Articles
147 Documents
<![CDATA[PERJANIAN SEWA MENYEWA TANAH PEKARANGAN DESA (PKD) BERDASARKAN PERATURAN DAERAH PROPINSI BALI NOMOR 3 TAHUN 2001 TENTANG DESA PAKRAMAN ]]>
<![CDATA[Dewa Gde Rudy]]>
<![CDATA[ NOTARIIL Jurnal Kenotariatan Vol. 2 No. 2 (2017): November 2017 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Warmadewa Press ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.22225/jn.2.2.410.149-159
<![CDATA[ABSTRAK Artikel ini mengambil judul “Perjanian Sewa Menyewa Tanah Pekarangan Desa (PKD) Berdasarkan Peraturan Daerah Propinsi Bali Nomor 3 Tahun 2001 Tentang Desa Pakraman” tanah PKD adalah tanah yang dikuasai oleh Desa Pakraman yang diberikan kepada warga desa untuk ditempati dengan kompensasi melaksanakan kewjaiban (ayahan) kepada Desa Pakraman. Pada perkembangan saat ini banyak tanah dengan status tanah PKD menjadi obyek perjanjian sewa menyewa dengan tujuan komersial. Permasalahan yang dibahas adalah : 1) Keabsahan dari perjanjian sewa menyewa tanah PKD tersebut. 2) Kapasitas Desa Pakraman berkaitan dengan perjanjian sewa menyewa tanah PKD. Hasil pembahasan menunjukkan bahwa : 1) Perjanjian sewa menyewa tanah PKD berdasarkan Ketentuan Perda No. 3 Tahun 2001 secara eksplisit tidak dilarang, sehingga karenanya perbuatan hukum tersebut dapat dibenarkan serta sah dan mengikat bagi pihak-pihak. 2) Desa Pakraman mempunyai kapasitas sebagai pihak yang mempunyai hak dan kewenangan dalam mengatur dan mengelola pemanfaatan tanah PKD sebagai tanah adat. Oleh sebab itu, perjanjian sewa menyewa tanah PKD harus mendapatkan persetujuan Desa Pakraman melalui Paruman Desa Pakraman. ABSTRACT This article entitles "Lease of Rent of Village Land (PKD) Based on Bali Province Regulation Number 3 Year 2001 About Pakraman Village" PKD land is land which is controlled by Desa Pakraman given to the villagers to be occupied with compensation to perform the magic (ayahan) to Pakraman Village. In the current development of many lands with the status of land PKD became the object of lease agreement with commercial purposes. The issues discussed are: 1) Validity of the lease agreements of land PKD. 2) Pakraman Village Capacity related to land lease agreement of PKD. The results of the discussion show that: 1) land lease agreement of PKD based on Provisions of Perda no. 3 of 2001 is explicitly prohibited, so that such legal acts may be justified and valid and binding for the parties. 2) Desa Pakraman has the capacity as a party having the right and authority to manage and manage the utilization of PKD land as customary land. Therefore, the lease agreement of land for PKD must get the approval of Pakraman Village through Paruman Desa Pakraman.]]>
<![CDATA[REGULATION OF THE CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY CONCEPT IN THE COMPANY LIMITED IN INDONESIA LEGAL PRODUCTS ]]>
<![CDATA[I Nyoman Yatna Dwipayana Genta]]>
<![CDATA[ NOTARIIL Jurnal Kenotariatan Vol. 4 No. 2 (2019) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Warmadewa Press ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.22225/jn.4.2.1237.96-102
<![CDATA[Corporate Social Responsibility (hereinafter written CSR) must be legally enforced by a Limited Liability Company that runs business activities in the field and/or related to natural resources in Indonesia. This provision comes into force since the promulgation of Law No. 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies, State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2007 No. 106, Additional State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia No. 4756 (hereinafter the Limited Liability Company Law). Taking into the problem, this study aims to explore more deeply about the urgency of regulating the concept of CSR from what was initially voluntary and then becoming a legal or mandatory obligation after the enactment of the Limited Liability Company Law. The type of research used in this study is a type of normative legal research, using the type of legislation approach, approach to Legal Concept Analysis and Historical approaches. Based on the result of the study, it can be concluded that the sustainability of the company will be guaranteed if the corporation participates in the interests of stakeholders and the environment in which the Limited Liability Company conducts its activities becomes one of the urgency of regulating the concept of CSR in Indonesian legal products. The basic factors that make the implementation of CSR activities in Indonesia have not run optimally are that there are still weaknesses in the regulation on the regulation of CSR concepts in Indonesia which include restrictions on companies.]]>
<![CDATA[Urgensi Pendaftaran tanah (Perspektif Utilities dan Kepastian Hukum) ]]>
<![CDATA[ochtorina susanti]]>
