Vol 11, No 1 (2023): JANUARI-JUNI ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/privat.v11i1.47322
<![CDATA[The purpose of writing this article aims is to find out how the effectiveness of the implementation of the First To File principle in the trademark registration system and what problems arise from the application of the First To File principle in protecting trademark rights in Indonesia.This research is descriptive analytical as a description of a situation, and provides data about a situation. Collecting data in this writing is done in literature by examining data consisting of primary legal material and secondary legal material, then the data is analyzed using normative-qualitative methods.The results of the writing of this article indicate that Law Number 21 of 1961 concerning Company Marks and Commercial Trademarks which adhere to the First To Use system has been replaced by Law Number 19 of 1992 concerning Trademarks which applies the First To File principle. The First To File principle in the trademark registration system provides more legal certainty because it appoints the first registrant as the legal owner of a mark if it has passed a series of mark registration and has a trademark certificate, but in its implementation there are problems with the absence of clear and firm norms related to the application of "equality in essence. "So as to open up opportunities for the emergence of popularity of Well-Known Mark. Keywords: Intellectual Property Rights; Trademark; First To File.]]>
<![CDATA[ASPEK PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM PENDANAAN DONATUR DAN PENERIMA DONASI MELALUI PLATFORM DONATION BASED CROWDFUNDING (STUDI EMPIRIS DI PT KITA BISA INDONESIA) ]]>
<![CDATA[Adelia, Tara Aziza]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Privat Law Vol 11, No 1 (2023): JANUARI-JUNI ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/privat.v11i1.45528
<![CDATA[This research describes legal issues, especially problems in terms of legal protection of funding of donors and donors who make transactions through a crowdfunding donation platform at Kitabisa.com. This research is an empirical legal research. The purpose of this study was to determine aspects of legal protection in the crowdfunding business, especially donation-based crowdfunding in Indonesia. The author conducted research through interview techniques at PT Kita Bisa Indonesia from the Legal section and the distribution of questionnaires with specifications of having used the Kitabisa.com platform both as Campaigners and Donors. The results of this study indicate that there is still a legal vacuum in regulating donation-based crowdfunding supervision mechanisms in Indonesia. The regulations that have been made are no longer relevant to the current situation and change management of technology infrastructure and digitalization, so it seems that donation-based crowdfunding must be forced to follow the regulations regarding the Collection of Money and Goods and Foundation Laws, but there are no regulations that clearly regulate the collection of online donations in Indonesia. Additionally, the donation- based crowdfunding supervision system overseen by the Ministry of Social Affairs is ineffective because the system is unclear and inefficient. This research also shows that the community still does not understand in detail the system and arrangements regarding donation-based crowdfunding, because the platform is still considered unfamiliar in the eyes of the public. Key Words: Financial Technology; Crowdfunding; Legal Protection]]>
<![CDATA[PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP DATA PRIBADI PENUMPANG PESAWAT UDARA (Studi Kasus Terungkapnya Data Penumpang Malindo Air) ]]>
<![CDATA[Saputri, Elsa Halida]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Privat Law Vol 11, No 1 (2023): JANUARI-JUNI ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/privat.v11i1.45389
