cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika
Published by Universitas Sebelas Maret
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education,
Mathematics
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 347 Documents
 29   30   31   32   33 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN THINK TALK WRITE DAN NUMBERED HEAD TOGETHER DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK DISERTAI STRATEGI PETA KONSEP PADA MATERI BILANGAN DITINJAU DARI GAYA BERPIKIR SISWA KELAS VII SMPN Se-KOTA METRO LAMPUNG TAHUN PELAJARAN 2014/2015 Nur Syarifah Fitriani; Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi; Riyadi Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: This research aimed to know: (1) which one of the learning models with scientific approach gave a better achievement between TTW-Concept Mapping, NHT- Concept Mapping, or classical, (2) which one of the students with thinking style had a better achievement between students with concrete sequential, abstract sequential, concrete random, or abstract random, (3) at each of learning models with scientific approach, which one of the students with thinking style had a better achievement between students with sequential concrete, sequential abstract, concrete random, or abstract random, (4) at each thinking style, which one of learning models with scientific approach gave a better achievement between TTW-Concept Mapping, NHT- Concept Mapping, or classical. Population of the research was the seventh class students of Junior High School at Metro city on academic year 2014/2015. Instrument used to gather data were mathematics achievement test and thinking style questionnaire. Data analysis technique used was unbalanced two ways analysis of variance. Based on the data analysis, it was concluded as follows. 1) TTW-CM gave better achievement than NHT-CM, NHT-CM gave better achievement than classical, 2) Students with concrete sequential had better achievement than students with abstract sequential, concrete random, and abstract random, students with abstract sequential gave the same achievement with concrete random, and abstract random, student with concrete random gave the same achievement with abstract random, 3) In each learning models, student with concrete sequential had better achievement than students with abstract sequential, concrete random, and abstract random. Students with abstract sequential had better achievement than students with concrete random, and abstract random, the student with concrete random gave the same achievement with abstract random, 4) In each of thinking style, students who was subject to TTW-CM models gave better achievement than NHT-CM, NHT-CM gave better achievement than classical.Keywords: Think Talk Write, Numbered Head Together, Thinking Style, Achievement. 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAMS GAMES TOURNAMENT DAN NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN EMOSIONAL SISWA Margono, Agus; Budiyono, Budiyono; Sujadi, Imam
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The purposes of  this study were to determine: (1) which has better learning achievement in mathematics, the application of TGT type cooperative learning, NHT type cooperative learning, or direct learning, (2) which has better learning achievement, the students with high emotional intelligence, medium, or low, (3) which has better learning achievement at each level of high, medium, and low emotional intelligence on cooperative learning model TGT, NHT, or direct learning, (4) which has better learning achievement on students with high, medium or low intelligence emotional at each learning of TGT, NHT, and direct learning.This research was a quasi experimental with 3 × 3 factorial design. The study population were  seventh grade student of Junior High School State of Yogyakarta. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling with sample of the study were the students of SMPN 1, SMPN 12, and SMPN 14. Each of samples consists of three classes as TGT models class, NHT models class, and control class. The number of total members sample were 303 students. The instrument used to collect the data was mathematics achievement test instruments and students emotional intelligence questionnaire instrument. From the analysis it was concluded that: (1) TGT learning model has better achievement than NHT model and direct learning, NHT learning model has better achievement than direct learning, (2) the students with high emotional intelligence has better achievement than the students with medium and low emotional intelligence, while the students with medium emotional intelligence has better achievement than the students with low emotional intelligence, (3) the students with high emotional intelligence has the same achievement on TGT, NHT, or Direct Learning model; the students with medium intelligence, TGT model has better performance than NHT model, NHT model has the same achievement as direct learning model, TGT model has the same achievement as direct learning model; the students with low emotional intelligence has the same achievement on learning TGT model, NHT model, and direct learning, (4) the students with high, medium and low emotional intelligence has the same performance on TGT and NHT learning; on Direct Learning, the students with high emotional intelligence has better achievement than students with low emotional intelligence, the students with high emotional intelligence has the same achievement as medium emotional intelligence, the students with medium emotional intelligence has the same achievement as low emotional intelligence.Keywords: Teams Games Tournament, Numbered Heads Together, Emotional Intelligence, Learning Achievement.
