cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Reza Pustika
Contact Email
reza.pustika@dkv.itera.ac.id
Phone
+6285222332523
Journal Mail Official
padilagawdy@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Gunung Sari RT.03 No. 82, Kelurahan Karya Bakti, Kecamatan Lubuklinggau Timur II, Kota Lubuklinggau Sumatera Selatan, Indonesia
Location
Unknown,
Unknown
INDONESIA
Journal of Education and Instruction (JOEAI)
Published by Institut Penelitian Matematika, Komputer, Keperawatan, Pendidikan dan Ekonomi
ISSN : -     EISSN : 27152480     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31539/joeai.v8i2.14817
Core Subject : Humanities, Education, Social,
Humanities Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences
Development: defining design specification to specific form, such as developing learning materials through learning materials, handout, learning tools including audio, visual, audiovisual. Equipment: empowering the process and learning source to achieve learning objective. Evaluation: starting from problem analysis as early crucial steps in development and evaluation of learning content because the objectives and obstacles are clarified during this process.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Linguistik dan Bahasa
Articles 433 Documents
 40   41   42   43   44 
PBL dan Discovery Learning Berbantuan Virtual Laboratorium terhadap Keterampilan Pemecahan Masalah dan Efikasi Diri Siswa
JOEAI (Journal of Education and Instruction) Vol. 9 No. 2 (2026): JOEAI (Journal of Education and Instruction)
Publisher : Institut Penelitian Matematika, Komputer, Keperawatan, Pendidikan dan Ekonomi (IPM2KPE)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31539/zc6nh111

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to test the effectiveness of the Problem-Based Learning (PBL) model, Virtual Lab-assisted Discovery Learning (DL), and the conventional model on improving problem-solving skills and self-efficacy. The research method used was a quasi-experimental design with a non-equivalent pre-test and post-test control group. The results showed a significant difference in improvement in problem-solving skills between the three groups (p < 0.001). The Virtual Lab-assisted Discovery Learning model provided the highest improvement (an average increase from 26.77 to 57.43), followed by the Virtual Lab-assisted PBL model (an average increase from 26.39 to 55.64) and the conventional model (an average increase from 27.48 to 34.45). Meanwhile, for the self-efficacy variable, although all classes experienced significant internal improvement (p < 0.05), no statistically significant difference was found between the groups (p = 0.741). In conclusion, the use of virtual laboratories in active learning models is effective for visualizing abstract concepts and for training students' systematic, logical thinking. However, self-efficacy growth tends to be evenly distributed across approaches that provide successful experiences.   Keywords: Discovery Learning, Self-Efficacy, Problem-Solving Skills, Problem-Based Learning, Virtual Laboratory
Model Pembelajaran Project Based Learning dan Flipped Learning terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggidan Minat Belajar Siswa SMA
JOEAI (Journal of Education and Instruction) Vol. 9 No. 2 (2026): JOEAI (Journal of Education and Instruction)
Publisher : Institut Penelitian Matematika, Komputer, Keperawatan, Pendidikan dan Ekonomi (IPM2KPE)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31539/ezd6f339

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the differences in the influence of Project-Based Learning (PjBL), Flipped Learning, and conventional models on students' higher-order thinking skills and learning interests. The research method used is a quasi-experiment with a research design involving all grade XI students of SMA Negeri 2 Muara Beliti as the population. The results of statistical analysis of higher-order thinking skills using the ANOVA test showed a significance value of 0.000 (p <0.05), which means there is a significant difference between the project based learning, flipped learning, and conventional learning models on students' higher-order thinking skills, while the results of statistical analysis of students' learning interests using the ANOVA test showed a significance value of 0.000 (p <0.05) which means there is a significant difference in students' learning interests between the three learning groups. The conclusion is that: 1) there is a significant difference in the influence of PjBL, Flipped Learning, and conventional models on higher-order thinking skills, where the PjBL model is proven to be significantly more effective than the other two models; 2) There is a significant difference in the influence on students' learning interest, with the PjBL model having an advantage over both the Flipped Learning and conventional models.   Keywords: Flipped Learning, Higher-Order Thinking Skills, Learning Interest, Project-Based Learning.
Keterampilan Menyusun Jurnal dalam Siklus Akuntansi dan Kemandirian Belajar melaui Model Project Based Learning (PjBL) dan Inquiry
JOEAI (Journal of Education and Instruction) Vol. 9 No. 2 (2026): JOEAI (Journal of Education and Instruction)
Publisher : Institut Penelitian Matematika, Komputer, Keperawatan, Pendidikan dan Ekonomi (IPM2KPE)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31539/vtehx054

Abstract

This study aims to analyze differences in journaling skills during the accounting cycle and in student learning independence when applying the Project-Based Learning (PjBL) and Inquiry models compared to the conventional model. The method used was a quasi-experimental model with a non-equivalent pre-test and post-test control group design. The results showed significant differences in journaling skills among the three groups (p = 0.005 < 0.05). The Inquiry model (Mean Rank 48.06) and PjBL (Mean Rank 45.24) were significantly more effective than the conventional model (Mean Rank 29.18). For the learning independence variable, the PjBL model (Mean Rank 54.02) proved significantly superior to the Inquiry (34.54) and conventional (32.79) models. In conclusion, the PjBL and Inquiry models are effective in improving students' technical accounting skills due to their student-centered nature. However, the PjBL model has a stronger impact on developing independent learning through autonomy in real-life project work.   Keywords: Inquiry, Accounting Journal, Learning Independence, PjBL

Page 44 of 44 | Total Record : 433

 40   41   42   43   44 

Filter by Year

2018 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 9 No. 2 (2026): JOEAI (Journal of Education and Instruction) Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): JOEAI (Journal of Education and Instruction) Vol. 8 No. 6 (2025): JOEAI (Journal of Education and Instruction) Vol. 8 No. 5 (2025): JOEAI (Journal of Education and Instruction) Vol. 8 No. 4 (2025): JOEAI (Journal of Education and Instruction) Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): JOEAI (Journal of Education and Instruction) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): JOEAI (Journal of Education and Instruction) Vol 8 No 1 (2025): JOEAI (Journal of Education and Instruction) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): JOEAI (Journal of Education and Instruction) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): JOEAI (Journal of Education and Instruction) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): JOEAI (Journal of Education and Instruction) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): JOEAI (Journal of Education and Instruction) Vol 6 No 2 (2023): JOEAI (Journal of Education and Instruction) Vol 6 No 1 (2023): JOEAI (Journal of Education and Instruction) Vol 5 No 2 (2022): Journal of Education and Instruction (JOEAI) Vol 5 No 1 (2022): JOEAI (Journal of Education and Instruction) Vol 4 No 2 (2021): JOEAI (Journal of Education and Instruction) Vol 4 No 1 (2021): JOEAI (Journal of Education and Instruction) Vol 3 No 2 (2020): JOEAI (Journal of Education and Instruction) Vol 3 No 1 (2020): JOEAI (Journal of Education and Instruction) Vol 2 No 2 (2019): JOEAI (Journal of Education and Instruction) Vol 2 No 1 (2019): JOEAI (Journal of Education and Instruction) Vol 1 No 2 (2018): JOEAI (Journal of Education and Instruction) Vol 1 No 1 (2018): JOEAI (Journal of Education and Instruction) More Issue