cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior
Published by Universitas Sebelas Maret
ISSN : -     EISSN : 25490281     DOI : -
Core Subject : Health,
Medicine & Pharmacology Public Health
Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior (JHPB) is an electronic, open-access, double-blind and peer-reviewed international journal, focusing on health promotion and health-related behaviors. It began its publication on May 21, 2015. The journal is published four times yearly. It seeks to understand factors at various layers associated with health behavior and health-impacting policy and find evidence-based social and behavioral strategies to improve population health status.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 509 Documents
 34   35   36   37   38 
Meta-Analysis of Public Trust in the Implementation of the COVID-19 Vaccination Based on the Health Belief Model Amallia, Ade; Ma'ruf, Agus Syukron; Rohmah, Isna Nur
Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior Vol. 6 No. 4 (2021)
Publisher : Masters Program in Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Background: Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The magnitude of the global spread of COVID-19, and the declaration by the WHO as a public health emergency pandemic, has created an urgent need for rapid diagnosis, vaccines and therapies for COVID-19. This study aims to determine the relationship between perceptions of COVID-19 and vaccination with the Health Belief Model theory approach, one of which is perceived benefit, with the acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination.Subjects and Method: This study uses a systematic review and meta-analysis with PICO, population: people with an age range of 18-65 years. Intervention: health belief model. Comparison: not health belief model. Outcome: Receiving the COVID-19 Vaccine (Perceived Benefit). The articles used were obtained from several databases, namely Google Scholar, Pubmed, Science Direct, MDPI. The article search keywords were “Health Belief Model” AND “vaccination COVID-19” OR COVID-19 vaccine” AND “COVID-19” The inclusion criteria for research articles were full-text articles using a cross-sectional study design, community research subjects with a range of aged 18-65 years, with the result of the study being receiving the COVID-19 Vaccine (Perceived Benefit) after which a multivariate analysis was carried out with adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR). Data were analyzed using the Review Manager application (RevMan 5.4).Results: A total of 9 cross-sectional studies involving 31,055 vaccine recipient communities spread across Bangladesh, China, South Asia, Hong Kong and Malaysia were selected for a systematic review and meta-analysis. The data collected showed that a person with a high level of confidence in the benefits of the vaccine had a major influence on the acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine as much as 3.96 times compared to someone with no confidence in the benefits of the COVID-19 vaccine (aOR = 3.97; CI 95 % = 2.62 to 6.02; p < 0.001).Conclusion: People with a high level of confidence in the benefits of the COVID-19 vaccine can increase the impact of receiving the COVID-19 vaccine.Keywords: health belief model, COVID-19 vaccine, vaccine acceptanceCorrespondence:Ade Amallia. Study Program of Prosthetic Orthotic, Health Polytechnics, Ministry of Health Surakarta. Jl. Letjen Sutoyo, Mojosongo, Jebres, Surakarta, Central Java 57127. Email: amallia­adelia@gmail.com. Mobile: 081228466836.Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior (2021), 06(04): 298-306DOI: https://doi.org/10.26911/thejhpb.2021.06.04.04 
Application of the Health Belief Model on the Reproductive Health Services Uptake in Adolescents: A Meta-Analysis Kusumawardani, Dyah Ayu; Ayu, Elsa Jumasni
Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior Vol. 6 No. 4 (2021)
Publisher : Masters Program in Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Background: Adolescence is a period of transition from childhood to adulthood and is characte­rized by changes in physical, psychological, and social behavior that can affect their lives at high risk. Various problems that occur in adolescents are influenced by various dimensions of life within them, both biological, cognitive, moral and psychological dimensions as well as the influence of the surrounding environment. This study aimed to estimate the effect of the Health Belief Model, especially its construction of perceived vulnerability, perceived seriousness, and perceived benefits in the use of reproductive health services with a meta-analysis.Subjects and