cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika
Published by Universitas Sebelas Maret
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education,
Mathematics
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 347 Documents
 27   28   29   30   31 
ANALISIS KETERAMPILAN DASAR MENGAJAR MAHASISWA PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA DALAM PEMBELAJARAN MIKRO (Studi Kasus pada Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika FKIP UNS Tahun Akademik 2012/2013) Frasetyana, Anita Diah; Sujadi, Imam; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research is to describe the basic teaching skills in microteaching of the students majoring in Mathematics Education of the Faculty of Teacher Training and Education of Sebelas Maret University in Academic Year 2012/2013. The subject of this research consisted of two students conducting a microteaching. One of the subject has high academic ability whereas the other subject has low academic ability  Type of the research was a qualitative case study research. The subjects of this research were taken by using the purposive sampling. The technique of analyzing the data was Miles and Huberman concept, namely, data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The results of this research are as follows: the skill that the students have mastered in the apperception activity is the skill to conduct apperception by using the questions related to the learning material which is going to be learnt and giving description on the activity and/or scope of learning material of the class meeting; the skill that the students have mastered in asking questions to their  microteaching students is the skill to raise question clearly relevant to the problems discussed; the skill that the students have mastered in the reinforcement is the skill to use non-verbal reinforcement by nodding head and smiling; the skill that the students have mastered in conducting variation in teaching is the skill to vary the volume of voice and the standing position in the classroom; the skills that the students have mastered in explaining are the skills to present the learning material in structured or systematic sequence, to emphasize the important parts, to give examples by following deductive or inductive pattern, and to give feedback; the skill that the students have mastered in group activity is the skill to distribute the chance for their microteaching students to participate and to analyze or extend the view of their microteaching students; the skills that the students have mastered are the skills to give clear instruction and to get their microteaching students prepared by setting the size of the group and the number of the group members as well as to ask their microteaching students to account for their group activity; the skills that the students have mastered in the closing activity are the skills to make summary by either the students themselves and/or by involving their microteaching students and to conduct written test as an evaluation tool in teaching Mathematics.Keywords: basic teaching skill, microteaching, and teaching Mathematics.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TAI DAN NHT PADAPOKOK BAHASAN RELASI DAN FUNGSI DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ) SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN PRINGSEWU PROVINSI LAMPUNG Rahayu, Siti; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Sari, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: This research aims at finding out: (1) which one results better mathematics learning achievement among type TAI, NHT, or conventional; (2) which one has better  mathematics learning achievement among students with AQ categories; (3) at each of  learning models, which students has better mathematics learning achievement with AQ categories; (4) at each of AQ categories, which one results better mathematics learning achievement among type learning models. This study was quasi-experimental research. The population of this study was all students in grade VIII SMP Pringsewu, Lampung. The sampling technique was done by stratified cluster random sampling. Data analysis tecnique was used to test the hypothesis was  two-ways analysis of variance with unbalanced cell as a 3x3 factorial design.The conclusions of the research were as follows. (1) Cooperative learning type TAI results better mathematics learning achievement than type NHT and conventional, and the achievement  of student mathematics learning by NHT is the same as the achievement conventional.  (2) The achievement  of student mathematics learning in climbers is the same as the achievement campers, students with climbers have better mathematics learning achievement than those with quitters, and the achievement  of student mathematics learning in campers is the same as the achievement quitters; (3)  in each learning models, the students mathematics learning achievment is in constancy with  result of AQ categories, (4) in each of AQ categories, students mathematics learning achievment is in constancy with result of learning models.Keywords: Team Assisted Individualization (TAI), Numbered Head Together (NHT), conventional,  Adversity Quotient (AQ)
STRATEGI MEMBELAJARKAN MATEMATIKA PADA KELAS VII INKLUSI DI SMP PGRI 1 SAMPIT KABUPATEN KOTA WARINGIN TIMUR Shaliha, Nurul Hidayati; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Sujadi, Imam
