Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
3.904
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) JURNAL UNIZAR LAW REVIEW Jurnal Ilmu Hukum The Juris Jurnal Jatiswara GANEC SWARA PALAR (Pakuan Law review) Jurnal Kompilasi Hukum Collegium Studiosum Journal Jurnal Risalah Kenotariatan Jurnal Pepadu Jurnal Wicara Desa Jurnal DIskresi
AD. Basniwati
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 36 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 36 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
THE POSITION AND AUTHORITY OF CONSTITUTIONAL COURT IN CONSTITUTIONAL SYSTEM OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA Basniwati, AD.
Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Vol 2, No 5 (2014): HUKUM DAN TATA KUASA
Publisher : Jurnal IUS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (269.003 KB) | DOI: 10.12345/ius.v2i5.169

Abstract

According to institutional or organization system the existence of constitutional court as one of judicial body is not a subordinate of supreme courts other judicial body. This is mean; there are dual highest judicial body among judicial authorities,  which are the supreme court and constitutional court. The arising problem is related to the function and position of constitutional court  in constitutional system of the people of Indonesia. Standing position of constitutional court as a highest judicial body implicates to the Supreme Court. Where  before the formation of constitutional court,  supreme court was the highest judicial body which coordinates all judicial power,  afterward,  there is one judicial body which stand equally to it,  that is constitutional court. Moreover,  through its constitutional authority.  constitutional court hold the authority implementation of Supreme Court to examine regulation which hierarchy level lower than the law against the valid law.Keywords : Constitutional court
THE POSITION AND AUTHORITY OF CONSTITUTIONAL COURT IN CONSTITUTIONAL SYSTEM OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA AD. Basniwati
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 2, No 2 (2014): HUKUM DAN TATA KUASA
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (269.003 KB) | DOI: 10.12345/ius.v2i5.169

Abstract

According to institutional or organization system the existence of constitutional court as one of judicial body is not a subordinate of supreme courts other judicial body. This is mean; there are dual highest judicial body among judicial authorities,  which are the supreme court and constitutional court. The arising problem is related to the function and position of constitutional court  in constitutional system of the people of Indonesia. Standing position of constitutional court as a highest judicial body implicates to the Supreme Court. Where  before the formation of constitutional court,  supreme court was the highest judicial body which coordinates all judicial power,  afterward,  there is one judicial body which stand equally to it,  that is constitutional court. Moreover,  through its constitutional authority.  constitutional court hold the authority implementation of Supreme Court to examine regulation which hierarchy level lower than the law against the valid law.Keywords : Constitutional court
Aspek Hukum Administrasi Negara Surat Keputusan Bersama Menteri Terhadap Pembubaran Ormas AD Basniwati; M. Saleh
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 10, No 1: April 2022 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v0i0.1032

Abstract

Salah satu hak konstitusional masyarakat yang diatur dalam Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 adalah kebebasan berkumpul dan berserikat, sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 28E ayat (3) Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah ormas mempunyai anggota yang jelas, mempunyai kepengurusan terstruktur sesuai hierarki, kewenangan, dan tanggung jawab Masing-masing, di bidang/mengenai/perihal kemasyarakatan seperti pendidikan, kesehatan, keagamaan, kepemudaan, dan lain-lain dalam arti kemasyarakatan seluas-luasnya. Keberadaan Ormas di era sekarang sering menjadi perdebatan, terutama adanya sikap pemerintah melalui SKB Menteri dalam pembubaran Ormas. Untuk menjawab isu hukum tersebut, peneliti menggunakan metode penelitian normative, dengan menggunakan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan penafsiran yang digunakan adalah penafsiran gramatikal dan autentik. Aspek hukum yang akan dikaji adalah keberadaan SKB Menteri dalam pembubaran ormas dari aspek Hukum Administrasi Negara. Hal ini bukan tanpa alasan, karana sering ketetapan yang dikeluarkan pemerintah ada yang sifat mengatur (regeling) dan ada yang bersifat Penetapan (beseeching). Hasil yang dituju adalah adanya pembedaan yang jelas dalam SKB tersebut antara pengaturan dan penetapan.
Pengawasan DPRD dan Kendala-Kendala yang Dihadapi Terhadap Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah AD Basniwati
Jatiswara Vol 31 No 1 (2016): Jatiswara
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Law No. 32 Year 2004 on Regional Government , gives broad authority to autonomous regions to organize Regional Government . With such authority , giving an opportunity for the region to explore and exploit all the potential that exists for the welfare of the people . In contrast with broad authority , also open opportunities for abuse of governmental authority , thus requiring supervision. With this research conducted , in hope will provide more advanced impact on the concept of financial management oversight by the Regional Chief and Council , so the possibilities are not in want will be solved as soon as possible . The method used in this study is a research method that uses normative law approach and conceptual approach , by conducting periodic review - review of the regulations in order to answer the law or which deals with issues that are relevant to the subject . Based on research conducted found : a. The shape of the Parliament supervision of financial management in achieving good local governance . b . Factors that constrain the supervision of Parliament for the area of financial management.
Politik Hukum Perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2014 Tentang MPR, DPR, DPD Dan DPRD AD Basniwati
Jatiswara Vol 34 No 1 (2019): Jatiswara
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (421.867 KB) | DOI: 10.29303/jatiswara.v34i1.187

