cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Iyah Faniyah
Contact Email
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Phone
+6285263256164
Journal Mail Official
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Editorial Address
JL. Bandar Purus No.11, Padang Pasir, Kec. Padang Barat, Kota Padang
Location
Kota padang,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Unes Law Review
Published by Universitas Ekasakti
ISSN : 26543605     EISSN : 26227045     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1019
Core Subject : Health, Science, Education, Social,
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences
UNES Law Review adalah Jurnal Penelitian Hukum yang dikelola oleh Magister Hukum Pascasarjana, Universitas Ekasakti Padang. Penelitian yang dimuat merupakan pendapat pribadi peneliti dan bukan merupakan pendapat editor. Jurnal terbit secara berkala 4 (empat) kali dalam setahun yaitu September, Desember, Maret, dan Juni. UNES Law Review mulai Volume 4 Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 sampai Volume 9 Nomor 2 Tahun 2027 Reakreditasi Naik Peringkat dari Peringkat 5 ke Peringkat 4 sesuai nomor Akreditasi : 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 Oktober 2022 UNES Law Review is a Legal Research Journal managed by Postgraduate Law Masters, Ekasakti University, Padang. The published research is the personal opinion of the researcher and is not the opinion of the editor. The journal is published periodically 4 (four) times a year, namely September, December, March and June. UNES Law Review Volume 4 Number 3 of 2022 to Volume 9 Number 2 of 2027 Reaccreditation Raised Rank from Rank 5 to Rank 4 according to Accreditation number: 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 October 2022
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 3,918 Documents
 223   224   225   226   227 
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA KORPORASI PADA KJPP MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2023 Hamidi, Dudung; Ratnawati Gultom, Elfrida
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.478

Abstract

Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the criminal code in articles 12, 20, 36, as well as in articles 45 to 50, states that corporations have legal responsibilities where the corporation is a business entity or not a legal entity in the form of a firm, limited partnership or equivalent according to law legislation. One of the business entities is the Office of public appraisal service (KJPP) was formed based on the regulation of the Minister of Finance number 228/PMK.01/2019. The research is a descriptive analysis research using a normative juridical and references in the form of legislation and literature that supports the research. The purpose of the research is to analyze the existence of corporate responsibility for KJPP to Law number 1 of 2023 and legal protection in carrying out appraisal professional service activities. The results of the analysis show that until recently: (1) KJPP is directly related to corporate criminal responsibility and (2) its activities of KJPP does not currently have good legal protection because in carrying out the appraisal profession it is still supported by a Ministerial of Finance Regulation which hierarchically, legislation are at the bottom.
URGENSI PENGATURAN LENIENCY PROGRAM TERHADAP DUGAAN KARTEL ATAS KELANGKAAN MINYAK GORENG DI INDONESIA Putra Rizal Pratama, Arya; Setyawati, Ria; Budi Kagramanto, L.; Aju Wulandari, Sinar
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.479

Abstract

Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition stipulates various prohibitions for actions that cause unfair business competition, especially contractual activities between business actors, one of which is a cartel The actions of this cartel have an impact on the sustainability and welfare of consumers as a result of price and production regulation in the market. In proving the realm of unfair business competition, namely cartel, it can be proven through indirect evidence. Indirect evidence according to the Regulation of the Commission for the Supervision of Business Competition Number 1 of 2010 concerning Procedures for Handling Cases is a guide. The cartel case approach which is regulated through Article 11 of Law Number 5 of 1999 adopts the principlerule of reason tend to see and examine the reasons of business actors who commit an act that is considered to violate the competition law. However, the success of disclosing cartel cases is still experiencing obstacles. Several countries have implemented leniency program as a response to cartel cases. The process of enforcing business competition law in Indonesia has not been able to overcome cartel cases that have harmed consumers. The results of this study explain the difficulty in disclosing cartel cases in Indonesia because there are no parties or informants to assist law enforcement to ascertain the alleged cartel. The urgency of the leniency program is the only way to reduce difficulties and restore an efficient and effective economic situation so that consumers are able to prosper.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PEKERJA SENI LUKIS DIGITAL MENURUT FATWA MUI NOMOR 1/MUNAS VII/MUI/5/2005 TENTANG HAK KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL DI KOTA MEDAN Hamidah Polem, Wanda; Zuhri, Ahmad
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.480