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objectives of this research were to describe inclusive learning system and teacher strategy in teaching mathematics from the teacher’s ability in explaining in accordance with conceptual and procedural knowledge of 7th grade students of SMP PGRI 1 Sampit. This research was a qualitative descriptive using a single case study method, in depth study of learning system and Mathematics learning in inclusive school. The subject of the research was the Headmaster of SMP PGRI 1 Sampit to obtain information about learning system and Mathematics teacher assistant of the 7th grade in order to know the Mathematics learning strategy in inclusive class of SMP PGRI 1 Sampit. The information of inclusive learning systems were taken by documenting, observation and interview. The validity technique of learning system data used in this research was Triangulation Method. The information of Mathematics learning strategy including the teacher’s ability in explaining the conceptual and prosedural knowledge. The data was taken from the transcription of six recording Mathematics learning activity and two best observations. The validity technique of learning system data used was member check technique. The research result shows as follows : 1) The learning system of inclusive students of the 7th grade of SMP PGRI 1 Sampit was different with the regular learning system. However, it was found that there is no individual learning program especially for slow learner students and the lack of computer technology used in the learning process. 2) The Mathematics learning strategy in the inclusive 7th grade of SMP PGRI 1 Sampit observed from the teacher’s ability in explaining the subject in accordance with the delivering explanation indicators which were planning the explanation, clarity of delivering the explanation, the use of examples and illustrations, the use of intonation in delivering the explanation, and giving the feed back to the students. The teacher used Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) to teach the concept of mathematics and Discovery Learning methods to teach the procedure of mathematics.Keywords: learning system, Mathematics learning strategy, inclusive
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TTW DAN TPS PADA PERSAMAAN GARIS LURUS DITINJAU DARI KARAKTERISTIK CARA BERPIKIR SISWA SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN PRINGSEWU Suningsih, Ari; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Riyadi, Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 4 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The purposes of the research were to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from students mind  style. The learning model compared were TTW (Think Talk Write), TPS (Think Pair Share) and conventional. The kind of research was a quasi experimental research. The population was the students of Junior high school in Pringsewu regency on academic year 2013/2014. The size of the sample was 286 students, consisted of 98 students in the first experimental group, 105 students in second experimental group and 84 students in control group. The instruments used were mathematics achievement test and questionnaire. Hypothesis analysis test used two ways analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The conclusions were as follow. (1) TTW model gave the same effect as TPS, but TTW model  was better than conventional and TPS model gave the same effect as conventional. (2) For all types of students mind style gave the same effect for mathematics learning achievement of students. (3) In each model of learning, students with mind style types concrete sequential, abstract sequential, concrete random, or abstract random have the same effect for mathematics learning achievement. (4) In each mind style, TTW model gave the same effect as TPS, but TTW model was better than conventional and TPS model gave the same effect as conventional.Keywords: TTW, TPS, Conventional, Mind Style, Mathematics Learning Achievement.
PENGEMBANGAN PERANGKAT PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA BERBAHASA INGGRIS BERDASARKAN TEORI KECERDASAN MAJEMUK (MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCES) PADA MATERI BALOK DAN KUBUS UNTUK KELAS VIII SMP Wicaksono, Dian Panji; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 5 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract : This research aimed to produce and describe the process and the result of the development of Mathematics learning set in English, based on the multiple intelligences theory on topic of cuboid and cube. This research was conducted in seventh grade of SMPN 1 Ngadirojo, SMP N 3 Ngadirojo, and SMPN 2 Ngadirojo that each of those has 32 students. This research was developmental study, i.e. the development of learning set based on the multiple intelligences theory as mentioned above. The development model that’s used refers to the Tjeerd Plomp one. Based on the conducted research, there were some conclusions as the followings (1) The process of the development of Mathematics learning set in English, based on the multiple intelligence theory: (a) The initial investigation phase obtained supporting theories for learning set development such as multiple intelligence theory by Gardner, Armstrong, and Bellanca, 2013 curriculum investigation that mandates to involve the multiple intelligences in Mathematics learning, students’ condition investigation that have various dominant intelligent. (b) The design phase obtained the developed learning set, i.e. lesson plan, student text book, student work sheet, and assessment sheet arranged in English, research instrument plan that consists of learning equipment validation sheet, observation sheet of learning implementation, observation sheet of students’ multiple intelligences involvement activity, and students’ response questionnaire. (c) On the realization phase, it’s arranged the learning set and research instrument. (d) On the test, evaluation, and revision phase, the learning set and limited trial were validated. (2) The result of development of Mathematics learning set in English, based on multiple intelligences theory: (a) The validity of learning set on lesson plan was 3.96, student text book 3.72, student work sheet 4.02, and assessment sheet 3.86. (b) The developed learning set could be used with a little revision and the average of learning implementation was 4.22. (c) This developed learning set could be said that it has been effective because the students’ multiple intelligences involvement activity reached 89,46% and the students’ responses were positive. Although the classical thoroughness was not achieved because only 35.42% of students met the minimal achievement criteria.Keywords : Mathematics Learning Set in English Based, Multiple  Intelligences, cube and  cuboid.      