PROFIL SISWA SMP DALAM PEMECAHAN MASALAH YANG BERKAITAN DENGAN LITERASI MATEMATIS DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ) Rahmawati, Novia Dwi; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: This research aims to describe the profile of junior high school students with climber’s, camper’s, and quitter’s type in problem solving from related with mathematics literacy using Polya steps. This research was a qualitative descriptive research. The subjects of this research were taken by using a combined technique of stratified sampling and Snowball sampling. The subjects of this research were seven 9th grade students of SMP Negeri 6 Surakarta regency, which consisted of three students with climber’s type, two students with camper’s type, and two students with quitters’s type. The data were collected through questionnaire and task-based interview technique on subject matter of space and shape mathematics literacy third level. The data were analyzed using a Miles and Huberman’s concept, that was data reduction, presentation, and conclusion. The results of this research are as follows: (1) climber’s students in understanding the problem, devising a plan, carrying out the plan, and looking back the answer aspects have reached all aspects needed, those are reasoning, argumentation, communication, modelling, connection, and representation aspect; (2) camper’s students in understanding the problem, devising a plan, and looking back the answer aspects have reached all aspects, those are reasoning, argumentation, communication, modelling, connection, and representation aspect, but in carrying out the plan, they have only reached reasoning, argumentation, communication, modelling and connection aspects, not representation aspect; (3) quitter’s students understanding the problem and looking back the answer aspects have reached all aspects, those are reasoning, argumentation, communication, modelling, connection, and representation aspect, but in devising a plan, they have only reached communication, modelling, and connection aspects, not reasoning, argumentation, and representation aspect. Whereas in carrying out the plan, they have only reached reasoning, argumentation, communication, modelling and connection aspects, not representation aspect.Keywords: Profile, problem solving, mathematics literacy, Polya’s steps, Adversity Quotiont (AQ) 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TWO STAY TWO STRAY (TSTS) DAN THINK-PAIR-SHARE (TPS) PADA MATERI PERSAMAAN DAN PERTIDAKSAMAAN LINEAR SATU VARIABEL DITINJAU DARI KARAKTERISTIK CARA BERPIKIR SISWA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN PACITAN Kusuma, Fitriana Anggar; Budiyono, Budiyono; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 4 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of research was to find out: (1) which learning models provided the better mathematics learning achievement, Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS), Think Pair Share (TPS) or direct learning, (2) which category of thinking pattern characteristics provided the better mathematics learning achievement, concrete sequential (SK), abstract sequential (SA), random concrete (AK) or abstract concrete (AA), (3) in each learning model, which category provided the better mathematics learning achievement SK, SA, AK or AA thinking patterns, and (4) in each category of student thinking pattern characteristics, which learning model provided the better mathematics learning achievement, TSTS, TPS or direct learning models. This study was a quasi-experimental research with a 3x4 factorial design. The population of research was all of the VII graders of Junior High Schools in Pacitan Regency. The sampling technique used was stratified cluster random sampling. The sample of research consisted of 237 students 81 students for experimental class 1 and 77 students for experimental class 2 and 79 students for control class.  Considering the hypothesis test, the following conclusions could  be drawn. (1) The learning using TSTS model provided the better mathematics learning achievement than the one using TPS, and the TSTS and TPS models provided learning achievement as good as the direct learning model did in one-variable equation and disequation material. (2) The learning achievement of the students with SK type of thinking pattern characteristics was better than that of those with SA and AK types, but that of those with SK type was as good as that of those with AA type, that of those with SA type as good as that of those with AK, and that of those with AA was better than that of those with SA and AK types of thinking pattern characteristics. (3) In TSTS, TPS and direct learning models, the mathematics learning achievement of the students with SK type was better than that of those with SA and AK types, but that of those with SK was as good as that of those with AA, that of those with SA was as same as that of those with AK, and that of those with AA was better than that of those with SA and AK types of thinking pattern characteristics. (4) In the thinking pattern characteristics of SK, SA, AA, and AK types, the TSTS learning model provided the better mathematics learning achievement than the TPS model and the TSTS and TPS provided better learning achievement than direct learning model in one-variable linear equation and disequation material.Keywords: Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS), Think-Pair-Share (TPS), Student’s Thinking Pattern Characteristics. 
PENGEMBANGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN GROUP INVESTIGATION (GI) BERBANTU VIDEO CAMTASIA PADA MATERI PELUANG UNTUK SISWA SMA/MA NEGERI KABUPATEN CILACAP TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014 Retno, Eli Widoyo; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 5 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract. The objectives of this research were to investigate: (1) the process and result of the development of the GI learning model; (2) the effectiveness of the modified GI learning model toward the students’ learning achievement in Mathematics and character of social responsibility in the topic of discussion of Probability. This research used the Research and Development (R&D) method. It consisted of two phases, namely: (1) research and development phase and (2) effectiveness test phase of the modified GI learning model. The former, with some modifications, referred to the ones claimed by Borg and Gall. The latter used the quasi experimental research method. The results of the research were as follows: 1) The modified GI learning model assisted with Camtasia Video is a valid, effective, and practical learning model. In addition, it also matches 2013 curriculum so that it was applicable in Senior Secondary Schools/Islamic Senior Secondary Schools of Cilacap. 2) The modified GI learning model assisted with Camtasia Video is more effective than the GI learning model toward the students’ learning achievement in Mathematics and the character of social responsibility on the topic of discussion of Probability. Keywords: Learning model, GI, Camtasia Video, Learning achievement, and Social responsibility
PROFIL RESPONS SISWA DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH ALJABAR BERDASARKAN TAKSONOMI SOLO DITINJAU DARI MINAT BELAJAR MATEMATIKA Laisouw, Ruslan
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 1 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research is to investigate the profile of response in solving SOLO taxonomy-based algebra problems of the students in Grade VIII with the high, medium, and low Mathematics learning interests. Structure of Observed Learning Outcome (SOLO) taxonomy is a framework to classify the students’ response comprising 4 levels. The subjects of the research consisted of six students in Grade VIII of MTA junior Secondary School of Gemolong, Sragen in academic year 2011/2012.The instrumen used were test instrument, and the interview guideline.the data analysis so as to find out the response in solving SOLO taxonomy-based algebra problems.The results of the research are as follows. The response levels in solving SOLO taxonomy-based algebra problems of two subjects with the high Mathematics learning interest belong to extended abstract level (level 4).The response levels of two subjects with the medium Mathematics learning interest in solving SOLO taxonomy-based algebra problems are different from one to the other; one of them has the relational level (level 3) while the other has the multi-structural level (level 2). For this case, the students with the same Mathematics learning interest category (medium level) have the have different response.The response levels of two subjects with the low Mathematics learning interest in solving SOLO taxonomy-based algebra problems are also different from one to the other; one of them has the multi-structural level (level 2) while the other has uni-structural level (level 1). For this case, the students with the same Mathematics learning interest category (low level) have the different response.Key words: Students’ response level, algebra problems, SOLO taxonomy, and Mathematics learning interest
PENGEMBANGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN NHT (NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER) BERBASIS OUTDOOR STUDY UNTUK MENINGKATKAN PRESTASI BELAJAR SISWA SMA KELAS X PADA MATERI POKOK SISTEM PERSAMAAN DAN PERTIDAKSAMAAN Marfuah, Iim; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objectives of the research were: (1) to yield valid, efficient, practical and effective learning model for equation and inequality system; (2) to know which students had better the learning achievement of mathematics using outdoor study-based NHT or NHT learning models; (3) to know which students had better learning achievement, the students with high or those with moderate or those with low social intelligence; (4) to know which for students with high social intelligence, moderat social intelligence and low social intelligence, outdoor study-based NHT had better learning achievement than NHT learning model; (5) to know which students had better learning achievement, outdoor study-based NHT or NHT learning model, in each level of social intelligence. The development of learning model was conducted referring to R&D procedure suggested by Borg & Gall. The result of development constituted the procedure/syntax of outdoor study-based NHT learning model. For effectiveness test, this research was a quasi-experimental research with a 2×3 factorial design. The instrument employed to collect the data was mathematics learning achievement test and student social intelligence questionnaire. Based on hypothesis testing, it can be concluded as follows. (1) The result of development constituted the procedure/syntax of outdoor study-based NHT were valid, efficient, practical and effective learning model with some game or activity such us ringball for SPLDV game, ringball for SPLDV game, to guess length and wide, inequality project and estafed. (2) The students’ mathematics learning achievement in outdoor study-based NHT learning model was better than that in NHT. (3) The students with high social intelligence had mathematics learning