Method: This study is a review of meta-analytical studies. This research article was obtained from the electronic databases of PubMed, Springer Link, Elsevier and Google Scholar. The articles used in this study are articles published from 2011-2021. The search for articles was carried out by considering the eligibility criteria defined using the PICO model. P: adolescents. I: perceived vulnerability, perceived seriousness, perceived benefit. C: Low perceived vulnerability, perceived seriousness, perceived benefit. O: use of reproductive health services. The articles included in this study are full text articles with a Srocsectional study design. This article was analyzed using the Review Manager 5.3 application.Results: There are 9 articles in total. The results showed that there was high heterogeneity (I2= 82%; p <0.0001), so that the data analysis on the florest plot used a random effect model. The perception of vulnerability that is felt to be strong increases the likelihood of using reproductive health services by 2.42 times compared to the perception of vulnerability that is felt to be weak, and it is not statistically significant (aOR= 2.42; 95% CI= 1.60-3.67; p= 0.001).Conclusion: The use of reproductive health services is not statistically significant in predicting reproductive health in adolescents.Keywords: health belief model, belief, reproductive health service, reproductive health careCorrespondence:Dyah Ayu Kusumawardani. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Central Java, Indonesia. Email: dijeayu16@gmail.com. Mobile: +6281466847498.Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior (2021), 06(04): 318-326DOI: https://doi.org/10.26911/thejhpb.2021.06.04.06 
Meta Analysis: Health Belief Model on Cervical Cancer Screening among Women of Reproductive Age Habibatullah, Afifa Intifadha; Wulandari, Adetya; Wardani, Aurina Firda Kusuma
Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior Vol. 6 No. 4 (2021)
Publisher : Masters Program in Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Background: Cervical cancer is one of the most common cancers and the most common cause of death in women worldwide. Health Belief Model is a theoretical model that explains the influence of beliefs on a person's health behavior, including cervical cancer prevention behavior. This study aims to determine the effect of the HBM construct on cervical cancer screening behavior among women of childbearing age based on a primary study conducted by previous researchers.Subjects and Method: This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis with PICO as follows: Population: women of reproductive age, Intervention: HBM constructs of high perceived severity and high self-efficacy. Comparison: low perceived severity and low self-efficacy. Outcome: cervical cancer screening. The articles used in this study were taken from several databases, namely Google Scholar, Pubmed, SpringerLink, Scopus, and SAGE. The keywords used for the search were “Health Belief Model” AND “Cervical Cancer Screening” OR “Cervical Cancer Test” OR “Pap Smear” OR “Papanicolaou Test” OR “VIA Test” OR “Visual Inspection Acetic-Acid” AND “Adjusted Odds Ratio” OR aOR. Inclusion criteria were full-text articles in English and Indonesian with a cross-sectional study design, population of women of childbearing age, and cervical cancer screening as an outcome, analyzed multivariately by including adjusted Odds Ratio/aOR. Articles were selected using the PRISMA flow diagram and analyzed using the Review Manager 5.3 application.Results: A total of 7 cross-sectional studies from Europe, Asia, Africa, and Australia were reviewed and meta-analyzed. The results showed that women of childbearing age with high perceived severity were 1.61 times more likely to have cervical cancer screening than those with low perceived severity (aOR = 1.61; 95% CI = 1.11 to 2.34; p = 0.01). The data also showed that women of childbearing age with high self-efficacy were 5.91 times more likely to undergo cervical cancer screening than women with low self-efficacy (aOR= 5.91; 95% CI= 3.25 to 10.75; p<0.001).Conclusion: Severity perception and self-efficacy are predictors for tertiary prevention of type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.Keywords: health belief model, perceived severity, self-efficacy, cervical cancer screening.Correspondence:Afifa Intifadha Habibatullah. Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sebelas Maret. Jl. Ir. Sutami 36A, Surakarta 57126, Central Java, Indonesia. Email: afifa.pink2@gmail.com. Mobile: 085728146915.Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior (2021), 06(04): 307-317DOI: https://doi.org/10.26911/thejhpb.2021.06.04.05