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE PAIRS CHECK (PC), THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS), DAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) PADA MATERI KUBUS DAN BALOK DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI SE-KOTA SURAKARTA Suci Irawati; Budiyono Budiyono; Isnandar Slamet
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: This study aimed at determining the effect of learning models on the learning achievement in Mathematics viewed from the students’ Learning Style. The learning models compared were learning model Pairs Check (PC), Think Pair Share (TPS) and Problem Based Learning (PBL). This research was a quasi-experimental research with 3×3 factorial design. The population of research was all grade VIII students of Junior High School (SMP) in Surakarta. The samples were chosen by using stratified cluster random sampling. The instruments used were achievement test and questionnaire of learning styles. The technique of analyzing the data was two-ways ANOVA with unbalanced cells. The results of research showed as follows. (1) The PC resulted better learning achievement than the TPS and PBL. TPS resulted learning achievement as good as PBL, (2) The students having visual learning style resulted better learning achievement than did those having auditorial learning style. The students having visual learning style resulted better learning achievement than  those having kinesthetic learning style. The students having auditorial learning style resulted better learning achievement than those having kinesthetic learning style.  (3) At the students having visual learning style, PC resulted better learning achievement than that TPS and PBL, TPS and PBL resulted the same learning achievement. At the students having auditorial learning style, PC and TPS resulted the same learning achievement, PC resulted better learning achievement than that PBL, TPS resulted better learning achievement than that PBL. At the students having auditorial learning style, PC, TPS and PBL resulted the same learning achievement, (4) In PC, the students having visual learning style resulted learning achievement as good as those having auditorial learning style, the students having visual learning style resulted better learning achievement than did those having auditorial learning style, The students having auditorial learning style resulted learning achievement as good as those having kinestetik learning style. In TPS and PBL, The students having visual learning style resulted learning achievement as good as those having auditorial and kinestetik learning style.Keywords :  Pairs Check (PC), Think Pair Share (TPS), Problem Based Learning (PBL),  Learning Style.