achievement better than those with either moderate or low one, and those with moderate had mathematics learning achievement better than those with low one. (4). In outdoor study-based NHT learning model, the students with high social intelligence had mathematics learning achievement as same as those with moderate one, and those with either high or moderate social intelligence had mathematics learning achievement better than those with low one. In NHT learning model, the students with high social intelligence had mathematics learning achievement better than those with either moderate or low one, and those with moderate one had mathematics learning achievement as same as those with low one. (5) The students with high social intelligence in outdoor study-based NHT learning model provided the result (product) as same as those in NHT learning model. The students with moderate social intelligence in outdoor study-based NHT learning model provided the result better than those in NHT learning model. The students with low social intelligence in outdoor study-based NHT learning model provided the result as same as those in NHT learning model.Keywords: NHT (Numbered Heads Together), Outdoor Study, Student Social Intelligence
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DENGAN PENDEKATAN QUANTUM LEARNING PADA POKOK BAHASAN STATISTIKA DITINJAU DARI MINAT BELAJAR SISWA KELAS XII SMK KELOMPOK TEKNOLOGI SE-KABUPATEN KEBUMEN TAHUN PELAJARAN 2012/2013 Rizana, Dani
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

AbstractThe objective of this research is to investigate: (1) which of the TPS learning model with Quantum Learning approach, the TPS learning model, and the conventional learning model results in a better learning achievement of the students; (2) which of the students with the high, medium, and low learning interest levels have a better learning achievement; (3) which of the students taught in the TPS learning model with Quantum Learning approach, the TPS learning model, and the conventional learning model have a better learning achievement with the high, medium, and low learning interest levels; and (4) which of the students have a better learning achievement in each of the learning interest levels with the TPS learning model with Quantum Learning approach, the TPS learning model, and the conventional learning model. This research used the quasi-experimental method with the factorial design of 3 x 3. The population of this research was all of the 12th-grade students of the engineering vocational secondary schools in Kebumen regency in the academic year of 2012/2013. The data of this research were gathered through documentation, questionnaire, and achievement test. The test on the hypothesis of the research was conducted by using unbalanced Two-way Analysis of Variance. The results of this research are as follows: (1) the TPS learning model with Quantum Learning approach and the TPS learning model result in an equal learning achievement whereas the TPS learning model with Quantum Learning approach results in a better learning achievement than the conventional learning model. However, the TPS learning model and the conventional learning model result in an equal learning achievement; (2) the students with the high learning interest level have an equal learning achievement to those with the medium and low learning interest levels; (3) the TPS learning model with Quantum Learning approach results in an equal learning achievement to the TPS learning model but results in a better learning achievement than the conventional learning model in the high, medium, and low learning interest levels whereas the TPS learning model results in an equal learning achievement to the conventional learning model in the high, medium, and low learning interest levels; and (4) the students with the high learning interest level have an equal learning achievement to those with the medium and low learning interest levels in the TPS learning model with Quantum Learning, the TPS learning model, and the conventional learning model.Keywords: Learning achievement, TPS, Quantum Learning, conventional, and learning interest
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI) DENGAN ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING (AfL) PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN SPASIAL SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN KARANGANYAR Pratiwi, Fitri Apriyani; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of learning model toward learning achievement in mathematics viewed from the spatial ability. The learning models of this research were cooperative learning model of the TAI type with AfL, the cooperative learning model of the TAI type, and the direct learning model. This research used the quasi experimental research method with the factorial design of 3 x 3. Its population was all of the students in Grade VIII of State Junior Secondary Schools of Karanganyar. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique. The samples consisted of 284 students. The instruments used to gather the data were test of learning achievement in Mathematics and test of spatial ability. The proposed hypotheses of the research were tested by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The results of the research were as follows. 1) the students instructed TAI with AfL had a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those instructed TAI and those instructed with the direct learning model. Furthermore, the students instructed with TAI had the same learning achievement in Mathematics as those instructed with the direct learning model. 