<![CDATA[ NOTARIIL Jurnal Kenotariatan Vol. 2 No. 1 (2017): Mei 2017 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Warmadewa Press ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.22225/jn.2.1.152.33-45
<![CDATA[ABSTRACT The land registry is an administrative liability based on legislation that has two goals: on the side of the utilities and in terms of legal certainty, which boils down to guarantee protection. When later raised legal act which implies the land ownership dispute, it can be proved by evidence that is perfect evidence, namely the certificate of land ownership. This study aims to find and analyze and provide an understanding of the importance of land registration in Indonesian positive law. Results of studies using normative juridical with legislation approach and conceptual approach. On the side of legal certainty and these utilities provide an explanation that land registration is done in order to provide legal certainty for the public welfare. Keyword : Registration, Land, Utilities, Legal Certainty]]>
<![CDATA[PERAN NILAI LOKAL DALAM PENYELASAIAN SENGKETA PERTANAHAN (SEBUAH ANALISIS MODEL MEDIASI PERDATA) ]]>
<![CDATA[Lamahudin Suhri]]>
<![CDATA[ NOTARIIL Jurnal Kenotariatan Vol. 1 No. 1 (2016): November 2016 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Warmadewa Press ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.22225/jn.1.1.105.14-36
<![CDATA[Masyarakat di nusantara menandang tanah bukan hanya dalam perspektif ekonomi saja tetapi juga dalam perspektif yang lain yaitu dalam perspektif religiusitas (ketauhitan) budaya dan ekologi. Masyarkat di nusantara melihat alam (tanah) adalah anugrah sekaligus amanah yang harus di pelihara dan di jaga. Peran nilai lokal dalam penyelesaan sengketa pertanahan dapat mejadi model mediasi perdata dalam berbagai kasus agraria nasional. Pendekatan antropologi hukum mejadi hal yang menarik untuk digunakan karena masyarakat Indonesia dengan beraneka ragam budaya, yang dapat memberi penjelasan dari data empiris dan pranata hukum dalam struktur masyarakat. Kedeapan penyelsaian sengkta pertanahan dengan model mediasi perdata yang mangacu kepada nilai nilai kearifan lokal. Dengan prinsip musyawarah bertujuan melibatkan atau mengajak semua pihak untuk berperan serta dalam kehidupan bermasyarakat, sehingga kesetiaan dan ketaatan masyarakat terhadap apa yang disepakati bersama akan dijaga pula secara bersamama-sama, karena kesepakatan tadi adalah buah dari pikiran dan pendapat bersama dalam nuansa kekeluargaan dan saling memuliakan. Nilai lokal ini diharapkan dapat menjaga kesatuan yang bulat dan utuh antara Manusia, Alam dan Tuhan, dalam nuanasa spritul, perdamaian dan persaudaraan.]]>
<![CDATA[Nominee Agreement Made For The Purposes Of Land Ownership By Foreign Citizens On The Basis Of ANotarial Deed ]]>
<![CDATA[Luh Putu Sudini]]>;
<![CDATA[I Wayan Kartika Jaya Utama]]>
<![CDATA[ NOTARIIL Jurnal Kenotariatan Vol. 3 No. 2 (2018) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Warmadewa Press ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.22225/jn.3.2.849.109-115
<![CDATA[National land laws prohibit the ownership right of land by foreigners as reflected in the provisions of Article 9 UPPA, the Basic Agrarian Law, which confirm that only Indonesian citizens who can have ownership rights on the land. In addition, the provisions of Article 26 Paragraph (2) UUPA also prohibit the transfer of ownership of land from the citizen of Indonesian to foreign citizen, both directly and indirectly. Legal consequences of the deed of agreement of the land ownership rights of Indonesian citizen by foreign citizens made by a notary public is null and void because the objective conditions are not met, as postulated by Article 1320 of the Civil Code. Indeed ownership rights to land by foreign citizens, either directly or indirectly does not promise a legal protection to the party concerned.]]>
<![CDATA[WOMEN, LAW AND POLICY: CHILD MARRIAGE PRACTICES IN INDONESIA ]]>
<![CDATA[Sonny Dewi Judiasih]]>;
<![CDATA[Susilowati Suparto]]>;
<![CDATA[Anita Afriana]]>;
<![CDATA[Deviana Yuanitasari]]>
<![CDATA[ NOTARIIL Jurnal Kenotariatan Vol. 3 No. 1 (2018) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Warmadewa Press ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.22225/jn.3.1.647.47-55