Abstract

Nikmat akal merupakan salah satu karunia Allah SWT kepada manusia. Karena anugerah ini, orang dapat bernalar, membuat penilaian moral, dan berkreasi dengan membuat berbagai alat yang membuat hidup mereka lebih mudah, terutama dalam hal penggunaan teknologi digital. Berkat teknologi yang serba digital ini, informasi dapat dengan mudah diperoleh dari jaringan internet di mana saja dan kapan saja. Namun, tidak dapat dipungkiri bahwa isu lain muncul. Salah satunya adalah perlindungan hak cipta bagi seniman yang kreasi digitalnya diposting secara online. Metodologi penelitian hukum-empiris digunakan. Adalah tirani untuk memakai, mengungkapkan, membuat, memakai, menjual, mengimpor, mengekspor, mendistribusikan, memberikan, menerbitkan, mereproduksi, menjiplak, memalsukan, dan membajak hak kekayaan intelektual orang lain tanpa persetujuan mereka. Perundang-undangan tersebut inkonstitusional, menurut Fatwa MUI Nomor 1/MUNAS VII/MUI/5/2005 Tentang Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HKI). Selanjutnya menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta, setiap orang yang memakai hak komersial atas suatu ciptaan harus terlebih dahulu mendapat persetujuan dari pencipta atau pemegang hak cipta. Upaya pembelaan hukum turut wajib sejalan terhadap hukuman yang keras serta memadai kepada pelanggar hak cipta oleh aparat penegak hukum berdasarkan pada peraturan perundang-undangan yang ada.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP DEBITUR ATAS AKTA CESSIE YANG DILAKSANAKAN SEPIHAK OLEH KREDITUR (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN No. 53/ Pdt.G/2018/PN Gpr. DAN PUTUSAN No. 21/ Pdt.G/2019/PN Kdr) Yusvaldi, Rhonny; Azheri, Busyra; Adelina Mannas, Yussy
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.481

Abstract

According to Article 613 paragraph (1) of the Civil Code, it is stated that the surrender of receivables on behalf of and other incorporeal objects are carried out by making an authentic deed and/or private deed, by which the rights to the object are delegated to another person. In a cessie, the takeover of bank receivables by a third party does not mean that only the receivables are taken over, but is accompanied by the takeover of the bank's rights and obligations, including the transfer of collateral for the debtor's debt. The research method used in this study is a Normative Juridical approach, the research results obtained are 1. As a result of the Cessie Deed being carried out unilaterally by the creditor, the Jessie is carried out by making an authentic deed or private deed, the Jessie is transferred by the creditor, and there will be a replacement of the creditor only if the cassie is carried out by Article 613 of the Civil Code, but if the cassie is carried out unilaterally by the creditor then the cassie deed has no legal consequences because the cassie in the deed does not fulfill one of the elements of Article 613 of the Civil Code 2. In case, the taking over of a receivables bank by a third party does not mean that only the receivables are taken over, but it is accompanied by the takeover of the rights and obligations of the bank, including the transfer of collateral for the debtor's debt. The transfer of receivables by Jessie does not result in the termination of the existing agreement made between the creditor and the debtor. 3. The debtor's legal protection for a session which is carried out unilaterally by the creditor according to the Civil Code Article 613 such submission to the debtor has no consequences unless the delivery is notified to him or in writing it is approved and acknowledged if the cassie is carried out unilaterally by the creditor the Jessie has not resulted in the debtor, in other words, the Jessie has not occurred or has not been transferred and the debtor can file a lawsuit in court.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM KONSUMEN TERHADAP PRODUK PANGAN KADALUWARSA Nugroho, Ali; Ratnawati, Elfrida
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.482

Abstract

The rampant distribution of expired food and drinks does not only occur before major holidays, but also occurs on weekdays, which is common in the community. Everyone, at one time either in a single position/alone or in a group with other people. under any circumstances, a citizen must be a consumer for a particular product or service, entitled to legal protection that must be provided by the state. One of the protections that must be provided by the state is consumer protection. This study uses a juridical method by conducting legal research that prioritizes literary materials which basically aims to find secondary data consisting of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. This is done so that people do not consume products or services that endanger safety, health, and so on, so that people get satisfaction. In RI Law. No. 8 of 1999, concerning consumer protection (UUPK). Legal protection for consumers can be in the form of non-litigation mechanisms, namely settlements without a judicial process based on Article 47 of Law No. 8 of 1999 concerning consumer protection. As well as the legal form of protection for consumers who experience losses from the distribution and trade of expired food is protection. laws to be upheld and enforced. The responsibility of the business actors for the losses they experience, the consumer can report it to the relevant parties or agencies.
SURAT PERNYATAAN PENGUASAAN FISIK BIDANG TANAH SECARA SPORADIK YANG AKAN DIJADIKAN SEBAGAI DASAR PEMBERIAN PEMBIAYAAN PADA BANK BSI KCP PASAMAN BARAT Sofiani, Suci; Rembrandt, Rembrandt; Hasbi, M.
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.483