Health Belief Model Application in Encouraging Colorectal Cancer Screening in Adults: Meta-analysis Ersananda, Audria; Rahmah, Aulia Siti Nur
Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior Vol. 6 No. 4 (2021)
Publisher : Masters Program in Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer is one of the cancers caused by the growth of malignant abnormal cells in the large intestine and rectum which are part of the gastrointestinal system. Screening has the potential to reduce the burden of colorectal cancer with the support of scientific literature showing a reduction in colorectal cancer mortality ranging from 18% to 57% (depending on the screening test used). The Health Belief Model is a health behavior model that can predict a person's interest in screening for colorectal cancer. This study aims to estimate the effect of the Health Belief Model in colorectal cancer screening by meta-analysis.Subjects and Method: Meta-analyses were performed by searching articles from the PubMed, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect databases. The keywords and Boolean operators used are Health Belief Model OR perceived susceptibilty OR perceived risk OR risk perception OR perception of risk AND screening colorectal OR colonoscopy OR faecal occult blood test OR sigmoidoscopy. The inclusion criteria in this study were full-text articles with a cross-sectional design. The articles were published in English from 2012 to 2022. The population used in this study were both male and female adults. Analysis of perceived susceptibility to final study results was reported using the adjusted odds ratio (aOR). Article analysis using RevMan 5.3 software.Results: A total of 9 articles were used. The results showed that a person's perception of being vulnerable or at high risk will increase colorectal cancer screening by 1.81 times compared to someone who has a low perception of susceptibility to colorectal cancer screening (aOR= 1.81; 95% CI= 1.58 to 2.07) and the results are significant. statistically (p < 0.001).Conclusion: Perceived susceptibility is statistically significant in predicting someone to be screened for colorectal cancer.Keywords: health belief model, susceptibility perception, colorectal cancer screening.Correspondence:Aulia Siti Nur Rahmah. Catholic School of Health Sciences, St.Vincentius A Paulo, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia. Email: rahmaaulia500@gmail.com.  Mobile: +6281233511180Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior (2021), 06(04): 327-338DOI: https://doi.org/10.26911/thejhpb.2021.06.04.07 
Meta-analysis: Relationship between Antenatal Care Visits and Exclusive Breastfeeding Wardani, Aurina Firda Kusuma; Utomo, Asrori Ibnu
Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior Vol. 7 No. 1 (2022)
Publisher : Masters Program in Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Background: Breastmilk is the main source of nutrition for babies who cannot eat solid food until they are 6 months old. Exclusive breastfeeding education can be given as long as pregnant women make antenatal care visits. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between antenatal care visits and exclusive breastfeeding.Subjects and Method: This study was a meta-analysis with the following PICO, population: mothers. Intervention: antenatal care visits. Comparison: no Antenatal Care visits. Result: Exclusive breastfeeding. The articles used in this study were obtained from three databases, namely Google Scholar, Pubmed, and Science Direct. Keywords to search for articles are “Antenatal Care Attendance” or “Antenatal Care Visit” or “Prenatal Care” and “Exclusive Breastfeeding” or “exclu­sively breastfed”. Included articles are full-text English with a cohort study design from 2010 to 2021 and report on adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) in multivariate analysis. Article selection is done by using PRISMA flow diagram. Articles were analyzed using the Review Manager 5.3 application.Results: A total of 9 cross-sectional studies involving 19,716 mothers from Africa, Europe, and Asia were selected for systematic review and meta-analysis. The data collected showed that mothers who had antenatal care visits increased 1.50 times for exclusive breastfeeding compared to mothers who did not visit antenatal care (aOR = 1.50; 95% CI = 1.18 to 1.89); (p < 0.001).Conclusion: Antenatal care visits increase exclusive breastfeeding.Keywords: antenatal care, exclusive breastfeeding, meta-analisisCorrespondence:Aurina Firda Kusuma Wardani. Study Program of Public Health, Universitas Veteran Bangun Nusantara Sukoharjo.  Jl Letjen Sujono Humardani No 1 Jombor, Sukoharjo, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia. Email: firdakw@gmail.com. Mobile: +6282135012135Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior (2022), 07(01): 9-17 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26911/thejhpb.2021.07.01.02