Abstract

Demokrasi menekankan pada pentingnya check and balance di seluruh institusi negara. Di Indonesia berjalannya check and balance bisa dilihat dari tidak adanya monopoli wewenang dari sebuah institusi. Namun revisi Undang-undang Nomor 17 tahun 2014 tentang MPR, DPR, DPRD dan DPD (selanjutnya disebut dengan UU MD3) justru kembali meletakkan seluruh kuasa pada tangan eksekutif dan legislatif. Pemanggilan anggota dewan harus seijin presiden dan revisi pada pasal 72 ayat (3) dan (4) mengenai pemanggilan paksa dan penyanderaan yang harus dilakukan atas permintaan DPR tidak mencerminkan komitmen untuk mewujudkan pemerintahan yang adil dan bersih. Pejabat seakan mendapatkan imunitas dari upaya penegakan hukum. Terlepas dari saratnya kepentingan partai politik untuk menguasai DPR, revisi UU MD3 memang sudah selayaknya ditinjau ulang.
Hubungan DPR dan BPK dalam Melaksanakan Fungsi Pengawasan AD Basniwati
Jatiswara Vol 30 No 1 (2015): Jatiswara
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (133.481 KB)

Abstract

The existence of the House of Representatives (DPR) to the Supreme Audit Agency (BPK) is an implementation of a power-sharing horizontally in order to perform the functions of state institutions in the capacity and parallel position. Parliament is an institution that state institutions have a legislative function, the function of the budget, and monitoring functions. While the Audit Board is an institution with a state institution whose primary function as a body of state financial check on the tasks of the state. In performing supervisory functions there are two state agencies that have oversight function in this field, namely the House of Representatives and the CPC, in this case the House of Representatives to supervise in politics while the CPC conduct supervision in the financial sector. The results of the financial audit conducted by the CPC in return it back to Parliament to be discussed, so that in carrying out the functions of a connection between the two.
Eksistensi Putusan Ultra Petita dalam Polemik Pengujian Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) dalam Rangka Penegakan Hukum Muhammad Saleh; AD Basniwati
Jatiswara Vol 27 No 3 (2012): Jatiswara
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (262.485 KB)

Abstract

As stipulated in the article 24 (1 and 2) of the constitution of Republic ofIndonesia 1945, Constitutional courts is, beside Supreme Court, one of the judicial courts element. This means that constitutional court is bound to general principles of judicial power, i.e. freedom, impartial and independent from any other institution in enforcing law and justice. One of the constitutional court’s decisions assumed to be controversy is what so called “ultra petita decision”. In the context of procedural law prevails in the court, ultra petita is decision which contains things out of claimant’s request within a judicial review process. This clearly will bring about legal discussion among legal experts.
REKONSTRUKSI KEDUDUKAN KETETAPAN MAJELIS PERMUSYAWARATAN RAKYAT DALAM HIERARKI PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN HAERUMAN JAYADI; AD. BASNIWATI; LALU GUNA NUGRAHA
GANEC SWARA Vol 16, No 1 (2022): Maret 2022
Publisher : Universitas Mahasaraswati K. Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35327/gara.v16i1.289

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the position of the Decree of the People's Consultative Assembly based on the science/theory of legislation with a specific target in the form of producing teaching materials in the subjects of Constitutional Law and Legislation. The research method used is a normative legal research method using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Based on the research, it was found that the MPR Decree which is still in effect today is the MPR Decree which is regulatory in nature while the MPR Decree which is stipulating/decision is no longer in effect. Various legal issues arise from the existence of the MPR tap which is placed in a higher position/level in on the Law, which is related to the testing, namely the tools/testing stones and the authorized institution to test it. The ideal position in the future if you still want to maintain the existence and enforceability of the MPR Decree is to place the MPR Decree on an equal footing with the Law. The suggestions that can be given based on the results of the research and discussion as well as the conclusions mentioned above are as follows: The legislators, in this case the DPR and the President, shall immediately form a law which regulates the contents of the MPR Decree which is still valid. The legislators revise or amend Law no. 12 of 2011 concerning UUUP3 Article 7 paragraph (1) by placing the MPR Decree as equal to the Law.
Hak Konstitusional Penyandang Disabilitas Dalam Pemilu AD Basniwati; Lalu Guna Nugraha
Journal Kompilasi Hukum Vol. 4 No. 2 (2019): Jurnal Kompilasi Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jkh.v4i2.17