<![CDATA[Child marriages are common throughout Indonesia. This is due to a strong influence of Indonesian customs and religion that strongly influence the lives of its people. It is worth pointing that marriage age arrangements in Indonesian Marriage Law reinforces that legal age for men is 19 years and 16 years for women. The 2012 statistics show that Indonesia is the 37th highest in the world in child marriage, while at the Southeast Asian level, this country ranks second after Cambodia. The ranking went up dramatically since in 2016, based on UNICEF, Indonesia ranked the 7th in child marriage worldwide. This means that the practice of child marriage in Indonesia happens, especially to women at the age of 18 years, and there is no discrimination related to the age of marriage. Against this matter, there has been a file for judicial review that demands marriage age for men and women to be pegged at the age of 18 years. However, the Judge of the Constitutional Court, through Decision Number 30-74/PUU-XII/2014, states that age of marriage remains valid for the 19-year-old for man and 16-year-old for women. The struggle does not stop there because at this time, there a national movement of STOP CHILD MARRIAGE formed by civil organisations in cooperation with the Commission of Child Protection and Ministry of Woman Empowerment and Child Protection. This movement sees that the practice of child marriage is a national emergency problem that must be addressed seriously. Further, this movement demands immediate enactment of government regulation in favour of the law which must promptly revise the Marriage Law, especially related to the marriage age.]]>
<![CDATA[LAW ASPECT OF “LET THE PRODUCER AWARE” PRINCIPLES RELATED TO CONSUMER PROTECTION LAW IN INDONESIA ]]>
<![CDATA[Deviana Yuanitasari]]>;
<![CDATA[Sonny Dewi]]>;
<![CDATA[Susilowati Suparto]]>;
<![CDATA[Hazar Kusmayanti]]>
<![CDATA[ NOTARIIL Jurnal Kenotariatan Vol. 4 No. 2 (2019) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Warmadewa Press ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.22225/jn.4.2.1196.80-84
<![CDATA[Changes in the legal construction begin with a paradigmatic shift in the relationship between the consumer and businesses, as reflected in the preference of let the producer aware principle in favor of letting the buyer aware principle. This study aims to find out the implication of the let the producer aware principle for goods and services, and its development in consumer protection law in Indonesia and to find out the legal system of Indonesia adopts the let the producer aware principle in order to protect Indonesian consumers. The research method applied in this study is normative juridical approach. The data obtained from the study of literature which is used as secondary data. Furthermore, interviews were conducted to obtain primary data, and then the data were analyzed by juridical qualitative method. As a result of analysis, it shows that firstly: the implementation of let the producer aware principle in Indonesia has not been properly conducted because of the common perception that consumers’ opinion is less valuable than producers’. Secondly, the adoption of the let the producer aware principle for consumer protection by Indonesian Legal policy is shown by Law Number 8 Year 1999 about Consumer Protection (Indonesian Consumer Protection Act), which is based on the principle of fault liability, utilizing reversed burden of proof. This way, both parties are protected, because it proportionally distributes the liability to each party. In conclusion, both producers and consumers are equally protected on condition that they can provide evidence of the losses obtained.]]>
<![CDATA[KEWENANGAN CAMAT DAN KEPALA DESA SEBAGAI PEJABAT PEMBUAT AKTA TANAH (PPAT) SETELAH BERLAKUNYA UUJN ]]>
<![CDATA[RR. Cahyowati]]>;
<![CDATA[Djumardin Djumardin]]>
<![CDATA[ NOTARIIL Jurnal Kenotariatan Vol. 2 No. 2 (2017): November 2017 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Warmadewa Press ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.22225/jn.2.2.349.84-100
<![CDATA[Abstrak Berdasarkan ketentuan Pasal 15 ayat 2 huruf f Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris, bahwa notaris diberi kewenangan membuat segala akta otentik yang berkaitan dengan tanah. Sementara secara historis Kedudukan Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) baik sebelum maupun setelah berlakunya Undang-undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris, kaitannya dengan pembuatan akta otentik dibidang pertanahan adalah membantu Kepala Kantor Pertanahan dalam melaksanakan pendaftaran tanah. Secara yuridis bahwa dasar hukum PPAT adalah Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 37 Tahun 1998 Tentang Peraturan Jabatan Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah dan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 sebagai pelaksana dari Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria Nomor 5 tahun 1960 (UUPA). Berdasarkan ketentuan Pasal 6 ayat 2 Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah bahwa dalam dalam melaksanakan pendaftaran tanah, Kepala Kantor Pertanahan dibantu oleh PPAT dan Pejabat lain yang ditugaskan untuk melaksanakan kegiatan-kegiatan tertentu menurut Peraturan Pemerintah ini dan peraturan perundang-undangan yang bersangkutan. Terkait dengan akta otentik berdasarkan ketentuan Pasal 1868 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata, dimana disebutkan bahwa akta otentik adalah akta yang dibuat dalam bentuk yang ditentukan Undang-Undang, oleh atau dihadapan pejabat umum yang berwenang untuk itu ditempat akta itu dibuat. Dengan demikian secara yuridis normatif Akta PPAT bukan merupakan akta otentik karena (1) PPAT bukan Pejabat Umum; (2) Bentuk akta PPAT tidak ditentukan undang-undang, melainkan ditentukan Peraturan Menteri; oleh karena itu untuk menghindari terjadinya perbedaaan persepsi antara noratis sebagai PPAT dengan BPN atau pejabat lainnya sebagai PPAT dalam pembutan Akta PPAT maka perlu dilakukan singkronisasi antara berbagai produk hukum yang terkait dengan PPAT, terutama setelah berlakunya UUJN. Kata kunci : Kewenangan, Akta PPA]]>
