cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Muhammad Abdul Ghofur
Contact Email
Muhammad Abdul Ghofur
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
muhammadghofur@unesa.ac.id
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota surabaya,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
JURNAL EKONOMI PENDIDIKAN DAN KEWIRAUSAHAAN
Published by Universitas Negeri Surabaya
ISSN : 2303324X     EISSN : 2579387X     DOI : -
Core Subject : Economy, Education, Social,
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Social Sciences
Jurnal Ekonomi Pendidikan dan Kewirausahaan (JEPK) is a scientific publication that publishes scientific articles of research, study and development in the field of economics education, entrepreneurship, and economics education.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 223 Documents
 19   20   21   22   23 
Moolang Virtual Class Platform: Economic Learning Outcomes and Implication for Entrepreneurship Education Yogi Dwi Satrio; Ana Dhoud Daroin; Bagus Shandy Narmaditya; Vika Annisa Qurrata; Sheerad Sahid; Mila Adhisty
JURNAL EKONOMI PENDIDIKAN DAN KEWIRAUSAHAAN Vol. 14 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS NEGERI SURABAYA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jepk.v14n2.p325-346

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluates the effectiveness of the Moolang virtual learning platform in improving economic learning outcomes and examines its relevance to economic and entrepreneurship education amid Indonesia's shifting digital learning habits. Method: A four-phase quasi-experimental design compared an experimental class (n = 30, Universitas Negeri Malang) using Moolang with a control class (n = 30, State University of Surabaya) receiving conventional instruction, under balanced internet connectivity conditions (50% strong, 50% weak, self-reported). Learning outcomes on demand-supply economic concepts were assessed at the end of each phase and analyzed using a mixed-design (split-plot) ANOVA with Group (experimental vs. control) as the between-subjects factor and Phase (1-4) as the within-subjects factor. Results: The experimental class significantly outperformed the control class in Phase 2 (p = .038, d = 0.55), Phase 3 (p < .001, d = 1.85)  and Phase 4 (p = .007, d = 0.73), with no difference at Phase 1 baseline (p = .568, d = 0.15). The mixed ANOVA showed a significant Group main effect, F(1,58) = 34.37, p < .001 and a significant Group × Phase interaction, F(3,174) = 5.52, p = .001 (Greenhouse-Geisser corrected p = .003 following a significant Mauchly's test), while the Phase main effect alone was not significant, F(3,174) = 1.29, p = .278. Novelty: Unlike prior evaluations that treat virtual classrooms as a generic phenomenon and analyze repeated-measures data with independent-samples ANOVA, this study applies a mixed-design ANOVA appropriate to the repeated-phase structure of the data and situates platform effectiveness within economics-specific case content (price-mechanism reasoning and implicit opportunity-cost trade-offs) rather than treating entrepreneurship relevance as an unexamined extension.
Beyond Entrepreneurship Education: Unpacking the Psychological Pathways to Entrepreneurial Intention Hidayatul Arief; Muazza Muazza; Urip Sulistiyo; Siti Syuhada; Zenvi Ann M. Macalinao
JURNAL EKONOMI PENDIDIKAN DAN KEWIRAUSAHAAN Vol. 14 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS NEGERI SURABAYA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jepk.v14n2.p347-384

Abstract

Objective: Entrepreneurship education is widely regarded as an important factor associated with students’ entrepreneurial intention; however, the specific cognitive and dispositional dimensions underlying this relationship remain insufficiently understood. This study examines the association between entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial intention and investigates whether four dimensions of entrepreneurial mindset—alertness to opportunity, risk propensity, ambiguity tolerance, and dispositional optimism—mediate this association. Method: A quantitative cross-sectional survey was conducted with 2,696 senior university students at the University of Jambi, Indonesia, selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire and analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), with bootstrapping used to assess the significance of direct and indirect relationships. Results: Entrepreneurship education showed a positive and significant association with entrepreneurial intention and with all four dimensions of entrepreneurial mindset. Alertness to opportunity, risk propensity, and ambiguity tolerance were positively associated with entrepreneurial intention and showed significant indirect associations between entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial intention. Among the four dimensions, alertness to opportunity showed the largest indirect association. In contrast, dispositional optimism was not significantly associated with entrepreneurial intention and did not show a significant indirect association. Novelty: This study advances entrepreneurship education research by conceptualizing entrepreneurial mindset as a multidimensional construct rather than a homogeneous psychological construct. By examining its specific dimensions simultaneously, the study provides a more differentiated understanding of how cognitive and dispositional characteristics are associated with the relationship between entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial intention.
E-Office Implementation, Public Service Efficiency, and Entrepreneurial Competencies in Higher Education: A Case Study at Universitas Negeri Surabaya Anggara Cahya Nugraha; Endang Siti Astuti; Agung Nugroho Lutfi Imam Fahrudi
JURNAL EKONOMI PENDIDIKAN DAN KEWIRAUSAHAAN Vol. 14 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS NEGERI SURABAYA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jepk.v14n2.p247-266

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the implementation of the e-office system in supporting academic and non-academic administration at Universitas Negeri Surabaya, and to identify the factors that influence its success in fostering administrative efficiency and entrepreneurial culture in higher education. Method: A qualitative descriptive approach with a case study design was employed. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, observations, and document analysis in work units implementing the e-office. The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) was used to analyze user acceptance in terms of perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness.  Results:  The findings indicate that e-office development tailored to user needs enhances technology adoption and work efficiency. Its implementation streamlines administrative processes, reduces bureaucracy, and improves user satisfaction. However, obstacles remain, particularly delays in electronic signature verification (TTE) due to manual confirmation, requiring further automation. Key success factors include ease of access, processing speed, information reliability, and effective user training. The study also reveals that administrative digitalisation supports the development of digital learning orientation and entrepreneurial competencies among graduates, as efficient and transparent processes allow greater focus on innovation and creative problem-solving.  Novelty: This study offers a contextual contribution by combining TAM-based acceptance analysis with a qualitative case study of e-office implementation in an Indonesian public university. It identifies practical success factors and barriers, and highlights the role of e-office as a foundational infrastructure for cultivating an entrepreneurial mindset and supporting the broader entrepreneurial ecosystem of the university.

Page 23 of 23 | Total Record : 223

 19   20   21   22   23 

Filter by Year

2013 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 14 No. 2 (2026) Vol. 14 No. 1 (2026) Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 13 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 12 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 12 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 11 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 11 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 10 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 10 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 9 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 9 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2019) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2018) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2017) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2017) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2016) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2016) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2015) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2015) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2014) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2014) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2013) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2013) More Issue