Abstract

Tujuan pendaftaran tanah menurut Pasal 3 huruf a Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah yaitu untuk memberikan kepastian hukum dan perlindungan hukum kepada pemegang hak atas suatu bidang tanah, Surat Penyataan Fisik Bidang Tanah (Sporadik) merupakan gerbang awal dari pihak yang mendaftarkan tanahnya secara sporadik. Kegunaan dari surat ini ialah sebagai bentuk penegasan bahwa yang bersangkutan telah menguasai sebidang tanah tersebut secara sah sebelum memohon pengajuan hak atas tanah tersebut. Di sebagian besar Daerah Kabupaten Pasaman Barat Provinsi Sumatera Barat masih sangat banyak tanah-tanah yang belum terdaftar atau belum bersertipikat. Dalam penulisan ini menggunakan metode yuridis empiris. Dari hasil penelitian disimpulkan bahwa 1) Bank Bsi KCP Pasaman Barat menerima agunan berupa Surat pernyataan penguasaan fisik bidang tanah secara sporadic untuk dijaminkan sebagai anggunan untuk pinjaman KUR dibawah 100 juta 2). pihak Bank Bsi KCP Pasaman Barat hanya menjadikan surat sporadik tersebut sebagai pegangan untuk menjadi jaminan pada kredit KUR karena sporadik tidak bisa diikat hak tanggungannya dan tidak dibunyikan dalam akad kredit KUR tersebut.
TANGGUNG JAWAB PPAT DALAM PEMASANGAN HAK TANGGUNGAN (Studi Kasus Perkara Nomor 285 PK/Pdt/2013) Nidya Sari, Tri; Ismansyah, Ismansyah; Fendri, Azmi
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.484

Abstract

Dalam pemberian Hak Tanggungan dengan membuat Akta Pemberian Hak Tanggungan (APHT) oleh PPAT terlebih dahulu dibuat perjanjian utang piutang yang menjadi dasar Hak Tanggungan. Fransisca terhadap PT Bank Central Asia (BCA), Kantor Notaris/PPAT R. Sabar Partakosoema, Dinny Herlela, Kepala Badan Ketahanan Nasional Jawa Barat, dimana dalam hal ini Tergugat II yaitu Kantor Notaris/PPAT R.Sabar Partakosoema kalah penggugat Surat Hak Milik (SHM) dan juga APHT atas nama tergugat, penggugat juga merasa dirugikan karena kerugian tersebut, penggugat sebagai pihak yang melaporkan kerugian tersebut dibuat, namun penggugat yaitu Maria Fransisca tidak merasa bahwa dia telah kehilangan SHM dan APHT. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian yuridis normatif, yaitu penelitian yang difokuskan untuk mengkaji penerapan kaidah atau norma dalam hukum positif. Hasil penelitian ini adalah tanggung jawab Notaris/PPAT dalam Perjanjian Kredit Dengan Hak Tanggungan. Dalam hal ini Notaris membuat dan mengesahkan akta otentik dalam perjanjian Kredit, dan Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) berwenang untuk membuat dan mengesahkan Surat Kuasa Pembebanan Hak Tanggungan (SKMHT). Akibat hukum yang timbul karena pemasangan hak tanggungan yang tidak dilakukan oleh UUJN adalah batal demi hukum dan tidak mempunyai kekuatan mengikat dan kreditur pemegang hak tanggungan akan kehilangan hak istimewanya sebagaimana diatur dalam UUHT. Tanggung Jawab Notaris Dalam Memasang Hak Tanggungan Yang Menyimpang Dari UUJN Terkait Perkara Nomor 285 PK/Pdt/2013 Seperti Mencabut Minuta Akta Jika minuta akta hilang maka dapat dikatakan Notaris tidak melaksanakan kewajibannya untuk menyimpan minuta akta dengan benar.
ANALISIS YURIDIS LEGALITAS CRYPTOCURRENCY SEBAGAI ALAT PEMBAYARAN DALAM TRANSAKSI BISNIS DI INDONESIA Margaretha, Selviana; Ratnawati, Elfrida
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.485