2) The learning achievement in Mathematics of the students with the high spatial ability was better than that of the students with the moderate spatial ability and that of the students with the low spatial ability. In addition, the learning achievement in Mathematics of the students with the moderate spatial ability was better than that of the students with the low spatial ability. 3) In each learning model of the TAI with AfL, TAI, and the direct learning model, the students with the high spatial ability had a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the moderate spatial ability and those with the low spatial ability. Moreover, the students with the moderate spatial ability had a better learning achievement in Mathematicsthan those with the low spatial ability. 4) In each of the students with the high, moderate, and low spatial abilities, TAI with AfL results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics than TAI and the direct learning model. Furthermore, TAI results in the same learning achievement in Mathematics as the direct learning model.Keywords: Team Assisted Individualization (TAI), Assessment for Learning (AfL), and spatial ability                
EKSPERIMENTASI PEMBELAJARAN STAD DENGAN MEDIA POWER POINT DAN MODEL BANGUN RUANG MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI LENGKUNG DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR Mardi, Mardi; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Triyanto, Triyanto
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 4 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research are to investigate: (1) which one that is more effective in teaching geometry, the STAD type of cooperative learning model with Power Point media or that with Geometrical Model media or that with Conventional media, (2) which learning style results in a better learning achievement and (3) which media used in the STAD learning model results in a better learning achievement in each learning style of the students.This research used the quasi-experimental method. The population of this research was the 9th-grade students of the state junior secondary schools in Ngawi regency in the academic year of 2012/2013. The samples of this research consisted of 250 students who were divided into 85 students of the first experiment class, 83 students of the second experiment class, and 82 students of the control class. The samples were taken by using stratified cluster random sampling. The data of this research were gathered through documentation, test, and questionnaire. The hypothesis of this research were tested by using unbalanced Two-way Analysis of Variance. Conclusions drawn are as follows: (1) the STAD learning model with the Power Point media is better than the STAD learning models with the Geometrical Model and the Conventional media whereas the STAD learning model with the Geometrical Model media is equal to the STAD learning model with the Conventional media; (2) the students with the kinesthetic learning style have a better learning achievement than those with the visual and auditory learning styles whereas the students with the visual learning style have an equal learning achievement to those with the auditory learning style; (3) the STAD learning model with the Power Point media results in a better learning achievement than that with the Conventional media whereas the STAD learning model with the Power Point media results in an equal learning achievement to that with the Geometrical Model media and the STAD learning model with the Power Point media results in an equal learning achievement to that with the Conventional media in the visual learning style; (4) the STAD learning model with the all of the three types of media results in an equal learning achievement in the auditory learning style; and (5) the STAD learning model with the Geometrical Model media results in a better learning achievement than that with the Conventional media whereas the STAD learning model with the Power Point media results in an equal learning achievement to that with the Geometrical Model media and the STAD learning model with the Power Point media results in an equal learning achievement to that with the Conventional media in the kinesthetic learning style.Keywords: STAD, Power Point media, Geometrical Model media and learning style.

Page 31 of 35 | Total Record : 347

 29   30   31   32   33 

Filter by Year

2013 2018


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 5, No 3 (2018): Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 5, No 2 (2018): Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 5, No 1 (2018): Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 2 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 2 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 1 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 1 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 9 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 9 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 7 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 5 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 5 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 4 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 4 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 7 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 7 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 6 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 6 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 5 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 5 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 4 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 4 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 3 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 1 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika More Issue