<![CDATA[This article aims to assess the protection carried out by airlines for airplane passengers if they failed to protect their personal data. Methode used in this article is a sociological or empirical legal research method named descriptive, and the approach research used a qualitative approach that produces descriptive data. In this case of laws used source of invitation primary legal materials and secondary legal materials by means of literature studies and interviews. Data analysis technique used is qualitative analysis with qualitative methods. This law written to shows that apart from the existence of legal responsibility as well as ethical responsibility which aims to retain consumers, by revising the contents of the work agreement between Malindo Air and GoQuo. Malindo Air itself manages all consumer passwords automatically and urges consumers to change the password used for Malindo Miles. Malindo Air and GoQuo also reported 2 (two) former GoQuo employees who have distributed Malindo Air passanger personal data.Key words: personal data; flight protection measures; Malindo Air]]>
<![CDATA[PROBLEMATIKA DALAM PELAKSANAAN HAK TANGGUNGAN ELEKTRONIK BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 4 TAHUN 1996 TENTANG HAK TANGGUNGAN ATAS TANAH BESERTA BENDA-BENDA YANG BERKAITAN DENGAN TANAH ]]>
<![CDATA[Bisyir, Dzaky Alwan]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Privat Law Vol 11, No 1 (2023): JANUARI-JUNI ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/privat.v11i1.45370
<![CDATA[Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan dan menganalisis permasalahan dalam pelaksanaan hak tanggungan elektronik. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum empiris yang bersifat deskriptif. Pendekatan penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatan penelitian kualitatif. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah dengan peneltian lapangan dan studi kepustakaan. Selanjutnya teknik yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah dengan menggunakan teknik analisis data kualitatif dengan metode analisis interaktif. Problematika dalam pelaksanaan hak tanggungan elektronik yaitu adanya ketidaksesuaian norma hukum terkait dengan hak tanggungan elektronik antara Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 1996 tentang Hak Tanggungan dengan Peraturan Menteri Nomor 9 Tahun 2019 tentang Pelayanan Hak Tanggungan Terintegrasi Secara Elektronik. Selanjutnya yaitu lemahnya sistem pembuktian yang mengatur mengenai dokumen elektronik yang terdapat pada sistem hak tanggungan elektronik jika terjadi permasalahan hukum. Permasalahan terakhir yaitu rendahnya kesiapan sumber daya manusia serta sarana prasarana oleh pihak pengguna sistem hak tanggungan elektronik.]]>
<![CDATA[KEBIJAKAN FASILITASI HAK KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL OLEH BADAN EKONOMI KREATIF (BEKRAF) DALAM PENGUATAN UMUM BIDANG EKONOMI KREATIF ]]>
<![CDATA[Herdyanto, Rizky]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Privat Law Vol 11, No 1 (2023): JANUARI-JUNI ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/privat.v11i1.43491
<![CDATA[AbstractThis legal research describes whether Badan Ekonomi Kreatif , especially the Deputy of Intellectual Property Rights and Regulations, has run its program in facilitating Intellectual Property owned by creative economy performers in Indonesia. This research uses descriptive empirical legal research methods. The results of this research indicate that Bekraf has greatly assisted Creative Economic actors in obtaining legal protection over their products. The problem experienced by Bekraf is the lack of coordination between Bekraf and its partners, creative economy actors who put aside the importance of IPR, as well as communal products of Geographycal Indications that are contrary to IPR Principles. The Ministry of Tourism and Creative Economy hopefully hopefully can continue Bekraf’s Intellectual Property Facilitation and disseminating IPR on a periodic basics for the creative economy actors.Keywords: Intellectual Property Rights; Bekraf; Facilitation; Creative Economy. AbstrakPenulisan hukum ini mengkaji apakah Badan Ekonomi Kreatif khususnya Deputi Fasilitasi Hak Kekayaan Intelektual dan Regulasi sudah menjalankan programnya dalam memfasilitasi Kekayaan Intelektual milik pelaku ekonomi kreatif di Indonesia. Penulisan ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum empiris bersifat deskriptif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa Bekraf melalui programnya sudah membantu para pelaku ekonomi kreatif dalam memperoleh kekuatan hukum atas produk maupun ciptaannya. Hambatan yang dialami Bekraf berupa kurangnya koordinasi antara Bekraf dan mitra kerja, pelaku ekonomi kreatif yang mengesampingkan pentingnya Kekayaan Intelektual, serta produk komunal Indikasi Geografis yang bertentangan dengan prinsip HKI. Kementrian Pariwisata dan Ekonomi Kreatif diharapkan dapat melanjutkan program Bekraf dalam Fasilitasi Kekayaan Intelektual dan melakukan sosialisasi HKI secara periodik terhadap pelaku ekonomi kreatif.Kata Kunci: Hak Kekayaan Intelektual; Bekraf; Fasilitasi; Ekonomi Kreatif.]]>