Meta-Analysis of Factors Affecting Compliance Behavior in Taking Iron Folate Supplements in Pregnant Women Aisyiyah, Farida Nur; Apriliani, Eltigeka Devi
Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior Vol. 6 No. 4 (2021)
Publisher : Masters Program in Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Background: Pregnant women can have a higher risk of iron and folic acid deficiency due to poor adherence to iron folate supplements. Factors that influence pregnant women during antenatal check-ups on adherence to taking iron folate supplements are getting counseling, having knowledge, attending antenatal care and diagnosing anemia. This study aims to analyze the factors that influence the behavior of adherence to taking iron folate supplements in pregnant women.Subjects and Method: This was a meta-analysis study using PRISMA flowchart guidelines. The article search process was carried out between 2011 and 2021 using databases from PubMed, Google Scholar and ScienceDirect. Based on the database, there were 12 articles that met the inclusion criteria. The analysis was carried out using RevMan 5.3 software.Results: A total of 12 articles reviewed in the meta-analysis showed that there were 7 articles discussing pregnant women who received nutritional counseling had higher adherence behavior to taking iron folate supplements and were statistically significant (aOR= 2.39; 95% CI= 1.92 to 2.96; p <0.001), and there were 8 articles discussing pregnant women with anemia who had higher adherence to taking iron folate supplements and were statistically significant (aOR= 3.28; 95% CI= 1.56 to 6.87; p= 0.002).Conclusion: Nutrition counseling and anemia status can improve the behavior of adherence to taking iron folate supplements in pregnant women.Keywords: supplement, iron-folic acid, anemia, counselingCorrespondence:Farida Nur Aisyiyah. Klaten District Health Office. Jl. Pemuda Nomor No.313, Mlinjon, Tonggalan, Central Klaten, Central Java. Email: faridanur88@gmail.com. Mobile: +62 852-1493-3173.Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior, (2021), 06(04): 339-354DOI: https://doi.org/10.26911/thejhpb.2021.06.04.08
Meta-Analysis: Application of Health Belief Model to Breast Self-Examination (BSE) Syahbaniar, Desi; Utami, Dian Asih Ning
Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior Vol. 7 No. 1 (2022)
Publisher : Masters Program in Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer is a type of non-communicable disease characterized by the appear­ance of abnormal cells in the breast. Breast self-examination (BSE) is one method of early detection of breast cancer. Health belief model is a health behavior that can predict women's interest in doing BSE. This study aimed to estimate the effect of the health belief model on the practice of BSE with a meta-analysis.Subjects and Method: This research is a meta-analysis study using PRISMA flowchart guide­lines. The article search process was carried out between 2015-2022 using databases from PubMed, Google Scholar and Scopus. Based on the database, there were 9 articles that met the inclusion criteria. The analysis was carried out using Revman 5.3 software.Results: As many as 9 articles spread across 2 continents, namely Asia and North America. 8 main studies from Asia, 3 from Turkey, 2 from Iraq, 1 from Yemen, 1 from Iran, and 1 from Indo­nesia. One major study from North America, namely Mexico, reviewed in the meta-analysis showed that perceived benefits were strong (aOR= 1.03; 95%CI= 0.96 to 1.11; p= 0.440; I2=79%).Conclusion: The perceived benefits were not statistically significant in predicting the practice of BSE in women.Keywords: health belief model, perceived benefit, BSECorrespondence:Desi Syahbaniar. Study Program of Medical Record, Jember State Polytechnic, East Java. Jl. Mastrip, Krajan Timur, Sumbersari, Jember, East Java, 68121. Email: desiniar15@gmail.com. Mobile: +6287708465646Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior (2022), 07(01): 1-8DOI: https://doi.org/10.26911/thejhpb.2021.07.01.01
The Relationship between Health Belief Model Applications with Smoking Quitting Behavior: A Meta-Analysis Anggreani, Gadis Nur; Nurhayati, Faridah; Prianggi, Herawati
Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior Vol. 7 No. 3 (2022)