<![CDATA[PEMBATASAN KLAUSULA EKSONERASI ]]>
<![CDATA[Made Sarjana]]>
<![CDATA[ NOTARIIL Jurnal Kenotariatan Vol. 1 No. 1 (2016): November 2016 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Warmadewa Press ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.22225/jn.1.1.175.109-127
<![CDATA[Kontrak merupakan suatu perjanjian yang didasarkan atas kesepakatan diantara pihak-pihak yang membuatnya. Kesepakatan yang dilakukan tersebut didasarkan pada adanya prinsip kebebasan berkontrak. Adanya prinsip kebebasan berkontrak tersebut terdapat kencendrungan sering dimanfaatkan oleh pihak yang kedudukannya lebih kuat untuk meminimalisir tanggungjawabnya dan mengalihkannya terhadap pihak yang lemah. Klausula yang melepaskan tanggungjawab dan mengalihkannya kepada pihak lain dalam suatu kontrak disebut dengan klausula eksonerasi. Dalam praktik penggunaan klausula eksonerasi masih sering ditemukan dan dimanfaatkan oleh pihak yang posisinya lebih kuat daripada yang lainnya. Dengan demikian posisi pihak yang lemah dalam suatu kontrak, akan selalu menjadi pihak yang dirugikan dengan berlakunya klausula eksonerasi. Keberadaan klausula eksonerasi perlu mendapat pengkajian lebih mendalam untuk melindungi posisi pihak-pihak yang kedudukannya lebih lemah dalam setiap kontrak. Penggunaan klausula eksonerasi tidak boleh dilakukan dengan leluasa tanpa mengindahkan kaedah-kaedah ataupun prinsip-prinsip dalam hukum kontrak. Pembatasan terhadap penggunaan klausula eksonerasi perlu dilakukan untuk melindungi pihak yang posisinya lemah, dengan memperhatikan peraturan perundang-undangan, asas-asas hukum perjanjian serta yurisprudensi. Penggunaan klausula eksonerasi yang tidak mengindahkan pembatasan tersebut dijadikan dasar untuk melakukan gugatan bagi pihak yang dibebankan tanggungjawab untuk membebaskan dirinya dari kerugian yang semestinya tidak dialaminya dengan menyatakan kontrak dapat dibatalkan atau kontrak batal demi hukum. Demikian juga halnya untuk setiap kontrak tertentu keikut sertaan pemerintah perlu diberikan ruang semata-mata untuk melindungi masyarakat sebagai pihak yang lemah, agar tidak dirugikan karena adanya klausula eksonerasi.]]>
<![CDATA[Legal Consequences For The Guarantee Agreement Of The Warehouse Receipt Made With The Deed ]]>
<![CDATA[Dewa Made Ari Widiyatmika]]>
<![CDATA[ NOTARIIL Jurnal Kenotariatan Vol. 3 No. 2 (2018) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Warmadewa Press ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.22225/jn.3.2.846.75-87
<![CDATA[In the legislation concerning the Warehouse receipt system in Indonesia, there is no explanation of the form of the agreement to impose security rights on warehouse receipts. As a result, the agreement is made under private a deed. The purpose of this study is to find out related provisions to legal consequences of the agreement to impose security rights on warehouse receipts made with the deed under hand. The research method used in this study is normative juridical method with statute approach. The data of the study were collecting by examining primary legal materials, namely legislation and secondary legal material in the form of doctrines or theories obtained from legal literature and scientific research. Results of the study show that the conditions that must be fulfilled in preparing the agreement to impose the guarantee rights on the Warehouse receipt encompass the validity of the ownership of the Warehouse receipt, the validity of the agreement based on Article 1320 of Indonesian BW. The agreement to impose the guarantee right on the Warehouse receipt is made with an authentic deed, and notification to the registration center or BAPPEBTI. The legal consequence of the agreement to impose the guarantee right on the warehouse receipt made under the deed of hand is that it does not have perfect verification power in the event that one party can still deny the signature in the deed under hand, and another supporting evidence is required in the court to prove the truth of the deed under the hand. It is different from an authentic deed made by a general official who has perfect verification power (volledig) and is binding (blindende).]]>