<![CDATA[KAJIAN YURIDIS PRAKTIK PERSEKONGKOLAN DALAM TENDER (Studi Putusan KPPU Perkara Nomor 24/KPPU-I/2016) ]]>
<![CDATA[Az Zarah, Intania]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Privat Law Vol 11, No 1 (2023): JANUARI-JUNI ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/privat.v11i1.47468
<![CDATA[This research aims to determine the consideration of a conspiracy in the Commission decision on Case No. 24 / KPPU-I / 2016 and implementation of legal justice in the Commission’s Decision Case No. 24 / KPPU-I / 2016 in terms of economic and fairness aspects. This research is a normative law research which are prescriptive and applied. The approach used are the statute approach and the case approach. The sources of legal materials consist of primary legal materials, secondary and tertiary legal materials with literature study. This research used deductive analysis technique. Commission’s in Decision Number 24 / KPPU-I / 2016 has considered on the case in accordance with Law No. 5 of 1999, however its considerations do not consider whether the consequences of the conspiracy are hindering business competition or not. The commission in deciding the Commission Case Number 24 / KPPU-I / 2016 tended to only pay attention to the justice aspect while the economic aspect seemed a little neglected, so that the KPPU Decision Number 24 / KPPU-I / 2016 did not fully fulfill legal justice.Keywords: Tender Conspiracy; Business Competition; Fairness]]>
<![CDATA[PELAKSANAAN PERJANJIAN JUAL BELI PRODUK PETROKIMIA ANTARA PT PERTAMINA (PERSERO) DENGAN DISTRIBUTOR ]]>
<![CDATA[Sanjaya, Garin Purna]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Privat Law Vol 11, No 1 (2023): JANUARI-JUNI ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/privat.v11i1.43735
<![CDATA[AbstractThe purposes of this article are to determine the implementation of petrochemical product sale and purchase agreement between PT Pertamina (Persero) with the distributors, and to determine the obstacles and solutions regarding of petrochemical product sale and purchase agreement. This research uses descriptive empirical legal research methods. The results of this research shows the agreement had based on the Pedoman Pemasaran Produk Petrochemical Trading Nomor A-002/F00000/2016-S9 and had been implemented well with parties. The obstacles caused by government policies, the complexity of customs duty, and unstable of international oil prices. The solutions to resolve these obstacles with expanding international agreements in the economic sector, optimalize of Pertukaran Data Elektronik (PDE) system at custom duty, and selecting distributor then determining competitive prices.Keywords: Petrochemical Sale and Purchase Agreement; Implementation; The Obstacles; Solutions.AbstrakArtikel ini mengkaji bagaimana pelaksanaan perjanjian jual beli produk petrokimia antara PT Pertamina (Persero) dengan distributor, serta mengetahui hambatan dan solusi dalam pelaksanaan perjanjian jual beli produk petrokimia. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum empiris bersifat deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perjanjian telah didasarkan pada Pedoman Pemasaran Produk Petrochemical Trading Nomor A-002/F00000/2016-S9 dan telah dilaksanakan dengan baik oleh para pihak. Hambatan perjanjian disebabkan oleh kebijakan pemerintah, pengurusan izin kepabeanan, dan harga minyak dunia yang tidak stabil, Solusi untuk terhadap hambatan dengan memperluas perjanjian internasional bidang ekonomi, mengoptimalkan penggunaan sistem Pertukaran Data Elektronik (PDE) dalam pengurusan kepabeanan dan memilih distributor secara selektif serta penentuan harga yang kompetitif.Kata kunci: Perjanjian Jual Beli Petrokimia; Pelaksanaan; Hambatan; Solusi.]]>