Publisher : Masters Program in Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Background: Smoking is a habit of smoking cigarettes that is carried out in daily life, cigarettes are also a necessity that cannot be avoided for people who have a tendency to cigarettes. HBM is a model of individual health beliefs in determining the actions to be taken and is explained as a concept formulated with the aim of understanding why individuals do or do not perform various healthy behaviors. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the level of effectiveness of the Health Believe Model (HBM) application in the decision to quit smoking.Subjects and Method: This article was compiled with a systematic review and meta-analysis study. This study uses the PICO Model. The meta-analysis study was conducted by searching for articles from databases in electronic form including PubMed, Springer Link, Elsevier and Google Scholar. "Health Belief Model Application", or "Quit Smoking Behavior" or "Perceived Suscepti­bility" and "Perceived Severity". The inclusion criteria for this study were full articles using a cross-sectional study, with the publication year 2014-2021. Analysis of articles in this study using RevMan 5.3 . software.Results: A total of 12 cross-sectional studies from Asia, and Africa were selected for systematic review and meta-analysis.  The data collected showed that high perceived vulnerability increase 2.11 times to smoking quitting behavior compared with low perceived vulnerability, but its statistically not significant (OR= 2.09; 95% CI= 0.81 to 5.37; p= 0.130), and high perceived severity increase 1.43 times to smoking quitting behavior compared with low perceived severity (OR= 1.43; 95% CI= 0.57 to 3.58; p= 0.450), increase 2.11 times to smoking quitting behavior compared with low perceived vulnerability, but iw was statistically not significant.Conclusion: Perceived vulnerability, and perceived severity was not statistically significant in smoking quitting behavior.Keywords: health belief model, smoking qutting behavior, perceived vulnerability, perceived severity.Correspondence:Gadis Nur Anggreani. Study Program of Public Health, Universitas Tadulako, Palu, Central Sulawesi. Email: anggreanigadis@gmail.com.  Mobile: +6281335205131.Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior (2022), 07(03): 170-181DOI: https://doi.org/10.26911/thejhpb.2022.07.03.01
The Relationship of the Health Belief Model to the Prevention Behavior of Metabolic Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis Study Mulianda, Cendekia Airedeta; Solehaini, Dena Tri
Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior Vol. 7 No. 1 (2022)
Publisher : Masters Program in Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Background: Risk factors for Metabolic Syndrome include hypertension, glucose intolerance, central obesity and dyslipidemia. These conditions if they occur together are referred to as Metabolic Syndrome which can increase the risk of non-communicable diseases, namely heart, stroke, and type 2 diabetes. This study aimed to estimated the relationship between the constructs of the Health Belief Model (HBM) on the prevention of metabolic syndrome (SM) risk factors.Subjects and Method: This article was compiled with a systematic review and meta-analysis study. This study uses the PICO Model. The meta-analysis study was conducted by searching for articles from databases in electronic form including Google Scholar, Pub-Med, and Science Direct. The keywords used are "Health Belief Model" or "Metabolic Syndrome Prevention" or "MetS" or "Risk Factors Metabolic Syndrome" or "Hypertension" or "High Blood Glucose" or "Insulin Resist­ance" or "Central Obesity" or "Dyslipidemia". The inclusion criteria for this study were full articles using a cross-sectional study, with the publication year 2012-2021. Analysis of articles in this study using RevMan 5.3 . software.Results: A total of 12 cross-sectional studies from Asia, and Africa were selected for systematic review and meta-analysis. The data collected showed that high perceived severity increases 1.38 times to metabolic syndrome risk factor prevention behavior compared with low perceived severity, but its statistically not significant (aOR= 1.38; 95% CI= 0.82 to 2.30; p= 0.220), high susceptibility perception increases metabolic syndrome risk factor prevention behavior 1.15 times compared  with low susceptibility perception (aOR= 1.15; 95% CI= 0.83 to 1.58; p= 0.410) but it was statistically not significant.Conclusion: Perceived severity, and susceptibility perception was not statistically significant in predicting preventive behavior for metabolic syndrome risk factors.Keywords: health belief model, risk factors, syndrome metabolic, meta-analysis Correspondence:Cendekia Airedeta Mulianda. Masters Program in Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret. Jl. Ir. Sutami 36A, Surakarta 57126, Central Java, Indonesia. Email: c.airedeta@gmail.com. Mobile: +6282336712311.Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior (2022), 07(01): 28-41DOI: https://doi.org/10.26911/thejhpb.2021.07.01.04