PENGEMBANGAN KURIKULUM BERDIFERENSIASI MATA PELAJARAN MATEMATIKA SMA UNTUK SISWA CERDAS ISTIMEWA DAN BERBAKAT ISTIMEWA DI KELAS AKSELERASI Murtianto, Yanuar Hery
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 1 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The research was aimed at: (1) formulating the needs of mathematics curriculum for gifted and talented students in acceleration class; (2) developing model prototype of differentiated mathematics curriculum of senior high school in acceleration class; (3) finding out the appropriateness of the differentiated mathematics curriculum that was developed.Research and development method was used to produce the model of mathematics curriculum. This method consisted of some steps, namely: (1) the preliminary step including field observation and literary research; (2) the development step including mathematics curriculum analysis and prototype design to be model differentiated mathematics curriculum; and (3) evaluation step to examine the final design of differentiated mathematics curriculum.Findings of the results were: 1) the need of the mathematics is concerned with: (a) the repetition of material minimum, (b) the effectiveness of the compacting of time (c) encourage gifted and talented students to think at a high level, (d) in accordance with the national curriculum tailored to the guidelines for the implementation of accelerated learning program (e) relative ready to use on the condition that a minimum school, 2) to develop a prototype model of differentiated curriculum in high school math class acceleration is done by: (a) analytical standards of competence and competence elementary school and high school mathematics, (b) identify standards and basic competencies based on the revised Bloom's taxonomy, (c) mapping standards and basic competencies essential, (d) the escalation of basic competence, (e) develop an indicator based on the escalation of basic competence, ( f) determine the allocation of time on each indicator, (g) organize competency standards, basic competency and escalated of indicators into structure of the semester (h) determine the allocation of time in each half, and 3) the results of the evaluation showed: (a) from in terms of the feasibility of the content of the prospective users of the respondent, the result that differentiated curriculum is good since was responded very good and good as big as 95%, (b) in terms of linguistic, with the result that differentiated curriculum is good since was responded good as big as 100%, (c) the presentation of the curriculum in terms the result that differentiated curriculum was developed is good since was responded very good and good as big as 95%, and (d) in terms of the potential users of the product from graphic, the result that differentiated curriculum is good since was responded very good and good as big as 100%. Besides the evaluation of the design is also made evaluation of differentiated mathematics curriculum content that includes seven components: (a) an accelerated rate of learning by repetition at least 75% of respondents gave very appropriate responses, 25% responded accordingly, (b) control the national curriculum (KTSP) in a shorter time 100% of respondents responded very appropriate, (c) material that is abstract, complex and deep 100% of respondents responded accordingly, (d) the use of skills learned in applying problem-solving strategies 75% of respondents said the suit, 25% of respondents said quite appropriate, (e) oriented learners 100% of respondents said that accordingly, (f) to apply research skills appropriate 75% of respondents said that, 25% said quite appropriate, and (g) motivate students to learn independent is responsed appropriate by the respondent of 100%.Key words: Differentiated Mathematics Curriculum, Gifted, Acceleration.
EKSPLORASI KONSTRUKSI PENGETAHUAN MATEMATIKA SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI 1 SURAKARTA MENGGUNAKAN TEORI ACTION, PROCESS, OBJECT, SCHEME (APOS) PADA MATERI POKOK FAKTORISASI BENTUK ALJABAR Zahid, Muh. Zuhair; Sujadi, Imam; Sari S, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 7 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of the this qualitative research was to describe and analyze the mathematical construction process of eighth graders of SMPN 1 Surakarta in the algebraic factoring topic based on the APOS Theory. The subjects of the research were the eighth graders of SMPN 1 Surakarta and have been selected by using purposive sampling with the following criteria: (1) the students have learning algebraic factoring before; (2) the students were able to communicate his thoughts orally and written; and (3) each students were in high, medium, and low ability group. Data retrieved with the think aloud method and taken by the researcher himself, assisted by two auxiliary instruments; algebraic factoring test and interview guides. The main data sources were the words and actions of students when they were being interview. Data was validated by using data triangulation, where data collection was conducted at two different times. Based on the findings and discussions, it can be concluded as follows. (1) In action stage, the students presented their knowledge orally, by using pictures, and in writing form. The students then subtracted the simple algebraic form by classifying the algebraic terms which have the same variables. In process stage, the students multiplied the binomial with FOIL method and classified the algebraic terms that have same variables mentally and in the written form. In object stage, the students factorized the trinomial procedurally. In schema stage, the subject explained that the factor when multiplied by another factor will produce the factored trinomial and linked the action, process, and object stage to formed a complete concept of algebraic factoring. (2) In process stage, there was a student who made mistakes that could be classified as ‘invalid or incompatible distribution’. In object stage, there was a student who did factorization in non-procedural way.Keywords: construction of mathematical knowledge, APOS theory, algebraic factoring
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL), NUMBERED HEAD TOGETHER (NHT) DAN THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS BELAJAR SISWA PADA MATERI HIMPUNAN SMP NEGERI KABUPATEN KEBUMEN Prihastini Oktasari Putri; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Dewi Retno Sari Saputro