Abstract

Abstract The flow of world globalization has greatly impacted technological advances, especially in the payment technology sector which can assist in a fast, safe and secure payment system. At this time we have realized that there is a named currencycryptocurrency, but in Indonesia it has not been regulated concretely regarding the use and legal protectioncryptocurrency. This study aims to examine the regulation of legality and legal protection of cryptocurrencies based on laws and regulations and policies made by the Indonesian government using normative juridical law methods and statutory regulations approaches. Regarding the legal materials used by the authors in the form of primary and secondary legal materials obtained by the authors from books, journals, literature, and data from the Indonesian Government, then the authors analyzed the data using descriptive and legal arguments to obtain systematic and comprehensive research results. Regarding the results of the research, it explains that Cryptocurrency in Indonesia has not been fully regulated, but several rules and policies have been issued by the authorities. Bank Indonesia prohibits the use of Cryptocurrency as a legal means of payment, but the use of Cryptocurrency as a digital asset is still permitted. Bappebti regulates Crypto exchanges, DGT regulates taxes on profits from Cryptocurrency transactions, and OJK warns the public about the risks of investing in the Crypto market. The Indonesian government is in the process of regulating cryptocurrencies more comprehensively through revisions to the capital market law and tax laws.
FUNGSI PENGAWASAN DPRD TERHADAP PEMERINTAH DAERAH DALAM MEWUJUDKAN APARATUR PEMERINTAH DAERAH YANG BERINTEGRITAS UNTUK KESEJAHTERAAN RAKYAT Arsyi Jailolo, Muhammad; Ilmar, Aminuddin; Ilyas, Anshori
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.486

Abstract

This study aims to examine the effectiveness of the supervisory function of the Makassar City DPRD on the performance of the Makassar City Government itself as an ideal variable aspect of regional government administration. This research was conducted at the Makassar City DPRD and Makassar City Government. The time of this research is for two months (February to March 2023). This study uses an empirical-qualitative method and uses primary data collected by giving questions in the form of interviews to respondent representatives from DPRD and Makassar City Government. Furthermore, the method of data analysis was systematically inventoried and then the content material was analyzed using an analytical conceptual approach with qualitative analysis. The results of this study indicate that the substance of the DPRD's oversight function in Makassar City runs with the process of budgeting, legislation, and supervising the enforcement of local regulations. the implementation mechanism is by monitoring evaluation and absorption of community aspirations. The obstacle is that not all DPRD recommendations are implemented by the Makassar City Government. The problem lies in the firmness of human resources in the Makassar City DPRD
DASAR DAN PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MENGABULKAN PERMOHONAN PELAKSAKSANAAN PERKAWINAN BEDA AGAMA (STUDI PUTUSAN NO. 622/PDT.P/2018/PN.MKS.) Hidayah, Nur
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.487

Abstract

In the provisions of the Marriage Law, there are no clear provisions regarding the arrangement of interfaith marriages, giving rise to a legal vacuum, to carry out marriages of different religious statuses, they must first obtain a stipulation granted by the PN. PN can be granted by the judge. Even though the Marriage Law does not regulate marriage with different religious statuses. The type of research chosen by the author in this study is normative (normative juridical). This relates to reviewing, explaining, and analyzing legal regulations relating to interfaith marriages, by examining legal materials such as a copy of Case Determination No. 622/Pdt.P/2018/PN.Mks regarding Basis for Judge Considerations in Granting Applications for Execution of Different Marriages Religion. Whereas the basis for the Makassar District Court judge in granting the request of the applicant named X (pseudonymized name) of the applicant and the applicant named Y (pseudonymized name) regarding the implementation of marriages of different religions is to prevent the application of smuggling of social and religious values "samen leven" or cohabiting and smuggling applicable laws. Then the judge's consideration was that the wishes of the applicants must be respected as part of human rights according to what was mandated in articles 27 and 29 of the 1945 Constitution and guided by the decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia No: 1400 K/Pdt/1986 dated 20 January 1989.

Page 225 of 392 | Total Record : 3918

 223   224   225   226   227 

Filter by Year

2018 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 4 (2026) Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2023) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023) Vol 5 No 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol 5 No 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 3 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022) Vol 4 No 2 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2021) Vol 4 No 1 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2021) Vol 3 No 4 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2021) Vol 3 No 3 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2021) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 4 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2021) Vol 3 No 2 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2020) Vol 3 No 1 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2020) Vol 2 No 4 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2020) Vol 2 No 3 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2020) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 4 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2020) Vol 2 No 2 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2019) Vol 2 No 1 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2019) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 4 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018) More Issue