Meta-Analysis: Effectiveness of Web-Based Intervention to Increase Physical Activity in Older People Fazrina, Gina; Cahyaningrum, Hapsari
Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior Vol. 7 No. 1 (2022)
Publisher : Masters Program in Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Background: The increasing global population of older people and the trend of life expectancy make the discussion of physical activity an urgent urgency, given its role in preventing various non-communicable diseases and increasing life expectancy. Web-based intervention is believed to be an intervention that can change habits related to physical activity in older people. This study aimed to find out whether web-based intervention is effective in increasing physical activity for older people.Subjects and Method: This research is a meta-analysis based on the PRISMA flow diagram. The article search process is carried out through journal databases, in the form of: Google Scholar, PubMed, and ResearchGate. Keywords to search for articles are: "Aged" OR "older adult" OR "elderly" AND "Exercise" OR "exercise" OR "physical activity" OR "physical activities" OR "physical exercise" OR " physical exercises" OR "physical fitness" AND "Internet-Based Intervention" OR "internet-based interventions" OR "web-based interventions" OR "web-based interventions" OR "online interventions" OR “internet intervention” OR “mobile health” OR “mhealth” OR “tele­health” OR “ehealth” AND “randomized control trials” OR “randomized control trials” OR “RCT”. The articles included are study design randomized control trial (RCT), articles with research subjects older people aged 50 years and over, and the intervention used is web-based intervention. Articles that meet the criteria are then analyzed using the Revman 5.3 application.Results: A total of 9 articles were found from the Netherlands, Spain, England, Belgium, and Sweden. The data collected showed that web-based intervention increase physical activity in older people, and it was statistically significant (SMD= 0.78; 95% CI=0.15 to 1.41; p= 0.020).Conclusion: Web-based intervention is effective for increasing physical activity for older people who are more than 50 years old.Keywords: web-based intervention, physical activity, older people, meta analysis.Correspondence:Gina Fazrina. Study Program of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences Cirebon. Jl. Brigjen Dharsono No. 12B ByPass Cirebon 45153, West Java, Indonesia. Email: ginafazrina@gmail.com. Mobile: +681212533833.Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior, (2022), 07(01): 55-66DOI: https://doi.org/10.26911/thejhpb.2021.07.01.06 

Page 36 of 51 | Total Record : 509

 34   35   36   37   38 

Filter by Year

2016 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 10 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 9 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 9 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 8 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 8 No. 3 (2023) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2023) Vol 8, No 1 (2023) Vol 7, No 4 (2022) Vol. 7 No. 4 (2022) Vol 7, No 3 (2022) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2022) Vol 7, No 2 (2022) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2022) Vol 7, No 1 (2022) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2021) Vol 6, No 4 (2021) Vol 6, No 3 (2021) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2021) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2021) Vol 6, No 2 (2021) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2021) Vol 6, No 1 (2021) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2020) Vol 5, No 4 (2020) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2020) Vol 5, No 3 (2020) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2020) Vol 5, No 2 (2020) Vol 5, No 1 (2020) Vol 4, No 4 (2019) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2019) Vol 4, No 3 (2019) Vol 4, No 2 (2019) Vol 4, No 1 (2019) Vol 4, No 1 (2019) Vol 3, No 4 (2018) Vol 3, No 3 (2018) Vol 3, No 2 (2018) Vol 3, No 1 (2018) Vol 2, No 4 (2017) Vol 2, No 3 (2017) Vol 2, No 2 (2017) Vol 2, No 1 (2017) Vol 1, No 4 (2016) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2016) Vol 1, No 2 (2016) Vol 1, No 1 (2016) More Issue