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objectives of this research are to know: (1) which one was better result in learning achievement of mathematics among PBL, NHT, and TPS, (2) which one was better learning achievement among students in high, middle, and low creativity categories of  mathematics, (3) in each learning model, which one was better learning achievement among students’ creativity categories, students having high, middle, or low; and (4) in each creativity categories, which one was better learning achivement among students of PBL, NHT, or TPS. This research used quasi-experimental research. The population was all of the students in Grade VII of State Junior High School in Kebumen. The samples of research were taken by using stratified cluster random sampling technique and consisted of 268 students. They divided into three groups. They were 92 students in the group of first experiment, 88 students in the group of second experiment, and 88 students in the group of third experiment. The instruments to collect the data were test of learning achievement and the questionnaire of learning creativity in mathematics. The data were examined by using two-way ANOVA with unbalanced cells. The results of the research were as follows. (1) Student in the model of PBL model result in a better learning achievement than NHT and TPS learning models. Student in NHT learning model results in a better learning achievement than TPS learning model. (2) Learning creativity gives students a different effect on mathematics’ learning achievement in the subject of set. The students with the high creativity have a better learning achievement than those with the middle and low categories, and student with the middle creativity have a better learning achievement than those with the low creativity categoriy. (3) In each learning model, students with the high creativity category have learning achievement as good as those with the middle or low categories. (4) In each of the creativity categories of students, students with the high creativity category of PBL have learning achievement as good as those in NHT and TPS, students with the middle creativity category of PBL have better learning achievement than those in TPS, then learning models of NHT and TPS have same learning achievement, and students in PBL and NHT have same learning achievement; last, in the low learning category, student in PBL have better learning achievement than those in TPS, student in NHT and TPS have same learning achievement and the student in PBL and NHT have same learning achievement.Keywords:    Problem Based Learning, Numbered Head Together, Think Pair Share, and learning creativity.
PROSES BERPIKIR SISWA SMP DALAM MENYELESAIKAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA BERDASARKAN LANGKAH-LANGKAH POLYA DITINJAU DARIADVERSITY QUOTIENT Widyastuti, Rany; Usodo, Budi; Riyadi, Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 3 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aims of this research are to describe the thinking process of junior high school students with type of climber, camper, and quitter in solving mathematics problems based on Polya’s rule. This was a qualitative descriptive research. The subjects of this research were taken by using a combined technique of stratified sampling and purposive sampling. The subjects of this research were three 9th grade student of SMP Negeri 1 Jaten Karanganyar regency, which consists of astudent with climber’s type, a student with camper’s type, and a student with quitter’s type. The data collection in this research was conducted through questionnaires and task-based interview technique whichwereused in the subject matter of two variable linear equation system.Thedata validationtechnique used triangulationof time andreferences. The data was analyzed by usingMiles and Huberman’s concept, that was data’s reduction, data’s presentation, and conclusion. The result of this research showed that (1) climber’s student used assimilation thinking process in understanding the problem, devising a plan, carrying out the plan, and looking back the answer, (2) camper’s student used assimilation thinking process in understanding the problem, carrying out the plan, and looking back the answer, student used assimilation and accomodation thinking process in devising a plan, and (3) quitter’s student used imperfection assimilation and accomodation thinking process in understanding the problem, student didn’t use assimilation and accomodation thinking process in devising a plan, carrying out the plan, and looking back the answer.Keywords: thinking process, problem solving, Polya’s rule, Adversity Quotient (AQ)

Page 29 of 35 | Total Record : 347

 27   28   29   30   31 

Filter by Year

2013 2018


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 5, No 3 (2018): Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 5, No 2 (2018): Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 5, No 1 (2018): Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 2 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 2 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 1 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 1 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 9 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 9 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 7 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 5 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 5 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 4 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 4 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 7 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 7 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 6 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 6 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 5 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 5 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 4 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 4 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 3 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 1 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika More Issue