Abstract

Setiap orang, mempunyai hak dan kedudukan yang sama untuk memperoleh kebutuhan dasar, dan setiap orang berhak atas pengakuan, jaminan, perlindungan, dan kepastian hukum yang adil serta perlakuan yang sama di hadapan hukum. Setiap orang, telah dijamin perlindungan hukum dalam memenuhi hak asasinya, terutama hak hidup dan untuk diperlakukan yang sama dalam kehidupan bersama, bermasyarakat, dan berbangsa/bernegara. perlindungan, penghormatan, dan penegakan terhadap hak asasi manusia, demi tercapainya kesejahteraan, penghormatan terhadap kemanusiaan, keadilan dan kebahagiaan sebagai umat bernegara. dalam UU No 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum, Para Penyandang disabilitas yang merupakan Warganegara Indonesia mempunyai hak untuk memilih dan dipilih dalam Pemilihan Umum, akan tetapi penyandang disabilitas menggunakan hak suaranya masih samar-samar. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian normatif yang menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan metode pendekatan konseptual, dengan melakukan penelahaan-penelahaan terhadap peraturan-peraturan perundang-undangan guna menjawab atau yang berhubungan dengan permasalahan sehingga relevan dengan pokok bahasan. Berdasarkan penelitian yang dilakukan ditemukan a. Bagaimana makna hak konstitusional penyandang disabilitas dalam Pemilu di Indonesia, b. Bagaimanakah hak konstitusional penyandang disabilitas dalam Pemilu tahun 2019 di Indonesia?
Kedudukan Dewan Perwakilan Daerah Dalam Sistem Parlemen Indonesia Berdasarkan UUD 1945 Haeruman Jayadi; AD Basniwati; Lalu Guna Nugraha
Unizar Law Review (ULR) Vol 4 No 2 (2021): Unizar Law Review
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Al-Azhar Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji bagaimana keberadaan Lembaga DPD dalam penyelenggaraan ketatanegaraan di Indonesia. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normative, yang menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan ini ditemukan bahwa berdasarkan UUD 1945, Secara struktural kelembagaan, DPD merupakan lembaga parlemen sedangkan secara fungsional, DPD tidak dapat dikatakan memiliki fungsi legislasi oleh karena kewenangan yang dimiliki dalam pembentukan undang-undang tidak sampai pada memberikan persetujuan melainkan hanya ikut membahas saja. Sebagai lembaga parlemen, secara stuktural kelembagaan, DPD merupakan lembaga negara utama, namun secara fungsional tidak menunjukkan adanya fungsi yang sepenuhnya sebagai lembaga legislatif, sehingga dapat dikatakan sebagai lembaga parlemen yang memiliki kewenangan yang sangat lemah dalam pembentukan undang-undang. Oleh karena itu secara fungsional dapat dikatakan sebagai lembaga penunjang kekuasaan legislatif (DPR). DPD sebagai salah satu bagian dari lembaga parlemen, secara kelembagaan memiliki kedudukan yang sederajat dengan lembaga parlemen yang lain yaitu dengan DPR dan MPR.
Co-Authors Abdul Khair agung setiawan Akbar, Sand Amalia, Riska Ari Baiq Nurminah Cahayani, Ayu Septina Dimara, Kristi Joy Oktofifteen Haeruman Haeruman Jayadi HAERUMAN JAYADI Haeruman Jayadi Haeruman Jayadi Hikmah, Ayu Nurul Hikmah Humairoh, Tata Ine Indriani Iqozul Himam Jayadi , Haeruman Kafrawi Kafrawi Kaharuddin Kaharuddin Kaharuddin Khairul Umam Kusuma, Rahmawati Lalu Guna Nugraha Lalu Guna Nugraha Lalu Guna Nugraha M. Saleh Mahendra Wijaya Kusuma Malik, Deni Putra Muhamad Sahril Gunawan Muhammad Saleh Nugraha, Lalu Guna Nurdiansyah, Andi Pitaloka, Diva Pratiwi, Mita Ayu Rajiburrahman, Rajiburrahman Rr. Cahyowati Sapitri, Diana Sofwan Sofwan Sofwan Sofwan Sri Hariati Subandi Subandi